Interpreting Evidence Interactions with the Pharmaceutical Industry - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 57
About This Presentation
Title:

Interpreting Evidence Interactions with the Pharmaceutical Industry

Description:

The conscientious,explicit and judicious use of current best ... Rodent Non rodent. Single dose 2-4w 2w = 2 weeks 2-4w 2w. 1 month 1m 1m. 3 months 3m/6m 3m ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 58
Provided by: ian50
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Interpreting Evidence Interactions with the Pharmaceutical Industry


1
Interpreting Evidence /Interactions with the
Pharmaceutical Industry
  • __________________________________________________
    ___
  • Dr Joseph Cheriyan
  • Clinical Pharmacology Unit
  • Department of Medicine

2
NHS Annual Drug Expenditure
Drugs Total 5 billion
3
Evidence Based Medicine
  • The conscientious,explicit and judicious use of
    current best evidence in making decisions about
    the care of individual patients. The practice of
    EBM means integrating individual clinical
    expertise with the best available external
    clinical evidence from systematic research

Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM EBMwhat is it and what
it isnt. BMJ 312 (7023)71-2, 1996
4
Wheres the Evidence?
  • Primary Evidence
  • Randomised controlled trials
  • Observational studies
  • Descriptive studies
  • Case reports
  • Secondary Evidence
  • Meta analysis
  • Systematic reviews
  • Summary reviews
  • Respected opinions
  • Tertiary Evidence - Clinical Guidelines

Adapted from Richard Glickman-Simon, MD 2004
5
Evidence portals
  • MEDLINE
  • PubMed
  • Cochrane collaboration
  • NICE reviews
  • SIGN reviews (Scotland)

6
Randomised Clinical Trials
  • Blinding Open vs. single vs Double blind
  • Randomisation Simple, blocked, central vs centre
    based,stratified, adaptive (covariate vs
    response)
  • The most reliable assessment of treatment
    efficacy comes from randomised, double-blind,
    controlled clinical trials

(Friedman,,Furberg DeMets Fundamentals of
Clinical Trials 1982)
7
Data from trials
  • Quantitative eg weight, SBP
  • Ordinal eg categories of mild, moderate,severe or
    unordered (eg death, AE, lost to F/up) or binary
    (eg success vs. failure)

8
Measures of quantitative data
  • Mean
  • Median
  • Mode
  • Standard Deviation
  • Range
  • Standard error or Std error of the mean

9
Measures of quantitative data
  • Mean Sum of all values divided by n
  • Median middle value of a sample after ranked in
    order
  • Mode the most frequently occurring value
  • SDaverage deviation from mean, about 95 of
    normally distributed data lie within 2 SDs of
    mean
  • Range diff. between largest and smalest values
  • SE (or SEM) Measure of the uncertainty of a
    single sample mean as an estimate of the general
    population mean

10
Key Results in a Trial
  • Relative risk
  • Relative risk reduction
  • Absolute risk reduction
  • Number needed to treat

11
Event Rates
  • Event rate in experimental group
  • Event rates
  • n with event / total
  • Control event rate (CER)
  • Experimental event rate (EER)

Intervention Event No event Total Experiment
a b (ab) Control c d (cd) CER c
/ (cd) EER a / (ab)
12
Relative Risk (reduction)
  • Relative risk Experimental event rate
  • Control event rate
  • Relative risk reduction (RRR)
  • RR-1
  • Or control-experimental event rate
  • control event
    rate

13
Absolute Risk Reduction
  • Difference in two event rates
  • control-experimental event rate

14
Numbers Needed to Treat
  • NNT is the number of patients that need to be
    treated (for a specific time period) to prevent
    one event
  • NNT 1 / ARR

15
An ExampleCAPRIE Study Lancet 1996
3481329-1339
ARR 5.83-5.32 0.51 RR 0.89 RRR
0.51/5.83 0.087 or 8.7 NNT 1/0.0051 196
16
Are Results Statistically Significant
  • P-value
  • beware the Type I error
  • statistical false positive
  • Confidence interval
  • gives an idea of precision
  • If not significant, what was the power of the
    study?

