The Ethics of Biological Modification of Human Beings - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 83
About This Presentation
Title:

The Ethics of Biological Modification of Human Beings

Description:

The Ethics of Biological Modification of Human Beings. Julian ... Monogamous prairie vole vs polygamous meadow vole. Neuroscience to treat and prevent disease ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:212
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 84
Provided by: Mira161
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Ethics of Biological Modification of Human Beings


1
The Ethics of Biological Modification of Human
Beings Julian Savulescu Uehiro Professor of
Practical Ethics University of Oxford
2
Radical Alteration of Humans
  • Current Possibilities
  • Transgenesis
  • Chimeras
  • Human-Animal

3
(No Transcript)
4
Transgenesis
  • Current uses
  • Medical research
  • Disease resistant species
  • Products useful to humans
  • Xenotransplantation

5
Chimeras
  • Animal
  • Human
  • Human-Animal

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
The Threat to Humanity
  • Objection
  • Threat to humanity
  • Unnatural
  • Affront to human dignity
  • transgression of the unspeakably profound.
  • Repugnance may be the only voice left that
    speaks up to defend the central core of humanity
    Leon Kass

20
What is Humanity?
  • Distinguishes us from other animals
  • Candidate properties for our moral status
  • capacity to reason
  • capacity to act from normative reasons, including
    moral reasons
  • capacity to act autonomously
  • capacity to engage in complex social
    relationships
  • capacity to display empathy and sympathy
  • capacity to have faith (believe in a god)

21
What Promotes or Erodes Our Humanity?
  • Actions which express our humanity
  • Express our practical rationality
  • Modification to prevent disease vs creation of
    freaks for entertainment
  • Actions which erode or promote the capacity to
    engage in practical reasoning
  • Improved sensory capacity, longevity, empathy,
    rationality, memory vs ferociousness, violence

22
Conclusion
  • Radical genetic alteration of humans is not
    necessarily a threat to our humanity
  • It may be
  • But it may promote our humanity
  • Another lesson
  • Can does not imply will
  • Against the empirical version of the slippery
    slope argument

23
Vision
  • Redefine the purpose of science and medical
    research
  • 20th century medicine treat and prevent disease
  • 21st century medicine should develop and use
    science and medical technology not just to
    prevent or treat disease, but to enhance peoples
    lives through biological modification
  • We should we make happier, better people

24
Making Better People Now
  • Cosmetic surgery, botox, beauty industry,
    appetite suppressants, body art, piercing,
    tattooing
  • Children bat ears, growth hormone
  • Sport EPO, anabolic steroids, growth hormone
  • Identification of athletes on the basis of
    genetic potential ACTN3
  • Cognitive enhancement nicotine, ritalin,
    modavigil, caffeine
  • Mood enhancement psychological self-help,
    prozac, recreational drugs, alcohol

25
Making Better People Now
  • Sexual performance/drive
  • Hormonal castration of paedophiles
  • Viagra
  • 34 of all men 40-70 around 20 million in the
    US have some erectile dysfunction
  • Only 1 in 5 seek help
  • 20 million men world wide use viagra
  • Largely treats effects of normal aging
  • 12 decline in erectile function every decade
    normally.
  • May prevent impotence - preventative

26
Much more radical biological enhancement is
possible
  • Longevity
  • Cure disease 12 years
  • Stem cell science
  • Quality of life

27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Radical Biological Enhancement
  • Biology and how we live animal research
  • Hard working monkey
  • Monogamous prairie vole vs polygamous meadow vole
  • Neuroscience to treat and prevent disease
  • Environmental stimulation, prozac, nerve growth
    factors
  • Prevents degeneration rats with the gene for
    Huntington Disease
  • Enhance in normals?

30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
Behavioural Genetics
  • genes which are associated with non-disease
    states, such as psychological types, personality
    traits, intelligence and behaviour in general.
  • aggression and criminal behaviour
  • alcoholism and addiction
  • anxiety
  • personality disorders
  • psychiatric diseases
  • homosexuality
  • maternal behaviour
  • memory and intelligence
  • neuroticism and novelty seeking.
  • ACTN3 and sprint/endurance performance

34
Possibility of Enhancement
  • Genetic selection
  • By mating
  • Prenatal diagnosis
  • Preimplantation genetic diagnosis
  • against diseases
  • sex selection
  • height
  • Biological manipulation
  • Pharmacology
  • Genetic manipulation

