Welcome to the Principals Coffee - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Welcome to the Principals Coffee

Description:

Parent/Teacher Conferences.Before. Talk with your child about his/her feelings toward school. ... When discussing the conference with your child afterward, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: beckysto
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Welcome to the Principals Coffee


1
Welcome to the Principals Coffee November 13,
2008 Melissa D. Peterson Stephen S. Grenham
2
  • Agenda
  • Parent/Teacher Conferences
  • MCAS
  • Questions and Answers

3
  • Parent/Teacher Conferences..Before
  • Talk with your child about his/her feelings
    toward school.
  • Talk about the social relationships your child
    has with his/her peers.
  • Talk about the classroom activities that go on
    during the day.

4
  • Parent/Teacher Conferences..During
  • Learn about your childs progress.
  • Share your insights with your childs teacher
    the conference is the opportunity to hear from
    your childs teacher, but its also a perfect
    time to share your perspective.
  • Discuss your childs strengths and challenges.
  • Ask questions How do I help at home?

5
  • Parent/Teacher Conferences..After
  • You should have a better understanding of your
    childs
  • Academic, social, and emotional development.
  • Strengths and areas of growth that are needed.
  • Special abilities.
  • When discussing the conference with your child
    afterward, stress the good things that were
    covered and be direct about the problems that
    were identified.

6
Any Questions?
7
2008 MCAS Report
8
What is MCAS?
  • Criterion referenced test
  • Combination of open response, short answer, long
    composition and multiple choice questions
  • Administered in grades 4, 8, and 10 from
  • 1998-2000
  • Test was expanded to include grades 3,5,
  • 6, 7, and 9 in 2001

9
MCAS Performance Levels
  • Advanced scores range from 260-280
  • Proficient scores range from 240-259
  • Needs Improvement scores range from 220-239
  • Warning scores range from 200-219

10
How Are AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress)
Determinations Calculated?
  • A (B or C) D AYP
  • A Participation Rate 95 or greater
    participation in MCAS
  • MCAS-Alt
  • B Performance 85.4 or greater Composite
    Performance
  • Index (CPI) in ELA
  • (or) 76.5 or greater CPI in mathematics
  • C Improvement Meet or exceed Cycle IV
    Improvement
  • Target (Specific to districts, schools, and
    subgroups)
  • D Performance or Improvement on Additional
    Indicator
  • Grades 1-8 92 or higher attendance rate, or
    1 improvement over 2005

11
State Performance Targets 2001-2014
100.0
95.1
90.2
85.4
92.2
80.5
84.3
75.6
70.7
76.5
ELA
68.7
60.8
Math
Current Cycle
53.0
12
How is the Composite Performance Index Calculated?
  • A school or districts Composite Performance
    Index (CPI) is calculated by combining points
    generated by students who take the standard MCAS
    tests with points generated by students who take
    the MCAS-Alt. Points are calculated by
    determining, in each subject for each student
    group, the following
  • The number of students who took standard MCAS
    tests who performed at each of the five
    proficiency levels and multiplying the number at
    each level times the proficiency index points
    associated with that level
  • The number of students who participated in the
    MCAS-Alt for reasons other than significant
    cognitive impairments who demonstrated
    performance equivalent to each of the five
    proficiency levels and multiplying the number at
    each level times the proficiency index points
    assigned to that level
  • The number of students with significant cognitive
    impairments who demonstrated performance at each
    of the five MCAS-Alt levels and multiplying the
    number at each level times the MCAS-Alt index
    points associated with that level.
  • The point totals from steps one, two and three
    above are added together and the sum is divided
    by the total number of students assessed (using
    standard MCAS tests and the MCAS-Alt.)
  • The result is a number between 0 and 100, which
    constitutes the district, school, or subgroups
    CPI for that subject and student group.

13
Composite Performance Index (CPI)
  • Composite Performance Index Results (CPI) CPI
    points are awarded to each student tested
    according to the tables below.
  • Standard MCAS
  • Performance Level Scaled Score CPI
    Pts.
  • Advanced (A) 260-280 100
  • Proficient (P) 240-258 100
  • Needs Improvement (NI) 230-238 75
  • Needs Improvement (NI) 220-228 50
  • Warning (W) 210-218 25
  • Warning (W) 200-208 0

14
Composite Performance Index (CPI)
  • Composite Performance Index Results (CPI) CPI
    points are awarded to each student tested
    according to the tables below.
  • Alternate Assessment Corresponding
    CPI Pts.
  • Performance Level MCAS Level
  • Advanced (A_A) A 100
  • Proficient (P_A) P 100
  • Needs Improvement (NIA) NI 100
  • Progressing (PRG) W 100
  • Emerging (EMG) W 75
  • Awareness (AWR) W 50
  • Incomplete Portfolio (INP) W 25

15
Grade 3 - Mathematics
Grade 3 - Reading
Wrentham CPI 89.1 Target 76.5
Wrentham CPI 89.5 Target85.4
16
Grade 4 English Language Arts
Grade 4 Mathematics
Wrentham CPI 84.8 Target 76.5
Wrentham CPI 87.9 Target 85.4
17
Grade 5 Science and Technology
CPI 90.5
Grade 5 English Language Arts
Grade 5 - Mathematics
CPI 87.3 Target 76.5
CPI 93.2 Target 85.4

18
Grade 6 Mathematics
Grade 6 English Language Arts
Wrentham CPI 96.2 Target 85.4
Wrentham CPI 89.2 Target 76.5
19
What does this all mean
  • ELA performance level Very High
  • Mathematics performance level High
  • NCLB also requires test scores to be reported by
    student subgroup (Limited English Proficiency,
    Special Education, Low Income, Race). Although
    we are Very High in English/Language Arts, our
    subgroup of Special Education did not make AYP
    for two consecutive years triggering a label of
    Improvement Year 1 for Special Education at
    the Roderick School.

20
NCLB Accountability Status and Required Actions
(District Level)
21
Action Plan
  • Administration met to review scores, conduct item
    analysis of 2008 results and identify
    questions/curricula where our kids did not
    achieve 80. Grade level meetings (PreK 6) were
    held to share data trends.
  • Common Planning Time (ongoing) teachers meet
    with their grade level colleagues once every
    seven days to discuss highly effective teaching
    strategies.
  • Grades K-6 develop goals to improve student
    writing skills across the curriculum (i.e.
    answering open response questions both
    creatively and using information provided from a
    text and developing structured paragraphs that
    include topic sentences, details, and a clincher.
  • Identify students for before school tutoring
    model to support children and provide
    remediation.
  • Review expectations around curriculum compacting
    to continue to challenge our students.

22
Any Questions?
Our next Principals Coffee will be held on
Thursday, January 15th at 830 a.m. Suggestions
for possible topics are welcomed! We hope to see
you there.
Thank you for coming!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com