Title: The Ethics of Biological Modification of Human Beings
1The Ethics of Biological Modification of Human
Beings Julian Savulescu Uehiro Professor of
Practical Ethics University of Oxford
2Radical Alteration of Humans
- Current Possibilities
- Transgenesis
- Chimeras
- Human-Animal
3(No Transcript)
4Transgenesis
- Current uses
- Medical research
- Disease resistant species
- Products useful to humans
- Xenotransplantation
5Chimeras
- Animal
- Human
- Human-Animal
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19The Threat to Humanity
- Objection
- Threat to humanity
- Unnatural
- Affront to human dignity
- transgression of the unspeakably profound.
- Repugnance may be the only voice left that
speaks up to defend the central core of humanity
Leon Kass
20What is Humanity?
- Distinguishes us from other animals
- Candidate properties for our moral status
- capacity to reason
- capacity to act from normative reasons, including
moral reasons - capacity to act autonomously
- capacity to engage in complex social
relationships - capacity to display empathy and sympathy
- capacity to have faith (believe in a god)
21What Promotes or Erodes Our Humanity?
- Actions which express our humanity
- Express our practical rationality
- Modification to prevent disease vs creation of
freaks for entertainment - Actions which erode or promote the capacity to
engage in practical reasoning - Improved sensory capacity, longevity, empathy,
rationality, memory vs ferociousness, violence
22Conclusion
- Radical genetic alteration of humans is not
necessarily a threat to our humanity - It may be
- But it may promote our humanity
- Another lesson
- Can does not imply will
- Against the empirical version of the slippery
slope argument
23Vision
- Redefine the purpose of science and medical
research - 20th century medicine treat and prevent disease
- 21st century medicine should develop and use
science and medical technology not just to
prevent or treat disease, but to enhance peoples
lives through biological modification - We should we make happier, better people
24Making Better People Now
- Cosmetic surgery, botox, beauty industry,
appetite suppressants, body art, piercing,
tattooing - Children bat ears, growth hormone
- Sport EPO, anabolic steroids, growth hormone
- Identification of athletes on the basis of
genetic potential ACTN3 - Cognitive enhancement nicotine, ritalin,
modavigil, caffeine - Mood enhancement psychological self-help,
prozac, recreational drugs, alcohol
25Making Better People Now
- Sexual performance/drive
- Hormonal castration of paedophiles
- Viagra
- 34 of all men 40-70 around 20 million in the
US have some erectile dysfunction - Only 1 in 5 seek help
- 20 million men world wide use viagra
- Largely treats effects of normal aging
- 12 decline in erectile function every decade
normally. - May prevent impotence - preventative
26Much more radical biological enhancement is
possible
- Longevity
- Cure disease 12 years
- Stem cell science
- Quality of life
27(No Transcript)
28(No Transcript)
29Radical Biological Enhancement
- Biology and how we live animal research
- Hard working monkey
- Monogamous prairie vole vs polygamous meadow vole
- Neuroscience to treat and prevent disease
- Environmental stimulation, prozac, nerve growth
factors - Prevents degeneration rats with the gene for
Huntington Disease - Enhance in normals?
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33Behavioural Genetics
- genes which are associated with non-disease
states, such as psychological types, personality
traits, intelligence and behaviour in general. - aggression and criminal behaviour
- alcoholism and addiction
- anxiety
- personality disorders
- psychiatric diseases
- homosexuality
- maternal behaviour
- memory and intelligence
- neuroticism and novelty seeking.
- ACTN3 and sprint/endurance performance
34Possibility of Enhancement
- Genetic selection
- By mating
- Prenatal diagnosis
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis
- against diseases
- sex selection
- height
- Biological manipulation
- Pharmacology
- Genetic manipulation
35The ethical question - should we enhance?
- We should be happy people, not just healthy
people.
