Title: Jeffie Davis Danny Harmon Brandon Guynes David Nguyen Kelly Vaught
1Jeffie DavisDanny HarmonBrandon GuynesDavid
NguyenKelly Vaught
Xerox Outsourcing Global Information
Technology Resources
2Xerox Company Background
- Introduced 914 model in 1959
- Sales increase from 32 million to 1.1 billion
by 1968 - Held 95 share of the plain-paper market
- 1976 1982 share of US copier installations
dropped from 80 to 13
3Xerox Company Background
- 1980 introduced Leadership through Quality
- Participation
- Complete company unity
- Benchmarking
- Industry comparison
- Quality management
- Improved quality of service
4Xerox Company Background
- 1989 winner of Malcolm Baldrige Quality Award
- 1989 winner of Canadian National Quality Award
- 1992 recipient of 1st annual European Quality
Award
5Xerox Corporate Restructuring
- 1992 Xerox created 9 division
- Created to move decision making closer to the
customer - 3 customer operations
- 1993 began 10 workforce reduction over next 3
fiscal periods
6Strengths
Weaknesses
Federal Lawsuits Caused Forfeit of Patents No
Overall Coordination or Management of
Information Technology Investment
Name Recognition First Mover in the Plain-Paper
Copier Market Global Oriented
Foreign Competition Canon Minalta Ricoh Sharp
Outsource Information Technology Requirements
Opportunities
Threats
7Business Model
- Manufactures
- Markets
- Services
- Finances
- Document Processing Equipment
8Information Management at Xerox
- Corporate Information Management (CIM) was
established in the early 1970s - CIM was
- responsible for managing their data centers and
networks - expected to supply the overall IT leadership to
the company
9Centralizing Xerox IM
- It became apparent that the existing information
systems infrastructure was inadequate in the late
1980s - IM was not capable to provide the information
needed to support the companys new divisions - Xerox was not getting what they needed from the
money that was being poured into IM
10IM 2000 Project
- The IM 2000 reengineering project was started in
the middle of 1993 to address the problems in IM.
- Legacy Systems
- Financial Challenges
- Lack of consolidated applications
11IM 2000 Project
- Strategies were recommended to develop the new IT
infrastructure - Reduce/Redirect
- Infrastructure management
- Leverage worldwide IM resources
- Business processdriven solutions
12The Decision
- They tried to keep it Internal
- But
- They knew they had a steady demand
- They knew they had little time
- They knew they had funding constraints
- A rapid movement toward the IM 2000 vision
ultimately convinced Xerox to outsource
13Outsourcing Benefits
- Financial Benefits
- Experience
- Management
- Focus
14The Outsourcing Process
Aug 93
Sep 93
Oct 93
Nov 93
Dec 93
Jan 94
Feb 94
Mar 94
Leading vendors evaluated (8-10)
Selected CSC EDS IBM-ISSC Andresen Con
Solicited CSC Andersen Consulting
(partners) EDS IBM-ISSC and AT T (partners)
Selected EDS
Literature Search
Request for Information
Firm Bids against terms and baseline
15EDS is Selected
- Vendor Qualifications
- Human Resources
- Technical Solutions
- Financial
- Soft Criteria
16The Contract
- June 1994 Xerox signed a 3.2 billion 10-year
deal with EDS - EDS ran mainframes, legacy systems, world-wide
voice data in 19 countries - 170 million and 1,900 employees moved to EDS
17Spirit of the Contract
- This is not a client/vendor relationship this
is not a supplier relationship this is not a
win/lose situation this is a strategic
relationship. - -Reed
18Spirit of Contract
- Integration only available with complete
cooperation - Obstacles
- fear of publication
- Contract too lengthy
- Divorce issues
- Pricing issues
19Global Complexities
- Varying Human Resource Laws
- Cost of living adjustment provision
- Effect of a force majeure event
- Varying asset transfer laws
- Local telephone companies
20Issues to be Clarified
- Structure
- IM operation processes
- Management processes
- Human Resource Management
21Lessons Learned
- A multidisciplinary team is a necessity
- Employee communication is a key success factor
- Global integration of IM is necessary for a
global contract - The acceptance of a global IM strategy is a
necessity for common contract development
22 23Team Question 1
- What are the benefits of outsourcing?
24Team Question 2
- What benefits did Xerox gain by outsourcing?
25Team Question 3
- How difficult is global outsourcing compared to
domestic?
26Team Question 4
- Describe how the partner process could have been
changed to better to reconstruction of Xerox.