The Health Check of the CAP reform: Impact Assessment PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 14
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Health Check of the CAP reform: Impact Assessment


1
The Health Check of the CAP reformImpact
Assessment
  • DG for Agriculture and Rural Development
  • European Commission

2
The content of the Impact Assessment
  • Main Report
  • Three main sections, around the three policy
    questions of the HC
  • Annexes
  • A. Summary of stakeholder positions from public
    consultation
  • B. Economic background of EU agriculture
  • C. Background notes on the Single Payment Scheme
  • flatter rate, decoupling, cross-compliance,
    payment limitations
  • D. Background notes on market issues
  • cereals, dairy quotas, other support schemes,
    risk management
  • E. Background notes on new challenges
  • RD measures, modulation impact
  • F. Background notes from microeconomic analysis
    (FADN)
  • G. List of relevant external studies and
    evaluations

3
The methodology of the Impact Assessment
  • Background
  • Description of existing policies and situation
  • Identification of issue to be addressed in the HC
  • Options
  • Status-quo used as reference scenario
    (baseline)
  • Analysis assesses impact of changes with respect
    to baseline
  • Impact analysis and results
  • Main results presented in IA Report and
    summarised in tables
  • Background and more detailed information
    presented in the various Annexes

4
The analytical tools of the Impact Assessment
  • Quantitative analysis
  • Econometric models to assess impact on markets
    from
  • changes in cereal intervention and set-aside
    abolition
  • phasing-out of dairy quotas
  • Microeconomic static analysis to assess impact on
    farm margins from
  • further decoupling
  • impact from market measures (cereals, dairy)
  • flatter rates and payment limitations
  • Statistical analysis to assess impact from
  • payment limitations and modulation
  • risk management tools
  • Qualitative analysis
  • To assess changes in the scope of
    cross-compliance
  • To assess suitability of RD measures related to
    new challenges

5
Main conclusions - Direct support
  • Flat versus flatter rate
  • Move to EU-wide flat rate results in major
    redistribution across MS
  • Move to flatter rate results in targeted
    redistribution within a MS (or region of a MS)
  • Further decoupling
  • At farm level, impact of decoupling from neutral
    to positive on farm income
  • In some sectors, adjustment may be needed for
    industry
  • For extensive livestock, continuation of support
    provides environmental benefits
  • Payment distribution
  • Main issue in the extreme ends of the
    distribution of payments (0.3-13 13-0.3)
  • Distribution of payments affected globally by
    shift from farm to area
  • Flatter rate affects (to different degrees)
    distribution of payments within MS or regions
  • Lower payment limitations linked to SPS
    implementation

6
Redistribution between MS with an EU-wide flat
rate
7
Redistribution between MS with an EU-wide flat
rate
8
Potential impact of decoupling beef breeders
9
Distribution of EU CAP payments
10
Main conclusions Market issues
  • Cereal intervention-set aside
  • Wheat intervention allows other cereal prices to
    find their proper balance
  • Set-aside abolition brings supply response, but
    implies limited environmental losses
  • Dairy quotas
  • Main aim is smooth price adjustment
    (soft-landing) for the quota phasing-out
  • Some regions would face challenges with lower
    prices, require targeted support
  • Other support schemes
  • Income impact neutral to farmers
  • Differential impact implies need for transition
    for some supported industries
  • Risk management
  • Cost of EU-wide revenue scheme prohibitive
    targeted measures preferred option

11
Potential impact of 1 increase in milk quota
12
Potential impact of an EU-wide revenue scheme
13
Main conclusions New challenges
  • RD measures
  • Existing RD measures sufficient to address new
    challenges
  • Existing funds insufficient to meet additional
    needs
  • Modulation
  • Existing modulation mechanism tailored to EU-15
    needs
  • Additional modulation only affects NMS in 2012
  • Progressive modulation results in balanced
    contribution of large farms

14
For further information
  • CAP Health Check
  • http//ec.europa.eu/agriculture/healthcheck/i
    ndex_en.htm
  • EU agriculture and CAP reform
  • http//ec.europa.eu/agriculture/index_en.htm
  • Economic Analysis and Evaluation
  • http//ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/index_en
    .htm
  • Agricultural Policy Analysis and Perspectives
  • http//ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/perspec/
    index_en.htm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com