Title: TAMU Pemex Well Control
1TAMU - PemexWell Control
- Lesson 7B
- Other Abnormal Pressure Detection Methods
2Contents
- Moores Equation - Drilling rate
- Gas in the Drilling Fluid
- Rock Sample Characteristics
- Use of Surge and Swab Pressure to determine
Overbalance - Changes in Drilling Fluid Properties
- Temperature Indications
- Hole Conditions
3Moores Equation
- Moore proposed a practical method for maintaining
pore pressure overbalance while drilling into a
transition. - If drilling parameters are kept constant while
drilling into an abnormal pressure zone, the
drilling rate will increase.
4Moores Equation
- Moore suggests that we increase the mud weight
sufficiently to keep the drilling rate from
increasing. - The increase in mud weight will then be a measure
of the abnormal pore pressure. - But how much do we increase the mud weight?
5Moores Equation
Transition zone
Begin weighting up Weight up complete
6Ex. 2.10
?
7Example 2.10
- Bit parameters prior to transition were
- Bit Weight 4,700 lbf/in
- Rotary Speed 80 rpm
- Transition detected at 9,100 ft and the operator
immediately reduced the bit weight to 2,900 lbf/in
8Example 2.10
- Determine the extrapolated normal penetration
rate at a depth of 9,250 ft - if the bit weight is reduced from its current
value of 4,700 to 2,900 lbf. - Use the data in Fig. 2.46 and Moores penetration
rate model.
9Solution
Fig. 2.46
- The extrapolated normal penetration rate at
9,250 is 15.7 ft/hr, at 4,700 lbf bit weight. - This would have been the target rate had the bit
weight remained constant.
9,250
15.7
10Solution contd
- The target penetration rate at the reduced bit
weight of 2,900 lbf is calculated below
(assumes R a W)
- The target rate would revert back to 15.7 ft/hr
if the operator resumes drilling at 4,700 lbf/in.
11Example 2.11 - Fig. 2.46
How much should we increase the mud weight?
(Moore)
- At 8,300 ft (under normal conditions) increase
the ECD from 9.6 to 10.1 ppg. - In response, the drilling rate decreases from
20.5 ft/hr to 18.5 ft/hr - What is the shale compaction coefficient, c?
12Solution
- ECD changes from r1 9.6 to r2 10.1 ppg
- Calculate c, the shale compaction coefficient
- (9.6)c log 20.5 (10.1)c log 18.5
- (10.1/9.6)c log 20.5 / log 18.5 1.035
- c log 1.052 log 1.035
- c 0.679
Now use Eq. 2.24 to calculate the required change
in mud weight
13(No Transcript)
14Example 2.12
Fig. 2.46
- At 9,090 ft the normal penetration rate is 16.5
ft/hr - Actual penetration rate is 18.0 ft/hr, using a
mud weight of 9.6 ppg - Normal MW 8.3 ppg
9,090
Dr (10.0 - 9.6) 0.4 ppg
rp 8.3 0.4 8.7 ppg
16.5
15Other predictors of abnormal pressure
- Drilling rate is not the only available predictor
of abnormal pressure. - Properties of shale cuttings can be used
16(No Transcript)
17Shale density
Offshore Nigeria
D_shale density from Boatman
Transition
rn ro - g/cm3
Density - g/cm3
18Example 2.15
pp_14,000 ?
rn 2.54
ro 2.44
19Solution
- At 14,000, rn 2.54 and ro 2.44 g/cm3
- so, Dr 0.1 g/cm3
- From Fig. 2.48
- p14,000 0.05214.614,000
- p14,000 10,629 psig
20Dshale density from Boatman
21Shale density measurement
- 1. Fill a standard API mud balance with shale
cuttings (wash and dry with a towel) until
balance reads 8.33 ppg. - 2. Fill the cup to top with water and record
reading (e.g. 13.3 ppg).
8.33
Calculate S.G. of shale cuttings S.G.