35
The ethical question - should we enhance?
  • We should be happy people, not just healthy
    people.

36
First Argument for Enhancement
  • 1. Choosing not to enhance is harming
  • Dietary neglect results in a child with a
    stunning intellect becoming normal
  • Wrong
  • Failure to institute some diet means a normal
    child fails to achieve a stunning intellect
  • Equally wrong
  • Substitute biological intervention for diet

37
Moral Responsibility
  • Ought implies can
  • When we could not affect the biological nature of
    our children, we were not responsible for their
    deficiencies and disabilities
  • Can (roughly) implies ought to decide
  • When we can influence the biology of our
    children, we are morally responsible for the
    foreseeable consequences of failing to
    intervene/leaving it to nature
  • We can be morally responsible for the foreseeable
    consequences of our omissions sins of omission

38
Second Argument Consistency
  • We accept environmental interventions
    education, diet
  • Train children to be well behaved, co-operative
    and intelligent
  • We accept drugs
  • Ritalin, growth hormone
  • But could increase production or number of
    receptors by genetic modification

39
Consistency
  • There is no difference between environmental and
    biological intervention
  • Rats given stimulating environment vs prozac

40
Consistency
  • Environmental manipulations affect biology
  • Maternal care and stress
  • hippocampal development
  • cognitive, psychological and immune deficits
    later in life
  • Early experience can actually modify protein-DNA
    interactions that regulate gene expression,
    (changes in methylation id DNA) Michael Meaney

41
Prozac
  • Alters brain chemistry serotonin reuptake
    inhibitor
  • Early in life acts as a nerve growth factor
  • But may alter the brain early in life to make it
    more prone to stress and anxiety later in life,
    by altering receptor development (Science, 29
    October 2004)
  • people with a polymorphism that reduced their
    serotonin activity were more likely than others
    to become depressed in response to stressful
    experiences (Science, 18 July 2003)

42
Third Argument No difference to disease
  • If we accept the treatment and prevention of
    disease, we should accept enhancement
  • Goodness of health is what drives a moral
    obligation to treat or prevent disease
  • Health is not what matters health enables us to
    live disease prevents us from doing what we want
    and what is good
  • But how well our lives goes depends on our
    biology (in part)
  • Drives a moral obligation to enhance

43
Abortion as Enhancement
  • Pregnancy is not a disease
  • Abortion is not (generally) a medical treatment
  • Abortion is provided because it makes womens
    lives go better

44
Should we aim at perfection?
  • It is a brute fact that we are different. Those
    differences are, in large part, biological. And
    not all differences are equal.

45
What is the best life?
  • Addressing the Value Skeptic
  • Life with the most well-being
  • Philosophers have exercised themselves for
    several thousand years on what constitutes
    well-being
  • There are various theories of well-being
    hedonistic, desire-fulfilment, objective list
  • Not just absence of disease.
  • People trade length of life for non-health
    related well-being- smoking, alcohol, risk

46
What is the best life?
  • We do have some idea of the good life
  • Social institutions and scientific research aimed
    at addressing this
  • Services to enable people lead good lives
  • Ask advice
  • Self help
  • Education of children

47
Opportunity/Capability
  • Determined by
  • Genes
  • Environment parenting, social institutions,
    material resources
  • Increase capabilities/reduce disabilities
  • Improve chances of a good life

48
Disability
  • X is a disability in circumstances c if
  • 1. X reduces the goodness of a life and/or
  • 2. X reduces the chances of a person realising a
    possible good life
  • Disability is viewed as a bad thing
  • That is why we try to cure it

49
Examples of Character Traits Improving
Well-Being Self Control
  • Disabilities are
  • Pervasive
  • Can be character traits flaws in character
  • Can range from insignificant to profound
  • Eg lack of self-control

50
Self Control
  • In the 1960s Walter Mischel conducted impulse
    control experiments where 4-year-old children
    were left in a room with one marshmallow, after
    being told that if they did not eat the
    marshmallow, they could later have two.
  • Some children would eat it as soon as the
    researcher left.
  • Others would use a variety of strategies to help
    control their behaviour and ignore the temptation
    of the single marshmallow.

