Title: Controversies in Shock and Trauma Management
1Controversies in Prehospital Trauma
Management
Chief Will Chapleau EMT-P, RN, TNS Chicago
Heights Fire Department wchapleau_at_aol.com
2Controversy Has Always Been a Part of Prehospital
Care
- The increasing emphasis on Evidence Based
Medicine will dispel some controversies, and
stir up others.
3Overview
- Pneumatic Anti-Shock Garment
- Time on scene
- Fluid resuscitation
- ALS in Trauma
- Spinal immobilization
- Withholding or cessation of resuscitation
4The M.A.S.T. Suit
- Developed from G-suit concept
- Used extensively in combat
- Fell into disfavor despite the absence of
scientific data to suggest or support its demise.
5M.A.S.T in the U.S.
- Use expanded greatly after introduction
- At one time or another used for everything from
fracture control to cardiac arrest
6What does it do?
- Increases peripheral vascular resistance
- Increases cardiac output
- Autotransufusion occurs to a limited degree
- Increases cerebral perfusion pressure
- Assists in controlling internal bleeding
7NAEMSP Position Paper
- Collective review of literature by Dr. Robert E.
OConner and Dr. Robert Domeier January/March
1997 Prehospital Emergency Care Journal - Over 100 studies cited
8NAEMSP Position Paper
- Ironically..widespread condemnation of the PASG
took place in the absence of scientific
validation that it was detrimental in all
situations. Negative outcomes in a limited number
of restricted applications have been extrapolated
to the broad gamut of clinical situations.
9NAEMSP Position Paper
- .EMS providers should still be taught that the
PASG is an acceptable treatment modality, and
that medical direction may or may not elect to
use it.
10Is PASG Harmful?
- Studies seem to support that PASG may be
potentially harmful in treating patients with
thoracic injuries, particularly penetrating chest
trauma
11Head Injured Patients
- For a long time head injured patients were listed
as contraindications for PASG. - Studies show no significant change in ICP with
PASG - In fact, the improvement in cerebral perfusion
more than compensated for the rise in ICP.(Not
evaluated in patients with elevated ICP)
12When is the PASG useful?
- Pelvic injuries with hypotension
- Hypotension due to rupture of AAA
- Severe traumatic hypotension
- Uncontrollable hemorrhage of lower extremities
- Anaphylactic shock (unresponsive to standard
therapy)
13PASG May be Useful
- Penetrating Abdominal Trauma
- PSVT
- Hypotension due to hypothermia
- Septic shock
- Urologic shock (otherwise uncontrolled)
- Uncontrolled gynecological hemorrhage
- Ruptured ectopic pregnancy
14PASG may not be appropriate in cases of
- Penetrating Chest Trauma
- Diaphragmatic rupture
- Cardiogenic shock
- Cardiac Tamponade
- Cardiac arrest
- Bleeds above the diaphragm
- To splint lower extremity fractures
15Time on Scene
- What do the studies tell us?
- How much time do we have?
- How should we use the time we do have?
16Studies
- Dr. R.A.Cowley and the Golden Hour
- Time to surgery
17How much time do we have on the scene?
- Golden Hour
- Platinum ten minutes
- 8 minute standard
18Time in the Literature
- Osterwalder 2002 Prehosp Disaster Med 1775
- Swiss Study 254 patients
- Compared trauma patients with total prehospital
time 60 minutes with those whose time was gt 60
minutes - Group I ( 60 mins.) mortality 14
- Group II (gt 60 mins.) mortality 10
- No statistical difference
19The 8 Minutes or Less Benchmark
- Non-traumatic cardiac arrest
- Study from Seattle
- Survival from medical cardiac arrest was better
when BLS arrived within 4 minutes and ALS arrived
within 8 minutes. - This was then applied to all EMS responses.
20The 8 Minutes or Less Benchmark
- Fiedler et al 1986, Arch Surg 121902
- Response time and outcome from abdominal gunshot
wounds - No difference in RT for survivors and fatalities
- Grossman et al 1997 J Trauma 42723
- 459 major trauma patients
- Compared urban to rural setting
- Urban RT 7 minutes
- Rural RT 14 minutes
- Rural patients were 7x more likely to die if RT
was gt 30 minutes.
21The 8 Minutes or Less Benchmark
- Pons et al 2002, J Emerg Med 2343
- Does the 8 minute RT affect outcome after
trauma? - 3490 patients, 2 groups based on RT
- No difference in survival
- Pons et al 2005, Acad Emerg Med 12594
- - 9559 patients (all complaints)
- - 3 groups low, moderate, high risk of death
- - No survival benefit based on 8 mins.