8.33/(16.66 - 13.3) S.G. 2.48
22Possible Sources of Gas in a Drilling Fluid
- Drilled gas,
- Produced gas
- Recycled gas
- Contamination gas
23Possible Sources of Gas in a Drilling Fluid
- Drilled gas, cuttings gas, or liberated gas
refers to gas released from rock cuttings
generated by the bit. Usually small volumes.
Increasing MW will not help. - Produced gas refers to gas which enters the
wellbore from the walls of the hole. Increasing
MW will reduce the quantity. - Recycled gas is any wellbore gas that remains in
the mud after at least one pass through the
surface equipment. - Contamination gas is gas released from any
volatile hydrocarbons intentionally added to the
system (mud additives).
24Gas in Mud
- Connection gas - gas that has entered the
wellbore when pumps are shut down to make a
connection, can be detected in a gas trap. - Trip gas - gas that entered the wellbore during a
trip can also be detected. - Background gas - gas baseline concentration in
the mud usually small.
25Example 2.17
- Determine the density of the gas-cut mud returns
from a well at a depth of 2 ft below flowline
outlet if - Clean MW 12.0 ppg
- Flowline MW 7.0 ppg
- Atmospheric press 14.7 psia
- Sample temperature 100 deg F
- Gas gravity 0.6
26Solution At the Surface
- From Eq. 1.22,
- rg gg p/(2.77 Z T)
- rg,surface 0.614.7/(2.771560)
- rg,surface 0.00569 ppg
27Solution At the Surface
- From Eq. 2.26,
- rgm rm (1 - fg) rg fg
- fg (rm - rgm)/ (rm - rg)
- (12.0 7.0/(12.0 - 0.00569) 0.417
- This is the gas fraction at the surface, but fg
varies with depth.
28Solution contd
- By definition, fg Vg /(1Vg)
- so, Vg fg / (1- fg), but, pV ZnRT
- n fg p / ZRT(1- fg )
- n 0.000234 lb-moles/gal of mud
- This parameter stays constant with depth provided
the downhole gas entry rate remains constant.
29Solution 2 ft down
- Assuming the density of the mud-gas mixture does
not change appreciably over two ft of depth. - p2ft 14.7 0.052 7.0 2 15.43
psia - rg,2ft 0.6 15.43 / (2.77 1 560)
.00597 lbm/gal
30Example 2.17 contd
- fg,2ft (1 0.000234 80.275 560) / 15.43
- 1(1 0.000234 80.275 560) / 15.43
- fg,2ft 0.405 (down from 0.417 at the
surface) - r2ft 12 (1 - 0.405) 0.00597 0.405
- r2ft 7.14 ppg
- This is an increase of 0.14 ppg in just 2.
- See Fig. 2.51 for plot of entire range
31Clearly most of the gas expansion is near the top
of the wellbore. At 10,000, MW 11.9
ppg. What is the resulting reduction in BHP due
to the gas?
32Example 2.18
- What is the total change in HSP at the bottom of
the well described in Ex. 2.17? Average
temperature is 150 deg F. - From Eq. 2.28
33Example 2.18 contd
- In the annulus, without, gas
- BHP 12 10,000 / 19.25
6,233.8 psig - BHP 6,248 psia
- Average pressure (14.7 6,248) / 2
3,131 psia - From Fig. 1.6, Zavg 0.868
34Example 2.18 contd
- If pgm 6,248 psia, then
-
- Dpred 60 psi
- pgm 6,248 - 60 6,188 psia
- EMW (6,188 14.7) / (0.052 10,000)
11.87 ppg
35Gas cut mud
- A second iteration is generally not necessary if
the assumed value for pgm is reasonably close to
the calculated value. - Furthermore, adding gas to a drilling fluid will
increase viscosity, so the annular friction drop
will increase, partially off-setting any
reduction in BHP due to gas.
36Gas cut mud
- Another factor that will tend to offset the
reduction in mud density is drilled cuttings. - At a moderate to high drilling rate, the quantity
of cuttings present in the mud at any time, may
be significant.
