Genetic Regulatory Networks and Systems Biology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

Genetic Regulatory Networks and Systems Biology

Description:

GRN Example 3: Sea Urchin Endoderm Development. GRN Example 4: RNA interference ... (Part of) Sea Urchin GRN for development. Hood-Galas. Nature, Jan 23 03 ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:495
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: eduardo9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Genetic Regulatory Networks and Systems Biology


1
Gene(tic) Regulatory Networks and Systems
Biology
  • Lecture 1 Jan-Feb 04
  • Dr. Eduardo Mendoza
  • Physics Department
  • Mathematics Department Center for
    NanoScience
  • University of the Philippines
    Ludwig-Maximilians-University
  • Diliman Munich, Germany
  • eduardom_at_math.upd.edu.ph
    Eduardo.Mendoza_at_physik.uni-muenchen.de

2
Topics
  • Genetic vs. Gene(tic) Regulatory Networks
  • GRNs in the Systems Biology Context
  • Network motifs
  • Cell Biology from molecular to modular
  • Papers for presentation

3
1. Genetic vs. Gene(tic) Regulatory Networks
  • Variations of genetic network concept
  • Noveen 1998 an association of many genes which
  • interact with each other in cascades or parallel
    pathways and
  • achieve a specific function or various functions
    through such interactions
  • Note interactions allow adjustment of gene
    expression or function thru activation/inhibition
    of transcription, translation or
    post-translational modifications
  • Wagner 2001 a group of genes in which
    individual genes change the activity of other
    genes
  • Note activity changes changes in gene
    expression on mRNA or protein level (methylation
    state, phosphorylation state or alternative
    splicing)

4
Genetic Networks variations (2)
  • Dhaeseleer 2000
  • Focuses on transcriptome level ? higher level
    interactions (rather than biochemical mechanísms)
  • Need to integrate gene expression data with
    information sources

5
Gene(tic) regulatory networks
  • GRN defined as networks of regulatory
    interactions between DNA, RNA, proteins and small
    moleculesDEJO02
  • Also called transcriptional regulatory networks
  • (Classical) GRN Example 1 lac operon in E.coli
  • GRN Example 2 Drosophila segment polarity
  • GRN Example 3 Sea Urchin Endoderm Development
  • GRN Example 4 RNA interference

6
GRN Example 1 The lac Operon
7
Example 2 Drosophila segment polarity GRN
8
Example 3 (Part of) Sea Urchin GRN for
development
Hood-Galas Nature, Jan 23 03
9
RNAi (RNA Interference) Nature July 25 02
10
Bio-Map
NETWORK BIOLOGY
11
Terminology
  • Biochemical processes mediate the interaction of
    cells with their environment and are responsible
    for most of the information processing inside the
    cell. Networks of interacting proteins underlie
    many of these processes. Three major types of
    biochemical processes are distinguished
  • Metabolic pathways are sequences of chemical
    reactions, each catalyzed by an enzymes, where
    certain product molecules are formed from other
    small substrates. Metabolites are usually small
    molecules while enzymes are proteins.
  • Signal transduction networks are pathways of
    molecular interactions that provide communication
    between the cell membrane and intracellular
    end-points, leading to some change in the cell.
    Signals are transduced by modification of one
    proteins activity or location by another
    protein.
  • Gene regulation circuits determine whether or
    not a particular gene is expressed at any
    particular time. Transcription factors, proteins
    that promote or repress transcription, either
    directly or indirectly bind regulatory DNA
    elements.
  • Metabolic, transduction and regulatory circuits
    are interleaved and integrated. For example, gene
    regulation circuits are fed by external signals
    transmitted by signal transduction pathways.

12
Two main problems/challenges (Altman)
13
2. GRNs in the Systems Biology Context
  • What is Systems Biology?
  • This emerging paradigm aims at systems-level
    understanding which requires a set of
    principles and methodologies that links the
    behaviors of molecules to systems characteristics
    and functions (H. Kitano, ICSB 2000)
  • Primary focus is the cell, but from there
    extensible to organs, organisms, ecosystems,..
  • Other names Integrative (whole-istic) Biology,
    Quantitative Biology, Predictive Biology, Network
    Biology,...

