CADTH and the Health Technology Inquiry Service - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

CADTH and the Health Technology Inquiry Service

Description:

Medical and surgical procedures. Drugs, vaccines, and blood products ... To inform health technology decisions when evidence is required in a short timeframe ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: alla65
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CADTH and the Health Technology Inquiry Service


1
CADTH and the Health Technology Inquiry Service
Jeannette Smith Stakeholder Relations Officer
  • August 2008

2
Presentation
  • CADTH Overview
  • Health Technology Inquiry Service
  • Purpose
  • Products
  • Processes
  • Examples
  • Access

3
CADTH
  • Founded in 1989 by the Canadian federal,
    provincial, and territorial Deputy Ministers of
    Health
  • Private, not-for-profit organization
  • Funded by Health Canada, the provinces and
    territories (except Quebec)
  • Head office in Ottawa
  • Second office in Edmonton
  • Liaison presence in all provinces and territories
    (except Quebec)

4
CADTH
  • Canadas national health technology agency
  • Three programs
  • 140 employees

5
The need for CADTH
  • Drugs and health technologies are major drivers
    of health care costs
  • Concerns about appropriate care
  • Uncertainty regarding clinical benefit
  • Quality problem overuse, underuse, misuse
  • Affordability/sustainability issues
  • Uncertainty regarding cost-effectiveness
  • Practice or policy variation across parts of the
    system

6
CADTHs key clients and users
  • Government policy makers
  • Drug plan managers
  • Regional health authorities, LHINs
  • Hospitals and other health care facilities
  • Health professionals

7
What decision makers need
  • Independent, rigorously derived evidence- based
    information
  • Relevant information answering specific
    questions
  • Timeliness
  • Messaging concise, understandable
  • Context around decisions social, legal,
    ethical, political, patient, public
  • Support to interpret and apply the information

8
CADTHs role
  • Assessment of technologies from cradle to grave
  • Advice and recommendations
  • Assessment of utilisation of health technologies
    and drugs
  • Focus on policy questions
  • Directly linked to decision makers
  • The right information to the right people
  • Decision-maker support and education

9
CADTH Guiding Principles
  • Impartial
  • Independent of stakeholder influence on findings
  • Rigorous processes rigorously applied
  • Adaptable to change
  • Pan-Canadian
  • Focus on customer needs
  • Support to customers for uptake of findings
  • Collaborative

10
CADTHs Scientific Programs
  • HTA (Health Technology Assessment)
  • CDR (Common Drug Review)
  • COMPUS (Canadian Optimal Medication Prescribing
    and Utilization Service)

CADTH
CDR
11
Common Drug Review
  • Conducts objective, rigorous reviews of clinical
    and economic evidence for new drugs
  • Provides formulary listing recommendations to the
    publicly funded drug plans in Canada
  • Formulary decisions are based on CDR
    recommendations, as well as individual plan
    mandates, priorities, resources

12
Canadian Optimal Medication Prescribing and
Utilization Service (COMPUS)
  • Identifies optimal therapies in drug prescribing
    and use
  • Promotes their use to policy makers, educators,
    health care providers and consumers
  • First pan-Canadian F/P/T initiative established
    to support optimal drug therapy amongst these
    stakeholders
  • One of only a handful of programs of this nature
    in the world

13
COMPUS projects
  • Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs)
  • Diabetes Management

14
Health Technology Assessment
  • CADTHs HTA program offers three services
  • Health Technology Assessment (HTA)
  • Horizon Scanning and Emerging Health Technologies
  • Health Technology Inquiry Service (HTIS)

15
Health Technologies - definition
  • Comprise
  • Medical devices and equipment
  • Medical and surgical procedures
  • Drugs, vaccines, and blood products
  • Health technologies
  • Improve health
  • Prevent, diagnose or treat disease
  • Aid in rehabilitation or long-term care

16
Diverse products for diverse needs
17
HTA reports
  • 301 reports and overviews in 2007-08
  • 26 comprehensive peer-reviewed assessments
  • 11 overviews
  • 264 HTIS reports
  • On-line searchable database

18
HTAs examples
  • Emergency department overcrowding
  • Re-use of single-use medical devices
  • Long- vs. short-acting agents for ADHD (in
    progress)
  • Technologies for aiding reduction of
  • medication errors in hospitals (in progress)

19
HTA realities
  • HTAs take time and resources
  • CADTH HTA topics decided by national committees
  • HTAs can address only a small fraction of health
    technologies in use

20
Health Technology Inquiry Service
  • Purpose To make decision support available
  • Across the full spectrum of publicly funded
    health care institutions in Canada including
    governments, RHAs, LHINs, long term care
  • For the thousands of health technologies that may
    never be candidates for HTA
  • To inform health technology decisions when
    evidence is required in a short timeframe

21
HTIS
  • A research service that provides quick access to
    evidence to inform policies and decisions about
    the uptake, use and/or purchase of
  • Medical devices
  • Medical and surgical procedures
  • Diagnostic tests
  • Drugs

22
HTIS beyond the scope
  • The HTIS mandate does not extend to
  • Individual patient care issues
  • IT
  • Human Resources
  • Records management
  • Staff safety

23
HTIS users
  • Health care decision makers in
  • Federal and provincial ministries of health
  • Provincial and territorial medical directors
  • Regional health authorities, Local Health
    Integration Networks
  • Hospitals and other publicly funded health
    care facilities

24
HTIS products
  • Reports containing evidence about
  • Clinical outcomes
  • Risk, safety, mortality, morbidity
  • Quality of life
  • Cost-effectiveness, economic, or cost impacts

