Information Needs of Myocardial Infarction Patients - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Information Needs of Myocardial Infarction Patients

Description:

Evaluate patients' perceptions of the importance to them of items commonly taught post MI ... Priority of symptoms' as per Roebuck et al (2001) QL ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: ims17
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Information Needs of Myocardial Infarction Patients


1
Information Needs of Myocardial Infarction
Patients
2
The Aims of the Study
  • Evaluate patients perceptions of the importance
    to them of items commonly taught post MI
  • To compare these perceptions with those of the
    nurses who care for them
  • To compare the perceptions among the nurse groups
    themselves (CCU, ward, Rehab)

3
The Sample
  • 27 patients post first MI at one Dublin hospital
  • All CCU nurses at this hospital (27)
  • All cardiac ward nurses at this hospital (27)
  • Cardiac rehabilitation nurses in Ireland (35)

4
The instrument The Cardiac Patients Learning
Needs Inventory (CPLNI)
  • Devised by Gerard Peterson (1984) USA
  • Orignal questionnaire had 8 categories,
    containing 43 individual items pertaining to
    usual teaching areas.
  • The respondent is invited to respond to each
    individual item within the category using a five
    point likert scale to determine strength of
    agreement with each statement.

5
The Cardiac Patients Learning Needs Inventory
(CPLNI)
  • Cardiovascular Anatomy Physiology (AP)
  • Psychological factors
  • Risk Factors
  • Information about Medications
  • Dietary Information
  • Physical Activity
  • Miscellaneous information
  • Introduction to the Coronary Care Unit CCU

6
The Cardiac Patients Learning Needs Inventory
(CPLNI)
  • Gerard Peterson (1984) USA
  • Karlik Yarcheski (1987) USA
  • Wingate (1990) USA
  • Chan (1990) USA
  • Ashton (1997) USA
  • Turton (1998) UK
  • Hughes (2000) UK

7
Summary of Previous Results of the CPLNI
  • All areas were rated as important
  • Learning about anatomy and physiology were deemed
    important both during hosptial stay after
    discharge
  • Psychological factors were often regarded as
    being of moderate importance particularly after
    discharge
  • Risk factors/ lifestyle factors emerged as of
    primary concern to patients in all studies

8
Summary of Previous Results of the CPLNI
  • Medication information was regarded as an
    important area for learning at most times during
    recovery.
  • Information regarding diet and activity was rated
    as important for learning, however both areas
    were considered to be of low priority when rank
    order was considered.

9
Variations between patient and nurse perceptions
  • Nurses ranked medication information needs as
    priority learning
  • Nurses ranked medication information needs as
    being of greater importance than risk factor/
    lifestlye needs (CCU nurses ranked medicaton
    information needs higher than non CCU nurses)
  • Nurses percieved the individual item of
    resuming sexual activity to be high prority
    learning area, however, patients placed low
    priority on this topic.

10
CPLNI Used in the Study
  • Categories reduced by 1,an additional category
    added ( symptom management), items reduced from
    43 to 38 (6 added). Turton (1998)
  • Term risk factor was substituted with lifestyle
    factor, as patients appeared to misinterpret the
    former.

11
Results- patients
  • significantly different than nurses (p0.001)
  • Mostly accounted for by a large proportion of NI
    responses by the patients, in contrast to the
    nurses, to three main (Physical Activity) items
    when to resume driving, sexual activity, and
    work.
  • Most similar to the CCU nurse
  • The mean score of the Physical Activity category
    is significantly smaller than any other category,
    this was not the case for any of the nurse groups
  • Patients overall mean score was significantly
    smaller than any of the nurse groups

12
Results- Nurses
  • The divergence of the distributions of the 3
    nurse groups was significant (p0.033)
  • The CCU nurses had a lower overall score mainly
    due to lower scores in categories 2 3
    (Psychological factors Lifestyle factors)
  • Lifestyle medication also significantly higher
    than 3 lowest mean scores

13
Comparison of Nurse Patient Views
  • Score of symptom management significantly
    exceeds the mean scores of all other other
    categories
  • Both nurses and patients agreed that symptom
    management was of greatest importance when rank
    order was considered
  • Categories 3 (lifestyle) 4 (medication) were
    also ranked highly by all groups
  • Analysis reveals that all groups had similar
    priorities, but patients scores were generally
    lower

14
Comparison of Nurse Patient Views
  • 4 individual items were scored highest or nearly
    highest by all
  • What to do if I get chest pain
  • What the signs symptoms of a heart attack are
  • When to call a GP or ambulance
  • What I can do to reduce the chances of me having
    another heart attack
  • Biggest disagreement on items, scored lower by
    patients than any other items.
  • When I can resume driving
  • When I can resume sexual activity

15
Changes in patient scores
  • Of the 27 patients, 18 were re-administered the
    questionnaire on self-completion basis at home
    following discharge.
  • No overall change in score
  • On Psychological factors there was a
    significant mean score increase of 0.35,
    (P0.006), and on Medication information a
    significant mean decrease of 0.28, (P0.013).

16
Discussion
  • More congruence among nurse groups than
    previously reported
  • Priority of symptoms as per Roebuck et al
    (2001) QL
  • Medications usually ranked high among nurse
    groups risk factors among patients
  • Changes in needs over time noted

17
Discussion
  • Physical activity low priority as per Turton
    (1998)
  • Sexual activity information - low priority unless
    indicated by patient or spouse?(Turton,1998)
  • Sexuality as a topic?

18
What the signs symptoms of a heart attack are
What to do for chest pain
  • When to call a GP or ambulance

Reducing the chance of having another heart attack
19
Most helpful information- addressed their
concerns about having another MI
Lack of direction-bewilderment
  • Credibility of information

Perceptions of the cause of MI
20
Recommendations
  • Patient information needs assessment using simple
    methods
  • Teaching tailored to individual needs
  • Practical information central to survival crucial
    core of teaching
  • Language, terminology and approach congruent with
    patients needs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com