Title: Trajectory
1Trajectory
1. Physics. The path of any body moving under the
action of given forces . . . especially the
curve described by a projectile in its flight
through the air. O.E.D.
Multimedia Physics Studios
2Cluster Analysis of Cases
- Cluster analysis of cases dissects a sample
into distinct groups of individuals. - It takes a sample and makes a pie chart.
- Clusters are a categorical variable. Everyone
becomes a 1, 2 or 3. - Generally not discovering God-given categories
- Constructing a data-based typology
3Two Good Ways to Find Distinct Developmental
Trajectories
- Muthen2 Growth curve mixture modeling with MPLUS
- http//www.statmodel.com/index2.html
- Nagin Jones PROC TRAJ
- http//www.ncovr.org/docs/Special_Project/Trajecto
ry/index.htm
4Growth Curve Mixture Modeling with MPLUS
5Nagin Jones PROC TRAJ
- Free download from Carnegie Mellon.
- Easily installed.
- Runs as a SAS PROC
- Produces trajectorycharts automatically
- Parsimonious
- Model published in Psychological Methods
(1999, 2001) - Many studies injuvenile justice
Two-group logistic model from CM WWW site.
6Basic Readings
- Helgeson, V.S., et al., Psychological and
physical adjustment to breast cancer over 4
years identifying distinct trajectories of
change. Health psychology official journal of
the Division of Health Psychology, American
Psychological Association., 2004. 23(1) p. 3-15. - Jones, B.L., D.S. Nagin, and K. Roeder, A SAS
Procedure based on mixture models for estimating
developmental trajectories. Sociological Methods
and Research, 2001. 29 p. 374-393. - Nagin, D.S., Analyzing developmental
trajectories A semiparametric, group-based
approach. Psychological Methods, 1999. 4(2) p.
139-157.
7Trajectories Based on Continuous Variables
J. Child Psychology Psychiatry
8Trajectory Analysis vs. Longitudinal HLM
- Different
- HLM, pre-existing groups
- TRAJ, discover groups
- HLM, confirmatory
- TRAJ exploratory
- HLM, powerful general purpose tool
- TRAJ, interesting special purpose tool
- Similar
- Individual growth curves
- Model based, within children between children
- Iterative software
- Graphic results, not just p values
9Individual Growth Curves of Continuous Outcome
Distress of child i at time t
Distress(i,t) ßi0 ßi1t ßi2t2 . . .
ß0 the intercept, the score at time zero ß1 the
linear slope, indicating a constant increase or
decrease over time ß2 is the quadratic slope
indicating a curve of acceleration or
deceleration Individuals with missing
observations can be included Proc TRAJ goes up to
degree 5
10Polynomial ApproximationJust a description
- Polynomials can approximate almost any shape
- Monte Carlo curves
- Random betas
- Time4
11How PROC TRAJ Works
- Each child has an observed trajectory
- Each trajectory has an approximate model
description - Each child is described by several numbers
- Cases can be sorted into clusters by the several
numbers - Nagin developed the statistical theory
- Jones wrote PROC TRAJ software (free download)
12Trajectories Based on an Indicator
Membership in a delinquent group at a given time
(No, Yes)
13Trajectories in Health Psychology
Well-done example of trajectory analysis with
PROC TRAJ N 287 women surviving cancer
14Parallel Trajectories Are Less Informative
Scott Holupka Debra Rog VU Washington DC
15Two Examples of Trajectory Analysis
- Inattentive ADHD Symptoms in a High Risk Group N
267 school children - Recurrent Abdominal Pain (RAP) in children with
no medical diagnosis
16The Average Child? Try to Find Them!
- Children, K to 4
- 243 school children at risk
- 68 boys
- At risk for ADHD
- MD diagnosis
- Teacher screen or
- Followed 3 years
- Teacher ratings
- Inattentive symptoms
- Six or more is positive
The average child with ADHD gets somewhat better
over 3 years
Bickman, Wolraich, Lambert Simmons in prep
One size fits none
17ADHD Trajectories (unsuccessful)Only one group
resembles the mean
- Clinical chronic 61
- Starts clinical (6 or more)
- Slight improvement
- Clinical improving 30
- Starts clinical
- Remission by 1 year
- Subclinical
- Starts normal
- Stays normal
18Children with RAP, Recurrent Abdominal PainGrand
Means Are Deceiving
Â
19How do we find trajectories?TRAJPLOT Macro Shows
each solution
20How do we find trajectories?Best Fit 2, 3, or 4
Clusters
21How do we find trajectories? Rejecting a
4-trajectory solution
Group Size Prob. 1
(21.2) . 2 (67.1) 0.0004
3 ( 1.7) 0.0022?Gp 3 tiny 4
(10.0) 0.0874?Gp 1-Gp 4 nonsig
Four clusters not acceptable because there are
not 4 distinct clusters. In addition, cluster 3
is too small.
Knowing when to stop . . .
22Example of a 3 Group ModelPROC TRAJ
- Group Parameter Estimate Prob gt T
- 1 Intercept 15.44068 0.0000
- Linear -0.68666 0.0002
- Quadratic 0.01047 0.0002
- 2 Intercept 42.87414 0.0000
- Linear -2.42765 0.0000
- Quadratic 0.03429 0.0000
- 3 Intercept 33.74592 0.0000
- Linear 0.65764 0.1630
- Quadratic -0.00597 0.4160
23Three Common Trajectories for CSI
Â
- Long term risk
- Short term risk
- Low risk
Â
p lt .01 p lt .001 one-way ANOVA
24Try to Explain the Trajectories with Ordinary
Analysis (oneway ANOVA, regression, chi2
etc)Theory based gt Fishing
Comparison of Characteristics by CSI Symptom
Trajectory Group
Variable Low Risk N94 M (SD) Short Term Risk N17 M (SD) Long Term Risk N21 M (SD) F Ratio
Child Depression Inventory 7.72 (5.68) 11.88 (7.33) 14.57 (8.01) 11.65
Life Events 5.14 (3.66) 6.88 (4.78) 9.76 (4.42) 12.07
25OK, Officer, were fishing for a hypothesis.
Well test it with fresh data.
Like cluster analysis or exploratory factor
analysis, TRAJ needs cross validation