Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Carcinoma and HPV Viral Load - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Carcinoma and HPV Viral Load

Description:

... Final results of the 94-01 French Head and Neck Oncology and Radiotherapy Group ... oropharynx: results of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E2399. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:437
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: MarcC76
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Carcinoma and HPV Viral Load


1
Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal
Carcinoma and HPV Viral Load
  • Marc A. Cohen, MDResearch Presentation
  • Faculty Advisors Dr. Weinstein and Dr. OMalley

2
Goals of Study
  • Determine margins of resection, oncologic
    outcomes, and functional outcomes following
    primary Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) for
    oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC)
  • Determine prevalence of HPV positivity in OPSCC
    in patients that undergo TORS
  • Determine prevalence of cervical nodal metastases
    in OPSCC associated with HPV
  • Assess patient outcomes in reference to HPV status

3
IntroductionHead and Neck Cancer
  • There are 500,000 new cases of squamous cell
    carcinoma of the head and neck per year.1-3
  • Overall, 5 year survival is less than 501
  • More than 7,000 in US die from oral cavity /
    oropharyngeal cancer per year4
  • Oncologic outcomes with oropharyngeal squamous
    cell carcinoma (OPSCC) are reported along a
    widely divergent range.
  • Currently, most studies with significant power
    are investigating various chemoradiation
    protocols in OPSCC.

4
Divergent Outcomes with OPSCC IFrench cohort of
stage III and IV OPSCC treated with xrt vs
concomitant chemo/xrt (n226)
5 Denis, F. et al. J Clin Oncol 2269-76 2004
5
Divergent Outcomes with OPSCC IIECOG E2399
phase II chemoradiation trial in resectable AJCC
III and IV OPSCC (n69)
6 Cmelak et al. J Clin Oncol 253971-3977 2007
6
Divergent Outcomes with OPSCC IIIBrazilian
cohort of all stage OPSCC treated with
chemoradiation (n361)
7 Pedruzzi et al. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck
Surg 20081341196-1204.
7
HPV association with HNSCC
  • In past 10 years, there has been evidence
    supporting an association between high risk human
    papillomavirus (HPV) serotypes and HNSCC.8-12
  • High risk serotypes (16,18,33) are conserved and
    associated with HNSCC as well as cervical and
    other carcinomas of the anogenital tract.9

8
HPV associated HNSCC
  • HPV associated HNSCC comprise a distinct clinical
    entity and pathogenesis
  • More basaloid features9
  • Less p53 mutations13,14
  • Younger patients without conventional risk
    factors8-10
  • Lifetime number of sexual partners15
  • Better prognosis?

9
Prevalence of HPV
  • Data using all molecular techniques yields an
    association of approximately 9-26 in all cases
    of HNSCC with oropharyngeal squamous cell
    carcinoma being associated with 45-709,16-19
  • Most common serotypes are HPV 16 (84-94), 18
    (0-3), 33 (1-27)3,16,19-22

10
Prognosis with HPV status
  • There has long been debate about whether HPV
    positive lesions are associated with better
    patient prognosis.23-29
  • Recent studies have equated HPV positivity with
    decreased recurrence rates, longer disease free
    survival, and overall survival.23-26
  • Lack of field cancerization, intact apoptotic
    mechanisms, better immune response to viral
    specific antigens, reduced 2nd primary tumors23,30

11
ECOG chemoradiation outcomes in OP SCC with HPV
status
30 Fakhry et al. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2008
100261-269.
12
Prognosis with HPV positive OP SCC treated with
CRT
  • Worden et al., showed that, induction
    chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation is an
    effective treatment for SCC OP, especially in
    those that are HPV positive. The authors suggest
    CRT should be used in SCC OP that are HPV
    positive with alternative treatments reserved
    for those that do not respond to induction
    chemotherapy.31

13
Worden et al
31 Worden et al. J Clin Oncol 263138-3146 2008
14
Surgical resection of OP lesions and HPV
association
32 Licitra et al. J Clin Oncol 245630-5636 2006
15
Surgical resection of OP lesions and HPV viral
load
33 Cohen et al. Acta Otolaryngol 2008128583-9.
16
Hypotheses
  • TORS will be oncologically sound as the primary
    therapy in treatment of select oropharyngeal
    cancers
  • The prevalence of HPV positivity in OP lesions
    will be 60-70.
  • There will be no difference in cervical
    metastases in HPV positive and HPV negative
    lesions.
  • Patients with both HPV positive and negative
    lesions will have favorable prognosis when
    treated with TORS.

