Beef Quality Assurance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Beef Quality Assurance

Description:

Feasible measures reduce overall cost to be competitive as ... ID and eliminate genetics that produce tough beef. Post-mortem technology to enhance tenderness ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: Hol68
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Beef Quality Assurance


1
Beef Quality Assurance
2
Current Market Situation
3
Current Industry Challenges
  • Feasible measures reduce overall cost to be
    competitive as well as profitable
  • ID and eliminate genetics that produce tough beef
  • Post-mortem technology to enhance tenderness
  • Target 0.5 inches (max) fat thickness
  • Range of acceptable carcass size to 600-850lbs
  • Chuck and round value added products

4
Consumer Issues
  • Top 5 Concerns
  • Lack of uniformity
  • Inadequate tenderness
  • Low palatability
  • Excessive external fat
  • Price too high for value received

5
Processor Issues
6
Dark Cutters
Weather Implants Genetics Disposition Handling
Glycogen available to produce lactic acid
pH alters light absorption water-binding
ability
DARK CUTTER
7
(No Transcript)
8
What can we do?
  • Injection sites
  • Use of implants
  • Cattle handling
  • Good management practices
  • Recorded documentation

9
Best Management Practices
10
Trained Animal Handlers(TAH)
  • What is TAH all about?
  • Why should I bother?
  • Organizations that have already adopted TAH

11
TAH
  • Guidelines set up by NCBA
  • Involves
  • feeding
  • handling
  • shelter/housing
  • loading/receiving
  • sick/injured animals
  • marketing cattle
  • personnel training

12
Guidelines
  • Provide necessary food, water care
  • Provide disease prevention
  • Provide facilities for safe, humane efficient
    movement and/or restraint
  • Appropriate methods to euthanize terminally sick
    or injured livestock
  • Provide personnel with training/experience to
    properly care for cattle

13
Guidelines
  • Make timely observations of cattle to make sure
    basic needs are met
  • Minimize stress when transporting cattle
  • Keep updated on advancements and changes in the
    industry to make decisions based on sound
    production practices consideration to animal
    well-being
  • Persons who willfully mistreat animals will not
    be tolerated

14
TAH why bother?
  • Feedyard is known to adopt TAH practices
  • - consumer/community perception
  • - buyers
  • Reduce bruising/dark cutters improve efficiency
    of operation

15
Bruising/Dark Cutters
  • Trim losses due to bruising in 2000 cost the
    beef industry 22,819,687
  • Equates to 0.75 per fed steer and heifer
  • Discounts for dark cutters in 2000 were 30/cwt
    carcass weight
  • Total loss 164,592,393
  • Equates to 5.43 per fed steer and heifer (6.08
    in 1995)

16
Organizational Flow
  • Fast food chains
  • McDonalds
  • Burger King

Packing plants Tyson (IBP), Swift, Excel
Feedlots Kansas south to Texas panhandle Nutrition
ist part of job
17
Tyson
  • we pledge our diligence in leading the
    industry pursuit of new and improved technology
    and methods to further enhance animal well-being.
    This is not only the right thing to do, but is
    an important moral and ethical obligation we owe
    to our suppliers, to our customers, to
    ourselves,..

18
Tyson
  • Training requirements
  • Watch a video proper handling techniques
  • Discuss proper technique of handling livestock
  • Read training manual discuss points not
    understood
  • Participate in question answer session
  • Understand what an animal handling audit is and
    what is being evaluated
  • Take a written test
  • Sign a form of understanding and compliance
  • Receive and keep a copy of the training manual

19
  • Audits
  • Electric prod usage no. of animals that are
    touched (acceptable is less than 1 out of 4)
  • Vocalization no. of animals that vocalize
    around the stunning area (acceptable is less than
    3 out of 100)
  • Stunning efficiency no. of animals that are not
    properly stunned the first time (acceptable is
    less than 5 out of 100)
  • Slipping/Falling no of animals that slip or
    fall (acceptable is less than 1 out of 100)
  • Insensibility no. of animals that show signs of
    being sensible after shackling (must be 0)

20
McDonalds
  • 2002 500 audits of beef, pork and poultry
    processing facilities around the world
  • 6 person independent Animal Welfare Council
  • National Council of Chain Restaurants the Food
    Marketing Institute are adopting a common animal
    welfare compliance procedures
  • - major fast food chains
  • - food retailers and wholesalers

21
Burger King
  • 2002 completed audits on 100 of their system
  • 9 person Animal Welfare Council
  • 2003 completed implementation of the National
    Council of Chain Restaurants the Food Marketing
    Institute common animal welfare compliance
    procedures

22
  • McDonalds
  • Reportedsmall amount of cases where the audit
    was not acceptable, corrective actions were taken
    within 30 days to bring the facility up to
    McDonalds standards
  • Burger King
  • Reporteda small number did not meet company
    standard in this years audits.and is actively
    assisting these vendors suppliers in their
    efforts to reach full compliance.

23
Are your facilities ready?
  • Wendys audit team want to visit your feedlot.
  • DO YOU ALLOW THEM?

24
Are your facilities ready?
  • ARE YOU ANIMALS HANDLED IN A HUMANE WAY?

25
Are your facilities ready?
  • Employee training
  • - Who should be trained?
  • - Do you have supporting documentation
  • Who is trained?
  • How many hours of training?
  • Who trained them?
  • When can a trainee go unsupervised?

26
TAH Training Record
Name John Smith Supervisor Fred Fittle
Date 05/21/02
27
Are your facilities ready?
  • ARE YOU ATTENDING TO SICK/INJURED ANIMALS?

28
Health Records
08/11/03
OUTS
167
24
PINK EYE
Vet examined determined, no treatment required
SH
29
Are your facilities ready?
  • Health Concerns
  • Animal welfare audits
  • Documentation
  • Can you prove absence of antibiotic residues?
  • Type of antibiotic used?
  • When was it used?
  • What purpose was it used for?

30
Health Records
31
INVENTORY ITEM LA 200 EXPIRY DATE March
2004 VOLUME 500mL WITHDRAWAL 28 DAYS
32
Are your facilities ready?
  • Are you feeding any antibiotics or ruminant
    derived protein?

33
Are your facilities ready?
  • Feed Concerns
  • Do you have a protocol for feed suppliers?
  • Mycotoxins in DDGS
  • Dioxin in feed ingredients
  • I dont feed any ruminant by-products..
  • o.k. now prove it!

34
Are your facilities ready?
  • Feed Concerns
  • Know the hazards associated with feeds
  • RISK - Brokers
  • - Co-products
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com