Port and Waterways Safety Assessments PAWSA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Port and Waterways Safety Assessments PAWSA

Description:

Circle the number that best describes this condition in this port. ... TRAFFIC CONDITIONS. Volume Deep Draft 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 RA IAN ICM IRR ISI IDI VTIS VTS OTH ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: maryaw
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Port and Waterways Safety Assessments PAWSA


1
  • Port and Waterways Safety Assessments (PAWSA)

Jorge ArroyoPAWSA Project Officer MTS RD
SymposiumNovember 15, 2001

2
Objectives
  • Background
  • Process
  • Results
  • Benefits

3
PAWSA Background
  • Congressional mandate under 1997 DOT
    Appropriations Act
  • Identify minimum user requirements in
    consultation w/local maritime industry
  • Review Private/Public Partnerships
  • Marine Transportation System (MTS)
  • In parallel with the recommendations of the
    marine board

4
The National Dialogue Group
  • American Association of Port Authorities
  • American Pilots Association
  • American Waterways Operators
  • Council of American Master Mariners
  • INTERTANKO
  • Passenger Vessel Association
  • Natural Resources Defense Council
  • U.S. Chamber of Shipping
  • U.S. Coast Guard






5
NDG Tasks
  • Identify the information needs of the mariner
  • Define what a baseline VTS should include
  • Develop a process for determining where vessel
    traffic management needs to be improved

6
Three Keys
  • Involve Users Stakeholders
  • Tailor Specific Actions
  • Address Risks

7
PAWSA Development
  • Port Risk Model
  • Based On NDG Input
  • Analytical Hierarchy Process
  • Credible / Defensible

8
PAWSA Purpose
  • Forum and effective tool for evaluating risk and
    defining solutions for mitigation.
  • Determine if VTM improvements are needed through
    open dialogue with port stakeholders
  • Provide support for investment decisions

9
PAWSA Ports
Sault Ste Marie, MI
Lower Columbia River
Coos Bay, OR
Portland, ME
Boston, MA
Cincinnati, OH
Philadelphia, PA
San Francisco, CA
Baltimore, MD
Pascagoula, MS
Hampton Rds, VA
LA/LB
Port Fourchon, LA
Charleston, SC
Lake Charles, LA
Mobile, AL
Houston, TX
Port Everglades, FL
Berwick Bay, LA
Texas City, TX
Anchorage, AK
Miami, FL
Port Arthur, TX
Honolulu, HI
Port Lavaca, TX
Corpus Christi, TX
San Juan, PR

Ponce, PR
10
PAWSA at a Glance
  • COTP Lead
  • Panel of Experts
  • Rank Port Risks
  • Educate About VTM Tools
  • Evaluate Effectiveness of Tools

11
PAWSA Process
  • Session 1 - Risk Model
  • 3 Books
  • Generic Look at Risk
  • Sessions 2 3 - Local Assessment
  • 2 Books
  • Identify Rank Port Specific Risk
  • Evaluate Tools

