Visual attention - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Visual attention

Description:

Niko Kriegeskorte, Neurocognitie, FdP, Universiteit Maastricht ... The New Cognitive Neurosciences. MIT Press. Crude functional anatomy of attention ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: psyc91
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Visual attention


1
Visual attention
  • Functional principles and neuronal mechanisms of

Niko Kriegeskorte, Neurocognitie, FdP,
Universiteit Maastricht
2
(No Transcript)
3
Content-general versus content-specific attention
  • Content-general arousal and alertness
  • (for an overview see Koelega 1996)
  • Content-specific uneven allocation of limited
    processing resources to a number of concurrent
  • tasks
  • stimuli
  • (see Pashler 1997, Palmer 1999)

Common principle prioritization
4
Basic concepts ofcontent-specific attention
  • overt covert(e.g. eye movements)
    (internal)
  • top-down bottom-up
  • single focus multiple foci
  • space- feature- object-based
  • visual auditory tactile, etc.
  • sensory motor

5
Covert attentionhas measurable effects!
  • Behavioral effects
  • shorter RT
  • finer perceptual discrimination(e.g. of spatial
    structure, contrast and color)
  • Neuronal effects in specialized visual areas
  • Specialized visual areas show increased activity
    when their type of content is attended.
  • additive effect (baseline shift) upon attention
    onset
  • multiplicative effect (gain modulation) upon
    stimulus onset
  • The effects are stronger in areas higher in the
    visual hierarchy.

6
The cooperation ofcovert and overt visual
attention
  • Covert visuospatial attention and high-level eye
    movement control are coupled to the degree of
    being indistinguishable (by current methods) at
    the neural level.
  • When focussed covert attention is maintained at a
    peripheral location for seconds, it feels
    unnatural not to make a saccade to that
    location.
  • Conversely, it has been shown that a saccade to a
    location is necessarily preceded by a short
    moment of extremely focussed attention to the
    target location. (Deubel Schneider 96)

7
Hierarchical controlof active visual exploration
  • Body movements(minutes)
  • Head movements(seconds)
  • Eye movements(hundreds of milliseconds)
  • Covert attention shifts(tens of milliseconds)

costs of operation energy time
8
Some experimental paradigms of visual attention
  • Space-based visual attention
  • (Posner 1980)
  • Feature-based visual attention
  • (also called filtering, e.g. Kahneman
    Treisman 1984)
  • Visual search
  • (e.g. Wolfe 1998)
  • Object-based visual attention
  • (e.g. OCraven et al. 1999)

9
Visual attentional space
10
Mechanisms of covert spatial attentiontarget
enhancement and distractor suppression
target distractors
cf. Treisman (1960) and LaBerge Samuels (1974)
11
Metaphorsfor covert spatial attention
spotlight
zoom lens
12
Object-based attention
  • In object-based attention, either all or none of
    the features of an object are attended.
  • If two objects overlap in the visual field,
    spatial attention cannot separate them.
  • Their features must somehow be disentangled.

13
Brain areas involved in visual attention
  • Frontal, parietal and thalamic areas are involved
    in the control of many forms of visual
    attention.
  • Specialized visual areas implement the effect of
    attention. They show increased activity when
    their type of content is attended.
  • V1 V2 form
  • V4 color
  • V5 motion
  • FFA (fusiform face area) faces
  • PPA (parahippocampal place area) houses, rooms

strength of the effect of attention
14
How attention affects the time course of activity
in a specialized visual area
activity S caddA cmultSA
15
The functional neuroanatomy ofcovert spatial
attention
16
The temporal aspect of attention
  • Three phases of attentional modulation can be
    distinguished.
  • prestimulus preparatory activation (relation to
    imagery, not to be shown with ERPs.)
  • immediate poststimulus modulation (Neurons
    respond more sensitively to the first feedforward
    signal from the stimulus reaching them. Shown for
    IT in the monkey, see above.)
  • delayed poststimulus modulation (e.g. in V1,
    possibly due to adaptive resonance that takes
    time to establish itself)
  • The latency of attentional gain modulation after
    stimulus onset diminishes as one moves up the
    visual hierarchy.
  • V1 is modulated by attention, but the modulation
    begins only about 200ms after stimulus onset.
  • In early extrastriate visual areas, attentional
    modulation begins earlier about 70-100ms after
    stimulus onset. (Martinez et al. 99, Hopfinger et
    al. 00)
  • Monkey physiology (Desimone et al.) has shown
    attentional modulation in IT immediately after
    stimulus onset.
  • Long-term effect learning
  • Attention plays a central role in the formation
    of explicit and implicit memories.
  • Attention is required for the reorganization of
    cortical maps through experience (Merzenich et
    al.).

17
The relation betweenattention and imagery
  • Attention and imagery are both processes that
    involve sensory content and can operate
    independently of sensory perception.
  • Whereas imagery creates internal representations
    of objects that are not present, attention merely
    modulates sensory perception processes.
  • Just like attention, imagery leads to increased
    activity (baseline shift) in visual areas
    specialized for the type of visual content in
    question.
  • Attention and imagery might reflect a single
    fundamental psychological mechanism.

18
Effects of imagery in areas specializedfor
high-level object recognition
single-subject, non-averaged fMRI signal
(OCraven Kanwisher, in press)
19
Introductory literature
  • Kanwisher, N. Wojciulik, E. (2000). Visual
    attention insights from brain imaging. Nature
    Reviews 1, 91-100.
  • Driver, J. Frith, C. (2000). Shifting baselines
    in attention research. Nature Reviews 1, 91-100.
    147-148.
  • Section on Attention in Gazzaniga, M.S. (2000).
    The New Cognitive Neurosciences. MIT Press.

20
(No Transcript)
21
Crude functional anatomy of attention
  • Reticular formation (in the brain stem) and basal
    forebrain unspecific activation (sleep, waking,
    alertness).
  • Frontal lobe high-level control of spatial and
    object-based visual attention.
  • Parietal lobe mediation of spatial attention via
    spatial index map.
  • Ventral path mediation of object-based attention
    via complex object codes.
  • Thalamic nuclei (e.g. pulvinar) cortically
    controlled highly specific (down to features and
    retinotopic locations) modulation of other
    cortical areas via thalamocortical positive
    feedback loops.
  • Functionally specialized perceptual areas
    biasing of the representation of perceptual
    content according to thalamocortical modulation.

22
Theoretical considerationson attention
  • When one attempts to define the concepts
    attention, imagery, feedback and internal state
    clearly, they all seem to come to the same
    thing.
  • Space may be special as a feature dimension of
    attentional selection in that a spatial
    restriction can operate in conjunction with any
    other visual feature restriction, whereas two
    nonspatial feature restrictions cannot operate in
    conjunction.

23
Target enhancement versus distractor suppression
  • target-enhancement(related metaphors spotlight,
    zoomlens)
  • distractor-suppression(related metaphors gate,
    filter)
  • a combination of both
  • (adapted from LaBerge 2000)

24
Functions of sensory attention
  • Sequential analysis each part of the currently
    perceived scene is selected in turn for a
    particular kind of in-depth processing (e.g.
    object recognition).
  • Continuous prioritized perception a certain
    aspect of the perceptual stream (e.g. a piece of
    music in a café) continuously receives a greater
    share of the cognitive resources than other
    aspects.
  • Preparation of perception the system gets set to
    perceive a certain type of event. The preparation
    improves perceptual performance (e.g. RT,
    perceptual thresholds or perceptual precision).
  • (following LaBerge 2000)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com