Texas Soils Research Could We Do the Same - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Texas Soils Research Could We Do the Same

Description:

Sand. Silt. Clay. Structure. Loading Volume per surface area time (gallons per square foot) ... rate. Field tests versus lab tests. Dollars available ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: brucel150
Category:
Tags: research | same | soils | texas

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Texas Soils Research Could We Do the Same


1
Texas Soils Research Could We Do the Same?
  • Dr. Bruce J. Lesikar
  • Texas AgriLife Extension Service
  • Southwest Onsite Wastewater Conference
  • January 30 31, 2008

2
Overview
  • Background water movement
  • What is a soil loading rate? Comparing Apples
    and Oranges
  • What to measure?
  • Getting the data

3
Water Movement - Designing at the Boundaries
  • Water movement from a trench
  • Water movement through the soil treatment area or
    drain field
  • Water leaving the soil treatment area

4
Definitions
  • Long-term acceptance rate (LTAR) (gpd/ft2).
    design parameter expressing the rate that
    effluent enters the infiltrative surface of the
    soil treatment area at equilibrium, measured in
    volume per area per time, e.g. gallons per day
    per square foot (gpd/ft2).
  • Linear Loading Rate (LLR) (gpd/ft) quantity of
    effluent applied along the length of a lateral,
    trench or bed, typically expressed as volume per
    unit length per unit time (e.g. gallons per foot
    per day).

5
Hydraulic Loading LTAR
  • Loading rate 0.2 g/ft2-d
  • Annual loading 0.2 g/ft2-d x 365 days 73
    g/ft2- yr
  • Depth of water 73 g/ft2- yr / 7.48 g/ft3 9.8
    ft/yr or 118 inches/ yr

6
Linear Loading Rate
  • Do you account for side wall loading?
  • Three foot wide trench has 3 ft2 of absorptive
    area per foot of trench
  • Loading rate to bottom 3 ft x 0.2 gallons per
    day/ft2 0.6 gpd/ft

7
Definitions
  • Areal Loading Rate (ALR) (gpf/ft2) quantity of
    effluent applied to the footprint of the soil
    treatment area (or the absorption area of an
    above-grade soil treatment area) expressed as
    volume per area per unit time, e.g., gallons per
    day per square foot (gpd/sq. ft.).
  • Contour Loading rate (CLR) (gpd/ft) cumulative
    total of effluent applied to the soil profile at
    the down gradient end of a dispersal system
    installed on a slope, expressed as volume per
    unit length per unit time along the contour
    (e.g., gpd/ft.).

8
Contour Loading Rate
  • Assume slope is downward on this drawing
  • Sum the linear loading rate for the 4 trenches 3
    foot wide.
  • CLR 4 x (3ft2 x 0.2g/ft2-d) 2.4 g /d linear
    foot

9
Areal Loading Rate
10
Areal Loading Rate
  • Add distance between trenches to the total area
    where effluent is being distributed
  • Accounts for rainfall, evapotranspiration and
    percolation components of soil treatment area.
  • Compare systems on a more direct loading basis.
  • ALR (3ft2x0.2g/ft2-d)/ 9ft2
  • ALR 0.067 g/ft2-d
  • What about drip?

11
Composition of Soil
  • Inorganic materials
  • Organic materials
  • Air
  • Water
  • Microbes

12
Hydraulic Loading Rate
  • Textural classification
  • Sand
  • Silt
  • Clay
  • Structure
  • Loading Volume per surface area time (gallons
    per square foot)
  • Trench Infiltrative surface
  • Drip field Surface area

13
Organic Loading Rate
  • Biomat
  • Oxygen transfer capability
  • Loading
  • Mass per surface area (mg per square foot)
  • Mass per emitter (mg per emitter)
  • Trench Infiltrative surface
  • Drip field Surface area

14
Theoretical Hydraulic Acceptance Rates for Soils
Receiving Wastewater
Acceptance Rate
Long-term Acceptance Rate
Time
15
Water Movement from a Trench
  • Restricting water movement
  • Biological
  • Chemical
  • Physical
  • Unsaturated conditions outside the biomat
  • Water moves outward and downward in all
    directions from a ponded trench

Biozone
16
Biomat sidewalls
  • Biomat develops along the bottom and then around
    the trench
  • Ponding levels use sidewalls
  • Excessive ponding depths create saturated flow
  • Narrower allows more surface area
  • Narrower allows better O2 transfer

17
Water Movement From A Drip Emitter
  • Saturated Flow
  • Water moving in all directions from the emitter
  • Water moving along the lateral and then out into
    the soil
  • Unsaturated Flow
  • Dispersal in all directions

18
Modeled Flow Pattern Around a Drip Emitter
19
Water Movement From An Operating Drip Emitter
20
Water Movement Through the Drip Field
21
Determining Soil Loading Rates
  • Conduct a field study to characterize changes in
    soil hydraulic properties caused by application
    of septic tank effluent through subsurface drip
    systems.
  • Site data Wastewater loading
  • Soil data -
  • Water movement -
  • Soil chemical condition -

22
Site Description
23
Operation Data
24
Applied Effluent Quality
25
Soil Sample
  • Seven replicates of undisturbed soil cores 7.6 cm
    diameter by 7.6 cm long were obtained from three
    different locations and from three different
    depths around the drip emitter

26
Collecting Soil Samples
27
Location of the Soil Samples
28
Calculating Water Movement Rate
  • In lab process
  • Double ring infiltrometer
  • Amoozemeter reading
  • Perk tests?
  • Water loss from a trench?

Double ring infiltrometer
29
Location of Soil Samples in Soil Profile for
Chemical analysis
30 cm
30
Soil Core Sample Tests
  • Hydraulic conductivity was tested using constant
    head method, and
  • Soil retention curve was determined using
    pressure cell method.

31
Pore Size Distribution
  • Pore size distribution was determined from
    retention data using the following equation
  • r is the mean pore radius, h is the capillary
    potential, ? is the water surface tension, ? is
    the contact angle between liquid and solid, g is
    the acceleration due to gravity, and ? is the
    density of water.

32
Results of Soil Hydraulic Properties Analysis
33
Pore Size Distribution at 3 cm Above the Emitter
34
Pore Size Distribution at 7 cm Below the Emitter
Pore Radius Interval, ?m
35
Pore Size Distribution at 30 cm Below the Emitter
36
Change in the Concentration of Selected Chemicals
in the Irrigated Area Compared to That in the
Control Area ().
37
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Soil Surface
Drip Line
Emitter
38
Summary
  • What are you trying to measure?
  • Make sure you are comparing apples to apples not
    apples to oranges.
  • Data is important
  • Wastewater loading quantity, quality, area
  • Soils
  • Water acceptance rate
  • Field tests versus lab tests
  • Dollars available
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com