36First Argument for Enhancement
- 1. Choosing not to enhance is harming
- Dietary neglect results in a child with a
stunning intellect becoming normal - Wrong
- Failure to institute some diet means a normal
child fails to achieve a stunning intellect - Equally wrong
- Substitute biological intervention for diet
37Moral Responsibility
- Ought implies can
- When we could not affect the biological nature of
our children, we were not responsible for their
deficiencies and disabilities - Can (roughly) implies ought to decide
- When we can influence the biology of our
children, we are morally responsible for the
foreseeable consequences of failing to
intervene/leaving it to nature - We can be morally responsible for the foreseeable
consequences of our omissions sins of omission
38Second Argument Consistency
- We accept environmental interventions
education, diet - Train children to be well behaved, co-operative
and intelligent - We accept drugs
- Ritalin, growth hormone
- But could increase production or number of
receptors by genetic modification
39Consistency
- There is no difference between environmental and
biological intervention - Rats given stimulating environment vs prozac
40Consistency
- Environmental manipulations affect biology
- Maternal care and stress
- hippocampal development
- cognitive, psychological and immune deficits
later in life - Early experience can actually modify protein-DNA
interactions that regulate gene expression,
(changes in methylation id DNA) Michael Meaney
41Prozac
- Alters brain chemistry serotonin reuptake
inhibitor - Early in life acts as a nerve growth factor
- But may alter the brain early in life to make it
more prone to stress and anxiety later in life,
by altering receptor development (Science, 29
October 2004) - people with a polymorphism that reduced their
serotonin activity were more likely than others
to become depressed in response to stressful
experiences (Science, 18 July 2003)
42Third Argument No difference to disease
- If we accept the treatment and prevention of
disease, we should accept enhancement - Goodness of health is what drives a moral
obligation to treat or prevent disease - Health is not what matters health enables us to
live disease prevents us from doing what we want
and what is good - But how well our lives goes depends on our
biology (in part) - Drives a moral obligation to enhance
43Abortion as Enhancement
- Pregnancy is not a disease
- Abortion is not (generally) a medical treatment
- Abortion is provided because it makes womens
lives go better
44Should we aim at perfection?
- It is a brute fact that we are different. Those
differences are, in large part, biological. And
not all differences are equal.
45What is the best life?
- Addressing the Value Skeptic
- Life with the most well-being
- Philosophers have exercised themselves for
several thousand years on what constitutes
well-being - There are various theories of well-being
hedonistic, desire-fulfilment, objective list - Not just absence of disease.
- People trade length of life for non-health
related well-being- smoking, alcohol, risk
46What is the best life?
- We do have some idea of the good life
- Social institutions and scientific research aimed
at addressing this - Services to enable people lead good lives
- Ask advice
- Self help
- Education of children
47Opportunity/Capability
- Determined by
- Genes
- Environment parenting, social institutions,
material resources - Increase capabilities/reduce disabilities
- Improve chances of a good life
48Disability
- X is a disability in circumstances c if
- 1. X reduces the goodness of a life and/or
- 2. X reduces the chances of a person realising a
possible good life - Disability is viewed as a bad thing
- That is why we try to cure it
49Examples of Character Traits Improving
Well-Being Self Control
- Disabilities are
- Pervasive
- Can be character traits flaws in character
- Can range from insignificant to profound
- Eg lack of self-control
50Self Control
- In the 1960s Walter Mischel conducted impulse
control experiments where 4-year-old children
were left in a room with one marshmallow, after
being told that if they did not eat the
marshmallow, they could later have two. - Some children would eat it as soon as the
researcher left. - Others would use a variety of strategies to help
control their behaviour and ignore the temptation
of the single marshmallow.
51Self Control
- A decade later, they found that those who were
better at delaying gratification had - more friends
- better academic performance
- more motivation to succeed.
