Research Activities within the School of Computing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Research Activities within the School of Computing

Description:

To give an overview of our research activities ... Specialized System (Nephrology, Paediatrics, Acute Care, Cardiology, Gynaecology) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: compu354
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Research Activities within the School of Computing


1
Research Activities within the School of Computing
  • Welcome
  • Aim
  • To give an overview of our research activities
  • To attract new research members and generate a
    synergy amongst colleagues
  • Ethos of SoC Practical scholarship
  • Last RAE assessment
  • Information Systems (3A)
  • Mobile Computing (3B)
  • Applied Mathematics and Statistics (3B)
  • Operational Research (2)

2
Research Seminars within the School of Computing
  • A short introduction to our research activities
    but
  • Research seminars (for more detailed description)
  • All welcome to attend
  • on Wednesdays 4pm (Amanda Quek
    A.Quek_at_staffs.ac.uk))
  • Next research seminar
  • Speaker Robert Buxton (CIES)
  • Topic Fingerprinting oils, techniques allowing
    the development of a prototype pollution analysis
    and identification system
  • Date 15 January 2003
  • Venue Green Lecture Theatre
  • Time 4-5pm

3
Schedule
  • 1300-1430 Part 1
  • Applied Maths Prof B. Burrows
  • Stats and OR M. Fletcher
  • Information Systems Prof H. Shah and her team
  • IT Strategic Management Dr A. Eardley and his
    team
  • Organisational Semiotics Dr R. Clarke and his
    team
  • Artificial Intelligence Dr B. Sharp and her team
  • 1440 1500 Tea/Coffee
  • 1500 1700 Part 2
  • Centre for Intelligent Environmental Systems
    Prof W.J. Walley and M. OConnor
  • Mobile Network Systems Prof. R. Carrasco
  • Graphics and Image Processing Dr C. Chibelushi
    and his team
  • Web Engineering Dr L. Uden
  • Plenary

4
Research in Artificial Intelligence
  • Applications of AI techniques to process
    knowledge to solve specific problems
  • Key themes
  • Knowledge Based Systems (KBS), Agents Based
    Systems
  • Summarisation, text mining, ontology and semantic
    web
  • Members
  • Staff Tim Barker and B. Sharp
  • 2 PhD research students - FT (medical domain)
  • Su Linying ( knowledge based image understanding)
  • Vojtech Huser (clinical decision support systems)
  • 2 Research Assistants (also P/T PhD students)
    TRACKER project (decision making process)
  • Phil Windridge (ontology)
  • Caroline Chibelushi (text mining)
  • 2 PhD research students - PT
  • Thomas Olsson ( concept formation), Desmond Case
    (agents)

5
Knowledge / Agents Based Systems
  • Collaboration with STW and SWW (Rehabilitation of
    water mains)
  • Began in 1997, over 50k
  • Team Dr G. Bancroft, B. Edwards, B. Sharp (SoC)
    and A. Dean (Derby University)
  • 14 papers, 1 PhD, 4 MSc projects D. Cases
    current PhD
  • Problem
  • Great pressure on the UK water industry to
    develop an effective rehabilitation strategy
  • Aging water mains (corrosion and tuberculation
    problems)
  • Wide distribution networks
  • STW wealth of pipe data but inconsistencies and
    gaps
  • SWW no data, apply experts knowledge and react
    to problems
  • Need to respond swiftly to internal investment
    strategies, external policies, customer
    complaints, .

6
Research Issues
  • STW SWW needed a system to integrate different
    types of knowledge
  • Expert knowledge related to corrosion and pipe
    material
  • Prediction of corrosion and life expectancy of
    water mains
  • Strategic knowledge (for ex. investment policy,
    OFWAT rules)
  • and to reflect the dynamic interaction(s) of
    these knowledge domains
  • AI techniques being used data mining, neural
    networks, Bayesian belief networks, production
    rules, as well regression analysis (2 KBS)
  • Research issues
  • Can an agent based system provide a suitable
    platform?
  • How can we represent, in an agent-based
    architecture, the dynamic interaction(s) of the
    various knowledge domains ?
  • With how much autonomy should each agent be
    endowed?
  • How can collaborative problem solving be
    effectively incorporated among agents?

7
Automatic abstracting
  • Development of an Information Extraction System
    (INFORMEX)
  • To generate abstracts from scientific papers
  • Using Linguistic theories, Cognitive Science
    findings and AI techniques
  • Extension of the method to French texts
  • These techniques and in particular the idea
    behind Conceptual Constituents are being
    investigated further by Caroline Chibelushi in
    the TRACKER Project
  • 1 PhD, 1 MRes, 3 MSc Projects, 11 papers

8
Other AI Research Projects
  • Knowledge Based Systems in the Medical Domain
  • Su Linying Knowledge Based Image Understanding
  • Vojtech Huser Clinical Decision Support Systems
  • TRACKER Project Working with IS and OS teams
  • EPSRC grant in collaboration with Lancaster
    University
  • Principal Investigator Prof A. Alderson
  • Team B. Sharp, H. Shah, R. Clarke, 4 RAs
  • Phil Windridge (RA) Representing Meanings in
    Ontologies
  • Caroline Chibelushi (RA) Text Mining
  • Collaborative Learning with Affective Pedagogical
    Agents to Aid Summarisation
  • Tim Barker

