Measuring AgrAbility Outcomes with Quality of Life Indicators - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 67
About This Presentation
Title:

Measuring AgrAbility Outcomes with Quality of Life Indicators

Description:

Register a low level of satisfaction with the services that were provided ... Register no changes in farm productivity as a result of the program. The 3rd scenario: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 68
Provided by: rwil85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Measuring AgrAbility Outcomes with Quality of Life Indicators


1
Measuring AgrAbility Outcomes with Quality of
Life Indicators
  • Robert A. Wilson, Ph.D., M.Sc.
  • University of Delaware
  • Center for Applied Demography and Survey Research
  • Newark, Delaware 19716
  • rwilson_at_udel.edu
  • Paper presented National AgraAbility Project
    Training Workshop
  • Burlington, Vermont, November 8, 2005

2
Types of Program Evaluations
  • Process Evaluations
  • Impact Evaluations

3
Process Evaluations Analyze Program Inputs
  • Client Records
  • Outreach activity
  • Services Delivered
  • Procedures Followed
  • Day-by-day Staff Activity
  • Costs
  • Materials

4
Impact Evaluations Measure Program Outputs
  • Productivity
  • Farm output
  • Individual farmer or waterman output
  • Efficiency
  • Benefits/Costs
  • Satisfaction with services provided
  • Improvements in Quality of Life

5
Which AgrAbility outcome is most important?
  • Improved Productivity?
  • Satisfaction with services delivered?
  • Improvements in the Quality of Life?

6
A farmer could increase productivity as a
result of AgrAbility, but
  • Register a low level of satisfaction with the
    services that were provided
  • Experience no improvement in the quality of life

7
A farmer could be very satisfied with the
services provided by AgrAbility but
  • Register no changes in farm output
  • Experience no improvement in the quality of life

8
A farmer could experience an improvement in the
quality of life as a result of AgrAbility, but
  • Be dissatisfied with the AgrAbility Program
  • Register no changes in farm productivity as a
    result of the program

9
The 3rd scenario may be common among
  • Older Farmers
  • Farmers with certain disabilities, e.g. arthritis
  • Farmers who do not wish to retire from farming or
    who cannot retire from farming

10
With an aging agricultural labor
force, improvements in the quality of life may be
particularly important for AgrAbility programs.
11
Older farmers are particularly susceptible to the
degenerative diseases of aging
  • Arthritis
  • Coronary disorders
  • Cancer
  • Tobacco-related diseases
  • Diseases associated with exposure to toxic
    chemicals
  • Clinical Depression
  • Dementia (including Alzheimers Disease)

12
Degenerative diseases are normally marked with a
decline in the Quality of Life
13
How is the quality of life measured in medicine
and in rehabilitative services?
14
Quality of Life Measurements
  • Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs)
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)

15
Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs)
  • Used to measure the burden of disease in large
    populations countries, states, counties
  • DALYs are a hybrid measure that combines
    premature mortality with time lived with a
    disease

16
DISABILITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR (DALY)
One disability-adjusted life year (1 DALY)
indicates that one person either died a
year prior to life expectancy, or lived with a
disability for a year at a psychometric threshold
equivalent to death. If a disorder is severe,
it receives a weight that is closer to one (the
psychometric equivalent of death). If a
disorder is not severe, it receives a weight that
is closer to zero (the equivalent of perfect
health). DALYs can be aggregated for groups of
people and geographic areas.
Health Services Policy Research Group University
of Delaware
17
Example
If a population had 10 people at the beginning of
2002
5 of the people lived in perfect health
throughout the year 0
DALYs 1 female, aged 80, died of
alcohol-related cirrhosis,
(Life Expectancy 82) 2 DALYs 1
male, aged 50, died of lung cancer,
(Life Expectancy 80) 30 DALYs
2 males, both aged 20, died in alcohol-related
accidents (Life
Expectancy 80) 120 DALYs 1 female
(any age) lived with alcohol-related
cirrosis for the entire year (1
year x disability weight .20) .20
DALYs _____________ Total 152.20 DALYs
Health Services Policy Research Group University
of Delaware
18
Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) per 1000
Population (Age-Adjusted) Attributable to Alcohol
Dependence and Alcoholic Liver Cirrhosis by
Census Tract, State of Delaware, 1988-1993
Pennsylvania
New Jersey
Maryland
Atlantic Ocean
19
Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)
  • QALYs are a summary measure used to measure the
    health-related quality of life for both
    individuals and groups.
  • QALYs are frequently employed to gauge changes in
    the quality of life associated with therapy or
    new drugs
  • There are a number of standardized instruments
    from which QALYs may be generated
  • One instrument is the SF-36, which we are
    currently using in a small sample of farmers
    which is being carried by Peggy Mack.

