Title: Update: Hexavalent Chromium Cr(VI)
1Update Hexavalent Chromium Cr(VI)
- Drawn from the Preambles and Training Materials
from the National Office and Regions 5 and 6
2Purpose
Present an overview of the major provisions of
OSHAs Cr(VI) standard (71 FR 10100, February 28,
2006). Note This presentation is for training
purposes only. Consult the Federal Register on
OSHAs web site for the complete requirements of
this standard.
3What is Hexavalent Chromium?
- Toxic form of chromium metal that is generally
man-made - Used in many industrial applications primarily
for its anti-corrosive properties - Can be created during certain hot work
processes where the original form of chromium was
not hexavalent
4Is Chrome a Carcinogen or Necessary Element?
- Chrome III is an essential nutrient for
maintaining blood glucose levels - Chrome VI is classified as a known human
carcinogen
5Operations with Cr(VI) Exposure
- Electroplating
- Welding/cutting/torching/grinding painted
surfaces - Welding/cutting/grinding stainless steel, chrome
alloys and even carbon steel - Applying/removing coatings with chrome
- Glass production
- Chemical synthesis
- Chromium catalyst users
- Printing ink production
-
6Routes of Exposure
- Inhalation of dusts, mists, or fumes created
during processes involving the use of Cr(VI)
compounds or hot processes that cause the
formation of Cr(VI) - Eye or skin contact with powder, dusts or liquids
containing Cr(VI) with skin absorption possible - Ingestion through contamination of food and drink
(controversy over extent of issue)
7Major Health Effects
- Lung cancer
- Nasal septum ulcerations and perforations
- Asthma
- Skin ulcers
- Allergic and irritant contact dermatitis
8History of Exposure Limits
- 1943 ANSI standard was the source of OSHAs 1971
standard of 1mg/10 m3 Cr(III) or 52 µg/m3 CR(VI) - Mounting evidence of carcinogenicity
- 1974 by ACGIH
- 1975 by NIOSH
- 1984 by EPA
- 1990 by IARC
9Occupational Exposure Limits
- NIOSH REL
- 0.001 mg Cr VI/M3 10-hr TWA
- ACGIH TLV
- Water-Soluble Cr VI compounds as Cr
- 0.05 mg/M3 TWA
- Insoluble Cr VI compounds as Cr
- 0.01 mg/M3 TWA
-
- ACGIH BEI
- Total chromium in urine BEIs (2) for Chrome VI
water soluble fume
10History of New Standard
- In 1993 the Health Research Group petitioned for
ETS of 0.5 µg/m3 - OSHA unable to demonstrate grave danger
- In 1997 HRG sued to complete rulemaking process
and lost - In 2002 HRG sued to complete rulemaking process
and won - Proposed rule to be issued 10/4/04
- Final rule to be issued 1/18/06
- Final rule was issued 2/28/06
11Steps to Complete a Rule
- Review all research on health effects
- Peer review of OSHA review
- Develop risk assessment
- Justify significance of risk assessment
- Perform Economic Analysis and Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis with SBREFA Assessment 6
issues for each potential PEL - Submit to OMB 5 laws
- Proposed rule with Questions
- Hearings
- Final Rule
12Case Law for Health Standards
- 1980 Supreme Court decision on benzene requires
examination of significance of risk
(cost-benefit) - 1981 Lead and Cotton Dust cases gave concept of
technological and economical feasibility in view
of financial health and profitability of industry
and impact on unit pricing
13Greater Risk Than Asbestos
- At the new technologically and economically
feasible PEL, the cancer risk from Cr(VI) is
higher than other regulated carcinogens - Methylene Chloride 3.6 per 1000 workers
- Asbestos 6.7 deaths per 1000 workers
- Benzene 10 deaths per 1000 workers
- Cr VI 10-45 excess lung cancer deaths per 1000
workers for 45 years of exposure at new PEL of 5
ug/M3 - 2/28/06 FR p. 10225
14Three Cr(VI) Standards
- 1910.1026 General Industry
- 1926.1126 Construction
- 1915.1026 Shipyards
15Major Provisions of the Standards
- Scope
- Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL)
- Exposure Determination
- Regulated areas
- Methods of Compliance
- Respiratory Protection
- Protective Work Clothing and Equipment
- General industry only
- Hygiene Areas and Practices
- Housekeeping
- Medical Surveillance
- Communication of Hazards
- Recordkeeping
- Dates
16Scope Who is Coveredby the Standard?
All occupational exposures to Cr(VI) compounds
except
- Exposures that occur in the application of
pesticides - Application is already covered by EPA Standards
- The manufacture of pesticides and handling of
pesticide treated materials are covered under new
OSHA standard
17Scope Who is Coveredby the Standard?
All occupational exposures to Cr(VI) compounds
except
- Exposures that occur in the application of
pesticides - Exposures to portland cement
- American portland cement usually contains only
trace amounts - Would typically be over PEL for PNOR before over
on Cr(VI) - Use PNOR, Personal Protective Equipment and
Hazard Communication Standards for protection
18Scope Who is Coveredby the Standard?
