Title: Texas Soils Research Could We Do the Same
1Texas Soils Research Could We Do the Same?
- Dr. Bruce J. Lesikar
- Texas AgriLife Extension Service
- Southwest Onsite Wastewater Conference
- January 30 31, 2008
2Overview
- Background water movement
- What is a soil loading rate? Comparing Apples
and Oranges - What to measure?
- Getting the data
3Water Movement - Designing at the Boundaries
- Water movement from a trench
- Water movement through the soil treatment area or
drain field - Water leaving the soil treatment area
4Definitions
- Long-term acceptance rate (LTAR) (gpd/ft2).
design parameter expressing the rate that
effluent enters the infiltrative surface of the
soil treatment area at equilibrium, measured in
volume per area per time, e.g. gallons per day
per square foot (gpd/ft2). - Linear Loading Rate (LLR) (gpd/ft) quantity of
effluent applied along the length of a lateral,
trench or bed, typically expressed as volume per
unit length per unit time (e.g. gallons per foot
per day).
5Hydraulic Loading LTAR
- Loading rate 0.2 g/ft2-d
- Annual loading 0.2 g/ft2-d x 365 days 73
g/ft2- yr - Depth of water 73 g/ft2- yr / 7.48 g/ft3 9.8
ft/yr or 118 inches/ yr
6Linear Loading Rate
- Do you account for side wall loading?
- Three foot wide trench has 3 ft2 of absorptive
area per foot of trench - Loading rate to bottom 3 ft x 0.2 gallons per
day/ft2 0.6 gpd/ft
7Definitions
- Areal Loading Rate (ALR) (gpf/ft2) quantity of
effluent applied to the footprint of the soil
treatment area (or the absorption area of an
above-grade soil treatment area) expressed as
volume per area per unit time, e.g., gallons per
day per square foot (gpd/sq. ft.). - Contour Loading rate (CLR) (gpd/ft) cumulative
total of effluent applied to the soil profile at
the down gradient end of a dispersal system
installed on a slope, expressed as volume per
unit length per unit time along the contour
(e.g., gpd/ft.).
8Contour Loading Rate
- Assume slope is downward on this drawing
- Sum the linear loading rate for the 4 trenches 3
foot wide. - CLR 4 x (3ft2 x 0.2g/ft2-d) 2.4 g /d linear
foot
9Areal Loading Rate
10Areal Loading Rate
- Add distance between trenches to the total area
where effluent is being distributed - Accounts for rainfall, evapotranspiration and
percolation components of soil treatment area. - Compare systems on a more direct loading basis.
- ALR (3ft2x0.2g/ft2-d)/ 9ft2
- ALR 0.067 g/ft2-d
- What about drip?
11Composition of Soil
- Inorganic materials
- Organic materials
- Air
- Water
- Microbes
12Hydraulic Loading Rate
- Textural classification
- Sand
- Silt
- Clay
- Structure
- Loading Volume per surface area time (gallons
per square foot) - Trench Infiltrative surface
- Drip field Surface area
13Organic Loading Rate
- Biomat
- Oxygen transfer capability
- Loading
- Mass per surface area (mg per square foot)
- Mass per emitter (mg per emitter)
- Trench Infiltrative surface
- Drip field Surface area
14Theoretical Hydraulic Acceptance Rates for Soils
Receiving Wastewater
Acceptance Rate
Long-term Acceptance Rate
Time
15Water Movement from a Trench
- Restricting water movement
- Biological
- Chemical
- Physical
- Unsaturated conditions outside the biomat
- Water moves outward and downward in all
directions from a ponded trench
Biozone
16Biomat sidewalls
- Biomat develops along the bottom and then around
the trench - Ponding levels use sidewalls
- Excessive ponding depths create saturated flow
- Narrower allows more surface area
- Narrower allows better O2 transfer
17Water Movement From A Drip Emitter
- Saturated Flow
- Water moving in all directions from the emitter
- Water moving along the lateral and then out into
the soil - Unsaturated Flow
- Dispersal in all directions
18Modeled Flow Pattern Around a Drip Emitter
19Water Movement From An Operating Drip Emitter
20Water Movement Through the Drip Field
21Determining Soil Loading Rates
- Conduct a field study to characterize changes in
soil hydraulic properties caused by application
of septic tank effluent through subsurface drip
systems. - Site data Wastewater loading
- Soil data -
- Water movement -
- Soil chemical condition -
22Site Description
23Operation Data
24Applied Effluent Quality
25Soil Sample
- Seven replicates of undisturbed soil cores 7.6 cm
diameter by 7.6 cm long were obtained from three
different locations and from three different
depths around the drip emitter
26Collecting Soil Samples
27Location of the Soil Samples
28Calculating Water Movement Rate
- In lab process
- Double ring infiltrometer
- Amoozemeter reading
- Perk tests?
- Water loss from a trench?
Double ring infiltrometer
29Location of Soil Samples in Soil Profile for
Chemical analysis
30 cm
30Soil Core Sample Tests
- Hydraulic conductivity was tested using constant
head method, and - Soil retention curve was determined using
pressure cell method.
31Pore Size Distribution
- Pore size distribution was determined from
retention data using the following equation - r is the mean pore radius, h is the capillary
potential, ? is the water surface tension, ? is
the contact angle between liquid and solid, g is
the acceleration due to gravity, and ? is the
density of water. -
32Results of Soil Hydraulic Properties Analysis
33Pore Size Distribution at 3 cm Above the Emitter
34Pore Size Distribution at 7 cm Below the Emitter
Pore Radius Interval, ?m
35Pore Size Distribution at 30 cm Below the Emitter
36Change in the Concentration of Selected Chemicals
in the Irrigated Area Compared to That in the
Control Area ().
37Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Soil Surface
Drip Line
Emitter
38Summary
- What are you trying to measure?
- Make sure you are comparing apples to apples not
apples to oranges. - Data is important
- Wastewater loading quantity, quality, area
- Soils
- Water acceptance rate
- Field tests versus lab tests
- Dollars available