Gender Matching, Not Ethnic Matching, Desired For HIV Posttest Counseling PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 23
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gender Matching, Not Ethnic Matching, Desired For HIV Posttest Counseling


1
Gender Matching, Not Ethnic Matching, Desired For
HIV Post-test Counseling
  • Catherine Woodstock Striley, MSW, LCSW, Ph.D.,
  • NIMH Postdoctoral Trainee
  • Linda B. Cottler, Ph.D., Professor
  • Department of Psychiatry

2
Acknowledgements
  • Funded by
  • NIDA 01-DA08324, L.B. Cottler, PI
  • NIMH training grant T32-MH17104, L.B.Cottler,
    Director.

3
Problem
  • Very sensitive information is presented in HIV
    pre- and post-test counseling
  • Some studies in mental health settings suggest
    that
  • Women and men may prefer gender-matched
    counselors
  • African-Americans and whites may prefer a
    racially/ethnically matched counselor
  • Not everyone returns for their post-test
    counseling session
  • This may be due to dissatisfaction with the
    counselor

4
Aims
  • To examine whether or not women and/or men, and
    African-Americans and/or whites, prefer a matched
    counselor for HIV pre- and post-test counseling
  • To examine whether or not individuals with a
    racially or gender matched counselor express more
    of a preference for a matched counselor

5
Sample
  • EachOneTeachOne
  • NIDA funded study
  • investigated the effectiveness of providing HIV
    education to chronic drug and intravenous drug
    users.

6
Sample
  • 1220 drug users recruited
  • from St. Louis City high drug abuse, crime and
    prostitution areas
  • Store-front satellite health centers
    (HealthStreet) opened in two of these
    neighborhoods
  • Community Health Outreach Workers went out onto
    the streets to recruit sample
  • All received HIV pre- and post-test counseling
    and were randomized to enhanced HIV prevention
    or standard of care

7
Methods Independent Variables
  • Gender of participant (self-reported)
  • Race of participant (self-reported white or
    African-American)
  • Gender of counselor (agency records)
  • Race of counselor (agency records)
  • Matched (counselor and participant match on
    gender or race)

8
Methods Dependent Variables
  • Prefer an ethnically-matched counselor
  • Prefer a gender-matched counselor
  • Satisfaction
  • "If you were the counselor, what would you do or
    say differently?"

9
Analyses
  • Chi-squares in SAS
  • Gender by desire for gender-match
  • Ethnicity/Race by desire for ethnic-match
  • Matched by desire for gender-match
  • Matched by desire for ethnic-match

10
Sample Characteristics
  • 103 (93) were African-American
  • 8 (7) were white
  • 77 (69) were men
  • 34 (31) were women
  • Age ranged from 19 51 with a mean of 36 (sd7)

11
Matching
  • 50 (42) had an African-American counselor
  • 75 (58) had a white counselor
  • 101 (78) had a male counselor
  • 29 (22) had a female counselor
  • 42 of the session were done by 2 African
    American counselors
  • 58 were conducted by white counselors

12
Matched Pairs
13
Satisfaction
  • Satisfaction was measured by whether they would
    have done or said anything differently
  • Only 2 out of 118 said anything but "No",
    "Nothing", "Not a thing", "Would not change
    anything" or related statement
  • 1 suggested offering food
  • 1 suggested more AIDS information

14
Aim I Results Only gender affects desire for
match
  • Race and gender not significantly associated with
    desire for a racially or gender matched counselor
    except that men (17 of 77 or 22) were more
    likely to desire a match than women (2 out of 32
    or 6)
  • Out of those that desired a gender-match, 89
    were men compared to 11 of women, significantly
    more than would be expected
  • X24.3, p.04
  • N111

15
Aim II Gender Matching Results
  • 3 people (6) who did not have a gender matched
    counselor wanted one while 44 (94) did not
  • 16 (25) of those who did have a gender matched
    counselor wanted a matched counselor while 48
    (75) did not
  • X26.62, plt.01
  • N111

16
Gender Matching Results
17
Aim II Race Matching Results
  • No one without a race-matched counselor wanted
    one, while 65 (100) of those without a matched
    counselor did not want one
  • 9 (20) of those with a race matched counselor
    wanted a matched counselor while 35 (80) did not
  • X214.28, p.0002
  • N108

18
Race Matching Results
19
Conclusions
  • In this sample, women did not prefer a gender
    matched counselor
  • Other research has found differently
  • Interestingly, men did want a gender matched
    counselor
  • Counseling was about sexually risky behavior and
    HIV/AIDS
  • Race/ethnicity did not predict desire for an
    ethnically matched counselor

20
Conclusions II
  • Match predicted desire for a match
  • Being matched in this study was random
  • Satisfaction, as measured by whether they would
    have done or said anything differently, was high
  • Being matched in the context of high
    satisfaction, significantly predicted desire for
    a match

21
Implications
  • Being matched and satisfied may produce a "halo
    effect"
  • If you measure desire for match after a good
    experience, you are likely to find they desire to
    repeat the good experience and may attribute it
    to the match
  • This study unable to measure opposite If
    unsatisfied, is there less desire for a match?

22
Implications II
  • It may not be important to match counselors and
    clients by race and gender for HIV counseling
  • Except that males did prefer a male counselor
  • African-Americans may not expect to have a
    matched counselor
  • When their expectations change, and they realize
    it is an option, they may desire a race matched
    provider

23
For more information
  • Catherine Woodstock Striley, MSW, LCSW, Ph.D.
  • NIMH Postdoctoral Fellow
  • Department of Psychiatry
  • 40 N. Kingshighway, Suite 4
  • St. Louis, Missouri 63108
  • Phone 314-286-2268
  • Fax 314-286-2265
  • StrileyC_at_epi.wustl.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com