Title: Summary
1COST IMPACT OF USING SPECIFIC CYCLOOXYGENASE II
INHIBITORS IN ORTHOPEDIC OUTPATIENTS AT LERDSIN
HOSPITAL Jitsuda Phosri M.Sc. in Pharm., Assist.
Prof. Vithaya Kulsomboon Ph.D. , and Assist.
Prof. Niyada Kiatying-Angsulee Ph.D. International
Graduate Program in Social and Administrative
Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Introduction
- Specific Cyclo-Oxygenase II (COX II)
Inhibitors, have been introduced in several
countries for the relief of chronic pain in
rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.
Celecoxib and rofecoxib are members of these
specific COX II inhibitors, the incidence of
gastric side effects with this new group is lower
than observed in earlier NSAIDs. - In Thailand, there had been an increasing
trend of specific COX II inhibitors utilization
expenditures on celecoxib dramatically increased
from 45.1 million Baht in 1999 to 295.6 million
Baht while rofecoxib expenditures slightly
increased from 20.1 million Baht in 1999 to 155.8
million Baht in 2001. - The inappropriate prescribing of specific COX
II inhibitors (COX II) has economic impact on
individual patients and overall health care cost.
- Methods
- Research Design
- A retrospective Study during November 2002 to
December 2002 in orthopedic outpatient clinic at
Lerdsin Hospital, the Institute of Orthopedics of
Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand - Subjects Instrument
- Data from orthopedic outpatient
prescriptions and OPD Card that having specific
COX II inhibitors and NSAIDs was collected,
including, patients characteristics, patients
histories and physicians prescribing. - Data collection form was used to be instrument
of this study. - SPSS was used for analyzing the data.
- Abstract
- Problem Statement The inappropriate prescribing
of specific COX II inhibitors (C2I) has economic
impact on individual patients and overall health
care cost. - Objectives To characterize the patterns of C2I
use and to determine its cost impact in patients
who were at low risk and high risk for
gastrointestinal adverse effects. - Designs Retrospective design
- Settings Lerdsin Hospital, the Institute of
Orthopedics of Ministry of Public Health,
Bangkok, Thailand. - Study Population Data from orthopedic
outpatients having C2I and NSAIDs during November
to December 2002 were collected. The
proportionate sample was selected based on the
two months drug utilization data including 519
prescriptions of C2I and 594 prescriptions of
NSAIDs. To select the prescriptions, computerized
simple random sampling was used. The National
Institute for Clinical Excellence of United
Kingdom Guidance for C2I use was employed to
determine whether the patients receiving C2I were
at high risk of GI adverse events. - Outcome Measures Total cost per prescription,
average cost per prescription, average cost per
day, mean duration of prescribed drug, and cost
waste of C2I versus NSAIDs use in low risk group
of actual practice and standard treatment.
Additional cost of NSAIDs compared with C2I in
high risk group of actual practice. - Results Two hundred and eight (40.1) patients
receiving C2I and 113 (19.0) patients receiving
NSAIDs were considered to be at high risk for
upper GI adverse effects. Of the patients
receiving prescriptions for C2I, 112 (21.6)
received C2I alone and 159 (30.6) received
Gastro-Protective Agents (GPA) in addition to
C2I. The results showed that prescribing of C2I
compared with NSAIDs among patients who were not
at high risk of GI adverse events resulted in
excessive expenditure of 2.4 million Baht/year.
Compared with the three highest consumption drugs
in the hospital including diclofenac, Voltaren,
and ibuprofen 400 mg, cost waste of C2I use were
3.4, 1.7 or 3.2 million Baht/year, respectively.
The additional cost of NSAIDs compared with
celecoxib or rofecoxib use in the high risk
group, practice, were 1.5 or 1.8 million
Baht/year, respectively. - Conclusions The cost impact of C2I use among
patients who were at low risk for
gastrointestinal adverse events compared with
NSAIDs at Lerdsin Hospital was 2.4 million
Baht/year. Because of the high cost impact of C2I
use, it is necessary to employ clinical practice
guideline for prescribing restriction and
prospective drug use review for C2I. - Funding Sources Graduate Program in Social and
Administrative Pharmacy and Graduate School of
Chulalongkorn University
- Objectives
- To characterize the patterns of use of specific
COX II inhibitors in orthopedic outpatients at
Lerdsin Hospital. - To determine cost impact of using specific COX
II inhibitors in orthopedic outpatients who are
in low risk and high risk GI adverse effects.