14
What Data is Needed to Specify a Single
Eukaryotic Cell?
  • Macromolecules
  • 5 Billion Proteins
  • 5,000 to 10,000 different species
  • 1 meter of DNA with Several Billion bases
  • 60 Million tRNAs
  • 700,000 mRNAs
  • Organelles
  • 4 Million Ribosomes
  • 30,000 Proteasomes
  • Dozens of Mitochondria
  • Chemical Pathways
  • Vast numbers
  • Tightly coupled
  • Is a Virtual Cell Possible?

www.people.virginia.edu/rjh9u/cell1.html
15
A simpler view ...
just for fun ?
courtesy of scholars of the (elite) German
National Academic Foundation...
16
A systems biology view...

Lifes Complexity Pyramid (Oltvai-Barabasi,
Science 10/25/02)
System
Functional Modules
Building Blocks
Components
17
4 Key Areas - 4 Key Activities
  • Key Areas
  • Systems structures topology of networks (genetic
    regulatory, signal transduction, metabolic
    pathways,..), parameters, constraints
  • Systems dynamics eg stability analysis,
    sensitivity analysis, bifurcation analysis
  • Control methods eg identifying feedback
    mechanisms for minimizing malfunction
    (robustness)
  • Design methods modify, construct biosystems with
    desired properties
  • (H. Kitano, Science, Mar 02)
  • Key Activities
  • Systems simulation (Influence analysis)
  • Systems reasoning
  • Systems modeling
  • Systems discovery (Systems Inference,
    Reverse Engineering)

18
Systems Biology is an integrative approach
  • it seeks to integrate
  • levels (of structure and scale)
  • process phases (the many omics)
  • experiment and modeling/computational work
  • scientific disciplines (multi-disciplinary)
  • to achieve quantitative experimental results and
  • to build predictive models/simulation
    environments

19
Surprising?...
IAS Center for Systems Biology
Systems Biology Short Course Control and
Dynamical SystemsMay 21-24
UCSB To Be a Pioneer in Systems Biology Novel
Gift from Professor and Spouse will Build Centers
of Excellence Across the DisciplinesMay 13, 2003

etc...
20
Surprise _at_ first look Harvard Medical Schools
Approach
Nature Oct 2
First entirely new HMS department in 20 years
HMS plans to recruit 20 faculty members for the
new department
21
Why Systems Biology? (2)
  • J.B.Martin (Dean, HMS) It is worrying that we
    do not understand how most drugs work and
    essential that we in detail how both genetic
    mutations and the environment contribute to
    disease
  • M. Kirschner (cell biologist) We need to build
    on the foundation of molecular biology to
    construct an understanding of the architecture
    of the cell and how cells cooperate across organ
    systems with a predictive model of physiology as
    the ultimate goal.

22
Why Systems Biology? (3)
  • Major challenges of Cell Biology (B. Alberts, Sep
    01)
  • Graduate from cartoons to a real understanding of
    each protein machine
  • Completely understand one type of cell
  • Understand how cells make decisions in complex
    environments, such as in a multicellular organism
  • Understand how cells organize,and reorganize,
    their internal space
  • Decipher the pathways by which cells and other
    organisms evolved on the earth
  • Use our increasingly profound understanding of
    biology to design intelligent strategies to
    understand diseases

23
Why Systems Biology? (4)
  • The vision of the Institute of Systems Biology
    (ISB)
  • use systems approaches to enable in the next
    10-15 years predictive, preventive and
    personalized medicine

24
Systems Biology and D3(D3 Drug Discovery and
Development)
The vision
  • Modeling and simulation
  • can reduce the number of clinical trials that
    have to be performed on real human beings
  • can be used to design better trials once a drug
    is ready for testing in man

The Physiome Project a worldwide effort to
define the physiome by developing databases and
models which will facilitate the understanding
of the integrative functions of cells, organs
and organisms.
Currently
  • def.Physiome is the quantitative
  • and integrated description of the
  • functional behavior of the physiological
  • state of an individual or species.

