Title: Scoring an Oral Simulation Exam
1Scoring an Oral Simulation Exam
- Elizabeth A. Witt, Ph.D.
- American Board of Emergency Medicine
Presented at the 2005 CLEAR Annual
Conference September 15-17 Phoenix,
Arizona
2ABEM Certification Process
- Complete residency in Emergency Medicine
- Pass written certification examination
- Pass oral certification examination, a series of
simulated patient encounters
3Purpose of ABEMs Oral Certification Examination
- Assess clinical performance
- Test the application of knowledge of Emergency
Medicine
4Structure of ABEMs Oral Certification Examination
- 7 simulations based on actual clinical cases
- 1 field test simulation
- 4 single patient encounters
- 2 multiple patient encounters
- One-on-one 7 different examiners
- Examiner introduces each case and may play role
of patient, nurse, consultant, etc.
5(No Transcript)
6Scoring
- Done by the examiner during and immediately after
the session
7Examiner Qualifications
- ABEM diplomate at least 5 years
- Residency trained in EM (ACGME- or
RCPSC-approved) - Actively involved in the practice of clinical
Emergency Medicine - Nominated in writing by current examiner,
director, or senior director
8Examiner Qualifications, cont.
- Evaluated and recommended by ABEMs Test
Administration Committee - Appointed by the Board of Directors
- Distinguished for high quality patient care,
teaching, research, or leadership
9Examiner Training Before Exam
- Focus on standardizing the delivery and scoring
of each case - Demonstrations
- Training video
- Scoring practice with feedback
- Case presentation practice with feedback and
coaching - The what-ifs
10Examiner Training During Exam
- Observe a real simulation first
- Written materials support each case
- Observed by experienced examiner early
- End of 1st day group discussion and individual
feedback, coaching - Scoring sheets and notes reviewed by chief
examiners - Ongoing discussions, feedback, mentoring
11Standardized Ratings
- 8 performance criteria
- Scale 1 to 8
- Critical actions
- Yes/No
- Dangerous action
12Performance Criteria
- Data Acquisition
- Problem Solving
- Patient Management
- Resource Utilization
- Health Care Provided (Outcome)
- Interpersonal Relations
- Comprehension of Pathophysiology
- Clinical Competence (Overall)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15Final Score and Pass/Fail
- Only performance criteria ratings are used
- Two ways to pass
- Grand mean of all performance criteria scores gt
5.75 - Case score mean of performance criteria for
each case. - Highest and lowest case scores are averaged.
- If the hi-lo average AND all of the remaining
case scores gt 5.0, pass
16Example
- Grand Mean Standard
- Sum of performance criteria ratings 375
- Number of ratings (8x4) (18x2) 68
- Grand mean 375/68 5.51
- 5.51 gt 5.75?
- NO ? Fail
17Example
- Case Score Average (High-Low) Standard
- Mean of performance ratings for each case 4.75,
5.23, 5.42, 5.75, 5.83, 6.08 - High-Low Mean (4.756.08)/2 5.42
- Are the figures in gold all gt 5.00?
- Yes ? Pass
18Why Two Ways to Pass?
- Standard setting study Bayesian procedures ?
5.75 - BUT a 5 is acceptable performance
- AND there is potential for measurement error,
fluke, etc. - So
-
5
6
5
5
5
4
Pass
5
19A High Quality Exam
- Interrater Reliability
- 97 agreement on Critical Actions
- 95 agreement on Acceptable/Unacceptable
- 94 of all performance criteria ratings
within 1 point - Discriminant Validity 1. Residency trained
physicians 2. Physicians not trained via
residency 3. Residents beginning 2nd year of
residency 4. 4th year medical students - Correlation with written MC exam .77
- Predictive Validity
- Oral exam predicts performance better than
written exam does
20Benefits of Scoring Procedure
- Stable pass rates
- High involvement of EM community
- Checks and balances
- Standardized, yet flexible assessment
21Speaker Contact Information
- Elizabeth A. Witt, Ph.D.
- American Board of Emergency Medicine
- East Lansing, MI
- 517-332-4800
- ewitt_at_ABEM.org
- www.ABEM.org