Marsha Davenport, MD, MPH - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Marsha Davenport, MD, MPH

Description:

The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those ... Kia Tolson, MPH. Chet Roebuck. Reenea Logan. OPR, PHRT Training staff/participants. Thank You! ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:97
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: CDC681
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Marsha Davenport, MD, MPH


1
Preparedness Training for the Public Health
Workforce
  • Marsha Davenport, MD, MPH
  • Heather Brown, MPH
  • Clifford Smith, MS
  • Albert Romanosky, MD, PhD
  • Isaac Ajit, MD, MPH

2
OMB Disclaimer
  • The findings and conclusions in this
    presentation are those of the author(s) and do
    not necessarily represent the views of the
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

3
Presentation Overview
  • Background
  • Evaluation Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion of Findings
  • Recommendations
  • Closing

4
Background
  • Public Health Importance of Training
  • Essential Services of Public Health
  • Public Health Competencies
  • Training Levels
  • DHMH Training

5
Public Health Importance of Training
  • Flexibility and capacity to respond to new public
    health emergencies
  • A well-trained skilled workforce
  • Ongoing training for an established workforce

6
Essential Services of Public Health
  • Monitor community health
  • Investigate community health
  • Educate and empower community
  • Mobilize community partnerships
  • Develop policies and plans

7
Essential Services of Public Health
  • Enforce laws and regulations
  • Link people to health services
  • Assure a competent workforce
  • Evaluate health services
  • Research for new solutions

8
Public Health Competencies
  • 1. Analytic Assessment
  • 2. Policy/Program Development
  • 3. Communication
  • 4. Cultural Competency

9
Public Health Competencies
  • 5. Community Dimensions of Practice
  • 6. Basic Public Health Science
  • 7. Financial Planning and Management
  • 8. Leadership and Systems Thinking

10
Training Levels
  • CDC/CSTE
  • Entry-level
  • Mid-level
  • Supervisory
  • Senior Researcher

11
DHMH Training
  • DHMH Training Levels
  • Basic
  • Intermediate
  • Advanced
  • Train-the-trainer
  • Training Format
  • Day 1 Lectures, Break-out sessions
  • Day 2 Tabletop exercise

12
DHMH Training
  • Basic Course June and August 2005
  • All public health staff
  • Prerequisite none
  • Intermediate Course June 22-23, 2006
  • Mid- and Senior-level Public Health Staff (PHEPs,
    HOs)
  • Prerequisites Basic Course and NIMS Training

13
Core Competencies and Corresponding DHMH Training
14
Core Competencies and Corresponding DHMH Training
15
Evaluation Methods
16
Evaluation Goals
  • Identify topics relevant to intermediate level
    course
  • Determine effectiveness of course as an
    educational tool for local PH staff

17
Day 1 Evaluation Tool Criteria
  • 1. Relevance of content to program
  • objectives.
  • 2. Quality of instruction
  • 3. Expertise and level of knowledge.
  • 4. Quality of audiovisuals.

18
Day 1 Evaluation Scale Ratings
  • Excellent
  • Good
  • Fair
  • Poor
  • N/A

19
Day 2 Evaluation Tool Criteria
  • 1. Objectives related to the purpose.
  • 2. Teaching strategies appropriate.
  • 3. Presenter was effective.
  • 4. TAs were effective.
  • 5. AV Equipment functioned properly.

20
Day 2 Evaluation Tool Criteria
  • 6. I developed new skills/knowledge.
  • 7. Feel competent to apply skills.
  • 8. Logistics were clearly outlined.
  • 9. Exercise interactions educational.
  • 10. The exercise was beneficial.

21
Day 2 Agreement Scale Ratings
  • Strongly agree
  • Agree
  • Disagree
  • N/A

22
Overall Evaluation Tool Criteria
  • 1. Objectives related to the purpose.
  • 2. Teaching strategies appropriate.
  • 3. Presenters were effective.
  • 4. Break-out sessions were effective.
  • 5. AV equipment functioned properly.

23
Overall Evaluation Tool Criteria
  • 6. I developed new skills/knowledge.
  • 7. I feel competent to apply these skills.
  • 8. Logistics were timely delivered.
  • 9. The accommodations were beneficial.
  • 10. Logistics were complete.
  • 11. The training was beneficial.

24
Overall Agreement Scale Ratings
  • Strongly agree
  • Agree
  • Disagree
  • N/A

25
Results
26
Results Demographics
  • Target participants senior PH staff
  • Counties (20/24) 83
  • PHEPs (11/24) 46
  • HOs (1/24) 4
  • (Evaluations/Attendees)
  • Day 1 (49/79) 62
  • Day 2, overall (51/70) 73

27
Results Day 1 Lectures/Break-out Sessions
28
Summary of Day 1 Survey
  • Relevance of topics 75-96 excellent, good
  • Quality of instruction 69-100 excellent, good
  • Expertise 87-100 excellent, good
  • Audio Visual Quality 74-96 excellent, good

29
Mental Health Issues in Terrorism
30
Catastrophic Emergency Powers
31
Results Day 2 Exercise
32
Day 2 Exercise Evaluation
33
Day 2 Exercise Evaluation
34
Day 2 Exercise Evaluation
35
Overall Training
36
Summary of Overall Training Evaluation
37
Discussion
  • Limitations of Study
  • Survey Tool
  • Gaps in competencies
  • Accountability
  • Strengths of Study
  • Identify relevant components
  • Identify areas that need improvement

38
Recommendations
  • Stricter prerequisite enforcement
  • Reassess differences between levels
  • More thoroughly evaluate basic course
  • Identify appropriate staff for each of the
    courses
  • Conduct pre- and post-tests in future trainings

39
Closing
  • PHRT training covers appropriate competencies
  • In compliance with CDC guidelines
  • Assisting LHDs and DHMH in developing response
    capacity for public health emergencies

40
Acknowledgements
  • Katrina Rhodes, MD, MS
  • Kia Tolson, MPH
  • Chet Roebuck
  • Reenea Logan
  • OPR, PHRT Training staff/participants
  • Thank You!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com