25
Modeling/Simulation Potential in Life Sciences
  • Large IT investments expected
  • Experts believe bioinformatics (incl
    modeling/simulation) has the potential to reduce
  • the annual cost of developing a new drug by 33,
    and
  • the time taken for drug discovery by 30.
  • IT-related spending to rise from 12 b (01) to
    30 b (06)
  • Emerging standards and platforms SBML, BioSPICE
  • Pharma sector challenges
  • Steeply rising costs for new drugs .8 b (01) ?
    1.6 b (06)
  • 15 years average for a new drug (in addition 1
    in 5 drugs risk failure in human clinical trials)
  • 35 drugs with 73 b global sales face US patent
    expiration between 2002 and 2007

26
A biologists vision
Nobel Laureate Sydney Brenner, a professor of
biology at the Salk Institute, told participants
that he envisioned a time whenjust as the
National Academy of Sciences no longer has a
section for molecular biology because every
biologist is essentially a molecular
biologisteveryone is a computational
biologist. (The Scientist, Nov 12)
Friday, November 7,2003 Biology Keynote
Address Computational Models of Biological
Processes Sydney Brenner, D.Phil
27
Measurement challenges for Systems Biology
  • Requires high quality data as reference point for
    modeling simulation (in small and large
    experiments!)
  • Measurement process needs to be
  • comprehensive (wrt factors, time series,
    features)
  • Quantitatively accurate
  • Systematic
  • Next generation of experimental systems
    (microfluid systems, nanotechnology,
    femtochemistry,..) and supporting software
  • ? More challenging for experimental biologists!

(T. Ideker et al)
28
Modeling/computational challenges for Systems
Biology
  • Develop approaches for large complex systems
    encompassing multiple scales (in space and time)
    and with highly diversified components
  • Establish "systems engineering-oriented" ways of
    collaboration among modelers, including use of
    standards and platforms for data schemes and
    software tools used

29
Modtech diversity to match bio-complexity
  • Graphs (directed and undirected)
  • Bayesian networks
  • Boolean, generalized logical networks, polynomial
    models
  • Nonlinear ODEs (ordinary differential equations)
  • Special cases S-Systems, GMA Systems, pieceweise
    linear, qualitative
  • PDEs (partial differential equations) and other
    spatially distributed models
  • Stochastic master equations
  • Rule-based formalisms
  • Petri nets, transformational grammars, process
    algebras,.

Modtech Modeling techniques
30
Choosing the right Modtech
Source DEJO02
31
Key trend focus on motifs and modules

Lifes Complexity Pyramid (Oltvai-Barabasi,
Science 10/25/02)
System
Growing focus
Functional Modules
Building Blocks
Components
32
3. Network Motifs
  • Network motifs
  • are small subnetworks (max 5 nodes?)
  • perform specific information processing tasks (
    natural circuits)
  • repeat (in a statistically significant way)
  • are (probably) evolutionarily conserved
  • are analogous to protein motifs
  • Monod-Jacob (1961)
  • It is obvious from the analysis of these
    bacterial genetic regulatory mechanisms that
    their known elements could be connected into a
    variety of circuits endowed with any desired
    degree of stability.

