Trajectory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Trajectory

Description:

Trajectory. 1. Physics. The path of any body moving under the action of given forces. ... Trajectories in Health Psychology. Well-done example of trajectory ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:366
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: lamb91
Category:
Tags: trajectory

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Trajectory


1
Trajectory
1. Physics. The path of any body moving under the
action of given forces . . . especially the
curve described by a projectile in its flight
through the air. O.E.D.
Multimedia Physics Studios
2
Cluster Analysis of Cases
  • Cluster analysis of cases dissects a sample
    into distinct groups of individuals.
  • It takes a sample and makes a pie chart.
  • Clusters are a categorical variable. Everyone
    becomes a 1, 2 or 3.
  • Generally not discovering God-given categories
  • Constructing a data-based typology

3
Two Good Ways to Find Distinct Developmental
Trajectories
  • Muthen2 Growth curve mixture modeling with MPLUS
  • http//www.statmodel.com/index2.html
  • Nagin Jones PROC TRAJ
  • http//www.ncovr.org/docs/Special_Project/Trajecto
    ry/index.htm

4
Growth Curve Mixture Modeling with MPLUS
5
Nagin Jones PROC TRAJ
  • Free download from Carnegie Mellon.
  • Easily installed.
  • Runs as a SAS PROC
  • Produces trajectorycharts automatically
  • Parsimonious
  • Model published in Psychological Methods
    (1999, 2001)
  • Many studies injuvenile justice

Two-group logistic model from CM WWW site.
6
Basic Readings
  1. Helgeson, V.S., et al., Psychological and
    physical adjustment to breast cancer over 4
    years identifying distinct trajectories of
    change. Health psychology official journal of
    the Division of Health Psychology, American
    Psychological Association., 2004. 23(1) p. 3-15.
  2. Jones, B.L., D.S. Nagin, and K. Roeder, A SAS
    Procedure based on mixture models for estimating
    developmental trajectories. Sociological Methods
    and Research, 2001. 29 p. 374-393.
  3. Nagin, D.S., Analyzing developmental
    trajectories A semiparametric, group-based
    approach. Psychological Methods, 1999. 4(2) p.
    139-157.

7
Trajectories Based on Continuous Variables
J. Child Psychology Psychiatry
8
Trajectory Analysis vs. Longitudinal HLM
  • Different
  • HLM, pre-existing groups
  • TRAJ, discover groups
  • HLM, confirmatory
  • TRAJ exploratory
  • HLM, powerful general purpose tool
  • TRAJ, interesting special purpose tool
  • Similar
  • Individual growth curves
  • Model based, within children between children
  • Iterative software
  • Graphic results, not just p values

9
Individual Growth Curves of Continuous Outcome
Distress of child i at time t
Distress(i,t) ßi0 ßi1t ßi2t2 . . .
ß0 the intercept, the score at time zero ß1 the
linear slope, indicating a constant increase or
decrease over time ß2 is the quadratic slope
indicating a curve of acceleration or
deceleration Individuals with missing
observations can be included Proc TRAJ goes up to
degree 5
10
Polynomial ApproximationJust a description
  • Polynomials can approximate almost any shape
  • Monte Carlo curves
  • Random betas
  • Time4

11
How PROC TRAJ Works
  • Each child has an observed trajectory
  • Each trajectory has an approximate model
    description
  • Each child is described by several numbers
  • Cases can be sorted into clusters by the several
    numbers
  • Nagin developed the statistical theory
  • Jones wrote PROC TRAJ software (free download)

12
Trajectories Based on an Indicator
Membership in a delinquent group at a given time
(No, Yes)
13
Trajectories in Health Psychology
Well-done example of trajectory analysis with
PROC TRAJ N 287 women surviving cancer
14
Parallel Trajectories Are Less Informative
Scott Holupka Debra Rog VU Washington DC
15
Two Examples of Trajectory Analysis
  • Inattentive ADHD Symptoms in a High Risk Group N
    267 school children
  • Recurrent Abdominal Pain (RAP) in children with
    no medical diagnosis

16
The Average Child? Try to Find Them!
  • Children, K to 4
  • 243 school children at risk
  • 68 boys
  • At risk for ADHD
  • MD diagnosis
  • Teacher screen or
  • Followed 3 years
  • Teacher ratings
  • Inattentive symptoms
  • Six or more is positive

The average child with ADHD gets somewhat better
over 3 years
Bickman, Wolraich, Lambert Simmons in prep
One size fits none
17
ADHD Trajectories (unsuccessful)Only one group
resembles the mean
  • Clinical chronic 61
  • Starts clinical (6 or more)
  • Slight improvement
  • Clinical improving 30
  • Starts clinical
  • Remission by 1 year
  • Subclinical
  • Starts normal
  • Stays normal

18
Children with RAP, Recurrent Abdominal PainGrand
Means Are Deceiving
 
19
How do we find trajectories?TRAJPLOT Macro Shows
each solution
20
How do we find trajectories?Best Fit 2, 3, or 4
Clusters
21
How do we find trajectories? Rejecting a
4-trajectory solution
Group Size Prob. 1
(21.2) . 2 (67.1) 0.0004
3 ( 1.7) 0.0022?Gp 3 tiny 4
(10.0) 0.0874?Gp 1-Gp 4 nonsig
Four clusters not acceptable because there are
not 4 distinct clusters. In addition, cluster 3
is too small.
Knowing when to stop . . .
22
Example of a 3 Group ModelPROC TRAJ
  • Group Parameter Estimate Prob gt T
  • 1 Intercept 15.44068 0.0000
  • Linear -0.68666 0.0002
  • Quadratic 0.01047 0.0002
  • 2 Intercept 42.87414 0.0000
  • Linear -2.42765 0.0000
  • Quadratic 0.03429 0.0000
  • 3 Intercept 33.74592 0.0000
  • Linear 0.65764 0.1630
  • Quadratic -0.00597 0.4160

23
Three Common Trajectories for CSI
 
  • Long term risk
  • Short term risk
  • Low risk

 
p lt .01 p lt .001 one-way ANOVA
24
Try to Explain the Trajectories with Ordinary
Analysis (oneway ANOVA, regression, chi2
etc)Theory based gt Fishing
Comparison of Characteristics by CSI Symptom
Trajectory Group
Variable Low Risk N94 M (SD) Short Term Risk N17 M (SD) Long Term Risk N21 M (SD) F Ratio
Child Depression Inventory 7.72 (5.68) 11.88 (7.33) 14.57 (8.01) 11.65
Life Events 5.14 (3.66) 6.88 (4.78) 9.76 (4.42) 12.07
25
OK, Officer, were fishing for a hypothesis.
Well test it with fresh data.
Like cluster analysis or exploratory factor
analysis, TRAJ needs cross validation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com