17
Research Design
  • This clinical study was a retrospective analysis
    of a previously completed prospective trial
    evaluating outcomes of TORS for oropharyngeal
    squamous cell carcinoma.

18
Patient Inclusion
  • At least 18 years old
  • Presented with therapeutic approaches for a new
    squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx
    evaluated on prior endoscopy and with
    pre-operative computed tomography (CT) and/or
    magnetic resonance (MR)
  • Lesions that were anatomically amenable to
    transoral robotic surgery
  • Signed a written informed consent.

19
Tumor related contraindications
  • Unresectability of the tumor or involved lymph
    nodes
  • Invasion of the mandible
  • Bilateral posterior pharyngeal wall involvement
    (greater than 50)
  • Carotid artery involvement
  • Tumor fixation to the prevertebral fascia.

20
Additional intervention
  • Staged cervical lymphadenectomy was offered to
    all patients.
  • Adjuvant therapy with radiation and/or
    chemotherapy as indicated

21
Clinical Patient Data
  • Under IRB approved protocol, patient charts were
    evaluated with respect to gender, age, stage,
    margins of OP resection, incidence of pN in the
    neck, post operative radiation, swallowing
    function, and status of disease at follow up.
    This was done in a blinded fashion, prior to
    obtaining HPV data.
  • Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS
    16.0. Nonparametric statistics were performed
    using Pearsons Chi Square and Fishers Exact
    Test (2-sided). Kaplan-Meier analysis was
    performed for survival with differences assessed
    by the Log-Rank method.

22
Obtaining HPV data
  • In an arrangement with SensiGen, LLC, (Ann Arbor,
    Michigan) a biotechnology company focused on
    molecular diagnosis, we sent paraffin slides of
    oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma specimens
    for testing using real-time PCR technology. This
    company has performed HPV assays for other
    institutions.
  • Identification of the presence of any of the
    following HPV genotypes 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39,
    45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, 73 (for the
    16-plex version) in attomoles.
  • Measurement of the level of betaglobin DNA
    present, in attomoles.

23
Results Patient Information
  • The first 78 patients with oropharyngeal squamous
    cell carcinoma assessed
  • 58 patients with minimum 18 months follow up
  • 31 patients with HPV evaluation (no minimum
    follow up)
  • Mean follow up 21 months (2-41)
  • HPV assessed in 31 patients
  • 71 HPV positive, 95 of these HPV-16

24
Patient Characteristics
18 month follow (n58) HPV- (n9) HPV (n22)
Mean Age 57.4 55.4 58.6
Females 4 (7) 0 1 (5)
Follow up 25 (18-41) 23 (3-36) 21 (2-39)
Site (tonsil, BOT) 27(47), 26(45) 4(44), 3(33) 9(41), 12(55)
N in at-risk necks 44/56 (79) 6/8 (75) 17/23 (74)
ECS 20/53 (38) 3/8 (38) 7/22 (32)
AJCC (I-IV) 7(12), 4(7), 23(40), 24(41) 2(22), 0, 2(22), 5(55) 1(5), 0, 12(55), 9(41)
25
Oncologic Characteristics following TORS
18 month cohort (n58) HPV- (n9) HPV (n22)
Final margins (close/positive) 5(9), 0(0) 1(11), 0(0) 0 (0), 0 (0)
Local Recurrence 1 (2) 0 1 (5)
Neck Recurrence 1 (2) 1 (11) 0 (0)
Distant Metastases 4 (7) 0 (0) 1 (5)
Overall survival at 1 and 2-year 55/58 (95), 33/41 (81) 7/7 (100), 5/6 (83) 21/22 (95), 11/14 (79)
Disease specific survival 1 and 2-yr 55/56 (98), 33/36 (92) 7/7 (100), 5/5 (100) 21/21 (100), 11/12 (92)
26
58 patients with 18 months follow up overall
survival
27
Comparison of overall survival
Worden, F. P. et al. J Clin Oncol 263138-3146
2008
28
58 patients with 18 month follow up
disease-specific survival
29
Comparison of disease-specific survival
31 Worden et al. J Clin Oncol 263138-3146 2008
30
Overall survival with respect to post operative
adjuvant regimen
P0.585 (log rank)
31
Overall survival with respect to HPV status
P0.87 (log rank)

32
Comparison of outcomes related to HPV status
30 Fakhry et al. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2008
100261-269.
31 Worden et al. J Clin Oncol 263138-3146 2008
33
Swallowing function
  • There is a wide range of cited percentage of
    people after chemoradiation requiring gastrostomy
    tube. This is cited from 3 to approximately
    50.5,34,35
  • Ang et al cited the long term need for
    gastrostomy tubes in 30 of those with OPSCC
    treated with chemoradiation.34
  • Shiley et al cited the need for gastrostomy tube
    in 48 of those with OPSCC treated with
    chemoradiation.35
  • In our cohort 91 (50/55) of at risk patients had
    the gastrostomy tube removed.

