From Fringe Banking to the Financial Mainstream - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

From Fringe Banking to the Financial Mainstream

Description:

THE FRANK HAWKINS KENAN INSTITUTE OF PRIVATE ENTERPRISE ... my work must withstand peer scrutiny whether it be of a more advocacy nature or ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: davidp49
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: From Fringe Banking to the Financial Mainstream


1
The Center for
Community Capitalism
Marketing and Public Policy Conference University
of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT May 20-22,
2004 by Dr. Michael A. Stegman Center for
Community Capitalism University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill
2
Consumer Research with Most ImpactPotential
Impact SWFA
  • Savings for Working Families Act introduced by
    Joe Lieberman (D-CT) and co-sponsored by Rick
    Santorum (R-PA)
  • Drafted initial legislation contrary to
    consumer advocates, but ultimately became
    consensus vehicle for bringing Individual
    Development Accounts (IDAs), a form of matched
    savings accounts, to scale
  • Rather than working through community-based
    nonprofits and appropriations process, uses
    federal tax system to provide tax credits to
    banks to provide matching funds
  • Theory is that fed tax system should provide
    incentives to the poor to save, just as it does
    for the rich, but since poor cant use credits
    directly, exchange credits that banks can use for
    matching funds for IDA programs besides,
    appropriations more constrained than tax credits.
  • Introduced in 2000, passed by Senate, but not by
    House now SWFA is contained in President Bushs
    Faith-based Charitable Giving legislation called
    the CARE Act.

3
Litan CritiqueEvidence of Policy Impact
  • This study was the first to conclude that
    mortgage loans with abusive terms had declined,
    but its conclusion that subprime lending to the
    highest risk borrowers was not impairedand
    indeed, even increaseddirectly conflicted with
    other notable studies that had concluded just the
    opposite, namely that subprime credit had dropped
    in the wake of the NC statute.
  • It is not surprising, therefore, that the UNC
    study had attracted significant attention in the
    media from the time of its publication on June
    25, until August, 2003, the study had been
    mentioned in over 300 press stories in a Nexis
    search.
  • Supporters of anti-predatory lending state
    statutes are pointing to the study as evidence
    that states can enact tougher restrictions than
    are imposed at the federal level without
    unintenionally impairing the availability of
    credit to subprime borrowers generally.

4
Consumer Research with Most ImpactEvaluation of
North Carolina Predatory Lending Law
  • NC first state to enact predatory lending law
    banning particular business practices that are
    common in subprime lending industry. Subprime
    lending focuses on provision of mortgage loans to
    borrowers with blemished credit
  • Fundamental question is whether it is possible to
    regulate subprime lending in such a way as to rid
    the industry of abusive practices without
    throwing out the baby with the bathwater (reduce
    predatory lending without reducing flow of
    mortgage loans to qualified borrowers)
  • Until our paper was circulated, academic studies
    and industry consensus concluded that NCs law
    had caused subprime lenders to exit the state and
    overall flow of subprime credit to be reduced,
    thereby punishing consumers
  • Using a different dataset than others, and
    changing research question, we determined that
  • While overall supply of subprime credit declined
    in NC relative to neighboring states, 90 of the
    fall-off was in abusive or predatory loans also
    found no effects of the law on new purchase
    loans entire fall-off was in refinances, which
    is where most abuses lie.

5
The Predatory Lending Data Debate
  • Until our paper, two sources of subprime data for
    predatory lending research
  • HMDA, which contains no data on loan terms, or on
    borrowers other than race and location also
    cannot separate subprime from prime loans for
    lenders designated as subprime lenders by HUD
  • Proprietary database used by Michael Staten,
    Georgetown Credit Research Center, provided to
    him by an industry trade group, American
    Financial Services Association

6
Debate Over Data
  • AFSA data set included 1.4 million loans,
    analyzing just 300,000 of them in four states
    that were made by nine lender members.
  • LP database included 3.3 million securitized
    loans in all 50 states made by more than 20
    lenders. In terms of market share, the LP data
    included 42 percent of the entire subprime market
    in 1998, the starting point for our analysis, and
    51 percent in 2002, the endpoint.
  • Compared to ours, AFSA database covers fewer
    lenders, ends before many of NCs predatory
    lending laws provisions took effect, and is
    unavailable to other researchers for independent
    analysis.
  • Given robustness of the LP data, we are mystified
    by criticism of our work based mostly on dataset
    we used, while policymakers and academics alike
    praise GCRC work without raising any question
    about the nature and composition of their data.

7
Most Effective Means of Reaching Policymakers
with More Academic Consumer Research
  • Write applied scholarly papers for publication in
    appropriate journals and then write separate
    policy brief for wide distribution to policy
    makers.
  • What has worked for me is collaboration with
    Brookings Institution and their Policy Brief
    series
  • Creating a Scorecard for the CRA Service Test
    published in Georgetown Journal on Law and
    Poverty led to presentation to OCC
  • Tax Policy as Housing Policy The EITCs
    Potential to Make Housing More affordable for
    Working Familiespublished in Housing Policy
    Debate
  • Electronic Benefits Potential to Help the Poor
    book, Savings and the Poor, published by
    Brookings Press led to two invitations to meet
    with Senators, and with Senator Joe Lieberman
    writing forward and my writing legislation,
    Savings for Working Families Act.

8
How to Protect Against Research Biases
  • Premise of question implies that consumer
    research(ers) likely to be more biased than more
    traditional academic research(ers), which I
    dispute
  • Best protection against undue bias is peer review
    and peer community as much as I take pride in
    policy research, I assume that all of my work
    must withstand peer scrutinywhether it be of a
    more advocacy nature or more straightforward
    applied social science research.

9
Speed vs. Scientific defensible
  • Write applied scholarly papers for publication in
    appropriate journals and then write separate
    policy brief for wide distribution to policy
    makers.
  • What has worked for me is collaboration with
    Brookings Institution and their Policy Brief
    series
  • Creating a Scorecard for the CRA Service Test
    published in Georgetown Journal on Law and
    Poverty led to presentation to OCC
  • Tax Policy as Housing Policy The EITCs
    Potential to Make Housing More affordable for
    Working Familiespublished in Housing Policy
    Debate
  • Electronic Benefits Potential to Help the Poor
    book, Savings and the Poor, published by
    Brookings Press led to two invitations to meet
    with Senators, and with Senator Joe Lieberman
    writing forward and my writing legislation,
    Savings for Working Families Act.

10
Lie Enough Times The Case of Payday Loans
  • Payday Loan Industry argues that it is not fair
    to annualize their fees using APR because most
    payday advances are for a month or less, many for
    14 days or fewer
  • Argument goes that payday loans are one of the
    few accessible sources of very short-term,
    occasional credit for hard-pressed consumers and
    are not intended to be a source of longer-term
    credit, so APR is not fair way of assessing the
    reasonableness of the industrys charges.
  • You could take a taxi from Raleigh to Cary (about
    2 mile ride) or you could take the same taxi from
    Raleigh to Seattle for exactly the same rate, but
    total cost would be ridiculous. It would be much
    cheaper to fly. It would be silly for a cash
    advance customer to take a single cash advance
    for an entire year.
  • NC fee structure 15 per 100, maximum term 31
    days
  • In NC, median payday loan fee of 36 for median
    loan of 244 in 2000 translates to a median APR
    of 419. For a seven day loan, same parameters
    produce a 920 APR
  • Truth 18 of customers take out 13 loans/yr
    accounting for 38 of total revenues
  • Business model depends on rollovers renewals
    payday loans are a longer term source of credit
    than industry would have you believe.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com