Title: STABILITY REQUIREMENTS
1STABILITY REQUIREMENTS
- Rob Gehling
- Principal Adviser Technical Marine Standards
- Maritime Safety Environmental Strategy
- AMSA, Canberra
2YOUR TASK
- Presumed to be to design your vessel with intact
stability characteristics to meet the appropriate
statutory criteria - and ultimately prepare trim
stability booklet as would be required for
submission to a regulatory authority
3YOUR AIM!
- If under AMSA jurisdiction, to provide the Master
with such information satisfactory to the
Administration as is necessary to enable him by
rapid and simple processes to obtain accurate
guidance as to the stability of the ship under
varying conditions of service - Refer SOLAS II-1/22.1
- Load Lines Protocol (1988) reg. 10(2)(b) similar
- Appendix 2 of Marine Orders Part 12 defines what
is satisfactory to AMSA - Other jurisdictions (eg. State, Military) have
similar, if sometimes less stringent requirements
4MY BACKGROUND
- 3 years as Naval Architect in Drawing Office of
large shipyard, preparing and gaining approval
for stability booklets - 12 years in AMSA and its predecessors, assessing
and approving stability booklets - Australian delegate to IMOs Sub-Committee on
Stability, Load Lines and Fishing Vessels Safety
(SLF) since 1988, taking specific interest in
operational intact stability issues - Recently elected as Vice-Chairman of SLF
5JURISDICTION
- Determined by ship type and trading pattern
- Military DoDs own rules but are often guided
by commercial rules which they may make mandatory
(ref. s.3, Navigation Act 1912) - Trading ship (ref. s.2(a), Navigation Act) -
State requirements (USL Code) for intra-state
voyages incl charter boats, but AMSA (Marine
Orders/SOLAS) for inter-state and international
service - Fishing vessel or fishing fleet support vessel
(ref. s.2(b)/(ba), Navigation Act) State
requirements (USL Code) unless on international
voyages, then AMSA - Pleasure craft (ref. s.2(d), Navigation Act) -
State Boating laws re equipment but refer AYF and
relevant parts of AS.1799 re design and
construction
6DEFINITIONS
- Passenger ship (SOLAS) is ship which carries more
than 12 passengers - Cargo ship (SOLAS) is any ship which is not a
passenger ship - Special purpose ship (Special Purpose Ship Code)
is a mechanically self-propelled ship which by
reason of its function carries more than 12
special personnel (persons who are not passengers
or crew and who are in board in connection with
the special purpose of the ship or special work
being carried out aboard the ship, number
includes any passengers)
7CODES
- Offshore Supply Vessel (OSV) Guidelines
- Intact and damage stability requirements
- Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit (MODU) Code
- Includes intact damage stability
- High-Speed Craft Code (2000)
- Alternative to SOLAS construction/equipment
/certification requirements, includes intact
damage stability criteria - Special Purpose Ship Code
- Modifies SOLAS for SPSs, includes intact damage
stability criteria - Uniform Shipping Laws (USL) Code
- Used by State/NT authorities, stability mainly
intact
8IMO INTACT STABILITY CODE
- Adopted in November 1993 through res. A.749(18)
and has since been amended by res. MSC.75(69) - Intended to be a consolidation of requirements
and guidance information adopted by IMO (eg. res.
A.167(ES.IV), A.168(ES.IV), A.206(VII),
A.268(VIII) Codes for specific vessel types) - Non-mandatory but now under review again with
view to some parts being made mandatory - Useful reference but not implemented by Australia
(refer Marine Orders Part 12) because of problems
with weather criterion among other things
9TYPICAL TRIM STABILITY BOOKLET AS PER MO.12
- General stability-related info
- vessel particulars, draft mark diagram, immersion
angle heeling lever diagrams - Info for Master and officers
- Instructions stability criteria
- Worked example of stability condition calculation
- Calculations for typical / worst loading
conditions - Supporting data/tables/graphs
- Tank plan table, tank calibrations, hydrostatic
tables, KN tables, nomenclature, inclining report - NOTE Actual required content varies with ship
type
10STABILITY CRITERIA LANDING CRAFT
- Statutory Authority is Dept of Defence, so
following info relates to hypothetical (?)
application of commercial criteria - Criteria are at 6.2.2 and 6.2.3 of Appendix 2 to
Marine Orders Part 12, most likely using
6.2.3(k), or 8.C.16 of USL Code - Allows for maximum GZ to occur at angles between
15deg. and 25deg, but requires higher area under
GZ curve to 30deg. than normal IMO criteria - Note that criteria not to vary between load
conditions
11STABILITY CRITERIA MBD DAY SAILER/RACER
- As pleasure craft no statutory stability
requirements apply - But refer AYF stability requirements(?)
- Refer yacht stability requirements(?) of AS.1799
Small Pleasure Boats Code - Not mandatory but have effect under consumer
protection and trade practices law - Statutory stability requirements could apply if
vessel put into survey for commercial operations
(eg. harbour sailing) - USL Code section 8.C.12 implemented by State
authorities and also called up by Marine Orders
Part 12 (not AMSA jurisdiction!)
