Jeffie Davis Danny Harmon Brandon Guynes David Nguyen Kelly Vaught - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Jeffie Davis Danny Harmon Brandon Guynes David Nguyen Kelly Vaught

Description:

Jeffie Davis Danny Harmon Brandon Guynes David Nguyen Kelly Vaught – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: cltAs
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Jeffie Davis Danny Harmon Brandon Guynes David Nguyen Kelly Vaught


1
Jeffie DavisDanny HarmonBrandon GuynesDavid
NguyenKelly Vaught
Xerox Outsourcing Global Information
Technology Resources
2
Xerox Company Background
  • Introduced 914 model in 1959
  • Sales increase from 32 million to 1.1 billion
    by 1968
  • Held 95 share of the plain-paper market
  • 1976 1982 share of US copier installations
    dropped from 80 to 13

3
Xerox Company Background
  • 1980 introduced Leadership through Quality
  • Participation
  • Complete company unity
  • Benchmarking
  • Industry comparison
  • Quality management
  • Improved quality of service

4
Xerox Company Background
  • 1989 winner of Malcolm Baldrige Quality Award
  • 1989 winner of Canadian National Quality Award
  • 1992 recipient of 1st annual European Quality
    Award

5
Xerox Corporate Restructuring
  • 1992 Xerox created 9 division
  • Created to move decision making closer to the
    customer
  • 3 customer operations
  • 1993 began 10 workforce reduction over next 3
    fiscal periods

6
Strengths
Weaknesses
Federal Lawsuits Caused Forfeit of Patents No
Overall Coordination or Management of
Information Technology Investment
Name Recognition First Mover in the Plain-Paper
Copier Market Global Oriented
Foreign Competition Canon Minalta Ricoh Sharp
Outsource Information Technology Requirements
Opportunities
Threats
7
Business Model
  • Manufactures
  • Markets
  • Services
  • Finances
  • Document Processing Equipment

8
Information Management at Xerox
  • Corporate Information Management (CIM) was
    established in the early 1970s
  • CIM was
  • responsible for managing their data centers and
    networks
  • expected to supply the overall IT leadership to
    the company

9
Centralizing Xerox IM
  • It became apparent that the existing information
    systems infrastructure was inadequate in the late
    1980s
  • IM was not capable to provide the information
    needed to support the companys new divisions
  • Xerox was not getting what they needed from the
    money that was being poured into IM

10
IM 2000 Project
  • The IM 2000 reengineering project was started in
    the middle of 1993 to address the problems in IM.
  • Legacy Systems
  • Financial Challenges
  • Lack of consolidated applications

11
IM 2000 Project
  • Strategies were recommended to develop the new IT
    infrastructure
  • Reduce/Redirect
  • Infrastructure management
  • Leverage worldwide IM resources
  • Business processdriven solutions

12
The Decision
  • They tried to keep it Internal
  • But
  • They knew they had a steady demand
  • They knew they had little time
  • They knew they had funding constraints
  • A rapid movement toward the IM 2000 vision
    ultimately convinced Xerox to outsource

13
Outsourcing Benefits
  • Financial Benefits
  • Experience
  • Management
  • Focus

14
The Outsourcing Process
Aug 93
Sep 93
Oct 93
Nov 93
Dec 93
Jan 94
Feb 94
Mar 94
Leading vendors evaluated   (8-10)
Selected CSC EDS IBM-ISSC Andresen Con
Solicited CSC Andersen Consulting
(partners) EDS IBM-ISSC and AT T (partners)
Selected EDS
Literature Search
Request for Information
Firm Bids against terms and baseline
15
EDS is Selected
  • Vendor Qualifications
  • Human Resources
  • Technical Solutions
  • Financial
  • Soft Criteria

16
The Contract
  • June 1994 Xerox signed a 3.2 billion 10-year
    deal with EDS
  • EDS ran mainframes, legacy systems, world-wide
    voice data in 19 countries
  • 170 million and 1,900 employees moved to EDS

17
Spirit of the Contract
  • This is not a client/vendor relationship this
    is not a supplier relationship this is not a
    win/lose situation this is a strategic
    relationship.
  • -Reed

18
Spirit of Contract
  • Integration only available with complete
    cooperation
  • Obstacles
  • fear of publication
  • Contract too lengthy
  • Divorce issues
  • Pricing issues

19
Global Complexities
  • Varying Human Resource Laws
  • Cost of living adjustment provision
  • Effect of a force majeure event
  • Varying asset transfer laws
  • Local telephone companies

20
Issues to be Clarified
  • Structure
  • IM operation processes
  • Management processes
  • Human Resource Management

21
Lessons Learned
  • A multidisciplinary team is a necessity
  • Employee communication is a key success factor
  • Global integration of IM is necessary for a
    global contract
  • The acceptance of a global IM strategy is a
    necessity for common contract development

22
 
23
Team Question 1
  • What are the benefits of outsourcing?

24
Team Question 2
  • What benefits did Xerox gain by outsourcing?

25
Team Question 3
  • How difficult is global outsourcing compared to
    domestic?

26
Team Question 4
  • Describe how the partner process could have been
    changed to better to reconstruction of Xerox.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com