- Whether the child had grabbed for the marshmallow
had a much stronger bearing on their SAT scores
than did their IQ. - Impulse control has also been linked to
socioeconomic control and avoiding conflict with
the law. - Poor impulse control is a disability
52Other Categories
- All Purpose Goods
- Intelligence
- Memory
- Self- discipline
- Foresight
- Patience
- Sense of humour
- Optimism
53Other Categories
- Hearing can become deaf but the deaf cannot
become hearing. - Future opportunity-enhancing
- Hearing
- 4 limbs
- Open future
- Future opportunity-restricting
- Deafness
- Limb amputation (for apotemnophilia)
54Other Categories
- Autonomy enhancing
- Improving the psychological capacities necessary
for autonomy - concept of self
- ability to remember, understand and deliberate on
relevant information - strength of will
- foresight
- empathy, etc
- Our moral character
- empathy, imagination, sympathy, fairness,
honesty, etc - Monkeys and grape
- We try to instil these character traits, which
are biological states, by education.
55Other Specific Examples
- Religiosity
- Criminality
- Dutch family criminality mutation in the MAO
region of X chromosome - Blushing, shyness, stuttering
56Should we make happier people?
- Genes, not men, may hold the key to female
pleasure - genes accounted for 31 per cent of the chance of
having an orgasm during intercourse and 51 per
cent during masturbation - ability to gain sexual satisfaction is largely
inherited - The genes involved could be linked to physical
differences is sex organs and hormone levels or
factors such as mood and anxiety. - The Age, June 8, 2005
57How do we decide?
- Nature or God
- Experts philosophers, bioethicists,
psychologists, scientists - Authorities government, doctors
- Decide for ourselves liberty and autonomy
58How do we decide?
- Principle of liberal state
- Neutrality to conceptions of the good life
- Personal Autonomy
- Sole ground for interference is harm to others
- Advice, persuasion, information, dialogue
permissible - Negative liberty coercion and infringement of
liberty impermissible
59Limits of positive liberty
- What should be provided?
- Safety
- Harm to others
- Distributive justice
60 Children
- Young children, embryos and fetuses
- Who decides?
- Nature or God
- Experts philosophers, bioethicists,
psychologists, scientists - Authorities government, doctors - eugenics
- Parents procreative liberty and autonomy
61Justifications for Procreative Liberty
- Privacy of reproduction
- Parents bear costs of child-rearing
- Parents know best what kind of family they can
raise - Experiments in living
62Limits to Procreative Liberty
- Safety
- Harm to others
- Distributive justice
- Plausible conception of well-being and a better
life for the child - Consistent with development of autonomy in child
and a reasonable range of future life plans
63Summary Arguments
- What matters is human well-being, not only
treatment and prevention of disease - Our biology affects our opportunities to live
well - Our biology affects how we experience stimuli
- Essence of humanity is to choose to be better
- The biological route is no different to the
environmental - Biological manipulation to increase opportunity
and reduce disability is right
64Objection 1 Playing God
- We are not omnipotent and omniscient
- Genes are pleiotropic- genes for manic depression
may also promote creativity - Responses
- We play God already life is nasty, brutish and
short - Caution but balance benefits against risks
- Selection preferable to enhancement
65Objection 2 Change Society, Not People
- We should alter social arrangements to promote
well-being, not biologically alter people - Related disability is socially constructed
- Response
- Biopsychosocial fit
- We should consider all modifications, and choose
the modification, or combination, which is best - Skin colour
- Social modification and discrimination
- Biological modification and environmental risk
66Social Not Biological Enhancement
- Good Reasons to Prefer Social Rather Than
Biological Intervention - If it is safer
- If it is more likely to be successful
- If justice requires it (based on the limitations
of resources) - If there are benefits to others or less harm
- If it is identity preserving
- BUT VICE VERSA
67Objection 3 Value of Diversity
- Enhancement would narrow the range of
characteristics - Diversity is a value
- Response
- Evolution has no design it is indifferent to
how well our lives go - Not all diversity is good psychopathy
- Engineer diversity
68Objection 4 Discriminination
- a two class society of the enhanced and the
unenhanced, where the inferior unenhanced are
discriminated against and disadvantaged all
through life - Gattaca
69Responses
- Nature alots advantage and disadvantage with no
mind to fairness. - Some are born horribly disadvantaged, destined to
die after short and miserable lives. - Some suffer great genetic disadvantage while
others are born gifted, physically, musically or
intellectually. - nothing fair about the natural lottery
- allowing enhancement could be used to reduce
natural inequality.