Pattern of Drug Use
Figure 1 Pattern of Specific COX-II
Inhibitors Use in Orthopedic Outpatient
Department at Lerdsin Hospital
- Results
- Patient Characteristics
- Concerning age of patients, 35.1 of specific
COX II inhibitors group and 15.3 of NSAIDs group
were patients aged 65 years. From ?2 test,
there was an association between age and patient
receiving specific COX II inhibitors. The result
showed that, number of patients aged 65 years
receiving specific COX II inhibitors more than
number of patients aged 65 years receiving
NSAIDs (Plt 0.0001). - Based on our observation, it appeared that the
number of patient in CSMBS group received
specific COX II inhibitors was greater than the
number of patient who received NSAIDs. We
conducted Chi Square test (?2) whether there was
an association between CSMBS and patients
receiving specific COX II inhibitors. The
results showed that, the number of patients with
CSMBS coverage receiving specific COX II
inhibitors were greater than the others
(Plt0.0001).
Cost Waste of Low Risk Group in Actual Practice
and Standard treatment
Table 2Cost Waste of Low Risk Group in Actual
Practice and Standard Treatment
Pattern of Drug Use in Low Risk and High Risk
Group
Table 1 Number of Prescriptions in Low Risk
and High Risk for Upper GI Adverse Effects of
Specific COX II Inhibitors and NSAIDs Using
during November 2002 to December 2002 of
Orthopedic Outpatients at Lerdsin Hospital.
- Conclusion
- Policy Recommendation
- Cost waste of specific COX II inhibitors in low
risk group compared with NSAIDs was 2.4 million
Baht/year in actual practice. - Compared to Diclofenac, Voltaren? and Ibuprofen
400 mg, excessive expenditures were 3.4, 1.7, and
3.2 million Baht/year. - Further study should focus on individual
patients payment status to find our whether the
payment status is a factor influencing physician
prescribing. - Pharmaceutical and Therapeutic Committee (PTC)
should implement Drug Use Review (DUR) to
evaluate specific COX II inhibitors use in
clinical practice. - The Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) of
specific COX II inhibitors should be reviewed in
order to restrict specific COX II inhibitors use
for high risk group only.
- Summary
- Pattern of Specific COX II Inhibitors Use
- Physician prescribed appropriate COX II use in
high risk was 40.08 and inappropriate COX II use
in low risk group was 59.92 - Cost Waste
- COX II compared with NSAIDs in low risk for
actual practice 2.4 million Baht/year. - COX II compared with NSAIDs in low risk for
standard treatment e.g., Diclofenac 3.4 million
Baht/year, Voltaren 1.7 million Baht/year and
Ibuprofen 400 mg 3.2 million Baht/year. - Additional Cost
- NSAIDs compared with specific COX II inhibitors
in high risk for actual practice Celecoxib 1.5
million Baht/year, Rofecoxib 1.8 million
Baht/year.
- Discussion
- In this study, the most frequent prescribing was
specific COX II inhibitors plus GPA or NSAIDs
plus GPA. The results of this study were
different from a previous study conducted by
Phochanukul (1999), which demonstrated that the
most frequent prescribing pattern was specific
COX II inhibitors alone or NSAIDs alone. - In Thailand, Pharmaceutical and Therapeutic
Committee (PTC) should develop and implement
prior authorization policy for appropriate
specific COX II inhibitors utilization in the
hospital. This policy would help saving
substantial amount of money in long term.
Additional Cost of High Risk Group in Actual
Practice
Table 3 Additional Cost of High Risk Group in
Actual Practice
Celecoxib Gr. Rofecoxib Gr. NSAIDs Gr.
Total Cost (Baht) 77,589.12 118,956.06 26,776.67
Average Cost per prescription (Baht) 957.89 936.66 236.96
Mean Duration (Days) 31.17 27.24 21.36
Average Cost per Day Baht) 30.73 34.39 11.21
Number of Prescriptions 81 127 113
Additional Cost (Baht/year) 1,536,033.48 1,824,039.78 -