Title: Assessment
1Assessment Inquiry
2- Talking ? Teaching
- Any more than
- Listening ? Learning
3Testing ? Assessment
4Testing ? Assessment
- What are the goals?
- What are the differences?
- Testing of vocabulary is easy
- Assessing conceptual understanding is more
difficult.
5WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO REALLY UNDERSTAND A CONCEPT?
6WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO REALLY UNDERSTAND A CONCEPT?
- The student needs to be able to State
it Explain it explicitly Apply it
appropriately Reason with it Generalize with
it Integrate it with related concepts
7What would you want your students to know or be
able to do as a result of completing the Galilean
Moons Activity?
8What would you want your students to know or be
able to do as a result of completing the Galilean
Moons Activity?
Talk with a partner to identify goals for the GM
activity.
9Share your goals for the GM activity
10Traditional Testing
- True/False
- Multiple Choice
- Fill in the blank/short answer
- Matching
- Essay
11Authentic Assessment
- Demonstration of understanding
- Presentation of findings
- Questions for further study
- Methods and interpretation of analysis
- Common authentic assessments
- Poems, posters or drawings, etc.
- Are there others?
12How do you reliably assess these assessments
- Establish assessment criteria
- Determine expert explanations
- Compare to student work
- Authentic assessment tools
- Rubistar
- http//rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php
- Field Tested Learning Assessment Guide
- http//www.flaguide/org
- Flaguide summary slide
13Assessment Practice
- Develop an authentic assessment that you could
use for student teachers Galileo Moons Activity - Share your ideas
14Sharing of ideas
15Sharing student teachers samples
- Hard copies from Debra Stork
16www.flaguide.org
- Multiple-Choice Tests Mathematical
Thinking - TPS ConcepTests Attitude Survey
- Concept Mapping Portfolios
- Conceptual Diagnostic Tests
- Interviews Student Assessment of
- Scoring Rubrics Learning Gains
(SALG)
An Assessment Primer for Introductory Astronomy.
Astronomy Education Review, 1(1), 1-24, 2002. G.
Brissenden, T.F. Slater, and R. Matheiu.
Back