70Egalitarian social institutions
- how well the lives of those who are disadvantaged
go depends not on whether enhancement is
permitted, but on the social institutions we have
in place to protect the least well off and
provide everyone with a fair go. - People have disease and disability egalitarian
social institutions and laws against
discrimination are designed to make sure
everyone, regardless of natural inequality, has a
decent chance of a decent life.
71Discrimination
- How the biologically modified and unmodified are
treated is our choice - Equal concern and respect is possible in a world
of biological modification
72Objection 5 Enhancement Alters Identity
- Significant cognitive or other psychological
enhancement may alter identity - Complex
- Voluntary permissible
- Early in life like selection
73Objection 6 Value of Loss, Suffering, Limitation
and Mystery of Life
- Presidents Commissions Beyond Therapy
- Traumatic memories, shame, and guilt, are, it is
true, psychic pains. In extreme doses, they can
be crippling. Yet, short of the extreme, they can
also be helpful and fitting. They are appropriate
responses to horror, disgraceful conduct,
injustice, and sin, and, as such, help teach us
to avoid them or fight against them in the
future.
74Beyond Therapy
- there appears to be a connection between the
possibility of feeling deep unhappiness and the
prospects for achieving genuine happiness. If one
cannot grieve, one has not truly loved. To be
capable of aspiration, one must know and feel
lack. The world would be a sterile, monotonous
place where everyone is the same, and the mystery
and surprise of life is gone. - Michael Sandel we must be open to the unbidden
75Shakespeare
- The web of our life is of mingled yarn, good and
ill together our virtues would be proud if our
faults whippd them not, and our crimes would
despair if they were not cherishd by our
virtues. - Alls Well that Ends Well
- Thanks to Mike Parker for example
76Responses
- Introduce suffering, difficulty, light and dark
- Not all will enhance 10 choose not to abort
Down syndrome - There will be plenty of challenge and mystery
left in an uncertain world - Better children may be possible perfect children
will not - One can choose to go to a good play rather than
a poor one, and still experience the mystery of
events as they unfold.
77Objection 7 Self-defeating (or Unfair)
- If everyone stands on tiptoes, no one sees better
- But distinguish between
- positional goods height
- Non-positional goods - memory
- Question of justice not particular to
biological modification - If significant, make it free, like health care
78Public Interest
- Public interest is a legitimate ground for
interfering in liberty in extreme cases - Violence
- Health crisis - Cyprus
- We are responsible for the outcome would we harm
some person for the sake of the public interest? - Denying enhancement is a harm
79Conclusion
- 21st century medicine and medical research should
be to develop interventions which not only
prevent and treat disease, but make peoples
lives better. - Future
- Genetic engineering artificial chromosomes
- Internal technology nanotechnology, artificial
intelligence - Scientific and medical research is the way to
realise this future
80- The reasonable man adapts himself to the world
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt
the world to himself. Therefore all progress
depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman IV.
81Conclusion
- Shaw is wrong
- Sometimes it is rational to adapt biologically or
psychologically to the world - Sometimes it is rational to change the world
- Sometimes, we should accept things just as they
are - Which course of action or inaction we choose
depends on the benefits and risks, the
opportunity costs and the context
82Obligation to Consider Enhancement
- What we must do is consider all options and make
an active choice which reason supports - We good reason to be better
- We can no longer leave our lives thoughtlessly to
chance
83- We should be here for a good time, not just a
long time. - Biology will provide one answer how...