Core Training in Surgery - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Core Training in Surgery

Description:

Specialty specific competencies to allow progress into higher surgical ... Neurosciences programme. Do they add educational value? Require more programme time ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: arodr
Category:
Tags: core | surgery | training

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Core Training in Surgery


1
Core Training in Surgery
Are we nearly there yet?
  • Chris Munsch
  • Joint Committee on Surgical Training

2
Principles of design
  • Purpose
  • Function
  • Form

3
What is the purpose of core training?
  • Acquire relevant competencies
  • Determine career choice
  • Determine suitability for that career
  • Acquire relevant transferable competencies
  • Allow movement into another (more appropriate)
    career

4
What should core training deliver?
  • Generic professional competencies
  • Generic surgical competencies
  • Specialty specific competencies to allow progress
    into higher surgical training
  • Career advice/direction

5
The structure of core training?
  • The F2 question
  • Career choice when and how?
  • Run through, themed or generic programmes?
  • How long?
  • Management of core training
  • Assessment and selection
  • The role of non surgical modules

6
The F2 Question
  • Here to stay (for now)
  • Generic or vocationally themed
  • 2x6 or 3x4?

7
Career choice when and how?
  • Limited information, probably inconsistent
  • Influence of undergraduate and F1/2 experience
  • Most know what they dont want to do
  • If the system forces people to make a choice then
    they will

8
Career choice when and how?
  • Survey of timing of career choice by TO surgeons
    (Willett)
  • 35 by year 1
  • 56 by year 3
  • 84 by year 5
  • 77 previous experience was major factor in
    choice
  • 73 what I want to do
  • Data can be used to support or refute concept of
    run through
  • Is TO representative of all surgical
    specialities?

9
Run-through, themed or generic?
  • TO and Neuro (and Scotland) continue to favour
    run through
  • Generic surgical programmes
  • Themed programmes
  • Musculoskeletal
  • Head and neck
  • Torso
  • Mixed economy?

10
How long? (2 or 3 years)
  • Nature of F2
  • Different for run through and core programmes?
  • Acquisition of generic vs speciality specific
    competencies
  • ST3 entry requirements not being consistently met
    by 2 year core eprogrammes
  • EWTD more to come

11
Foundation 2
Competency based progression
Selection
Specialty Run Through Programme
Core Surgical Programme
ST1
CST1
Generic
ST 2
CST2
CST3
Themed
ST3 (Higher Specialty Training)
12
Management of core
  • Competencies defined in ISCP
  • Light touch from JCST
  • Deaneries and Schools of Surgery determine
    delivery
  • External QA?
  • Oversight group for core surgery?

13
Assessment and selection
  • Run through programmes - selection at end of F2
  • Entry to HST dependant on satisfactory progress
  • Themed/generic soft selection at ST1
  • National selection into HST at end of core
  • Selection ratio of 1.2 1.?
  • MRCS exam generic within the context of three
    themes (musculoskletal, head and neck or torso)

14
Role of non surgical specialities
  • General professional competencies relevant to
    surgery
  • AE, HDU
  • Speciality specific competencies
  • Neurosciences programme
  • Do they add educational value?
  • Require more programme time
  • Transferable skills inform career choice and aid
    movement

15
Summary
  • Core surgical training is not yet a done deal
  • 3 year core programmes are preferred
  • Mixed economy might work but needs piloting
  • Light touch from JCST
  • More work is needed on factors affecting career
    choice
  • Things will change
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com