51
Self Control
  • A decade later, they found that those who were
    better at delaying gratification had
  • more friends
  • better academic performance
  • more motivation to succeed.
  • Whether the child had grabbed for the marshmallow
    had a much stronger bearing on their SAT scores
    than did their IQ.
  • Impulse control has also been linked to
    socioeconomic control and avoiding conflict with
    the law.
  • Poor impulse control is a disability

52
Other Categories
  • All Purpose Goods
  • Intelligence
  • Memory
  • Self- discipline
  • Foresight
  • Patience
  • Sense of humour
  • Optimism

53
Other Categories
  • Hearing can become deaf but the deaf cannot
    become hearing.
  • Future opportunity-enhancing
  • Hearing
  • 4 limbs
  • Open future
  • Future opportunity-restricting
  • Deafness
  • Limb amputation (for apotemnophilia)

54
Other Categories
  • Autonomy enhancing
  • Improving the psychological capacities necessary
    for autonomy
  • concept of self
  • ability to remember, understand and deliberate on
    relevant information
  • strength of will
  • foresight
  • empathy, etc
  • Our moral character
  • empathy, imagination, sympathy, fairness,
    honesty, etc
  • Monkeys and grape
  • We try to instil these character traits, which
    are biological states, by education.

55
Other Specific Examples
  • Religiosity
  • Criminality
  • Dutch family criminality mutation in the MAO
    region of X chromosome
  • Blushing, shyness, stuttering

56
Should we make happier people?
  • Genes, not men, may hold the key to female
    pleasure
  • genes accounted for 31 per cent of the chance of
    having an orgasm during intercourse and 51 per
    cent during masturbation
  • ability to gain sexual satisfaction is largely
    inherited
  • The genes involved could be linked to physical
    differences is sex organs and hormone levels or
    factors such as mood and anxiety.
  • The Age, June 8, 2005

57
How do we decide?
  • Nature or God
  • Experts philosophers, bioethicists,
    psychologists, scientists
  • Authorities government, doctors
  • Decide for ourselves liberty and autonomy

58
How do we decide?
  • Principle of liberal state
  • Neutrality to conceptions of the good life
  • Personal Autonomy
  • Sole ground for interference is harm to others
  • Advice, persuasion, information, dialogue
    permissible
  • Negative liberty coercion and infringement of
    liberty impermissible

59
Limits of positive liberty
  • What should be provided?
  • Safety
  • Harm to others
  • Distributive justice

60
Children
  • Young children, embryos and fetuses
  • Who decides?
  • Nature or God
  • Experts philosophers, bioethicists,
    psychologists, scientists
  • Authorities government, doctors - eugenics
  • Parents procreative liberty and autonomy

61
Justifications for Procreative Liberty
  • Privacy of reproduction
  • Parents bear costs of child-rearing
  • Parents know best what kind of family they can
    raise
  • Experiments in living

62
Limits to Procreative Liberty
  • Safety
  • Harm to others
  • Distributive justice
  • Plausible conception of well-being and a better
    life for the child
  • Consistent with development of autonomy in child
    and a reasonable range of future life plans

63
Summary Arguments
  • What matters is human well-being, not only
    treatment and prevention of disease
  • Our biology affects our opportunities to live
    well
  • Our biology affects how we experience stimuli
  • Essence of humanity is to choose to be better
  • The biological route is no different to the
    environmental
  • Biological manipulation to increase opportunity
    and reduce disability is right

64
Objection 1 Playing God
  • We are not omnipotent and omniscient
  • Genes are pleiotropic- genes for manic depression
    may also promote creativity
  • Responses
  • We play God already life is nasty, brutish and
    short
  • Caution but balance benefits against risks
  • Selection preferable to enhancement

65
Objection 2 Change Society, Not People
  • We should alter social arrangements to promote
    well-being, not biologically alter people
  • Related disability is socially constructed
  • Response
  • Biopsychosocial fit
  • We should consider all modifications, and choose
    the modification, or combination, which is best
  • Skin colour
  • Social modification and discrimination
  • Biological modification and environmental risk

66
Social Not Biological Enhancement
  • Good Reasons to Prefer Social Rather Than
    Biological Intervention
  • If it is safer
  • If it is more likely to be successful
  • If justice requires it (based on the limitations
    of resources)
  • If there are benefits to others or less harm
  • If it is identity preserving
  • BUT VICE VERSA

67
Objection 3 Value of Diversity
  • Enhancement would narrow the range of
    characteristics
  • Diversity is a value
  • Response
  • Evolution has no design it is indifferent to
    how well our lives go
  • Not all diversity is good psychopathy
  • Engineer diversity

68
Objection 4 Discriminination
  • a two class society of the enhanced and the
    unenhanced, where the inferior unenhanced are
    discriminated against and disadvantaged all
    through life
  • Gattaca

69
Responses
  • Nature alots advantage and disadvantage with no
    mind to fairness.
  • Some are born horribly disadvantaged, destined to
    die after short and miserable lives.
  • Some suffer great genetic disadvantage while
    others are born gifted, physically, musically or
    intellectually.
  • nothing fair about the natural lottery
  • allowing enhancement could be used to reduce
    natural inequality.