All occupational exposures to Cr(VI) compounds
except
- Exposures that occur in the application of
pesticides - Exposures to portland cement
- Where employers have objective data demonstrating
that a material containing chromium or a process
involving chromium cannot release Cr(VI) in
concentrations at or above 0.5 µg/m3 as an 8-hour
time-weighted average (TWA) under any condition
of use
19Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) and Action Level
(AL)
- PEL 5 µg/m3 - TWA
- AL 2.5 µg/m3 - TWA
20Exposure Determination
Two options allowed for determining employee
exposures
- Scheduled monitoring option
- Performance-oriented option
21Scheduled Monitoring Option
- Prescribes a schedule for performing initial and
periodic personal monitoring - If initial monitoring indicates exposures are
- Below the AL monitoring can be discontinued
- At or above the AL monitor every 6 months
- Above the PEL monitor every 3 months
22Performance-Oriented Option
- Exposures characterized using any combination of
air monitoring data, historical monitoring data
or objective data - No fixed schedule for performing periodic
monitoring
23General Requirementsfor Exposure Determination
- Affected employees must be notified where
exposures exceed the PEL
24General Requirementsfor Exposure Determination
- Affected employees must be notified where
exposures exceed the PEL - Methods used for air monitoring and analysis must
be sufficiently accurate /- 25 and within a
statistical confidence level of 95 at AL
25General Requirementsfor Exposure Determination
- Affected employees must be notified where
exposures exceed the PEL - Methods used for air monitoring and analysis must
be sufficiently accurate - Employees or their representatives must be
allowed to observe Cr(VI) monitoring
26Regulated Areas
- For general industry employers only
27Regulated Areas
- For general industry employers only
- Areas where exposures exceed or can be reasonably
expected to exceed the PEL - Must be demarcated from other areas
- Must limit access to employees who have a need to
be there
28Methods of Compliance
- Establishes engineering and work practice
controls as the primary means of achieving the PEL
29Methods of Compliance
- Establishes engineering and work practice
controls as the primary means of achieving the PEL
- Exceptions
- Painting aircraft or large aircraft parts
- Use engineering and work practice controls to
achieve 25 µg/m3 and supplement with respirators
to achieve the PEL - Tasks or operations that do not result in
exposures above the PEL for 30 or more days per
year - Use of respirators alone allowed to achieve the
PEL
30Methods of Compliance
- Establishes engineering and work practice
controls as the primary means of achieving the PEL
- Exceptions
- Painting aircraft or large aircraft parts
- Tasks or operations that do not result in
exposures above the PEL for 30 or more days per
year
- Prohibits job rotation to achieve compliance with
the PEL
31Respiratory Protection Required
- Periods necessary to install or implement
feasible engineering and work practice controls - Maintenance or repair operations where
engineering and work practice controls are
infeasible - Operations where all feasible controls have been
used and exposures are still above the PEL - Operations where exposures do not exceed the PEL
for 30 or more days per year - Emergencies
32Assigned Protection FactorsFinal Rule August 24,
2006
Type of Respirator1,2 Half Mask Full Facepiece Helmet/ Hood Loose-Fitting
1. Air-Purifying Respirator 103 50
2. Powered Air-Purifying Respirator (PAPR) 50 1,000 25/1,0004 25
3. Supplied-Air Respirator (SAR) or Airline Respirator Demand mode Continuous flow mode Pressure-demand or other positive-pressure mode 105050 501,0001,000 25/1,0004 25
4. Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) Demand mode Pressure-demand or other positive-pressure mode (e.g., open/closed circuit) 10 5010,000 5010,000
33Protective Work Clothingand Equipment
- Use where a hazard is present or is likely to be
present from skin or eye contact with Cr(VI) - Provided and paid for by the employer
- Remove Cr(VI)-contaminated clothing and equipment
when work shift or task is completed - Clean, store and label Cr(VI)-contaminated
clothing and equipment
34Hygiene Areas and Practices
- Must provide change rooms and washing facilities
per 29 CFR 1910.141 - Employees must wash their hands and face at the
end of a work shift and prior to eating,
drinking, smoking, etc. - Employer-provided eating areas must be kept as
free as practicable of Cr(VI) - No eating, drinking, smoking etc. in regulated
areas
35Housekeeping
- For general industry employers only
- Keep all surfaces as free as practicable of
accumulations of Cr(VI) - Use HEPA vacuums or other methods that minimize
exposure to Cr(VI) - Use of compressed air prohibited unless
- Used in conjunction with a ventilation system to
capture the dust cloud created by the compressed
air, or - No alternative method is feasible
- Dispose of Cr(VI)-contaminated waste in labeled,
impermeable bags/containers
36Medical Surveillance
- Provisions for conducting baseline and periodic
health assessments of exposed employees - Provided by or under the supervision of a
physician or other licensed health care
professional (PLHCP) - Provided at no cost to employee and at a
reasonable place and time
37Purpose of Medical Surveillance
- Determine if an individual can be exposed to the
Cr(VI) present in their workplace without
experiencing adverse health effects - Indentify Cr(VI)-related adverse health effects
so that appropriate intervention measures can be
taken - Determine the employees fitness to use PPE, such
as respirators
38Which Employees Must Be Provided Medical
Surveillance?