9
Knowledge-Based Image Understanding by Spatial
Reasoning
Su Linying Supervisors
Bernadette Sharp Claude Chibelushi
  • A knowledge-based approach to interpreting
    tibia/fibula X-rays in semantic description for
    fracture identification

10
Why knowledge-based approach?
  • Image understanding needs knowledge
  • Explicit knowledge representation helps not only
    machine but also human being
  • Application expansion or modification without
    recoding

11
The problems
  • Knowledge representation and integration (Spatial
    representation)
  • Mechanism for utilizing knowledge (Spatial
    reasoning)

12
(No Transcript)
13
Knowledge Hierarchy
14
Spatial representation and reasoning
  • Representing knowledge in Facts and Rules of
    expanded predicate logic (in fuzzy theory)
  • Using Resolution Proofs in hybrid control as the
    reasoning strategy.

15
Clinical Decision Support Systems in Medicine
  • Vojtech Huser, MD
  • PhD, Sep 2002 - 2005

16
Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS)
  • Focus of Medical Informatics
  • Bioinformatics (DNA analysis, genome project)
  • Bioimaging (image analysis)
  • Clinical Informatics (CDSS)
  • Public Health Informatics
  • Researchers Medical Doctors, Computer Scientists

17
Clinical Decision Support Systems
  • What are CDSS ?
  • CDSS is a software that is designed to be a
    direct aid to clinical decision-making, in which
    the characteristics of an individual patient are
    matched to a computerized clinical knowledge base
    and patient-specific assessments or
    recommendations are then presented to the
    clinician or the patient for a decision (Sim,
    2001)

18
Clinical Decision Support Systems
  • Why it is good to have CDSS?
  • Number of medical facts is growing enormously
    (also general medical knowledge necessary for all
    doctors)
  • Human brain capacity is limited
  • Perfect cooperation among specialists within the
    health care system is needed
  • Degrease the number of preventable errors (Kohn
    2002, Bates 2001)

19
Clinical Decision Support Systems project aims
  • Investigate the existing CDDS and their pros and
    cons
  • Global Systems (Iliad, DxPlain, QMR)
  • Specialized System (Nephrology, Paediatrics,
    Acute Care, Cardiology, Gynaecology)
  • Include new emerging trends in medicine (Evidence
    Based Medicine)
  • Include new emerging standards for
  • Clinical Guidelines (GLIF I and II)
  • Electronic Patient Record (HL7)
  • MeSH (Medical Subject Headings)
  • UMLS (Unified Medical Language System)

20
Clinical Decision Support Systems project aims
(ctd)
  • To make better use of existing medical knowledge
    systems (Medline, Isabel, include existing
    specialized systems as plug-ins)
  • To suggest a new architecture for better global
    CDSS and to bring CDSS and its knowledge closer
    to practicing physicians
  • More info at http//www.soc.staffs.ac.uk/vh4/mi/
    or v.huser_at_staffs.ac.uk

21
Representing meanings in ontologies
  • Phil Windridge

22
Domain
  • Systems/Software Development
  • Various IT Professionals
  • Analysts, designers, programmers, project
    managers, etc.
  • Various user groups/types
  • Strategic, tactical, operational

23
Ontologies
Wheeled Vehicle
Public Transport
Road Vehicle
Passenger Airplane
Commercial Aircraft
Bus
Commercial Passenger Airplane
Train
Adapted from http//opencyc.sourceforge.net/daml/c
yc-transportation.daml
24
Meanings
25
Representation
26
TEXT MININGCaroline Chibelushi13th Jan 2003
27
The project
  • Another research activity of the TRACKER project
  • To investigate the relationships between
    decision, decision making processes and rework in
    organisations using text mining techniques.
  • Data a set of recorded transcripts of meetings
    and a set of written minutes of meetings.

28
The Text Mining Approach
  • Aim is to discover information and relationships
    about decision making not contained explicitly
    within that collection
  • Text mining make use of both Linguistic and AI
    approaches
  • to analyse a collection of documents
    linguistically
  • identifying sentences, lexical items, conceptual
    constituents
  • some parsing (noun phrases, verb phrases,
    prepositional phrases)
  • to identify an appropriate representation of the
    meaning of words, propositions and sentences in
    the text
  • to apply data mining techniques to the documents
    to discover any patterns, associations and
    relationships hidden in the text

29
Text mining stages
  • Discovery

Text
Text Segmentation
Text
Text
ion
Vector Representation
Patterns Discovery Relationships Associations
Patterns
Knowledge Validation
Discovery
Relationships
and associations
30
Expected Results
  • To discover information and relationships between
    a decision, action, argument, issue and goal
  • The information will be crucial in making
    decisions visible
  • - Aim to reduce the number of decisions that
    necessitate subsequent rework

31
Collaborative Learning with Affective Pedagogical
Agents to Aid Summarisation
  • Tim Barker

32
  • Context CHALCS, Leeds
  • A Level Physics course in a VLE
  • Collaborative learning deeper engagement
  • The Case of the Missing Peer ?
  • Agent-based support for summarisation PROsila
  • Animated Pedagogical Agents
  • Opposing characters utilise affectations
  • Agents evaluated at schools CHALCS
  • Agents adapt affectively based on performance
  • Future work Open Source software suite

33
www.timbarker.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com