25
HTIS products
26
Staff
  • LIS staff -16 information specialists and library
    technicians
  • Authors and reviewers highly trained
    specialists experienced in conducting critical
    appraisals of evidence
  • In-house and contract

27
Report levels, content, timelines
  • Five levels of reports available
  • Level 1 Reference list 24-72 hours
  • Level 1.5 Summary of abstracts up to 10
    business days
  • Level 2 Summary of evidence with critical
    appraisal up to 30 business days
  • Level 3 Peer-reviewed summary with critical
    appraisal up to 60 business days
  • Level 4 Peer-reviewed rapid review 16 weeks

28
Content
  • Bibliography of best evidence listing quality
    evidence papers and other resources
  • List of abstracts from quality documents
  • Additional sources of potentially useful
    information
  • Contact information for people who are experts in
    or users of particular technologies
  • Summary of evidence with critical appraisal
  • Peer review

29
HTIS request process
  • Step 1
  • Complete a one-page request form
  • Requests can be made through
  • Member of CADTHs Liaison Team
  • E-mail htis_at_cadth.ca
  • Telephone (866) 898-8439
  • Fax (866) 662-1778

30
HTIS request process
  • Step 2
  • A 5- to 10-minute phone call from a CADTH
    research officer to
  • Refine/verify the question(s) - PICO
  • Discuss level of report required
  • Discuss timeframe for delivery of report

31
Search process
  • Two working days allotted for a basic search
  • Sources can include
  • PubMed
  • OVID MEDLINE
  • EMBASE
  • BIOSIS
  • CINAHL
  • Cochrane Library
  • University of York Centre for Reviews and
    Dissemination databases
  • ECRI
  • EuroScan
  • International HTA agencies
  • Internet (focused search)

32
Search process
  • English language articles only
  • All pertinent literature pro, con or neutral
    included in bibliography
  • Defined timeframe for example, articles
    published since 2001

33
Review process
  • All reports reviewed by
  • CADTH research assistant
  • HTIS Manager

34
Recent requests
  • Pneumatic anti-shock garments for acute shock
  • Needle gauge for administration of red blood
    cells
  • Disposable stapler use in bowel surgery
  • Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery for
    morbidly obese patients
  • Huber safety needles for intravascular access
    devices in adult oncology patients

35
Recent requests (cont.)
  • Temporal temperature measurement during minor
    surgery
  • Interventions for the management of obesity in
    patients with diabetes clinical and
    cost-effectiveness
  • Mattresses for decubitus ulcer prevention
  • Vacuum assisted wound closure
  • Medication administration via enteral feeding
    tubes

36
Monthly summary
  • Published around the 10th of each month
  • Lists all HTIS reports completed the previous
    month
  • Distributed by CADTH Liaison Team members
  • Freely available to anyone who requests it
  • People can request copies of any (or all) of the
    existing reports from their CADTH Liaison or from
    HTIS

37
HTIS in practice example 1
  • From an Ontario hospital
  • What is the evidence that the use of NSAIDS for
    analgesia will delay healing or increase the
    incidence of non-union in patients with
    fractures?
  • 2. Is there any evidence that multiple doses of
    an NSAID versus a single dose of an NSAID have an
    effect on healing time or incidence of non-union
    in patients with fractures?

38
Response
  • Thank you for providing the report on the use of
    NSAIDs in patients with fracturesIt gave me the
    evidence required to influence members of our
    Medical Advisory Committee to advance a new
    Medical Directive for Pain in our ER. The
    orthopedics surgeons remained unconvinced but
    those in the audience that practice evidence
    based medicine were convinced and voted in
    favour.
  • Medical Director Emergency Program

39
HTIS in practice example 2
  • From a small Northern Ontario hospital
  • 1. What is the cost-effectiveness of VAC
    dressings compared to other types of wound care
    for wound healing?
  • 2. Is there any evidence that VAC dressings
    decrease hospital length of stay compared to
    other types of wound care?
  • 3. Is there a specific patient population that
    VAC dressings should be used for?

40
Response
  • All I can say is that this is an absolutely
    super servicewithin two weeks I have been
    supplied with a veritable plethora of info that
    will help us to make a very informed decision.
  • I was also put on to McGill and the University of
    Köln, Germany where I have had personal
    communication with experts in the Field of
    Medical Technology Evaluation. That is pretty
    good for a small community hospital in Northern
    Ontario.
  • Assistant Executive Director/Patient Care Services

41
Key points
  • HTIS is Canadian
  • HTIS is free to any decision maker in Canadas
    publicly funded health care systems
  • HTIS is quick
  • HTIS responds to specific needs/questions
  • HTIS is unbiased
  • HTIS is confidential

42
HTIS and Hospital Medical Libraries
  • Not duplicate services
  • HTIS - an additional research-based resource that
    can provide impartial evidence specifically to
    inform decisions about health-technology-related
    policy, purchasing or patient care practices

43
Liaison Officers
  • Liaison Officers on the ground in each
    jurisdiction
  • Hired locally, work locally
  • Strengthen links between CADTH and its
    stakeholders
  • Ensure stakeholders needs are known. i.e. topic
    requests, policy decision needs
  • Deliver information to stakeholders
  • Help with uptake and utilization of advice

44
Accessing HTIS in Ontario
  • New requests
  • Existing reports
  • Monthly summaries of reports
  • Information
  • Jeannette Smith, Stakeholder Relations Officer
  • jeannettes_at_cadth.ca

45
www.cadth.ca
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com