Title: Ethics in Research
1Ethics in Research
- HPRF 295
- San Jose State University
- November 10, 2004
- Colleen OLeary-Kelley, PhD, RN, CCRN
2Definitions
- Research
- Systematic investigation to produce generalizable
knowledge - Participation in activities involving analysis of
specimens or data from people human subjects
research
- Human Subject
- A living individual about whom an investigator
obtains data - through intervention or interaction with the
individual or - through identifiable private information
3Historical Ethical Issues Related to Research
- Instances of unethical research involving human
subjects were discovered after World War II - Experiments involving sterilization were
conducted by the Nazi Party in Germany
4Historical Ethical Issues Related to Research
- Experimental research involved
- Sterilization procedures
- Development of vaccine for typhus
- Events were exposed post WW II
- 1946 Nuremberg trials
- Nuremberg Code developed as the first
international standard for conduct of research
5Unethical Research in the U.S.
- Tuskegee Syphilis Study 1932-1973
- Designed to determine the natural history of
untreated syphilis - Men were recruited without informed consent
- Treatment was withheld
- Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital Study 1965
- Studies that examined the rejection of cancer
cells - No informed consent
6Unethical Research in the U.S.
- Radiation tests performed on mentally impaired
boys 1946 to 1956 - Institutionalized boys were given radioactive
milk to study the bodys ability to digest
minerals
- Efforts to protect the rights of research
subjects occurred in response to knowledge of
these ethical violations
7Ethical Guidelines for Research
- In 1974, Congress mandated the National
Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects
of Biomedical and Behavioral Research - Primary task identify the ethical principles to
guide human research - The Belmont Report published 1979
8The Belmont Report
- Identified three ethical principles to guide
human research in the U.S. - Respect for persons
- Beneficence
- Justice
9The Belmont Report
- Respect for persons
- People have the right to self-determination and
the freedom to participate or not participate in
research. - Beneficence
- The investigator is obligated to maximize
benefits and minimize risk of harm.
- Justice
- Equals must be treated equally and fairly. An
injustice occurs when benefit to which a person
is entitled is denied without good reason or when
burden is unduly imposed.
10Additional Federal Regulations
- In the 1980s, regulations were further developed
and revised - Title 45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46,
Protection of Human Subjects (45 CFR 46)
- These regulations contain the ethical principles
of the Belmont Report - The minimal ethical and legal obligations for
research involving human subjects are outlined
11Ethical Issues in Research
- Federal regulations are intended to ensure that
clinical research is conducted ethically - Universities require that all human subject
research is conducted within guidelines - Federal regulations provide two main protections
for human subjects - Institutional review board (IRB) approval
- Informed consent
12Institutional Review Board (IRB)
- A committee of scientific and non-scientific
individuals, established according to federal
requirements, with responsibilities for review
and approval of human subjects research protocols
and consent forms
13Institutional Review Board
- The primary responsibility of the IRB is to
ensure that research is ethical and protects the
rights of subjects - The IRB must determine whether research studies
meet federal regulatory standards
14Exceptions to IRB Review
- Expedited IRB review may be allowed for research
that involves no more than minimal risk - Recording data using noninvasive procedures
- Study of existing documents or records
- An expedited review does not automatically exempt
the researcher from obtaining informed consent -
15Informed Consent
- A process of carefully informing research
subjects about a proposed course of treatment or
research that includes an explanation of the
potential risks and benefits and alternatives - The researcher must disclose information that may
influence a potential subjects decision to
participate
16Informed Consent
- Informed consent must include
- Purpose and description
- Risks
- Benefits
- Alternatives
- Confidentiality
- Greater than minimal risk
- Contact information
- Voluntary participation
- No payment required
17Informed Consent
- It is more than the formality of a signature on a
piece of paper - Requirements for informed consent
- Voluntariness
- Understanding
18Informed Consent
- Written consent may be waived in some situations
- Research presents minimal risk
- Impractical
- Consent is deferred to legally authorized
representative for those who are not capable of
giving informed consent
19Research in Special Populations
- Scrutinize whether research question could be
studied in a population capable of giving consent - Additional federal requirements for groups unable
to provide consent - Children
- Prisoners
- Pregnant women, fetuses, embryos
- People with impaired decision-making capability
20Research in Special Populations
- Vulnerable populations must not be singled out
because they are convenient samples - Researchers who study such groups need to show
that it is appropriate to involve vulnerable
subjects in research
21Ethics in Nursing Research
- ANA Commission on Nursing Research published
Human Rights Guidelines for Nursing in Clinical
and Other Research - Outlines code of ethics for nurse researchers and
caregivers - ANA, 1975 2002
- Protection of human rights
- Right to self-determination
- Right to privacy and dignity
- Right to anonymity and confidentiality
- Right to fair treatment
- Right to protection from discomfort and harm
22Scientific Fraud and Misconduct
- Fraud
- Fabrication or falsification of findings
- Misconduct
- Clinical practice based on false published data
- Unauthorized research
- may expose patients to unwarranted risk and may
not protect human rights - Conflict of interest
23Ethics in Clinical Trials
- Trials may be stopped early if findings show
increased risk or benefit - Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial
- stopped after 18 months because of increased
mortality in experimental group compared to
controls - Physicians Health Study
- stopped after 4.8 years because a significant
reduction in MI in the group treated with aspirin
24Online Resources
- Office for Human Research Protection (OHRP)
- OnlineEthics.org
- Hastings Center Report
- NIH bioethics resources