12STABILITY CRITERIA NWBS DAY TRIP BOAT
- Apply relevant criteria from section 8.C.1 of USL
Code - Assuming vessel is under State jurisdiction (not
AMSA) - Could use criteria of 2.3 to 2.5 of 2000 HSC Code
- Call-up standards of Annexes 7 and 8 of Code,
depending on whether craft is monohull or
multihull - Note that 1.1 of Annex 8 to the 2000 HSC Code
calls up the Severe wind and rolling criterion
from the IMO Intact Stability Code - Absence of adjustments to tabulated factors to
apply to HSC renders such application difficult
13STABILITY CRITERIA NWBS DAY TRIP BOAT (CONT)
- Note that Table 2.3.4 of 2000 HSC Code provides
for some inter-changeability between the
requirements of Annexes 7 and 8 - Eg. trimarans stability is similar to monohulls
but amahs of can be tailored to meet the
specified stability criteria - CFD may soon enable compliance with 2.4 to be
verified by calculation but trials required for
now - Intact stability criteria currently being
researched as major part of review of 2000 HSC
Code
14AUSTAL MONOHULL CREW/SUPPLY VESSEL
- Mexican flag and high service speed would
normally pose questions - But these are answered by specification of IMO
Code on Intact Stability (IS Code) - Severe Weather Criterion NOT required
- Note 2000 HSC Code could not be applied as HSC
Code requires high-speed criterion to be met at
displacement of maximum operational weight - Consider using 4.5.6 of IS Code in place of 3.1.2
- Offshore cargo handling probably precludes
fitting passenger cabin above cargo deck
15DAMAGE STABILITY
- (Not part of brief for this presentation but
generally results in relevant operational
information being included in Trim Stability
Booklet)
16ANY QUESTIONS????
17DAMAGE STABILITY SOLAS MARPOL
- SOLAS Ch. II-1 Part B provides deterministic
requirements for subdivision of passenger ships,
Res. A.265(VIII) is probabilistic alternative - SOLAS reg.II-1/8-1 covers probabilistic
subdivision and damage stability of ro-ro
passenger ships - SOLAS Ch.II-1 Part B-1 provides for probabilistic
subdivision damage stability for dry cargo
ships of Lgt80m unless covered by deterministic
criteria - MARPOL Annex I specifies oil tanker subdivision
damage stability requirements incl. double-hulls
18DAMAGE STABILITY SOLAS/MARPOL-RELATED CODES
- International Bulk Chemical (IBC) Code gives
requirements for chemical carriers - note that where a chemical carrier can carry
petroleum grades in addition to noxious liquid
substances in bulk, MARPOL Annex I also applies - International Gas Carrier (IGC) Code gives
requirements for liquefied gas carriers - Other Codes cover existing ships unnecessary to
list here
19NOTE RE PROBABILISTIC DAMAGE STABILITY
- Res. A.265 (IX) (1973) is probabilistic
alternative to SOLAS Ch.II-1 damage stability
requirements - now applied to ro-ro passenger ships through
SOLAS reg. II-1/8-1 - Amendments to SOLAS Ch. II-1 scheduled for
adoption in May to harmonise probabilistic
method for passenger cargo ships (flood length) - Probabilistic principles likely to be extended to
Load Line and MARPOL Conventions damage
stability - MARPOL Annex I oil outflow and guidelines for
double-hull equivalence are already probabilistic
20INTACT STABILITY DATA -DAMAGE STABILITY LINK
- A given ship at a given displacement and trim
will have a limiting intact KG at which it meets
any damage stability criterion - Tracking this data over a range of intact
displacements and trims gives a series of
limiting KG curves within which the ship must be
operated to maintain compliance with the
criterion - Such curves are most useful to the Master when
integrated into the intact stability booklet - preferably on the same page as similar limiting
KG information for intact stability criteria
21OTHER ASPECTS OF STABILITY
22SHIPS FOR DRY BULK CARGOES
- The most important criterion for such ships is in
relation to ships which may carry grain, which
must comply with the International Grain Code
which is given mandatory effect in SOLAS reg.
VI/9 - Most bulk carriers are designed to comply with
this Code even if they are intended to engage in
the iron ore and coal trades commercially
important in terms of both resale features and
being able to accept grain cargoes when they
arise - Involves provision of Grain Stability Data
- For specialised bulk cargoes, Bulk Cargoes Code
should be checked for any extra requirements - Eg. transportable moisture limits, extra
watertight integrity / bilge requirements, gas
sniffing (coal)
23TIMBER CARGOES
- Many Handy-size bulk carriers are arranged for
carriage of timber on deck (clear side-decks,
stanchions) - 1966 Load Line Convention Annex I, Ch. IV
provides for assignment of lumber load lines - stability requirements are as per 4.1 of Intact
Stability Code which in turn calls up the Code of
Safe Practice for Ships Carrying Timber Deck
Cargoes
24SUMMARY
- It is essential to establish the jurisdiction and
regulatory environment in which the ship will
operate at the outset - This varies between your selected projects
- AMSA intact stability requirements generally
build on basic IMO stability criteria, HSC is
exception - Looking beyond intact stability, relevant intact
stability criteria related to cargoes and the
operational linkage between intact and damage
stability should not be overlooked
25ANY QUESTIONS????