- Exposed at or above the action level(2.5 µg/m3)
for 30 or more days per year - Experiencing signs or symptoms of Cr(VI) exposure
- Exposed in an emergency
39Medical Examination Requirements
- Medical and work history, with emphasis on
- Cr(VI) exposure (past, present, future)
- History of respiratory system dysfunction
- History of asthma, dermatitis, skin ulceration or
nasal system perforation - Smoking status and history
- Physical examination, with emphasis on the
respiratory tract and skin - Any additional tests deemed appropriate by the
PLHCP
40When Must MedicalExaminations Be Offered?
- Within 30 days after initial assignment and
annually thereafter - Within 30 days after a PLCHP recommends
additional examinations - When employees shows signs or symptoms of Cr(VI)
exposure - Within 30 days after exposure during an emergency
- At the termination of employment
41Communication of Hazards
- Provide employee training in accordance with
OSHAs Hazard Communication standard (29 CFR
1910.1200) - Additional training on the contents of the Cr(VI)
standard and the purpose and description of the
medical surveillance program required by the
standard
42Recordkeeping
- No requirement to maintain training records
- Must maintain records per 29 CFR 1910.1020 for
- Air monitoring data
- Historical monitoring data
- Objective data
- Medical surveillance information, including
- PLHCPs written opinions
- Information provided to the PLHCP
43Compliance Start-Up Dates
- Effective date May 30, 2006
- Start-up dates
- All provisions except engineering controls
- For employers with 19 or fewer employees May 30,
2007 - For all others November 27, 2006
- Engineering Controls
- For all employers May 31, 2010
44Hexavalent Chromium
45FR Preamble Exposure Ranges
Task 1-5 µg/m3 Above PEL
Electroplating 11 13
Welding Stainless Steel GI 13 31
Const 15 27
Carbon Steel GI Const 12 6
Painting GI 3 17
Const 16 7
Steel Mills Stainless Steel GI 25 7
Carbon Steel GI 0.5 7
Iron SteelFoundries GI 15 5
Woodworking GI 0 14
Const 22 11
46OSHA Internal Training on Hexavalent Chromium
Sampling
- Most pre-existing sampling was for total chrome,
probably due to low cost - 50 for total metals analysis via ICP
- 150 for Cr(VI) analysis
- No way to separate or back calculate Cr(VI)
exposures from total chrome (ICP) - Comments at 5/2006 AIHCE Ask the Experts Cr(VI)
session indicate little new Cr(VI) sampling has
been done - Conclusion Exposure levels are not known
-
- WE NEED TO SAMPLE
47Cr VI SLTC Analysis OSHA ID215as of 6/2006
- Closed face 37mm PVC filter _at_ 2 lpm
- Lab extraction of Cr VI from filter using an
aqueous solution of sodium carbonate/sodium
bicarbonate - Ion chromatography for Cr VI with postcolumn
UV/visible detector set at 540nm wavelength - Limit of detection 0.003 ug/M3
- SAE varies, approx 0.112
48Interferences Welding Fume Sampling
- While in the cassette, Cr6 reacts with iron Fe2
to form Cr3 - Cr3 is not analyzed by method ID215
- In 6 days you lose 10 of Cr6 through the Fe2
reduction reaction - SHIP SAMPLE TO LAB IMMEDIATELY
- If mailing will be delayed, get buffer solution
from the lab ahead of time. While in the field
you put the filters in the buffer solution to
stabilize Cr6
49Interferences Plating Sampling
- While in the cassette, Cr6 reacts with acids
from the plating baths to form Cr3 - Cr3 is not analyzed by method ID215
- In 6 days you lose 10 of Cr6 through this acid
reduction reaction - Order sodium hydroxide coated filters from the
lab on an as needed basis for plating sampling - NaOH neutralizes the acid to cut down on Cr6
loss - Helps maintain Cr6 on the filter for 30 days
- 1-3 month expiration date on these coated filters
- SHIP SAMPLE TO LAB IMMEDIATELY
50Filter Blanks
- PVC filters are normally cut from sheet filter
stock using a stainless steel cutter - Stainless steel contains chromium, and stainless
steel cutters leave chrome VI contamination on
filters - OSHA uses PVC filters cut with a teflon coated
stainless cutter to reduce/avoid background
chrome contamination - Some employers may be taking samples with filters
contaminated by stainless cutters. - SEND FILTER BLANKS! 5 ug/M3 is a minute amount
of material, and filter blanks will help avoid
employer objections to your sample results
51Other Sampling Methods
- 1 NaOH coated binderless quartz fiber filter
wipe sample method is available - A colorimetric wipe test will be available soon.
You will be able to perform wipe tests in
lunchrooms, etc., and demonstrate evidence of
contamination - New sampling method is under review OSHA
analytical method ID215 may be updated to use
buffer solution in the field