- - Survival benefit for RT lt 4 minutes for
patients in moderate and high risk groups
22The 8 Minutes or Less Benchmark
- Smith et al 1985 J Trauma 2565
- 52 trauma patients with BP lt 100 mm Hg
- Scene Time Transport Time
- BP unable 16 8
- BP lt 70 17 9
- BP 70-100 15 11
23Fluid Resuscitation
- Studies
- How much do we need?
- What should we use?
- Whats next
24Argument Against IVs in the Field
- Solomonov et al.
- University research laboratory using adult male
rats with massive splenic injury - Rats were divided into 4 groups evaluating
aggressive and non-aggressive fluid therapy - Conclusion vigorous infusion of saline resulted
in increased intra-abdominal bleeding and
decreased survival time
25Argument Against IVs in the Field
- Bickell et al.
- 598 adult patients, penetrating torso trauma,
systolic lt90 _at_ presentation, predominate fluid
Ringers lactate - Immediate Resuscitation group (IR) with 238
patients - Delayed Resuscitation group (DR) with 289
26Immediate Resuscitation Group
- Received standard fluid therapy
- Average 870 mL before reaching hospital and 1608
mL in the ED - Systolic pressure averages 79
- Hemoglobin and platelet counts were lower
- Hemodynamic improvements on arrival did not last
into operating theater - 62 survival/increased hospital stay
27Delayed Resuscitation Group
- Cannulated, no specific fluid infusion until OR
- Averaged 92 mL and 283 mL at corresponding stages
- Systolic pressure averages 72
- 70 survival rates/shorter hospital stays
28How much should we use?
- Fluid should be administered to replace volume
until blood is available. - The rule of thumb is that blood should follow 3
liters of IV fluid. - If blood is not available you may need to use
more. - Keep in mind, IV fluid does not carry oxygen.
29What should we use?
- Lactated Ringers
- Normal Saline
- Hypertonic
- Blood Substitutes
30Protective Hypotensive Resuscitation
- How high must the systolic pressure be to perfuse
adequately? - Resuscitate to lower pressures slowing the rate
of blood loss while still perfusing vital
tissues.
31Whats next?
- More science and development of colloid and
plasma substitutes. - PolyHeme trials
32Spinal Clearance or Spinal immobilization
protocols
- 23 EMS agencies 17 Hospitals
- All used their standard immobilization protocol
- Filled out questionnaire asking for the presence
or absence of specific clinical criteria - Domeier 2002 J Trauma 5374
33Spinal Clearance or Spinal immobilization
protocols
- Evaluated 8975 trauma patients
- - Spine pain
- - Spine tenderness
- - Altered mental status
- - Evidence of Intoxication
- - Focal neurologic deficits
- - Suspected extremity fracture
- Identified 280 of 295 spinal injuries
34NEXUS Study
- Criteria for low probability of injury
- No midline spine tenderness
- No focal neurologic deficit
- Normal alertness
- No intoxication
- No painful distracting injury
- Reviewed 34,069 trauma patients
- 21 different centers
- Cervical spine injury was present in 818
- Missed only 8 patients, 2 considered significant
35Who doesnt need immobilization?
- Blunt Trauma, if all of the following are
present - - No neck pain
- - No neck tenderness
- - No distracting injury
- - No alteration in mental status
- (either from head injury or intoxication)
- - No neurologic complaints or findings
36ALS In Trauma
37(No Transcript)
38(No Transcript)
39Arguments against ALS
- Extended scene times
- limited or poorly documented benefit to patients
40Arguments for ALS
- Some studies show benefit when adequate personnel
is available - Improved outcome may be possible with ALS care
delivered enroute to Hospital - There is a point at which prehospital must end
and intrahospital must begin for the patient to
receive definitive care
41Airway and Ventilation
42DELAYED SCENE TIME
- Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 237, No.2, 2003
- Study shows an overall higher mortality rate
by advanced level providers on-scene. - Includes ET intubation.
43INCREASED MORBIDITY MORTALITY RATES WITH ETI
- The Journal of Trauma, Vol. 54,
- 2, 2003.
- Study shows pts who
- were intubated in the
- field had significant
- higher morbidity,
- nearly double the
- mortality rate.
44INCREASED MORBIDITY MORTALITY RATES WITH ETI
- The Journal of Trauma Vol. 54,
- 2, 2003.
- Study shows pts who were intubated in the
field had longer hospital stays more - nosocomial infections.