34
Conclusions
  • TORS appears to be oncologically sound, with
    adequate margins of resection as well as
    satisfactory preliminary overall and disease
    specific survival.
  • 1 and 2 year oncologic data is equal to or
    superior to the most recent chemoradiation data.
  • On preliminary assessment, negative HPV status
    does not appear to be a negative prognostic
    factor as seen in prior publications.
  • Swallowing function without gastrostomy tube is
    preserved in more than 90 of patients.

35
Future directions
  • With the cohort created, we can follow out for
    long term survival data.
  • We are awaiting quantitative data, with which we
    can further analyze patient outcomes.
  • We can compare outcome data for patients
    undergoing surgical resection with those
    undergoing primary chemo/xrt.
  • We can compare function of the those undergoing
    surgical resection with those undergoing
    chemo/xrt.

36
References
  • 1. Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Global cancer
    statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 1999 4933-64.
  • 2. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisaniet P.
    Estimating the world cancer burden Globocan
    2000. Int J Cancer 200194153-6.
  • 3. Herrero R, Castellsague X, Pawlita M, et al.
    Human papillomavirus and oral cancer the
    International Agency for Research on Cancer
    multicenter study. J Natl Cancer Inst
    2003951772-83.
  • 4. Carvalho AL, Nishimito IN, Califano JA,
    Kowalski LP. Trends in incidence and prognosis
    for head and neck cancer in the united states a
    site-specific analysis of the SEER database. Int
    J Cancer 2005114806-16.
  • 5. Denis F, Garaud P, Bardet E, et al. Final
    results of the 94-01 French Head and Neck
    Oncology and Radiotherapy Group randomized tiral
    comparing radiotherapy alone with concomitant
    radiochemotherapy in advanced-stage oropharynx
    carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20042269-76.
  • 6. Cmelak AJ, Sigui L, Goldwasser MA, et al.
    Phase II trial of chemoradiation for organ
    preservation in resectable stage III or IV
    squamous cell carcinomas of the larynx or
    oropharynx results of Eastern Cooperative
    Oncology Group Study E2399. J Clin Oncol
    2007253971-7.
  • 7. Pedruzzi PA, Kowalski LP, Nishimito IN, et al.
    Analysis of prognostic factors in patients with
    oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated
    with radiotherapy alone or in combination with
    systemic chemotherapy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck
    Surg 20081341196-204.
  • 8. Koch WM, Lango M, Sewell D, et al. Head and
    neck cancer in nonsmokers a distinct clinical
    and molecular entity. Laryngoscope
    19991091544-51.
  • 9. Gillison ML, Koch WM, Capone RB, et al.
    Evidence for a causal association between human
    papillomavirus and a subset of head and neck
    cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 200092709-20.
  • 10. van Houten VM, Snijders PJ, van den Brekel
    MW, et al. Biological evidence that human
    papillomaviruses are etiologically involved in a
    subgroup of head and neck squamous cell
    carcinomas. Int J Cancer 200193232-5.
  • 11. El-Mofty SK, Lu DW. Prevalence of human
    papillomavirus type 16 DNA in squamous cell
    carcinoma of the palatine tonsil, and not the
    oral cavity, in young patients a distinct
    clinicopathologic and molecular disease entity.
    Am J Surg Pathol 2003271463-70.
  • 12. Franceschi S, Munoz N, Snijders PJ. How
    strong and how wide is the link between HPV and
    oropharyngeal cancer? Lancet 2000356871-2.
  • 13. Blons H, Laurent-Puig P. TP53 and head and
    neck neoplasms. Hum Mutat 2003 21252-7.
  • 14. Westra WH, Taube JM, Poeta ML, et al. Inverse
    relationship between human papillomavirus-16
    infection and disruptive p53 gene mutations in
    squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
    Clin Cancer Res 200814366-9.
  • 15. Furniss CS, McClean MD, Smith JF, et al.
    Human papillomavirus 16 and head and neck
    squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer
    20071202386-92.
  • 16. Gillison ML, Koch WM, Shah KV. Human
    papillomavirus in head and neck squamous cell
    carcinoma are some head and neck cancers a
    sexually transmitted disease? Curr Opin Oncol
    199911191-9.
  • 17. Gillison ML, Shah KV. Human
    papillomavirus-associated head and neck squamous
    cell carcinoma mounting evidence for an
    etiologic role for human papillomavirus in a
    subset of head and neck cancers. Curr Opin Oncol
    200113183-8.
  • 18. Mork J, Lie AK, Glattre E, et al. Human
    papillomavirus infection as a risk factor for
    squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N
    Engl J Med 20013441125-31.