20
The recommended QALY measure is The SF-36
instrument
21
The SF-36 Health Survey
  • In general would you say that your health is
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Fair
  • Poor

22
2. Compared to a year ago, how would you rate
your health now?
  • Much better
  • Somewhat better
  • About the same
  • Somewhat worse
  • Much worse

23
Vigorous activities,
  • Such as running, lifting heavy objects,
    participating in strenuous sports?

24
Moderate activities, such as moving a table,
pushing a vacuum cleaner, bowling, or playing golf
25
Lifting or carrying groceries
26
Climbing several flights of steps
27
Climbing one flight of steps
28
Bending kneeling, or stooping
29
Walking more than a mile
30
Walking several hundred yards
31
Walking one hundred yards
32
Bathing or dressing yourself
33
4. During the last 4 weeks how much of
the time have you had any of the following
problems with your work or other regular daily
activities as a result of your physical
health?-all of the time-most of the time-some
of the time-a little of the time-none of the
time
34
Cut down on the amount of time you spent on work
or other activities
35
Accomplished less than you would like
36
Were limited in the kind of work or other
activities
37
Had difficulty performing the work or other
activities
38
5. During the last 4 weeks how much of the
time have you had any of the following problems
with your work or other regular daily activities
as a result of any emotional problems (such as
being depressed or anxious)?
39
-All of the time-Most of the time-Some
of the time-A little of the time-None of the
time
40
Cut down on the amount of time you spent on work
or other activities
41
Accomplished less than you would like
42
Did work or activities less carefully than usual
43
6. During the last 4 weeks to what
extent has your physical health or emotional
problems interfered with your normal social
activities with friends, neighbors or
groups?-Not at all-Slightly-Moderately-Quite
a bit-Extremely
44
7. How much bodily pain have you had
during the last 4 weeks?-None-Very
Mild-Mild-Moderate-Severe-Very severe
45
.During the last 4 weeks, how much did
pain interfere with your normal work?-Not at
all-A little bit-Moderately-Quite a
bit-Extremely
46
9. These are questions about how you feel
and how things have been with you during the last
4 weeks. For each question please give the 1
answer that comes closest to the way you have
been feeling. How much of the time during the
last 4 weeks
47
Did you feel full of life?
  • All of the time
  • Most of the time
  • Some of the time
  • A little of the time
  • None of the time

48
Have you been very nervous?
  • All of the time
  • Most of the time
  • Some of the time
  • A little of the time
  • None of the time

49
Have you felt so down in the dumps that nothing
could cheer you up?
  • All of the time
  • Most of the time
  • Some of the time
  • A little of the time
  • None of the time

50
Have you felt calm and peaceful?
  • All of the time
  • Most of the time
  • Some of the time
  • A little of the time
  • None of the time

51
Did you have a lot of energy?
  • All of the time
  • Most of the time
  • Some of the time
  • A little of the time
  • None of the time

52
Have you felt downhearted and depressed?
  • All of the time
  • Most of the time
  • Some of the time
  • A little of the time
  • None of the time

53
Did you feel worn out?
  • All of the time
  • Most of the time
  • Some of the time
  • A little of the time
  • None of the time

54
Have you been happy?
  • All of the time
  • Most of the time
  • Some of the time
  • A little of the time
  • None of the time

55
Did you feel tired?
  • All of the time
  • Most of the time
  • Some of the time
  • A little of the time
  • None of the time

56
  • 10. During the past 4 weeks how much of the time
  • has your physical health or emotional problems
  • interfered with your social activities
  • (like visiting friends, relatives, etc.)?
  • All of the time
  • Most of the time
  • Some of the time
  • A little of the time
  • None of the time

57
11. How TRUE or FALSE is each of the following
statements for you?
  • Definitely true
  • Mostly true
  • Dont Know
  • Mostly false
  • Definitely false

58
I seem to get sick a little easier than other
people
59
I am as healthy as anybody I know
60
I expect my health to get worse
61
My health is excellent
62
The SF-36 is calculated for 8 health factors
(0-100)
  • Physical limitations
  • Limitations in social activities
  • Limitations in work and home roles
  • Bodily pain
  • Psychological distress and wellbeing
  • Limitations because of emotional problems
  • Energy and fatigue
  • General health perceptions

63
(No Transcript)
64
Outcome Mean SF-36 Score
  • (Mean score for Experimental Group Time1-Mean
    Score for Experimental Group Time 2)
  • minus
  • (Mean score for Control Group Time1-Mean Score
    for Control Group Time 2)

65
2 Measurements
  • Time 1
  • Assessment at Program Intake
  • Time 2
  • Measurement following Intervention

66
Outcome Mean SF-36 Score
  • (Mean score for Experimental Group Time1-Mean
    Score for Experimental Group Time 2)
  • minus
  • (Mean score for Control Group Time1-Mean Score
    for Control Group Time 2)

67
Or 4 MeasurementsExperimental Design
  • Experimental Group
  • Time 1
  • Assessment at Program Intake
  • Time 2
  • Measurement following Intervention
  • Control Group
  • Time 1
  • Assessment at Program Intake
  • Time 2
  • Measurement following Intervention
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com