17
Pharmaceutical Industry and Drug Development
18
What is a Drug?
  • Any chemical compound - sugar ???
  • Anything which produces a change in the body -
    an axe ???
  • Define by characteristics
  • 1. use or potential use in diagnosis or treatment
    of disease
  • 2. selective in their actions

19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
Clinical drug development occurs in stages
  • Exploratory
  • Phase I-II
  • Confirmatory
  • Phase III

23
(No Transcript)
24
Drug Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism
and Excretion - What is Assessed and When?
Candidate Selection to FTIH
FTIH to PoC
PoC to commit to Phase III
Lead to Candidate
File Launch
Lifecycle Management
Phase 3
Phase II
Phase III
Phase IV
Phase I
  • Pharmacokinetics / Toxicokinetics
  • In-vitro metabolism / enzymology
  • ADME in toxicology species
  • Metabolite identification
  • Bioanalysis for Clinical, Toxicity and
    Oncogenicity Studies
  • ADME for reprotox and oncogenicity species
  • Placental and milk transfer
  • Identify routes of human metabolism
  • Compare human and animal metabolism
  • Human radiolabel study
  • Bioanalysis for Clinical and Toxicity Studies
  • Bioanalysis for Clinical Studies
  • ADME support of alternative administration routes

Progress to definition of animal and human ADME
25
(No Transcript)
26
Sources of Drugs
Animal Insulin (pig, cow)
growth hormone (man) Plant digitalis
(digitalis purpurea - foxglove)
morphine (papaver somniferum) Inorganic
arsenic mercury
lithium Synthetic chemical (propranolol)
biological (penicillin)
biotechnology (human insulin)
27
Approaches to Drug Discovery
DRIVER IS UNMET MEDICAL NEED IN A VIABLE MARKET
  • Historical cinchona (quinine) willow barks
    (aspirin)
  • Study disease process breast cancer (tamoxifen)
    Parkinsons disease (L-dopa)
  • Study biochem/physiological pathway
    renin/angiotensin
  • Develop SAR to natural compound
    beta-adrenoceptors (propranolol), H2-receptors
    (cimetidine)
  • Design to fit known structurally identified
    biological site ACEi
  • By chance (serendipity) random screening (HTS)
    penicillin dimenhydramate pethidine
  • Genomics identification of receptors gene
    therapy recombinant materials

28
Levels of testing
DRUG receptor
transduction system (second messenger enzyme)
BINDING
functional whole or part organs
BIOCHEMICAL TESTING
ISOLATED TISSUE EXPERIMENTS
Anaesthetised or conscious animals
WHOLE ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS
29
Animal Models of Efficacy
  • Existing normal behaviours/effects (anaesthesia
    contraception paralysis)
  • Create behaviours (fat rats hypertensive rats
    anxious rats epileptic rats)
  • Find unrelated behaviour affected by existing
    drugs (Straub tail for narcotic analgesics
    learned helplessness for antidepressants)

30
Clinical Testing
  • Phase 0 (non-clinical)
  • Phase 1 (volunteers)
  • Phase 2 (patients)
  • Phase 3 (large scale multi-centre)
  • Phase 4 (post registration monitoring)
  • phases can also be defined by the information
    you are trying to get out of the testing

31
PHASE I GOALS
  • Safety and tolerability of single and short-term
    (7d-14d) dosing with NCE
  • Obtain the concentration-time profile of the NCE
    determine the degree of proportionality between
    dose and plasma concentrations
  • Characterize relationship between dose-plasma
    exposure and appropriate markers of pharmadynamic
    effect or efficacy
  • Recommend dosage regimen for Phase II

32
Phase II
  • To investigate the dose-exposure-response/efficacy
    relationship in the target patient population
  • To select the optimal dosage regimen for Phase III

33
Phase III
  • Confirm Efficacy and Safety in a larger sample of
    the target population (thousands)
  • Define the Risk/Benefit Ratio
  • Differentiation of the drug from competitors
  • Regulatory Submission of Non-clinical and
    Clinical Studies

34
Phase I II. Phase III (US Japan vs Europe)
Minimum duration Studies in animals
Clinical Trial Repeat dose studies
Rodent Non
rodent Single dose 2-4w
2w lt 2 weeks 2-4w
2w 1 month 1m 1m
3 months 3m/6m 3m 6
months 6m 6m gt 6 months
6m chronic
35
Lack of Efficacy accounts for the largest part of
the of the Attrition Pie
Other 14
Other 10
Efficacy 46
Efficacy 29
DMPK 7
DMPK 7
Safety 17
DMPK 40
AEs 10
AEs 16
Safety 11
Prentis et al, 1988
Kennedy, 1997
36
Well-validated Surrogates
  • Hypertension Blood Pressure
  • Peptic Ulcers Suppression of gastric acid
    production over 24h
  • Glaucoma Intraocular pressure