37
References II
References
  • 19. Klussmann JP, Weissenborn SJ, Wieland U, et
    al. Prevalence, distribution, and viral load of
    human papillomavirus 16 DNA in tonsillar
    carcinomas. Cancer 2001 922875-84.
  • 20. Koskinen WJ, Chen RW, Leivo I, et al.
    Prevalence and physical status of human
    papillomavirus in squamous cell carcinomas of the
    head and neck. Int J Cancer 2003107401-6.
  • 21. Syrjanen S. HPV infections and tonsillar
    carcinoma. J Clin Pathol 2004 57449-55.
  • 22. Smith EM, Ritchie JM, Summersgill KF, et al.
    Age, sexual behavior and human papillomavirus
    infection in oral cavity and oropharyngeal
    cancers. Int J Cancer 2004108766-72.
  • 23. Gillison ML, Koch WM, Capone RB, et al.
    Evidence for a causal association between human
    papillomavirus and a subset of head and neck
    cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 200092709-720
  • 24. Schwartz SR, Yueh B, McDougall JK, et al.
    Human papillomavirus infection and survival in
    oral squamous cell cancer a population-based
    study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 20011251-9.
  • 25. Weinberger PM, Yu Z, Haffty BG, et al.
    Molecular classification identifies a subset of
    human papillomaviruses--associated oropharyngeal
    cancers with favorable prognosis. J Clin Oncol
    200624736-47.
  • 26. Ragin CC, Taioli E. Survival of squamous cell
    carcinoma of the head and neck in relation to
    human papilomavirus infection review and
    meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 20071211813-20.
  • 27. Gillison ML. Human papillomavirus-associated
    head and neck cancer is a distinct epidemiologic,
    clinical, and molecular entity. Semin Oncol
    200431744
  • 28. Clayman GL, Stewart MG, Weber RS, et al.
    Human papillomavirus in laryngeal and
    hypopharyngeal carcinomas. Relationship to
    survival. Arch Otololaryngol Head Neck Surg
    1994120743-748.
  • 29. Snijders PJ, Scholes AG, Hart CA, et al.
    Prevalence of mucosotropic human papillomaviruses
    in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
    Int J Cancer 199666464-9.
  • 30. Fakhry C, Westra WH, Li S, et al. Improved
    survival of patients with human
    papillomavirus-positive head and neck squamous
    cell carcinoma in a prospective clinical trial. J
    Natl Cancer Inst 2008100261-9.
  • 31. Worden FP, Kumar B, Lee SJ, et al.
    Chemoselection as a strategy for organ
    preservation in advanced oropharynx cancer
    response and survival positively associated with
    HPV16 copy number. J Clin Onol 2008263138-46.
  • 32. Licitra L, Perrone F, Bossi P, et al.
    High-risk human papillomavirus affects prognosis
    affects prognosis in patients with surgically
    treated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J
    Clin Oncol 2006245630-36.
  • 33. Cohen MA, Basha SR, Reichenbach DK, et al.
    Increased viral load correlates with improved
    survival in HPV-16-associated tonsil carcinoma
    patients. Acta Otolaryngol 2008128583-9.
  • 34. Ang KK, Harris H, Garden AS, et al.
    Concomitant boost radiation plus concurrent
    cisplatin for advanced head and neck carcinomas
    radiation therapy oncology group phase II trial
    99-14. J Clin Oncol 2005233008-15.
  • 35. Shiley SG, Hargunani CA, Skoner JM, et al.
    Swallowing function after chemoradiation for
    advanced stage oropharyngeal cancer. Otolaryngol
    Head Neck SUrg 2006134

38
Thank you
  • Dr. Weinstein
  • Dr. OMalley
  • TORS research team
  • Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck
    Surgery
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com