70
Egalitarian social institutions
  • how well the lives of those who are disadvantaged
    go depends not on whether enhancement is
    permitted, but on the social institutions we have
    in place to protect the least well off and
    provide everyone with a fair go.
  • People have disease and disability egalitarian
    social institutions and laws against
    discrimination are designed to make sure
    everyone, regardless of natural inequality, has a
    decent chance of a decent life.

71
Discrimination
  • How the biologically modified and unmodified are
    treated is our choice
  • Equal concern and respect is possible in a world
    of biological modification

72
Objection 5 Enhancement Alters Identity
  • Significant cognitive or other psychological
    enhancement may alter identity
  • Complex
  • Voluntary permissible
  • Early in life like selection

73
Objection 6 Value of Loss, Suffering, Limitation
and Mystery of Life
  • Presidents Commissions Beyond Therapy
  • Traumatic memories, shame, and guilt, are, it is
    true, psychic pains. In extreme doses, they can
    be crippling. Yet, short of the extreme, they can
    also be helpful and fitting. They are appropriate
    responses to horror, disgraceful conduct,
    injustice, and sin, and, as such, help teach us
    to avoid them or fight against them in the
    future.

74
Beyond Therapy
  • there appears to be a connection between the
    possibility of feeling deep unhappiness and the
    prospects for achieving genuine happiness. If one
    cannot grieve, one has not truly loved. To be
    capable of aspiration, one must know and feel
    lack. The world would be a sterile, monotonous
    place where everyone is the same, and the mystery
    and surprise of life is gone.
  • Michael Sandel we must be open to the unbidden

75
Shakespeare
  • The web of our life is of mingled yarn, good and
    ill together our virtues would be proud if our
    faults whippd them not, and our crimes would
    despair if they were not cherishd by our
    virtues.
  • Alls Well that Ends Well
  • Thanks to Mike Parker for example

76
Responses
  • Introduce suffering, difficulty, light and dark
  • Not all will enhance 10 choose not to abort
    Down syndrome
  • There will be plenty of challenge and mystery
    left in an uncertain world
  • Better children may be possible perfect children
    will not
  • One can choose to go to a good play rather than
    a poor one, and still experience the mystery of
    events as they unfold.

77
Objection 7 Self-defeating (or Unfair)
  • If everyone stands on tiptoes, no one sees better
  • But distinguish between
  • positional goods height
  • Non-positional goods - memory
  • Question of justice not particular to
    biological modification
  • If significant, make it free, like health care

78
Public Interest
  • Public interest is a legitimate ground for
    interfering in liberty in extreme cases
  • Violence
  • Health crisis - Cyprus
  • We are responsible for the outcome would we harm
    some person for the sake of the public interest?
  • Denying enhancement is a harm

79
Conclusion
  • 21st century medicine and medical research should
    be to develop interventions which not only
    prevent and treat disease, but make peoples
    lives better.
  • Future
  • Genetic engineering artificial chromosomes
  • Internal technology nanotechnology, artificial
    intelligence
  • Scientific and medical research is the way to
    realise this future

80
  • The reasonable man adapts himself to the world
    the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt
    the world to himself. Therefore all progress
    depends on the unreasonable man.
  • George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman IV.

81
Conclusion
  • Shaw is wrong
  • Sometimes it is rational to adapt biologically or
    psychologically to the world
  • Sometimes it is rational to change the world
  • Sometimes, we should accept things just as they
    are
  • Which course of action or inaction we choose
    depends on the benefits and risks, the
    opportunity costs and the context

82
Obligation to Consider Enhancement
  • What we must do is consider all options and make
    an active choice which reason supports
  • We good reason to be better
  • We can no longer leave our lives thoughtlessly to
    chance

83
  • We should be here for a good time, not just a
    long time.
  • Biology will provide one answer how...
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com