Title: Mara de la Luz Domper
1The privatization of Water and Sewage Companies
in Chile
- María de la Luz Domper
- Libertad y Desarrollo, Chile
- Sestri Levante, October, 2006
1
2- The adoption of the convention of respecting
individual property and the determination of
prices on a competitive market were the only ways
in which man could become able to exploit
discoverable resources so intensely as to raise
his increasing numbers seems to me
incontestable. . . . Von Hayek, Friedrich A.
3Chile A case of sustainable development
4Top 15 in Economic Liberty
Source Economic and Liberty Index, The Heritage
Foundation,2005.
5More growth and development due to liberty
7,6
5,3
3,1
Fuente Libertad y Desarrollo.
6More growth and development due to liberty
Economic Liberty Index and Growth Economic Rate
6,00
Chile
Costa Rica
5,00
Panamá
El Salvador
Perú
4,00
Bolivia
México
(1990-2003)
Growth economic rate
3,00
Brasil
Argentina
2,00
Colombia
Ecuador
Uruguay
Paraguay
1,00
Venezuela
0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
Economic Liberty Index
Fuente The Heritage Foundation
7CHILE Economic Profile 2005
- GDP US 113 billions
- Population 16 millions
- GDP per-capita US 6.872
- External debt US 44,5 billions, 40,1 of GDP
- Internationals reserves US 16,8 billions
8Chilean economic evolution main characteristics
9Chiles economic conditions before the reforms
A closed and highly intervened economy
Source Libertad y Desarrollo.
10Chile towards a free society The Reforms
Implemented
11The economic strategy
- The market as the main mechanism to allocate
resources - The Chilean economy opened to the international
competition - Concern for macroeconomic balances as a
requirement for sustained growth - Subsidiary role of the government
12The main instruments
- Tariff reduction.
- A free price system.
- Privatization of state owned-companies.
- Tax policy to encourage private savings and
- investment.
- Private solutions
- Social security
- Education
- Health
- Infrastructure
- Focus on extreme poverty sector.
13Main Results
- High Rate of Growth
- Diversification of Exports
- Reduction in Poverty
- Better Health
- Higher Coverage in Education
- Less Contamination
14Real GDP Growth(Annual of change)
15Inflation Rate ( December to December)
16Unemployment Rate Gran Santiago(Quarterly
average, Oct- Dec)
17Foreign investment(US millions accumulated)
18Taxes on Trade
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
19The last microeconomic reform...Privatization of
Water and Sewage Companies in Chile
20- Is it possible and socially desirable to grant
private property of natural resources such as
water, so essential for human life and for the
development of productive activities? - The privatization of Water and Sewage companies
in Chile as well as the creation of private
tradable water rights are an example of the
important role of private property in the
development of a society.
21Privatization of Water and Sewage Companies
- The legal framework that rules the operation of
water and sewage companies in Chile dates from
1988. - This legislation has set a new and modern legal
rate and an institutional framework that has
influenced the development of the sector. - It did not consider the companies privatization.
These companies were mainly public until the year
2000.
22Privatization of the Sanitary Sector
- The privatization process of this sector began in
1998. - The main goal of the privatization process was
the modernization of the sector. - Problems like operational and management
inefficiencies, service quality, and lack of
resources to treat served water were common in
the past.
23Main Problems of the Sector before its
privatization
- Investment deficit there was a need of resources
of 2.400 million dollars for the period (1995 and
2000), US250 million per year. - 63 of which, should be allocated to treatment
and disposition of waste water process. - In those years (1993,1994) the state sanitary
companies only invested US150 millions per year.
24Coverage of the Chilean Sanitary Sector 1993
25How was the privatization process handled ?
- Two different strategies were implemented.
- The first one, during President Freis
administration, considered the privatization of
some companies. - The second one, handled during President Lagoss
administration, considered the concession of the
water companies to the private sector for the
next 30 years.
26Privatization effects
27Coverage EffectsSanitary Urban Area
Source Sanitary Sector 2005 Report,
Superintendence of Sanitary Services, Mayo 2006.
