Title: Conducting Clinical Trials
1Conducting Clinical Trials
- University of Virginia
- SOM Clinical Trials Office
2Lessons learned from federal inspections
- Objectives of investigative site inspections
- Determine the facts surrounding a study
- Determine adherence to regulations
- Verify subject safety
- Verify validity of data
- Compare practices/procedures to research
commitments/applications - Unwritten objective - education
3Most common inspection findings
- Informed consent form inadequacies
- Protocol non-adherence
- Inadequate/inaccurate records
- Inadequate investigational article accountability
- Inaccurate case histories
4Most common inspection findings
- IRB not informed of protocol changes
- Unapproved concomitant therapy
- Records not available
- Subinvestigators/study personnel not listed
- Inappropriate follow-up of adverse events
5Most common inspection findings
- Failure to report adverse events
- Subjects enrolled into simultaneous
investigations - Submission of false information
- Inappropriate delegation
6Topics for discussion
- Study Conduct
- Regulatory / Administrative
- Data Collection / Documentation
- Safety Monitoring
7Study Conduct
- Investigator Agreement (and/or Form FDA 1572)
summarize the responsibilities of the
investigator for the conduct of the trial. - Conduct trials according to Standard Operating
Procedures (SOPs) which are consistent with the
regulations governing clinical trials
8Study Conduct
- Informed consent form inadequacies
- Protocol non-adherence
- Inadequate investigational article accountability
I - RB not informed of protocol changes
- Unapproved concomitant therapy
- Subjects enrolled into simultaneous
investigations - Inappropriate delegation
9Regulatory / Administrative
- Investigator is responsible to maintain all
regulatory documents for each study - Protocol
- Protocol amendments
- Case Report Forms (CRFs)
- Investigator Agreement (and/or Form FDA 1572)
- Current CV and medical license of PI and
sub-investigator
10Regulatory / Administrative
- All correspondence with the IRB (HIC)
- IRB (HIC) approval
- IRB (HIC) approved informed consent (all approved
versions) - All safety reports sent to IRB and/or federal
regulators - Normal values for laboratory tests (if
applicable) - All materials used in recruiting subjects
11Regulatory / Administrative
- Drug / device accountability records (if
applicable) - Screening log / subject log
- Correspondence
- Original signed consents
- All correspondence with federal regulators
- Financial records
12Regulatory / Administrative
- Record retention
- FDA regulated trial - retain all records for 2
years following the NDA approval (or final
decision not to approve) - Non-FDA regulated trial - 3 years following the
completion of the research - HIPAA - 6 years following the completion of the
research
13Regulatory / Administrative
- Informed consent form inadequacies
- Inadequate/inaccurate records
- Records not available
- Subinvestigators/study personnel not listed
14Safety Monitoring / Reporting
- Safety monitoring is required in all clinical
research studies - HIC requires a data safety monitoring plan be
incorporated in the protocol - Plan should be consistent with the degree of risk
involved with the study
15Safety Monitoring / Reporting
- Adverse event
- any untoward or undesirable sign, symptom or
medical condition (including an abnormal
laboratory finding) occurring after administering
the investigational agent even if the event is
not considered to be related to the
investigational agent. - Non-drug study - same definition, replace
investigational agent
16Safety Monitoring / Reporting
- Unexpected / unanticipated adverse event
- any adverse event, the specificity or severity
of which is not consistent with the current
investigator brochure (or package insert).
17Safety Monitoring / Reporting
- Serious adverse event
- any adverse event that
- results in death
- is life threatening
- requires hospitalization (or prolongation of
hospitalization) - results in persistent or significant disability /
incapacity - results in a congenital anomaly / birth defect
- is deemed serious based on medical judgement
18Safety Monitoring / Reporting
- Severity grading
- Usually reported as mild, moderate, or severe
(except in oncology trials) - Severity is a measurement of intensity not of
seriousness - A serious adverse event is not necessarily severe
- A severe adverse event is not necessarily serious
19Safety Monitoring / Reporting
- Expedited safety reporting
- Notify the HIC of any study-related adverse
events that are unexpected, serious, probably and
possibly associated with the investigational
agent/device - Notification must be made within 24 hours of the
event
20Safety Monitoring / Reporting
- Expedited safety reporting (drugs/biologics)
- Sponsor must notify the federal regulators by
telephone or by fax - details of any unexpected fatal or
life-threatening experience associated with the
use of the drug - Notification must be made no later than 7
calendar days after the initial receipt of the
information
21Safety Monitoring / Reporting
- Sponsor must notify the federal regulators and
all participating investigators in writing - details of any AE associated with the use of the
investigational drug that is both serious and
unexpected - any finding from laboratory tests that suggests a
significant risk for human subjects - Notification must be made no later than 15
calendar days after initial receipt of info
22Safety Monitoring / Reporting
- Expedited safety reporting (medical device)
- Sponsor must immediately conduct and evaluation
of any unanticipated adverse device effect. - If effect presents an unreasonable risk to the
subjects, all studies with this device must
terminated (within 5 working days of making
decision and within 15 working days of learning
of the event) - Federal regulators and the HIC must be informed
of unanticipated adverse device effects. If
study was terminated, cannot be resumed without
approval of both
23Safety Monitoring / Reporting
- Inappropriate follow-up of adverse events
- Failure to report adverse events
24Data Collection / Documentation
- Investigators are required to prepare and
maintain adequate and accurate records of all
observations and other data pertinent to the
study for each subject. - Investigators must maintain primary source
documents supporting significant data for each
subject in the case history records. - Source documentation is where the information is
first recorded.
25Data Collection / Documentation
- Source documentation should include (as
appropriate) - documentation that informed consent was obtained
prior to any study procedures - demographics
- evidence supporting diagnosis/condition
- information demonstrating that the subject meets
the inclusion criteria (e.g., medical history and
physical exam)
26Data Collection / Documentation
- documentation of each study visit
- information regarding the subjects exposure to
test or control article (or any investigational
procedures) - documentation of adverse events (with evidence of
appropriate follow-up as appropriate) - diagnostic test results, x-ray and laboratory
test results (for study-related tests) - Subject diaries
- ...
27Data Collection / Documentation
- Case Report Forms
- content of the case report form must capture data
as required by the protocol - the investigator ensures the accuracy of the data
recorded on the case report form - record data in pen, maintain audit trail (never
use white-out)
28Data Collection / Documentation
- Inaccurate case histories
- Submission of false information
29Who do you need to know?
- GCRC
- Human Investigation Committee (HIC)
- Grants and Contracts
- Ancillary service providers
- Pharmacy
- Laboratory
- Radiology
- Patient Financial Services
- Medical Records
- etc.
30Clinical Trials Office
- Contact the SOM Clinical Trials Office with
clinical research questions. - 924-8530
-