Title: From Fringe Banking to the Financial Mainstream
1The Center for
Community Capitalism
Marketing and Public Policy Conference University
of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT May 20-22,
2004 by Dr. Michael A. Stegman Center for
Community Capitalism University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill
2Consumer Research with Most ImpactPotential
Impact SWFA
- Savings for Working Families Act introduced by
Joe Lieberman (D-CT) and co-sponsored by Rick
Santorum (R-PA) - Drafted initial legislation contrary to
consumer advocates, but ultimately became
consensus vehicle for bringing Individual
Development Accounts (IDAs), a form of matched
savings accounts, to scale - Rather than working through community-based
nonprofits and appropriations process, uses
federal tax system to provide tax credits to
banks to provide matching funds - Theory is that fed tax system should provide
incentives to the poor to save, just as it does
for the rich, but since poor cant use credits
directly, exchange credits that banks can use for
matching funds for IDA programs besides,
appropriations more constrained than tax credits. - Introduced in 2000, passed by Senate, but not by
House now SWFA is contained in President Bushs
Faith-based Charitable Giving legislation called
the CARE Act.
3Litan CritiqueEvidence of Policy Impact
- This study was the first to conclude that
mortgage loans with abusive terms had declined,
but its conclusion that subprime lending to the
highest risk borrowers was not impairedand
indeed, even increaseddirectly conflicted with
other notable studies that had concluded just the
opposite, namely that subprime credit had dropped
in the wake of the NC statute. - It is not surprising, therefore, that the UNC
study had attracted significant attention in the
media from the time of its publication on June
25, until August, 2003, the study had been
mentioned in over 300 press stories in a Nexis
search. - Supporters of anti-predatory lending state
statutes are pointing to the study as evidence
that states can enact tougher restrictions than
are imposed at the federal level without
unintenionally impairing the availability of
credit to subprime borrowers generally.
4Consumer Research with Most ImpactEvaluation of
North Carolina Predatory Lending Law
- NC first state to enact predatory lending law
banning particular business practices that are
common in subprime lending industry. Subprime
lending focuses on provision of mortgage loans to
borrowers with blemished credit - Fundamental question is whether it is possible to
regulate subprime lending in such a way as to rid
the industry of abusive practices without
throwing out the baby with the bathwater (reduce
predatory lending without reducing flow of
mortgage loans to qualified borrowers) - Until our paper was circulated, academic studies
and industry consensus concluded that NCs law
had caused subprime lenders to exit the state and
overall flow of subprime credit to be reduced,
thereby punishing consumers - Using a different dataset than others, and
changing research question, we determined that - While overall supply of subprime credit declined
in NC relative to neighboring states, 90 of the
fall-off was in abusive or predatory loans also
found no effects of the law on new purchase
loans entire fall-off was in refinances, which
is where most abuses lie.
5The Predatory Lending Data Debate
- Until our paper, two sources of subprime data for
predatory lending research - HMDA, which contains no data on loan terms, or on
borrowers other than race and location also
cannot separate subprime from prime loans for
lenders designated as subprime lenders by HUD - Proprietary database used by Michael Staten,
Georgetown Credit Research Center, provided to
him by an industry trade group, American
Financial Services Association
6Debate Over Data
- AFSA data set included 1.4 million loans,
analyzing just 300,000 of them in four states
that were made by nine lender members. - LP database included 3.3 million securitized
loans in all 50 states made by more than 20
lenders. In terms of market share, the LP data
included 42 percent of the entire subprime market
in 1998, the starting point for our analysis, and
51 percent in 2002, the endpoint. - Compared to ours, AFSA database covers fewer
lenders, ends before many of NCs predatory
lending laws provisions took effect, and is
unavailable to other researchers for independent
analysis. - Given robustness of the LP data, we are mystified
by criticism of our work based mostly on dataset
we used, while policymakers and academics alike
praise GCRC work without raising any question
about the nature and composition of their data.
7Most Effective Means of Reaching Policymakers
with More Academic Consumer Research
- Write applied scholarly papers for publication in
appropriate journals and then write separate
policy brief for wide distribution to policy
makers. - What has worked for me is collaboration with
Brookings Institution and their Policy Brief
series - Creating a Scorecard for the CRA Service Test
published in Georgetown Journal on Law and
Poverty led to presentation to OCC - Tax Policy as Housing Policy The EITCs
Potential to Make Housing More affordable for
Working Familiespublished in Housing Policy
Debate - Electronic Benefits Potential to Help the Poor
book, Savings and the Poor, published by
Brookings Press led to two invitations to meet
with Senators, and with Senator Joe Lieberman
writing forward and my writing legislation,
Savings for Working Families Act.
8How to Protect Against Research Biases
- Premise of question implies that consumer
research(ers) likely to be more biased than more
traditional academic research(ers), which I
dispute - Best protection against undue bias is peer review
and peer community as much as I take pride in
policy research, I assume that all of my work
must withstand peer scrutinywhether it be of a
more advocacy nature or more straightforward
applied social science research.
9Speed vs. Scientific defensible
- Write applied scholarly papers for publication in
appropriate journals and then write separate
policy brief for wide distribution to policy
makers. - What has worked for me is collaboration with
Brookings Institution and their Policy Brief
series - Creating a Scorecard for the CRA Service Test
published in Georgetown Journal on Law and
Poverty led to presentation to OCC - Tax Policy as Housing Policy The EITCs
Potential to Make Housing More affordable for
Working Familiespublished in Housing Policy
Debate - Electronic Benefits Potential to Help the Poor
book, Savings and the Poor, published by
Brookings Press led to two invitations to meet
with Senators, and with Senator Joe Lieberman
writing forward and my writing legislation,
Savings for Working Families Act.
10Lie Enough Times The Case of Payday Loans
- Payday Loan Industry argues that it is not fair
to annualize their fees using APR because most
payday advances are for a month or less, many for
14 days or fewer - Argument goes that payday loans are one of the
few accessible sources of very short-term,
occasional credit for hard-pressed consumers and
are not intended to be a source of longer-term
credit, so APR is not fair way of assessing the
reasonableness of the industrys charges. - You could take a taxi from Raleigh to Cary (about
2 mile ride) or you could take the same taxi from
Raleigh to Seattle for exactly the same rate, but
total cost would be ridiculous. It would be much
cheaper to fly. It would be silly for a cash
advance customer to take a single cash advance
for an entire year. - NC fee structure 15 per 100, maximum term 31
days - In NC, median payday loan fee of 36 for median
loan of 244 in 2000 translates to a median APR
of 419. For a seven day loan, same parameters
produce a 920 APR - Truth 18 of customers take out 13 loans/yr
accounting for 38 of total revenues - Business model depends on rollovers renewals
payday loans are a longer term source of credit
than industry would have you believe.