FORESTRY TRANSFORMATION AND BENEFICIATION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

FORESTRY TRANSFORMATION AND BENEFICIATION

Description:

Outcome Cat A process. Lessons learned. Consequences ... The Mountains to Oceans Package ('MTO') stretches form Longmore near Humansdorp ... Outcomes Cat A ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: pmg8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FORESTRY TRANSFORMATION AND BENEFICIATION


1
FORESTRY TRANSFORMATION AND BENEFICIATION
  • Presentation to Portfolio Committee on Water
    Affairs and Forestry

2
CONTENT
  • Historical background
  • The State exiting commercial forestry operations
  • Restructuring objectives
  • Land reform
  • Category A packages
  • Outcome Cat A process
  • Lessons learned
  • Consequences/ applications of lessons learned
  • Conclusion

3
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
  • State Forestry in South Africa was initiated as
    a result of market failure
  • Late 1980s decision to commercialize State owned
    plantations SAFCOL established in 1992
  • In 1996 with the White Paper on Forestry,
    Government announced its exit from commercial
    operations to focus on efficient management of
    natural forests, regulatory role and sector
    leadership

4
STATE EXISTING COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS
  • Objective was to optimise operations and increase
    opportunities (diversify players in the sector)
  • Also driven by the need to privatize SAFCOL
  • Viability of operations was affected by the
    rationalization process mainly due labour matters
  • Inter Ministerial Cabinet Committee decided in
    1997 to offer private investors combined packages
    called category (A)

5
RESTRUCTURING OBJECTIVES
  • Policy on the restructuring of State Owned
    Enterprises Championed by DPE
  • The need to focus on core business of Government
    and increase operational efficiencies
  • Black Economic Empowerment (6 held by Government
    to influence the sector, 9 ESOP, 10 community)
  • Optimize forestry land use removal of
    uneconomical or environmentally sensitive
    plantation areas Lowveld Exit Strategy and Cape
    Conversion Process
  • Advance land reform objectives

6
LAND REFORM IMPLICATIONS
  • Inter-Ministerial Cabinet Committee of 15 April
    1999 re-affirmed that
  • Majority shareholding in State owned forestry
    operations should be privatized
  • State land not be sold at the same time, but
    leased
  • Lease rentals be retained for transfer to future
    land reform beneficiaries
  • The State will help to expedite finalization of
    land claims affecting forestry land
  • The State will help to facilitate a back lease
    agreement with the beneficiaries to avoid
    interruption of operations and to optimize land
    use

7
Category A packages
PACKAGE Singisi Forest Products (Pty) Ltd Siyaqhubeka Forests (Pty) Ltd Amatola Forestry Company (Pty) Ltd MTO Forestry (Pty) Ltd Komatiland Forests (Pty) Ltd
DISCRIPTION The Singisi package comprise of all the commercial plantations managed by DWAF in the former Transkei, around Umtata in the Eastern Cape, as well as state owned plantations under SAFCOLs control near Kokstad in Kwazulu-Natal. Some of the more northern plantations included in the package are located as far away as Pietermaritzburg. The Siyaqhubeka package is made up of four plantation areas having a high forestry potential (yield) in an area along the north coast of Kwazulu-Natal, stretching from Mtunzini in the south to Hluhluwe in the north. The plantations in the package were formerly managed by SAFCOL. The package also borders on the Greater St Lucia Wetlands Park. The Amathole lease area comprises two land management units situated near Hogsback and Stutterheim in the Eastern Cape. It is the smallest of the five Category A lease packages. The bidder for the package is Amathole Forest Holdings (Rance). The Mountains to Oceans Package ("MTO") stretches form Longmore near Humansdorp in the Eastern Cape to Kluitjieskraal near Wolsley in the Western Cape. A major feature of the package is that significant areas would be withdrawn from commercial plantation areas over the next 18 years, most of the land to be converted into conservation areas with smaller areas going for agricultural settlement and housing development. Over 45 000 ha of State forest land will eventually be transferred to conservation agencies, leaving behind only 8 of the original 18 plantations as permanent plantation areas. The Komati Package is the largest of the state owned plantation packages. It consists of all the commercial plantations managed by DWAF in the former homeland areas in Mpumalanga and Northern Province as well as state owned plantations under SAFCOLs management in the same provinces. The package stretches from Ngome in the south, near Vryheid in Kwazulu-Natal, to Thathe Vondo in the Soutpansberg in the Northern Province.
PROCEEDS (100) R17.1 million R100.0 million R1.3 million R23.3 million Not sold
BEE PARTNER Singilanga Directorate Trust Imbokodvo Lemabalabala Holdings Wildbreak Investment Holdings Wild Peach Investment Holdings State owned entity
BEE INTEREST 10 10 10 50 N/A
8
Outcomes Cat A
  • Four packages restructured covering almost 250
    000 ha, operations improved, better production
  • Collecting lease rentals of almost R16 million
    p.a.
  • Internal BEE transactions to each transaction and
    down-stream benefits
  • Optimising land use at St Lucia, Blyde and Tokai
    as well as generally in Southern and Western Cape
    affecting 65 000 ha
  • Staff transfers Resulted with job losses after
    some time
  • Government wage bill reduced

9
Lessons learned
  • Protracted transaction process and high cost
    implications
  • Slow progress in land reform implementation
    inhibiting finalisation of transactions and
    extending after care issues
  • Litigation terminating contracts to facilitate
    transactions resulted with buy out of around R38
    million
  • Labour costs protracted negotiations before the
    transaction, additional costs to retain benefits
    during the transaction, ongoing aftercare issues
  • Some promised benefits by operators to
    communities were not realized

10
LESSONS LEARNED
  • Land excluded from transaction reverting back to
    the state extra cost implications on MTEF
  • Limited ability to secure intergovernmental
    co-operation for post transaction issues
    (conversion)
  • Unforeseen implications on the forestry sector
    increased pulp plantations, decrease in gross
    plantable areas
  • Nett job losses, impact on livelihoods
  • Impact on small players in the industry small
    saw millers
  • Increased centralization of control over
    resources in specific areas is driving small
    operators out of business as demand for timber
    intensifies (MTO)

11
Consequences/ applications of lessons learned
  • New approach to restructuring of Category B and C
    plantations is more inclusive and is driven
    solely by the need to achieve broad
    representation in the sector partnerships, FED,
    developmental approach Targeting Land reform
    beneficiaries
  • Principle approval has been obtained to transfer
    MM to land reform beneficiaries in KZN
  • Refurbishment strategy approved to improve asset
    and operations to accommodate overstaffing
    pressures
  • Provide post transfer support to ensure
    sustainability of the operations Various options
    are been explored to utilize SAFCOL to support
    FED and beneficiary communities
  • Afforestation strategies in KZN and Eastern Cape
  • Review of conversion strategy Southern and
    western Cape

12
Conclusion
  • Have improved operational efficiencies by
    bringing in private sector
  • Have generated some income once off on sales
    and recurring through lease rentals
  • Achieved BEE objectives though on a limited scale
  • Optimizing land use environmentally sound
    practises

13
CONCLUSIONS
  • Land reform issues remains a major challenge
  • There is a need for the State to continue to play
    influential role to ensure sustainability of the
    sector and in particular the assets to be
    transferred to the land reform beneficiaries
  • Minimize the impact of restructuring both
    socially and economically

14
KE YA LEBOGA
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com