Interannual Variability of Warm-Season Rainfall over the US Great Plains in NASA/NSIPP and NCAR/CAM2.0 AMIP Simulations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Interannual Variability of Warm-Season Rainfall over the US Great Plains in NASA/NSIPP and NCAR/CAM2.0 AMIP Simulations

Description:

3) Simulations suggest that precip over the GP region is largely of convective nature. ... GP precip anomalies are associated with mean southerly MF from the Gulf of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: Alfr81
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Interannual Variability of Warm-Season Rainfall over the US Great Plains in NASA/NSIPP and NCAR/CAM2.0 AMIP Simulations


1
Interannual Variability of Warm-Season Rainfall
over the US Great Plains in NASA/NSIPP and
NCAR/CAM2.0 AMIP Simulations
  • By
  • Alfredo Ruiz-Barradas and Sumant Nigam
  • Department of Meteorology
  • University of Maryland

  • December 11, 2003

2
Goal
  • To assess interannual variability of
    precipitation over North America in AMIP-like
    runs of CAM2.0 and NSIPP models during summer
    months (June, July, August).

3
Outline
  • Data
  • JJA Climatology
  • Interannual Variability
  • Remarks

4
(No Transcript)
5
From TV News it seems we have the flood of the
century every year
6
Data
  • Precipitation
  • Retrospective US and Mexico analysis.
  • Hulme (University of East Anglia) data set.
  • Xie/Arkin precipitation data set.
  • NCEP ERA40 Reanalyses.
  • SST from Hadley Center.
  • NCEP ERA40 Reanalyses.
  • AMIP simulations (ens05 mean) from the NSIPP
    model.
  • AMIP simulation (case newsstamip06) from the CAM
    model.

7
Data
  • Reanalysis and simulations extrapolated to a
    5?2.5? grid on 17 pressure levels.
  • Monthly climatology for the 1950-1998 period.
  • Monthly anomalies wrt 1950-1998 climatology.
  • JJA is the mean of June, July, August.
  • Assessment through
  • Standard Deviation
  • Precipitation Index
  • Multivariate analysis

8
CLIMATOLOGY
  • OF
  • MOISTURE FLUXES

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Remarks Climatology
  • Vertically Integrated Moisture Fluxes 1)
    Observations in agreement mean southerly
    moisture fluxes from MFD in the Gulf of Mexico
    and Caribbean Sea toward MFC in the GP output of
    moisture fluxes by transients from the GP region
    to the N and NE. 2) Simulations reproduce
    observed features at different extent with NSIPP
    and CAM having problems to capture both MFC and
    southerly moisture flux.
  • Precipitation 1) No-reanalysis data sets agree
    very well. 2) NCEP Reanalysis overestimate
    precipitation ERA-40 is reasonably well. 3)
    Shifted maximum in simulations W in NSIPP, E in
    CAM.

15
INTERANNUAL VARIABILITY
  • OF PRECIPITATION

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
Remarks Variability
  • Precipitation 1) No-reanalysis data sets agree
    very well. 2) NCEP has larger variability than
    observations ERA-40 has reasonably variability
    but maximum is to the W of the GP. 3) Maximum of
    STD is shifted to the W in NSIPP and to the E in
    CAM.
  • Indices 1) ERA40 has larger correlation with
    no-reanalysis indices than NCEP has. 2)
    Simulations disagree with each other and with
    verifying no-reanalysis observations. 3)
    Simulations suggest that precip over the GP
    region is largely of convective nature. However
    ERA-40 indicates that large-sacle precipitation
    is equally important!!

22
REGRESSING INDICES
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
Remarks Regressions
  • GP precip anomalies are associated with mean
    southerly MF from the Gulf of Mexico and
    Caribbean Sea, as well as mean MFC. Transients
    enhance precip in the N and reduce it in the S of
    the region.
  • Simulations disagree between them, NSIPP is
    closer to observations but with max of precip to
    the W of the max of MFC CAM however shows MF
    from the Pacific!!
  • GP precip anomalies are linked to Pacific SSTs in
    both observations and simulations.
  • A wave-train with lows over the oceans and
    central US present in observations is weakly
    captured in simulations.

28
MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS
  • PrecipSfcTmpSfcPress

29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
JJA vs MJJA or JJAS
  • REOF OF SST?(700)

33
(No Transcript)
34
Remarks
  • Multivariate analysis indicates
  • Great Plains precipitation variability is the
    main mode of summer variability in observations
  • This is however not the case in both model
    simulations
  • Wet/dry events are cold/warm events in both
    observed and simulated summers.
  • Part of the GP precip variability seems to be
    forced by the atmosphere. Transition months
    affect the structure of what is defined as
    summer.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com