45Prehospital Emergency Care2005 April/June
9(2)163-6Garza AG, Algren DA, Gratton MC, Ma OJ
- Populations at risk for intubation nonattempt and
failure in the prehospital setting. - In Kansas City they did a retrospective
analytical study analyzing oral endotracheal
intubations on pediatric cardiac arrest, adult
traumatic arrest and adult cardiac arrest
patients over 66 months.
46Prehospital Emergency Care2005 April/June
9(2)163-6Garza AG, Algren DA, Gratton MC, Ma OJ
- 2,669 intubations were included.
- Conclusions
- There was a significant risk of intubation
nonattempt and intubation failure in the
pediatric cardiac arrest and adult traumatic
arrest cohorts compared with the adult cardiac
arrest population with the pediatric cohort being
at particularly high risk for failure and the
adult traumatic arrest cohort for higher risk for
nonattempt.
47J Trauma 2005 May, 58(5)933-9Davis DP, Peay J,
Sise MJ, Vilke GM, Kennedy F, Eastman AB, Velky
T, Hoyt DB
- The impact of prehospital intubation on outcome
in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury - In San Diego, patients with moderate to severe
TBI were identified from their trauma registry.
48J Trauma 2005 May, 58(5)933-9Davis DP, Peay J,
Sise MJ, Vilke GM, Kennedy F, Eastman AB, Velky
T, Hoyt DB
- Results
- 13,625 patients were identified from five trauma
centers. Overall mortality was 22.9 and 19.3
underwent prehospital intubation. Logistic
regression revealed an increase in mortality with
prehospital intubation. With the exclusion of
aero medical transports, patients intubated in
the field had worse outcomes.
49J Trauma 2004 Mar, 56(3)531-6Stockinger ZT,
McSwain NE Jr.
- Results
- Of 5,773 patients, 316 (5.5) had ETI and 217
(3.8) had BVM. Patients receiving ETI were
significantly more likely to die (88.9 vs.
30.9).
50More Intubation Studies
- A variety of studies show prehospital success
rates in the 85 range while anecdotal reports
can be lower. - Seems to be at least some coloration between
frequency of opportunity and performance.
51Withholding Resuscitative Measures
52Obvious signs of death
- Dependant livido
- Rigor Mortis
- Algo Mortis (steady lowering of body temperature
after death) - Injuries incompatible with life
53DNRs Living Wills
- Know your state laws and system protocols for
recognizing DNRs Living Wills and Advance
Directives - Participate in local education about patients
rights to determine their own destiny
54Trauma
- Injuries not compatible with life
- Pulse less and non-breathing blunt trauma victims
55Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
- Resuscitation efforts may be withheld in any
blunt trauma patient who, based on out of
hospital personnels primary survey is found
apneic and pulseless upon arrival of EMS at scene
56Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
- Victims of penetrating trauma found apneic and
pulseless by EMS based on their patient
assessment, should rapidly be assessed for the
presence of other signs of life such as pupillary
reflexes, spontaneous movement or organized ECG
activity.
57Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
- If any of these are present the patient should
have resuscitation performed and be transported
to the nearest emergency department or trauma
center. If these signs of life are absent
resuscitation efforts may be withheld.
58Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
- Resuscitation efforts should be withheld in
victims of penetrating or blunt trauma with
injuries obviously incompatible with life such as
decapitation or hemicorporectomy.
59Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
- Resuscitation efforts should be withheld in
victims of penetrating or blunt trauma with
evidence of a significant time lapse since
pulselessness including dependent lividity, rigor
mortis, and decomposition.
60Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
- Cardiopulmonary arrest patients in whom the
mechanism of injury does not correlate with
clinical condition, suggesting a nontraumatic
cause of the arrest, should have standard
resuscitation initiated.
61Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
- Termination of resuscitation efforts should be
considered in trauma patients with EMS witnessed
cardiopulmonary arrest and 15 minutes of
unsuccessful resuscitation and CPR.
62Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
- Traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest patients with a
transport time to an emergency department or
trauma center of greater than 15 minutes may be
considered nonsalvageable and termination should
be considered.
63Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
- Guidelines and protocols for TCPA patients who
should be transported must be individualized for
each EMS system. Consideration should be given to
factors such as the average transport time within
the system, and the definitive care capabilities
(ie., trauma centers) within the system. Airway
management and IV placement should be
accomplished during transport when possible.
64Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
- Special consideration must be given to victims of
drowning, lightning strike, and in situations
where significant hypothermia may alter prognosis.
65Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
- EMS providers should be thoroughly familiar with
guidelines and protocols affecting the decision
to withhold or terminate resuscitative measures.
66Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
- All termination protocols should be developed and
implemented under the guidance of the system EMS
medical director. On-line medical control may be
necessary to determine the appropriateness of
termination of resuscitation.
67Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
- Policies and protocols for termination of
resuscitation efforts must include notification
of the appropriate law enforcement agencies and
notification of the medical examiner or coroner
for final disposition of the body.
68Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
- Families of the deceased should have access to
resources including clergy, social workers, and
other counseling personnel as needed. EMS
providers should have access to resources for
debriefing and counseling as needed.
69Trauma NAEMSP ACS COT Position Paper
- Adherence to policies and protocols governing
termination of resuscitation should be monitored
through a quality review system.
70The Data on Trauma
- In TCPA patients, Shimazu et al report that 2.3
of blunt trauma and 4 of penetrating trauma
survived. 3 of the 5 blunt trauma patients had
isolated head trauma.
71The Data on Trauma
- Rosemurgy et al looked at 410 TCPA patients.
After excluding patients with injuries
incompatible with life, 96 blunt and 42
penetrating trauma patients remained, non of
which survived.
72The Data on Trauma
- Stratton et al looked at 1,051 patients with
prehospital TCPA. After excluding 116 patients
who were pronounced dead in the field or met
other exclusionary criteria such as primary
cardiac arrest, 879 unconscious and pulseless
were urgently transported. 4 or.08 survived, one
of which was neurologically devastated.
73The Data on Trauma
- There is some evidence that the initial ECG
rhythm obtained by EMS may predict survival. In a
study by Barttistella et al, none of the
asystolic or bradycardic (less than 40) patients
survived out of 134. The 16 survivors all had
initially detectable systolic pressures with
subsequent loss of vital signs and PEA between 80
150 bpm. They argued that PEA with HR less than
40 may be a reliable discriminator.
74Cessation of Resuscitation efforts
- Asystole most frequently represents the end of
life - Except in extreme situations, there is no
evidence to support transporting an asystolic
patient to the hospital. - Electrocution Hypothermia
75Science
- Blaives M, Fox JC
- Journal of the Academy of Emergency Medicine
- Concluded that patients presenting with cardiac
standstill on bedside electrocardiogram do not
survive to leave the ED regardless of their
electrical rhythm. This finding was uniform
regardless of downtime
76Cessation of Resuscitation efforts
- Since 1992, AHA has recommended resuscitation
cessation and non-transport protocols for
patients receiving continuing CPR
77Fixed Criteria for cessation?
- Devita MA
- Progressive Transplant
- Rejects fixed notion of irreversibility
78More Science
- Prehospital Emergency Care Jan-Mar 2001
- Regardless of medical futility criteria,
specialized training of EMS providers and
targeted related testing of operational issues
need to precede field implementation of on-scene
pronouncement policies.
79So what do we do?
- Know our own state laws local rules about DNRs,
Living Wills and Advanced Directives - Educate ourselves and our communities about DNR,
Living Wills and Advanced Directives
80So what do we do?
- Recognize obviously dead patients
- Respect properly documented patients wishes
81References
- American Heart Association ACLS guidelines and
course materials, 2001 - Devita MA, Progressive Transplant, 2001Mar
11(1)58-66 The Death Watchcertifying death
using cardiac criteria
82References
- Pepe PE, Swor RA, Ornato JP, Racht EM, Blanton
DM, Griswell JK, Blackwell T, Dunford J, Turtle
Creek Conference II, Prehospital Emergency Care
2001 Jan-Mar 5(1)79-87 Outcome in cardiac
arrest patients found to have cardiac standstill
on the bedside emergency department
electrocardiogram - Blaivas M, Fox JC, Academy of Emergency Emergency
Medicine Journal 2001 Jun8(6)616-21,
Resuscitation in the out of hospital setting
medical futility criteria for on-scene
pronouncement of death
83Pre-Hospital Science
- Whats been done?
- Whats needed?
84A single study contributes to a body of
knowledge. It is not the final word
85www.phtls.org
- PHTLS Symposium
- Research that drives the program
- 6th edition information
- International faculty
86Questions?
87- Will Chapleau EMT-P, RN, TNS
- Chief
- Chicago Heights Fire Department
- Chicago Heights, Illinois
- Chairman PHTLS Division
- of NAEMT
- Board of Directors NAEMSE
- Board of Directors
- Society of Trauma Nurses
- wchapleau_at_aol.com