Working Group - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Working Group

Description:

IEEE Rail Transit Vehicle Interface Standards Committee Meeting. March 14, 2000. March 14, 2000 ... to enhance service effectiveness of a rail transit system. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Pars175
Category:
Tags: group | rail | working

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Working Group


1
Working Group 2 Report
  • IEEE Rail Transit Vehicle Interface Standards
    Committee Meeting
  • March 14, 2000

2
Current Status
  • IEEE Std. 1474.1-1999, CBTC Performance and
    Functional Requirements, issued in December,
    1999
  • WG2 meeting to discuss next steps held on
    February 18, 2000 at SEPTA

3
Meeting Attendees
  • Consumers 17 (61)
  • Producers 5 (18)
  • Others 6 (21)
  • TOTAL 28 (100)

4
Process
  • Brainstorm potential new initiatives
  • Open items from IEEE Std. 1474.1-1999
  • Other proposals raised by WG2 members
  • Discussion
  • Establish consensus
  • vote

5
Recommendation 1
  • Environmental standard (incl. EMI/EMC) for CBTC
    wayside equipment
  • 100 of group voted on this item
  • 100 of those that voted, voted for
  • Recommendation is that WG8, or possibly a new WG,
    take on this standard initiative
  • (No chair currently identified for new WG)

6
Recommendation 2
  • Graphical user interface display standard for
    trainborne and central CBTC subsystems
  • 78 of group voted on this item
  • 95 of those that voted, voted for
  • Emphasis would be on defining information to be
    provided by CBTC subsystems for display purposes.
    Standard may also define form of display
    presentation
  • Alan Rumsey to prepare Scope and Purpose for
    proposed new standard for review/approval by
    RTVISC and to continue to chair WG for this new
    standard initiative

7
Recommendation 2
  • Proposed Scope
  • This standard establishes the information to be
    displayed on trainborne and central graphical
    user interfaces in communications-based train
    control (CBTC) systems.
  • Proposed Purpose
  • This standard will provide for consistent
    trainborne and central graphical user interfaces
    that take advantage of the characteristics of
    communications-based train control (CBTC) systems
    to enhance service effectiveness of a rail
    transit system.

8
Recommendation 3
  • Expand highway grade crossing functional
    requirements for CBTC systems
  • 67 of group voted on this item
  • 94 of those that voted, voted for
  • Extent to which expanded grade crossing
    requirements for CBTC systems will be addressed
    by WG14 needs to be clarified
  • If not being addressed by WG14, and subject to
    RTVISC approval, Vic Grappone has agreed to
    develop a detailed Scope and Purpose for proposed
    new standard, and chair a subgroup of WG2 to
    develop the additional functional requirements

9
Recommendation 4
  • CBTC standard to address operation of trains
    without crews
  • 75 of group voted on this item
  • 90 of those that voted, voted for
  • In general, it was the opinion of the WG2 members
    that the existing IEEE Std. 1474.1-1999 should be
    reviewed/updated in approximately 2 to 3 years
    time, to reflect experience of ongoing CBTC
    projects and CBTC system developments, and it was
    recommended that the update to include CBTC
    performance and functional requirements for train
    operations without crews should be incorporated
    at that time

10
Other WG2 Conclusions 1
  • CBTC interoperability interface standards

Data Communication System
11
Other WG2 Conclusions 1
  • CBTC interoperability interface standard
  • 100 of group voted on this item
  • only 18 of those that voted, voted for
  • While WG2 continues to support the ultimate goal
    of interoperability interface standards for CBTC,
    the WG2 members were unable to reach sufficient
    consensus that this effort should be progressed
    at this time
  • In the future, standards in the following area
    may also be desirable, but again there was
    insufficient consensus to proceed with standards
    development in these areas at this time

12
Other WG2 Conclusions 1a
  • Standard for a data communications subsystem for
    CBTC systems
  • only 68 of group voted on this item
  • only 63 of those that voted, voted for
  • Insufficient consensus within WG2 to proceed with
    standards development in this areas at this time

13
Other WG2 Conclusions 1b
  • Standard for definition of CBTC data elements
  • 93 of group voted on this item
  • only 42 of those that voted, voted for
  • Insufficient consensus within WG2 to proceed with
    standards development in this areas at this time

14
Other WG2 Conclusions 1c
  • Standard for CBTC/IEEE Std. 1473 interfaces
  • only 59 of group voted on this item
  • only 38 of those that voted, voted for
  • Insufficient consensus within WG2 to proceed with
    standards development in this areas at this time

15
Other WG2 Conclusions 2
  • Acceptance Testing Standards for CBTC Systems
  • 79 of group voted on this item
  • only 64 of those that voted, voted for
  • Insufficient consensus to proceed with such
    standards development at this time
  • It was also unclear if such a standard would be
    within the IEEE mandate (rather than within the
    mandate of the applicable regulatory agencies)

16
Other WG2 Conclusions 3
  • Maintenance Standards for CBTC Systems
  • 71 of group voted on this item
  • only 25 of those that voted, voted for
  • Insufficient consensus to proceed with such
    standards development at this time

17
Other WG2 Comments
  • Means of improving coordination between IEEE CBTC
    and NAJPTC/RSAC standard initiatives should
    continue to be explored
  • Means of establishing coordination between IEEE
    CBTC and European Urban Transit CBTC standard
    initiatives (UGTMS) should also be explored

18
Next Meeting
  • When Thursday, April 27, 2000
  • Where USS, Pittsburgh
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com