Diagnosis%20of%20Ovarian%20Cancer%20Based%20on%20Mass%20Spectra%20of%20Blood%20Samples - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Diagnosis%20of%20Ovarian%20Cancer%20Based%20on%20Mass%20Spectra%20of%20Blood%20Samples

Description:

Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer. Based on Mass Spectra. of Blood Samples ... diagnosis for a cancer patient. Measurements. Specificity: Probability of the correct ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:101
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: euge52
Learn more at: http://www.cs.cmu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diagnosis%20of%20Ovarian%20Cancer%20Based%20on%20Mass%20Spectra%20of%20Blood%20Samples


1
Diagnosis of Ovarian CancerBased on Mass
Spectraof Blood Samples
Hong Tang Yelena Mukomel Eugene Fink
2
Motivation
Early detection of cancer byanalysis of blood
samples.
  • Fast inexpensive test
  • Little discomfort

3
Outline
  • Mass-spectrum curves
  • Feature extraction
  • Experimental results
  • Conclusions

4
Mass spectrum
102
100
signalintensity
102
104
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
0
ratio of molecular weightto net electric charge
The curve of a cancer patient usuallydiffers
from that of a healthy person.
5
Patient data
  • Mass-spectrum curves of 685 people
  • Every curve consists of 15,155 points

Data set Number of cases Number of cases
Data set Cancer Healthy
1 2 3 100 100 162 116 116 91
6
Outline
  • Mass-spectrum curves
  • Feature extraction
  • Experimental results
  • Conclusions

7
Candidate features
  • Every point of the mass-spectrum curve is a
    candidate feature
  • Its relevance depends on the mean difference
    between values for cancer patients and healthy
    people

8
Feature relevance
  • Mean difference ?c ?h
  • Standard deviation of the difference (?c2
    ?h2)0.5

signal intensity
9
Minimal distance
102
100
signalintensity
102
feature
104
min distance
  • Impose a lower bound on the distance between
    feature points, which prevents the selection
    of correlated features
  • After selecting a feature point, discard all
    points within this distance bound

10
Feature selection
102
100
signalintensity
102
104
  • Repeat for a given number of features
  • Select the most relevant feature point
  • Discard all points within the minimal
    distance from the selected feature

11
Outline
  • Mass-spectrum curves
  • Feature extraction
  • Experimental results
  • Conclusions

12
Control variables
  • Number of feature points 1 to 64
  • Min distance between features 1 to 1024
  • Data mining techniques Decision trees
    (C4.5) Support vector machines (SVMFu)
    Neural networks (Cascor 1.2)

13
Measurements
  • Sensitivity Probability of the correct
    diagnosis for a cancer patient
  • Specificity Probability of the correct
    diagnosis for a healthy person

14
Results
Num. offeatures Min.dist. Sensi-tivity Speci-ficity
Set 1 DTSVMNN 43232 1 16256 86 82 80 78 84 84
Set 2 DTSVMNN 8 432 4 2 1 92 96 93 96 93 98
Set 3 DTSVMNN 81616 64 8 2 98100100 100 99 99
15
Summary
  • Performance range
  • Sensitivity 80100
  • Specificity 78100

16
Summary
Performance range
Sensitivity Specificity
Set 1 8086 7884
Set 2 9296 9396
Set 3 98100 99100
  • Optimal parameters
  • Number of feature points 432
  • Min distances between features 1256
  • Data mining technique Any

17
Outline
  • Mass-spectrum curves
  • Feature extraction
  • Experimental results
  • Conclusions

18
Conclusions
We have developed a technique for thedetection
of ovarian cancer based on theanalysis of blood
mass spectra.
The accuracy of this technique is still low, and
results vary across data sets.
19
Future work
  • Use more patient data
  • Consider other features of mass-spectrum
    curves
  • Apply to other cancers
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com