Predicting Access to Medical Care Among Out of Treatment Drug Users - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Predicting Access to Medical Care Among Out of Treatment Drug Users

Description:

... users have high need for medical care ... Received a checkup in 2 years ... regular checkup last 2 years b=.09. having insurance b=.16. meeting ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Stril
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Predicting Access to Medical Care Among Out of Treatment Drug Users


1
Predicting Access to Medical Care Among Out of
Treatment Drug Users
  • Catherine Woodstock Striley, MSW, LCSW, Ph.D.,
    NIMH Postdoctoral Trainee
  • Linda B. Cottler, Ph.D., Professor
  • Washington University
  • School of Medicine
  • Department of Psychiatry

2
  • Abstract
  • To test an Andersen-based model of access to
    health care in a drug using street-recruited
    sample including (among other variables tested)
    attitudes and beliefs in the predisposing block
    of variables legal and illegal income in the
    enabling block and drug, mental health, and
    sexually transmitted diseases in the need block
    of variables.
  • Demographics, health attitudes/beliefs,
    insurance, income, STDs and HIV, injection drug
    use, smoking and other behaviors were assessed
    using the Risk Behavior Assessment. The
    Diagnostic Interview Schedule was used to elicit
    mental health symptoms and diagnoses, and the
    Composite International Diagnostic Interview -
    Substance Abuse Module was used to elicit drug
    abuse and dependence. A 3 month follow-up
    ascertained the number of health care services
    received since baseline. An Andersen-based
    model of access was tested in multiple regression
    and in negative binomial regression to account
    for the dependent count variable.
  • A sample of 1224 street-recruited drug users in
    St. Louis City were enrolled in an NIDA-funded
    two arm HIV intervention (EachOneTeachOne), which
    randomized persons into standard of care versus
    an enhanced, peer-delivered educational program.
    The sample was predominately African American
    (90) and male (61). Age ranged from 18 to 70,
    with a median age of 39.
  • Using both regression with backward stepwise
    elimination and negative binomial regression, the
    model explained 9 of the variance in access.
    Being a woman, older age, believing no one could
    help, having insurance, exchanging drugs for sex,
    symptoms of depression, and meeting criteria for
    opiate tolerance, increased access. If the
    person endorsed reducing important activities,
    another criterion for opiate dependence, this
    decreased access.

3
  • Many of the variables found to predict access to
    medical care have been found in other studies of
    non-substance abusers, such as female gender,
    depression, and having insurance. However, that
    sex-traders were more likely to have access to
    medical care was surprising, and needs further
    clarification. Substance use has also been found
    to affect access in other studies. Particular
    diagnostic criteria for opiate dependence are
    important to access, and others are not. Greater
    tolerance probably makes it more likely that
    substance users can still negotiate the system
    requirements for access. Reducing activities due
    to drug use may include reducing the type of
    activities specifically needed to negotiate
    access.
  • Individual level variables alone are not
    particularly predictive of access in this
    population. Special paths to access for drug
    users may need to be established. Impairment and
    symptoms may interact with system-level barriers
    to care, such as needing to schedule appointments
    in advance, acting together as a barrier to
    medical care. It is important to go beyond
    thinking about drug use alone as an impediment to
    care, and to develop programs based on specific
    problems caused by drug use.

4
Acknowledgements
  • Funded by
  • NIDA 501-DA08324, L.B. Cottler, PI
  • NIMH training grant 5T32-MH17104, L.B.Cottler,
    Director

5
Problem
  • Intravenous drug users have high need for medical
    care
  • but, they have reduced access to that care
  • and more inappropriate access through emergency
    rooms
  • Few have studied access in street-recruited drug
    using populations
  • Unclear what effect individual mental health and
    substance use habits have on medical care access
    for out of treatment users

6
Aim
  • To test an Andersen-like model of predisposing,
    enabling, and need variables to predict realized
    access or use of health care services in a
    population of out of treatment drug users
  • that includes mental health problems, substance
    dependence, and enrollment in an HIV enhanced
    prevention project on realized access to health
    services