37
Ideal Surrogate linked to clinical endpoint via
same mechanism
Treatment
Surrogate Endpoint
Disease
Clinical Endpoint
Treatment Intervention acts through pathway
affecting clinical endpoint through the surrogate
38
Arterial Stiffness and Survival
LDL cholesterol and survival
39
Inappropriate surrogates
Surrogate
A
Treatment
Disease
Clinical Endpoint
Surrogate
B
A Surrogate is unrelated to mechanism that leads
to clinical outcome
B Surrogate is linked to to clinical outcome via
a pathway not affected by treatment intervention
40
Clinical Drug Development must have a cunning plan
15 y ago
Clinical Development
Discovery
NOW
Clinical Development
Discovery
41
DRUG DEVELOPMENT
  • Preclinical Studies - tissues and whole animals
  • Clinical Studies
  • ? Phase I healthy volunteers (20-50) - PK, PD
  • ? Phase II patients (50-300) - PK, PD,
    dose-ranging, safety
  • ? Phase III patients (250-1000) - formal
    clinical trial, efficacy, safety
  • Granting of Product Licence
  • ? Phase IV post-marketing patient studies
    (1000s), larger clinical trials
  • Developing and launching a new drug - 100M and
    10 to 15 years

42
GOVERNMENT
Ministry of Health
License Applications
Granted Licenses
Medicines Control Agency (MCA)
Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM)
43
Prescribing Drugs- a balance of benefit and risk
RISK
BENEFIT
44
Drugs can do good or harm!
  • Poisons in small doses are the best medicines
    and useful medicines in too large doses are
    poisonous
  • William Withering 1789

45
Study Stages Sample Sizes and Number of Sites
Phase II (n100300) 280 Sites
PreclinicalTesting
Approval
Phase III (n1,0005,000) 10100 or More Sites
Phase I (n50100) Usually Single Site
Phase IV Outcomes Research (nvariable) Variable
of Sites
Discovery
210
4
1
2
3
1.5
Varies
First in Human
Time (Years)
Note For Phase III, you could test upwards of
1520,000 subjects. Trovan was over 14,000 you
might want to up that figure for Phase III
Source PhRMA. Tufts Center for the Study of Drug
Development
2.1
46
US Dominates Global Market 11 Growth in 2003
US/Mil
Source IMS Health March 2003 Pharmacy
only Hospital only
47
U.S. Pharmaceutical IndustryRD Continues to
Grow
Expenditures (Billions of Dollars)
PhRMA member RD and non-PhRMA member biotech
company RD (including PhRMA research
associates). Estimated
48
From Laboratory to Patient The Complex Pathway
of Biopharmaceutical RD
Large-ScaleManufacturing/Phase IV
Drug Discovery
Pre-Clinical
Clinical Trials
FDA Review
1FDA ApprovedDrug
10,000Compounds
5 Compounds
250 Compounds
NDA Submitted
IND Submitted
5 Years
1.5 Years
6 Years
2 Years
2 Years
Average time in stage
Source Pharmaceutical Industry Profile, 2005,
PhRMA
49
U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry Cost of Developing
a New Drug Continues to Grow
Expenditures per Rx Drug (Millions of 2000
Dollars)
Source J.A. DiMasi, R.W. Hansen, and H.G.
Grabowski, The Price of Innovation New
Estimates of Drug Development Costs, Journal of
Health Economics 22 (2003) 151-185
50
World Trade in Drugs (Legal)
51
Annual Personal Spend on Drugs
52
Top Pharmaceutical Companies
53
Use of Generics
54
What Drugs Cost in Cambs (2000)
  • Omeprazole (anti-gastric acid) 3.5m
  • Simvastatin (cholesterol lowering) 2.4m
  • Beclomethasone (asthma) 1.8m
  • Fluoxetine (antidepressant) 1.5m
  • Lansoprazole (anti-gastric acid) 1.4m
  • Ranitidine (anti-gastric acid) 1.3m
  • Paroxetine (antidepressant) 1.2m
  • TOP 7 TOTAL gt13m
  • Total GP drugs gt67m

55
NICE (http//www.nice.org.uk/)
56
Local guidelines
  • GPs Cambridgeshire PCT guidelines
  • Addenbrookes

57
Summary
  • EBM provides evidence basis for clinical practice
    based on combining clinical experience,
    scientific investigation and reviewing results of
    outcomes research
  • Drug development is a long and expensive journey
    undertaken primarily by the pharmaceutical
    industry
  • Roles and responsibility of individual
    prescribers in a nationalised health system to
    prescribe in a rational, unbiased manner based on
    levels of evidence and national guidelines
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com