Summary - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Summary

Description:

Physician prescribed appropriate COX II use in high risk ... Lerdsin Hospital, the Institute of Orthopedics of Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: com1166
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Summary


1
COST IMPACT OF USING SPECIFIC CYCLOOXYGENASE II
INHIBITORS IN ORTHOPEDIC OUTPATIENTS AT LERDSIN
HOSPITAL Jitsuda Phosri M.Sc. in Pharm., Assist.
Prof. Vithaya Kulsomboon Ph.D. , and Assist.
Prof. Niyada Kiatying-Angsulee Ph.D. International
Graduate Program in Social and Administrative
Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Introduction
  • Specific Cyclo-Oxygenase II (COX II)
    Inhibitors, have been introduced in several
    countries for the relief of chronic pain in
    rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.
    Celecoxib and rofecoxib are members of these
    specific COX II inhibitors, the incidence of
    gastric side effects with this new group is lower
    than observed in earlier NSAIDs.
  • In Thailand, there had been an increasing
    trend of specific COX II inhibitors utilization
    expenditures on celecoxib dramatically increased
    from 45.1 million Baht in 1999 to 295.6 million
    Baht while rofecoxib expenditures slightly
    increased from 20.1 million Baht in 1999 to 155.8
    million Baht in 2001.
  • The inappropriate prescribing of specific COX
    II inhibitors (COX II) has economic impact on
    individual patients and overall health care cost.
  • Methods
  • Research Design
  • A retrospective Study during November 2002 to
    December 2002 in orthopedic outpatient clinic at
    Lerdsin Hospital, the Institute of Orthopedics of
    Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Subjects Instrument
  • Data from orthopedic outpatient
    prescriptions and OPD Card that having specific
    COX II inhibitors and NSAIDs was collected,
    including, patients characteristics, patients
    histories and physicians prescribing.
  • Data collection form was used to be instrument
    of this study.
  • SPSS was used for analyzing the data.
  • Abstract
  • Problem Statement The inappropriate prescribing
    of specific COX II inhibitors (C2I) has economic
    impact on individual patients and overall health
    care cost.
  • Objectives To characterize the patterns of C2I
    use and to determine its cost impact in patients
    who were at low risk and high risk for
    gastrointestinal adverse effects.
  • Designs Retrospective design
  • Settings Lerdsin Hospital, the Institute of
    Orthopedics of Ministry of Public Health,
    Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Study Population Data from orthopedic
    outpatients having C2I and NSAIDs during November
    to December 2002 were collected. The
    proportionate sample was selected based on the
    two months drug utilization data including 519
    prescriptions of C2I and 594 prescriptions of
    NSAIDs. To select the prescriptions, computerized
    simple random sampling was used. The National
    Institute for Clinical Excellence of United
    Kingdom Guidance for C2I use was employed to
    determine whether the patients receiving C2I were
    at high risk of GI adverse events.
  • Outcome Measures Total cost per prescription,
    average cost per prescription, average cost per
    day, mean duration of prescribed drug, and cost
    waste of C2I versus NSAIDs use in low risk group
    of actual practice and standard treatment.
    Additional cost of NSAIDs compared with C2I in
    high risk group of actual practice.
  • Results Two hundred and eight (40.1) patients
    receiving C2I and 113 (19.0) patients receiving
    NSAIDs were considered to be at high risk for
    upper GI adverse effects. Of the patients
    receiving prescriptions for C2I, 112 (21.6)
    received C2I alone and 159 (30.6) received
    Gastro-Protective Agents (GPA) in addition to
    C2I. The results showed that prescribing of C2I
    compared with NSAIDs among patients who were not
    at high risk of GI adverse events resulted in
    excessive expenditure of 2.4 million Baht/year.
    Compared with the three highest consumption drugs
    in the hospital including diclofenac, Voltaren,
    and ibuprofen 400 mg, cost waste of C2I use were
    3.4, 1.7 or 3.2 million Baht/year, respectively.
    The additional cost of NSAIDs compared with
    celecoxib or rofecoxib use in the high risk
    group, practice, were 1.5 or 1.8 million
    Baht/year, respectively.
  • Conclusions The cost impact of C2I use among
    patients who were at low risk for
    gastrointestinal adverse events compared with
    NSAIDs at Lerdsin Hospital was 2.4 million
    Baht/year. Because of the high cost impact of C2I
    use, it is necessary to employ clinical practice
    guideline for prescribing restriction and
    prospective drug use review for C2I.
  • Funding Sources Graduate Program in Social and
    Administrative Pharmacy and Graduate School of
    Chulalongkorn University
  • Objectives
  • To characterize the patterns of use of specific
    COX II inhibitors in orthopedic outpatients at
    Lerdsin Hospital.
  • To determine cost impact of using specific COX
    II inhibitors in orthopedic outpatients who are
    in low risk and high risk GI adverse effects.