7
Theoretical Access Model
  • Need Variables
  • Depression symptoms
  • Antisocial personality disorder symptoms
  • Smokes
  • Injection drug user
  • Has an STD
  • Has AIDS/ARC
  • Has exchanged drugs for sex
  • Has exchanged sex for drugs
  • Meets criteria for DSM-IV inhalant dependence,
    opiate dependence, cocaine dependence 1-7

Access to care
8
Methods
  • EachOneTeachOne
  • NIDA funded study
  • Investigated the effectiveness of providing HIV
    education to chronic drug and intravenous drug
    users
  • The baseline and 3 month follow-up interviews
    used the DIS, the CIDI-SAM, the NIDA RFA, and the
    Health Services Supplement

9
Sample
  • 1220 drug users recruited from areas of St. Louis
    City with high drug abuse, crime and prostitution
  • Store-front satellite health centers
    (HealthStreet) located in two of these
    neighborhoods
  • Community Health Outreach Workers went out onto
    the streets in pairs to recruit the study sample.
  • Recruited individuals received standard HIV pre-
    and post-test counseling and
  • were randomized to that or an enhanced HIV
    prevention

10
Descriptive Statistics
11
Descriptive Statistics
12
Independent Variables
  • Predisposing
  • Gender of participant -- self-reported
  • Race of participant -- African-American,
    Caucasian, or other race
  • Age
  • Education -- highest educational attainment
  • Health beliefs and attitudes -- covered 13 of
    most salient possible barriers to care

13
  • Enabling
  • Health insurance -- included private, VA,
    Medicare, Medicaid, group, prepaid
  • Income for last month (range)
  • Enhanced HIV prevention program (intent to treat
    analysis)
  • Received a checkup in 2 years before baseline

14
  • Need
  • Symptoms of depression and antisocial personality
    disorder
  • Smoked cigarettes
  • Has a reported STD
  • Has exchanged drugs for sex
  • Has exchanged sex for drugs
  • Meets DSM IV specific dependence criteria
  • for opiates
  • for cocaine
  • for inhalants (all criteria combined)

15
Dependent Variable
  • Number health care visits of any kind in 3 months
    since base line
  • A measure of realized access or service
    utilization

16
Analyses
  • First, backward elimination in multiple
    regression using SAS PROC REG where predisposing,
    enabling and need variables were entered in
    blocks
  • Then, confirmatory testing with binomial negative
    regression using SAS PROC GENMOD (Negative
    Binomial Regression) due to truncated and skewed
    nature of services utilization variable

17
Why Use Negative Binomial Regression?
  • Data is discrete
  • Data is truncated, with many scores at zero
  • Unlike Poisson, estimates third parameter, the
    dispersion parameter
  • Expresses contagion
  • A "spell" of depression so services will clump
  • Services are regular, not really random
  • Larger the variance relative to mean, higher
    level of dispersion

18
Health Care Visits Comparing Mean (with CI) for
6 Months Baseline and Follow-up
19
Results Final Model
  • Both multiple regression and negative binomial
    regression found the same variables predictive
  • of the variance in service utilization or
    realized access was explained by
  • gender (female) b.12
  • age (increasing) b.11
  • regular checkup last 2 years b.09
  • having insurance b.16
  • meeting depression criteria b.06
  • has given drugs for sex b.10
  • meets opiate dependence criterion for tolerance
    b.13
  • meets opiate dependence criterion for reduced
    activities b -.13
  • Standardized Betas are from multiple regression

20
NBR Results Increasing Visits by Significant
Variables
21
Conclusions
  • Very little (9) of the service variance in this
    out-of-treatment drug using population can be
    explained with a traditional individual model of
    predisposing, enabling and need variables
  • Individual health attitudes and beliefs did not
    contribute to the final model
  • Like many access models, being a women, getting
    older, having insurance and a usual source of
    care, increase access
  • Mental and behavior health problems contributed

22
Implications
  • Models explaining access in this high need
    population need to include provider and
    environmental variables
  • Many requirements for planned access to care may
    hinder drug-abusing populations from receiving
    care
  • Research needs to include such variables as
    medical care agency policies provider attitudes
    and behavior and barriers between the call to
    access services and actual service
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com