12
Port Risk Model
FLEET COMPOSITION
NAVIGATIONAL CONDITIONS
WATERWAY CONFIGURATION
SHORT-TERM CONSEQUENCES
LONG-TERM CONSEQUENCES
TRAFFIC CONDTIONS
HIGH RISK DEEP DRAFT CARGO PASSENGER VESSELS
VOLUME OF DEEP DRAFT VESSELS
WIND CONDITIONS
VISIBILITY OBSTRUCT- IONS
NUMBER OF PEOPLE ON WATERWAY
ECONOMIC IMPACTS
HIGH RISK SHALLOW DRAFT CARGO
PASSENGER VESSELS
VOLUME OF SHALLOW DRAFT VESSELS
VISIBILITY CONDITIONS
PASSING ARRANGE- MENTS
VOLUME OF PETROLEUM CARGOES
ENVIRON- MENTAL IMPACTS
VOLUME OF FISHING PLEASURE CRAFT
CURRENTS, TIDES AND RIVERS
CHANNEL AND BOTTOM
VOLUME OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL CARGOES
HEALTH AND SAFETY IMPACTS
WATERWAY COMPLEXITY
TRAFFIC DENSITY
ICE CONDITIONS
13
Book 1 Generic Risk Category Weights
For each pair, which factor has the greater
impact on the risk to port safety ?
Fleet Composition
Traffic Conditions
(Circle one number on each line)
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9
Navigational Conditions
Fleet Composition
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9
Waterway Configuration
Fleet Composition
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9
Short-term Consequences
Fleet Composition
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9
Long-term Consequences
Fleet Composition
14
Book 2 Generic Risk Factor Weights
For each pair, which subfactor has the greater
impact on this port risk factor ?
Traffic Conditions
(Circle one number on each line)
Volume of Shallow Draft Vessels
Volume of Deep Draft Vessels
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9
Volume of Fishing Pleasure Craft
Volume of Deep Draft Vessels
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9
Traffic Density
Volume of Deep Draft Vessels
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9
15
Book 3 Generic Risk Factor Scales
How much riskier is the condition on the right
than the condition on the left?
Navigational Conditions Ice
(Circle one number on each line)
Ice never forms
Some ice forms but rarely requires icebreaking
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Some ice forms but rarely requires icebreaking
Icebreakers needed to keep channel open during
ice season
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Icebreakers needed to keep channel open during
ice season
Vessels often require icebreaking
escorts, channel difficult to keep open
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Equally Somewhat Much More
Extremely Risky More Risky
Risky More Risky
16
Book 4A Estimating Risk in This Port
Circle the number that best describes this
condition in this port.
Navigational Conditions Ice
Ice never forms
A
Some ice forms but rarely requires icebreaking
B
Icebreakers needed to keep channel open during
ice season
C
Vessels often require icebreaking escorts,
channel difficult to keep open
D
17
Book 4B Estimating Risk in This Port
What impact does the subfactor below have on risk
in this port?
Fleet Composition Percentage of High Risk Deep
Draft Cargo Passenger Vessels
(Circle one number)
Low Risk Impact
High Risk Impact
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
18
Highest Risks / VTM Tools
  • Channel Bottom 9.0
  • Waterway Complexity 8.7
  • Volume of Petroleum 8.7
  • Traffic Density 8.0
  • Tide River Currents 7.5
  • Channel Width 7.4
  • Environmental Impacts 7.4
  • Vol. Fishing Pleasure 7.1
  • Improve Aids to Navigation
  • Improve Communications
  • Improve Rules Regulations
  • Improve Static navigation Info
  • Improve Dynamic navigation Info
  • Vessel Traffic Information Service
  • Vessel Traffic Service

19
Book 5 VTM Risk Mitigation
  • FLEET COMPOSITION
  • High Risk Deep Draft 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 RA
    IAN ICM IRR ISI IDI VTIS VTS OTH
  • High Risk Shallow Draft 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 RA
    IAN ICM IRR ISI IDI VTIS VTS OTH
  • TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
  • Volume Deep Draft 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 RA IAN
    ICM IRR ISI IDI VTIS VTS OTH
  • Volume Shallow Draft 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 RA IAN
    ICM IRR ISI IDI VTIS VTS OTH
  • Vol. Fishing Pleasure 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 RA
    IAN ICM IRR ISI IDI VTIS VTS OTH
  • Traffic Density 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 RA IAN ICM
    IRR ISI IDI VTIS VTS OTH

20
Results
  • Risk Assessment Baseline
  • Action Plan
  • ID Resource Requirements
  • Support Investment Decisions

21
Recurring Risks
  • ATON Visibility and Channel Configuration
  • Recreational Boating Fishing Vessels
  • Area Rules of the Road Familiarity,
    Communications Inexperienced Operators
  • Commercial Towing
  • Area Familiarity, Communications Horsepower
  • Navigation Conditions Information
  • Hydrographic Information

22
Benefits
  • Formal Risk Assessment
  • Formalizes ongoing work of existing HSC
  • Unification of Port Community
  • Cooperative look at risk by port community
  • First step toward establishing new HSC
  • Baseline for Future Risk Measurement
  • Periodic reassessment at local level
  • Expansion Potential
  • Mobility
  • Security

23
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com