Planning and Implementing a New Student Information System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Planning and Implementing a New Student Information System

Description:

Dennis Barrington-Light, CamSIS Project Director. University of Cambridge ... Accept that some days you are the pigeon and some days you are the statue' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: artd150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Planning and Implementing a New Student Information System


1

Student Records Officers Conference 2005
  • Planning and Implementing a New Student
    Information System
  • Dennis Barrington-Light, CamSIS Project Director
  • University of Cambridge

2
  • The CamSIS Project
  • University of Cambridge

3
Follow the yellow brick road to project success!
(a tale of heroes and villains)
4
The Route
  • Background to the CamSIS Project
  • Project Structure
  • User involvement
  • Tackling wider issues in a complex organisation
  • Conclusions

5
The issues
  • Each of the 31 Colleges and the University
    Offices have separate student records systems
    that do not communicate with each other
    electronically
  • Some of the Colleges use the same software but
    the implementations are separate
  • The Central system uses in-house software which
    no longer meets the Universitys requirements
  • Many Departments also have their own systems and
    none are linked to the central system
  • Data quality and duplication
  • Students have access to none of these systems

6
The Vision
  • That there would be one record for each student
    covering all the Colleges and Departments of the
    University
  • That it would be easy to maintain
  • That it would provide management information in a
    timely manner
  • That the data held would be accurate and
    up-to-date
  • And that students would be able to view and
    update their information

7
How to deliver the vision
  • University was sceptical that a suitable packaged
    solution existed for Cambridge
  • Extensive research into possible systems before
    commencing the project
  • Important to have a view of where you want to be
    in 5-10 years time not just for the present
  • Limit business process change initially to that
    which can be delivered in the project timescale
  • Plan for greater business process change once
    there is confidence that the base system works!

8
Preparation for the Journey
  • JanMay 2002 Project Definition Study to
    determine
  • Scope of the Project
  • Management Structure
  • Phasing
  • Business Process Analysis Phases 1 and 2
  • Phase 1 existing processes (to document as is
    information flows)
  • Phase 2 recommendations for change
  • Revalidation of the Student Data Model first
    prepared in 1999
  • But NOT to select software

9
Current business process..delivered by bicycle
10
.with a fully automated system
11
Procurement
  • August 2002 invitations to bid
  • October 2002 two suppliers shortlisted
  • November 2002 first round of demonstrations
    (general)
  • January/February 2003 second round of
    demonstrations (scripted)
  • Assessment by Special Interest Groups
  • March 2003 decision by Project Board to select
    Ciber/PeopleSoft approved by University

12
Project Structure
University Council
Planning Resources Committee
Information Strategy Group
CamSIS Project Board
CamSIS Steering Group
CamSIS Project Team
Working Groups
13
Project Structure
  • Small Project Board with Key stakeholders meets
    monthly
  • Project Director is Executive Officer of the
    Board
  • Dedicated full-time project team
  • Full-time professional Project Manager
  • Functional Team secondments from the University
    and Colleges of key managers
  • Technical Team secondments from University and
    new recruits

14
Project Team
Project Director
Project Manager
Project Administration Plus Helpdesk and
Training
Functional Team Users seconded to work
with CIBER consultant for each module
Technical Team Existing staff plus new
recruits and CIBER work on development Plus
DBAs, technical admin,etc
15
Steering Group
  • Chaired by Project Director
  • Membership includes lead Project Team members and
    key users
  • Role to oversee implementation
  • Meets monthly
  • Receives reports from the various Working Groups

16
Involving the wider community
  • 5 Functional Working Groups to support each of
    the Functional Leads e.g. Undergraduate
    Admissions, Student Records, etc.
  • A Technical Working Group to support the
    technical team
  • A Development Colleges Working Group
  • Membership for these groups drawn from throughout
    the University and Colleges
  • Website and Newsletters
  • Targeted demonstrations of achievements

17
The Journey begins with the Heroes
  • The Heroes are the Project Team who follow the
    yellow brick road set out by the Project Plan
  • Essential to have strong Project Management and
    leadership
  • The journey begins with team formation and
    concludes in the Emerald City of post
    implementation review!

18
On the journey we may meet.
The Lions
  • Key stakeholders on the Project Board willing to
    give practical support and backing to the project
  • A good Implementation Partner
  • Users who are willing to devote time and energy
    to making the project as success

19
The Tin Men..
  • Members of the Project Team who cannot adapt to
    working in a project environment
  • Users who are enthusiastic but get immersed in
    detail and cannot see the wood for the trees
  • Stakeholders who fail to fully engage in project
    processes but nevertheless feel able to comment
    with authority on the outcome

20
The Scarecrows.
  • People who propose solutions without first
    defining the business requirements
  • Users willing to engage in the project but who
    constantly question the need for change
  • Decision-makers who are unwilling to make
    decisions in a timely manner

21
...and watch out for the Wicked Witches of the
West on the way
  • Users and Stakeholders unwilling to engage in the
    project, but who then readily criticise it
  • Users and owners of legacy systems who are
    unwilling to consider change, often to protect
    their vested interests
  • Users who see change being a loss of control of
    their data and processes
  • The doom and gloom merchants!

22
Checkpoint reviews
  • Sub-group of the Project Board undertake a
    checkpoint review every 3-6 months
  • Panel chaired by the Project Director
  • Agenda set beforehand and appropriate team
    members provide documentation prior to the
    meeting
  • Team members make presentations on progress and
    are questioned by the Panel
  • A Report with recommendations is presented to the
    next Project Board

23
Outline Project Plan Phase I
  • Project mobilisation 1 July 2003
  • Phase I of Project due to complete October 2005
  • Implementation in University Offices, Development
    Colleges and small number of Departments
  • First go-live with central undergraduate and
    postgraduate admissions early October 2004
  • Second go-live with central student records and
    College admissions and students records October
    2005

24
Outline Project Phase II
  • Phase II of Project from October 2005
  • Roll-out to remaining Colleges and Departments
  • Upgrade to v 8.9
  • Add additional functionality requiring major
    business change
  • e.g. Improving processing of Postgraduate
    applications using work flow and electronic
    document managemente.g. Implementing financial
    aid for undergraduate bursaries

25
Corporate issues
  • How to convince all the various parties that
    working together is beneficial
  • How to turn agreement in principle into action
  • How to develop the software for a stepped
    implementation without those coming last feeling
    left out
  • How to sell a package to customers currently used
    to bespoke systems
  • How to convince staff that benefits to students
    will also be benefits to them even though it may
    mean more work initially

26
Conclusions and reflections on the Journey
  • Time spent in preparation is worth every penny
  • Full-time team essential
  • Get the best users involved in the team
  • Involve a wider group of users from day one
  • Set expectations at a realistic level from the
    start
  • Control scope creep
  • Manage risks
  • Stick to the Project Plan
  • Regular checkpoint reviews to ensure still on
    course
  • Manage the witches!!

27
And finally.
  • The words of David Brent
  • Accept that some days you are the pigeon and
    some days you are the statue
  • Someone has to be 100 per cent behind you before
    they can stab you in the back
  • If at first you don't succeed, remove all
    evidence you ever tried

28
Contact details (at the Emerald City)
  • Dennis Barrington-Light
  • Email Dennis.Barrington-Light_at_camsis.cam.ac.uk
  • Telephone 01223 764335
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com