37Gas in mud
- Gas in mud is monitored as the mud exits the
flowline. A gas trap is placed to sample the gas
before the mud passes over the shale shaker. - The gas concentration is recorded in arbitrary
gas units. - Look for relative changes.
38Gas detection unit
Gas detector located in the shale shakers possum
belly. BBG Background gas This is the baseline
gas concentration in the mud, and is usually in
the order of a few gas units. CG Connection Gas
39(No Transcript)
40CG constant BGG constant Overbalanced
CG increases BGG increases Underbalanced
CG increases BGG constant ?
CG increases BGG increases Transition zone
41Measuring Surge Pressure
Swab pressure is hard to measure, but surge is
not. Run one stand of pipe in hole at constant
velocity. Repeat at different velocities. Plot
surge pressure vs. pipe velocity.
Flowline
Mud Level
Closed Safety Valve
Pressure Recorder Sub
Drillpipe
42Measuring Surge Pressure
By assuming surge swab, we can predict
the swab pressure at different pipe pulling
speeds.
Surge/Swab Pressure, psi
Pipe Velocity, ft/sec
43Example
67 sec/std 59 sec/std 48 sec/std
452 min-units 1,036 min-units 2,132 min-units
44Example
- Estimate the pore pressure at TD if MW 11.7
ppg The length of each stand is 90 ft. - V1 90 ft / 48 sec 1.88 ft/sec
- V2 90 / 59 1.53 ft/sec
- V3 90 / 67 1.34 ft/sec
45Example
- From Figure
- Dp1 405 psi
- Dp2 300 psi
- Dp3 242 psi
Surge/Swab Pressure, psi
Pipe Velocity, ft/sec
46Example
- From Figure, plot of gas units vs. swab pressure,
- when line is extrapolated to zero velocity (zero
gas), overbalance is found to be 197 psi
Gas Units
0
197
Pressure, psi
47Example
- With an overbalance of 197 psi
- Pore pressure MW - (overbalance)
- 0.052 TD
- Pore pressure 11.7 - (197 / 0.052 13,600)
- pp 11.4 ppg.
48Changes in drilling fluid properties
- Gas in mud
- reduced density
- increased viscosity
- Salt water inflow
- chloride content
49Changes in drilling fluid properties
- Salt water inflow
- Chloride content
- Flocculation of sodium bentonite clay
- increases yield point
- increases gel strength
- increases water loss
- poor filter cake
- pH change
50Changes in drilling fluid properties
- Drilled rock salt can have similar effect
- CO2 and H2S may reduce pH
- H2S is very poisonous and is corrosive
- Raise pH and precipitate out any soluble
sulfides using scavengers.
51Temperature and abnormal press.
Geothermal temperature vs. depth
Poor conductivity requires higher temperature
gradient to maintain constant heat flux.
Undercompacted rock Lower thermal
conductivity Rock conducts heat better than pore
fluid
52Temperature indicators
- Temperature gradient tends to increase within a
pore pressure transition - Rock grains have a much higher thermal
conductivity than pore fluids - Well planning predictions may be assisted by
downhole temperature measurements in offset wells
53Temperature indicators
- Note that wellbore circulation of fluids will
distort the true temperature profile. - The drilling fluid temperature increases as the
fluid moves down the drillpipe. - As fluid enters the annulus its temperature
increases for a short while. - Higher up the annulus temperature decreases
54Flowline temperature from a North Sea well
Predictable increase in temperature of mud
returns as depth increases
Important tool if no shales are present
A deviation from the normal temperature trend may
signal abnormal pore pressure
55Hole Conditions
- Drilling torque when rotating pipe, and drag
during trips or connections, result from friction
between the drillstring or bit and the walls of
the hole. - Torque and drag (TD) will generally increase
with depth, gradually.
56Hole Conditions
- A sudden increase in TD may be caused by hole
instability. - Circulate bottoms up and observe samples.
- If abnormal pressure caused an increase in TD,
the rock samples will help to tell the story.
57Sample Shale Cuttings
Abnormally pressured shales
Normally pressured shales