Pattern of Drug Use
Figure 1 Pattern of Specific COX-II
Inhibitors Use in Orthopedic Outpatient
Department at Lerdsin Hospital
  • Results
  • Patient Characteristics
  • Concerning age of patients, 35.1 of specific
    COX II inhibitors group and 15.3 of NSAIDs group
    were patients aged 65 years. From ?2 test,
    there was an association between age and patient
    receiving specific COX II inhibitors. The result
    showed that, number of patients aged 65 years
    receiving specific COX II inhibitors more than
    number of patients aged 65 years receiving
    NSAIDs (Plt 0.0001).
  • Based on our observation, it appeared that the
    number of patient in CSMBS group received
    specific COX II inhibitors was greater than the
    number of patient who received NSAIDs. We
    conducted Chi Square test (?2) whether there was
    an association between CSMBS and patients
    receiving specific COX II inhibitors. The
    results showed that, the number of patients with
    CSMBS coverage receiving specific COX II
    inhibitors were greater than the others
    (Plt0.0001).

Cost Waste of Low Risk Group in Actual Practice
and Standard treatment
Table 2Cost Waste of Low Risk Group in Actual
Practice and Standard Treatment
Pattern of Drug Use in Low Risk and High Risk
Group
Table 1 Number of Prescriptions in Low Risk
and High Risk for Upper GI Adverse Effects of
Specific COX II Inhibitors and NSAIDs Using
during November 2002 to December 2002 of
Orthopedic Outpatients at Lerdsin Hospital.
  • Conclusion
  • Policy Recommendation
  • Cost waste of specific COX II inhibitors in low
    risk group compared with NSAIDs was 2.4 million
    Baht/year in actual practice.
  • Compared to Diclofenac, Voltaren? and Ibuprofen
    400 mg, excessive expenditures were 3.4, 1.7, and
    3.2 million Baht/year.
  • Further study should focus on individual
    patients payment status to find our whether the
    payment status is a factor influencing physician
    prescribing.
  • Pharmaceutical and Therapeutic Committee (PTC)
    should implement Drug Use Review (DUR) to
    evaluate specific COX II inhibitors use in
    clinical practice.
  • The Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) of
    specific COX II inhibitors should be reviewed in
    order to restrict specific COX II inhibitors use
    for high risk group only.
  • Summary
  • Pattern of Specific COX II Inhibitors Use
  • Physician prescribed appropriate COX II use in
    high risk was 40.08 and inappropriate COX II use
    in low risk group was 59.92
  • Cost Waste
  • COX II compared with NSAIDs in low risk for
    actual practice 2.4 million Baht/year.
  • COX II compared with NSAIDs in low risk for
    standard treatment e.g., Diclofenac 3.4 million
    Baht/year, Voltaren 1.7 million Baht/year and
    Ibuprofen 400 mg 3.2 million Baht/year.
  • Additional Cost
  • NSAIDs compared with specific COX II inhibitors
    in high risk for actual practice Celecoxib 1.5
    million Baht/year, Rofecoxib 1.8 million
    Baht/year.
  • Discussion
  • In this study, the most frequent prescribing was
    specific COX II inhibitors plus GPA or NSAIDs
    plus GPA. The results of this study were
    different from a previous study conducted by
    Phochanukul (1999), which demonstrated that the
    most frequent prescribing pattern was specific
    COX II inhibitors alone or NSAIDs alone.
  • In Thailand, Pharmaceutical and Therapeutic
    Committee (PTC) should develop and implement
    prior authorization policy for appropriate
    specific COX II inhibitors utilization in the
    hospital. This policy would help saving
    substantial amount of money in long term.

Additional Cost of High Risk Group in Actual
Practice
Table 3 Additional Cost of High Risk Group in
Actual Practice
Celecoxib Gr. Rofecoxib Gr. NSAIDs Gr.
Total Cost (Baht) 77,589.12 118,956.06 26,776.67
Average Cost per prescription (Baht) 957.89 936.66 236.96
Mean Duration (Days) 31.17 27.24 21.36
Average Cost per Day Baht) 30.73 34.39 11.21
Number of Prescriptions 81 127 113
Additional Cost (Baht/year) 1,536,033.48 1,824,039.78 -
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com