33
Motif examples
  • Feedfoward Loop
  • A regulator that controls a second Regulator
  • and together they bind a common target gene
  • Function
  • A switch for rejecting transient
  • input

Biphasic amplitude filters
34
Motif classes (1)
D.Wolf, A. Arkin
35
Motif classes (2)
D.Wolf, A. Arkin
36
4. A programmatic call by cell biologists
(Nature, Dec 99)
37
Reinforcing the modular view
  • Currently
  • Cancer Research UK
  • Medicine Nobel 01

Nature, Aug 03
38
What are (functional) modules?
  • Diverse characteristics proposed
  • chemically isolated
  • operating on different time or spatial scales
  • robust
  • independently controlled
  • significant biological function
  • evolutionarily conserved
  • clustered in the graph theory sense
  • ...
  • any combination of the above

Biochemistry Biophysics
Control Engineering
Biology
Mathematics
39
Modular Design Hypothesis (1)
Science, Sep 26
  • Although Nature is more of a tinkerer (F.
    Jacob), biological networks share structural
    principles with engineered systems, e.g.
  • Modularity
  • Robustness
  • Use of recurring circuit elements

40
Modularity vs. Non-Modularity
41
(Part of) Sea Urchin GRN for development
Hood-Galas Nature, Jan 23 03
42
Modular Design Hypothesis (2)
  • We suspect that animal GRNs are modular in
    structure in that there is an enumerably small
    set of GRN building blocks from which larger
    GRNs are constructed. It is likely that larger
    modules will be hierarchichally built up from
    combinations of smaller ones
  • Some building blocks are
  • Single and two-gene feedback loops (for ensuring
    unidirectional progress of developmental
    processes)
  • Positive feedback (community effect) between
    genes in different cells (ensure that all cells
    within a territory adopt the same fate)
  • Repression gene cascades (define sharp spatial
    boundaries between cells of different future
    territories)

H.Bolouri, E.Davidson, BioEssays Dec 02
43
Research _at_ Harvard Bauer Center (1)
  • NIGMS Center of Excellence for Modular design in
    Living Systems (9/03, 15 million)
  • Projects initiated
  • Computational approaches to identifying modules
    and predicting their behavior (A. Regev)
  • Theoretical analysis of functional modules (D.
    Fisher)
  • Robustness and evolvability in simple synthetic
    modules (M. Elowitz, Caltech)

44
Harvard Bauer Center (2)
  • Module Classes (in D. Fishers project)
  • Modules that perform Boolean (logical) functions
    (eg set of genes controlling Drosophila embryo)
  • Modules that measure environmental parameters (eg
    chemotaxis modules)
  • Modules that provide quantitative control of a
    biological process (eg set of proteins that
    control assembly of a mitotic spindle of a
    certain length

45
Harvard Bauer Center (3)
  • Experimental projects initiated
  • Dissecting and evolving the mating module of
    budding yeast (A. Murray)
  • Optical methods for monitoring protein
    phosphorylation in living cells (K. Thorn)
  • Regulation and integration in bacterial cells (M.
    Laub) (genetic modules in cell cycle)
  • The stress response, a universal integrating
    module (O. Rando)
  • Inter-module integration plasticity and
    robustness in brain and behavior (H. Hofmann)

46
Motifs vs. modules
But is the difference really clear?
  • Motifs
  • small
  • Repeated (significantly)
  • information processing task
  • evolutionarily conserved
  • Modules
  • large(r)
  • Overlapping
  • Significant biological function
  • evolutionarily conserved

47
Are (circadian) clocks motifs ?
or modules?
Roenneberg-Merrow
Model complexity
48
Motifs and modules many open questions
challenges
  • Partial list (Wolf-Arkin)
  • Establishing (or disproving) the engineering
    (circuit) metaphor (eg are there motifs unknown
    to engineering lexicon?)
  • Rigorous definitions of motif and module
  • Extending homology concepts to motifs and modules
  • Consistent theories of network evolution
  • Establishing parameter regimes for motif behavior
  • Experimental measurement of dynamics in single
    cells
  • ...

49
Papers for presentation
  • Group 1 (2 members, Feb 12/17)
  • J. Heidel, J. Maloney, C. Farrow Finding Cycles
    in Synchronous Boolean Networks with Applications
    to Biochemical Systems (preprint, 37 pp)
  • Group 2 (2 members, Feb 17/19)
  • R. Laubenbacher, B. Pareigis Finite Dynamical
    Systems, Adv. In Applied Math. 26 (2001), 14 pp

50
Thanks for your attention !
  • Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com