28Operational Profitability of the Sector
29Effects on Investment
- Between 1995 and 2005 companies invested US
2.789 million, of which, private companies
invested 63 (US 1.763 million), and public
companies 37 (US 1.026 millions). - Projections for the period 2006-2016 indicate
that this sector requires US1.339 millions. - The private sector shall contribute with 100 of
these requirements.
30State Annual Earnings With and Without
Privatization
31Which one is better Privatization or Concession?
- The principles of liberalism are condensed in a
simple word ownership or the private control of
the production factors (since the consumption
goods must evidently be a simple private
condition). Ludwig Von Mises.
32- In spite that the analysis term is relatively
short and given the fact that the last sanitary
company was given in concession in the year 2004,
some productivity and management indicators show
that the performance of the sanitary companies
that were privatized is better than the companies
that were given in concession
33- The average of clients per employee is higher in
the privatized companies than in the companies
given under concession - The private companies billed in average more than
the sanitary companies given in concession in
terms of m3 of drinking water per employee. - The explotation costs and average billing for m3
are less in the private sanitary companies than
in the sanitary companies under concession. - The administration expenditures and sales per
client are higher for the sanitary companies
under concession than for the privatized sanitary
companies.
34The investment carried out and projected is
higher for the privatized companies than the ones
projected for the concessioned companies.
35Main Problems of Concessions
- Lack of adequate legislation.
- Disincentive to invest.
- Decrease in the quality of the service.
- A higher price of the service.
- The public company as a shell, is maintained
since it is the one granting the concession to
the private party.
36Creation of tradable Water rights in Chile
- Since 1980 the property of water rights is
independent from land property. Water rights are
freely tradable in water markets. This has
encouraged an efficient use of hydro resources in
economic activities, like mining and
hydroelectric generation.
37Situation Before 1981 Water Code
- Before there were no water rights in Chile.
- Instead there were water favors granted by the
State by a revocable act, for which anyone who
efficiently uses water was risking that the
Authority would consider that there was not a
need of such big amount of water and reduce its
favors. - In this situation, investment and productivity
were not promoted since there was no assurance of
benefiting from the investment.
381981 Water Code Principles
- The right of water usage is assigned at
perpetuity. The complete domain of the water
usage is delivered (use, enjoyment and
disposition). Additionally it contemplates the
auction mechanism to assign the right between two
or more competitors. - The rights are transferable. This allows price
system to operate. the price reflects the cost
that each alternative use of the resource has. - It is not necessary to justify what you will
do with the water consequently, the usage right
is not tied to one specific use.
39- Consumptives and Non- Consumptives types of
rights were established. This rights can be of
permanent practice or eventual practice. - It creates the non consumptive right figure
which allows overlapping possible use of the
water with the only limitation that the rights
should not affect the ones previously
constituted. - Users manage the resource in an organized way.
- The role of the State is to maintain the
administrative powers and to grant rights for
usage.
40Transactions of Usage Rights
- There are few studies in Chile regarding rights
transactions, and as it is stated in an analysis
of the World Bank, the comparisons among them are
limited since they are based on different
information sources.
41- Bauer(1993) study presents data on the
transactions executed in Los Angeles (VIII
Region). He founded that 25 of the water
transactions were independent from the land
domain. - Hearne (1994), delivers information on the
transactions of water rights carried out in the
Maipo, Elqui and Limari rivers (IV and V Region).
He manily founded transactions were sanitary
companies purchase water rights. The price paid
per right was between US 1.100 - US 4.500.
42- A more recent study on water rights transactions
is the one of O. Cristi, Vicuña S., T. de Azevedo
L., Baltar A., (2000). This research analyses the
behavior of the water market in the Limari basin
(65.000 Ha. of irrigated water). - The study concludes that the permanent market of
water rights is quite developed. During the
period 1980-2000, the percentage of reassigned
water rights in each association, independently
of the land, fluctuated from 20 to 50. - At the same time, the increases in prices (of 41
up to 240) indicates that the market is able to
reflect the scarceness of water resources.
43Conclusion...
- There are not many studies which allows to make
an accurate analysis on how water market has
operated. Nevertheless, the results delivered
show that there are transactions of these rights
among peasants and among these with some
companies performed through the market and the
price system.