Title: Technology for Improving Cognitive Performance
1NIH Scientific Program Areas in RD of Technology
for Improving Cognitive Functions
- Technology for Improving Cognitive Performance
- (ICDR) June 29, 2006, Washington, DC.
- Daofen Chen, Ph.D.
- Program Director, Systems and Cognitive
Neuroscience (NINDS/NIH) - Jeffrey W. Elias, Ph.D.
- Chief Cognitive Aging Program (NIA/NIH)
2Outline
- NINDS/NIA scientific program areas of common
interests - NIH funding initiatives in RD of neurotechnology
and assessment tools in cognitive and behavioral
studies - Competence Technological Press (Dr. Elias)
- Neuroethical issues related to development and
use of neurotechnologies
3NINDS/NIA scientific program areas of common
interests
- Neurological disorders
- Neurodegenerative diseases (Parkinsons or
Alzheimers) - Stroke
- TBI
- Sensorimotor integration and control
- Cognitive function and dysfunction
- Neuroprotection
- Rehabilitation (repair, and plasticity)
- ..
4The Public Health Crisis of Alzheimers
- Will claim one in 10 baby boomers
- Medicare currently pays 1/3 of all its
health-care funds for 4.5 million Alzheimers
patients (91 B in FY05, will double in 4 years) - In next 5 years, 1/2 M new diagnosis annually,
as 78 M baby boomers reach 65 (14 M cases
projected in boomers lifetimes) - We either will become one, or will care for one
(or know one in extended family) - Requires 19K/year in out-of-pocket costs for
each caregiver family
Robert Essner, Wyeth Corp, Washington Post,
June 26, 06
5The Public Health Crisis of Alzheimers
- Currently 28 Alzheimers compounds in development
(pharm industry) - But, its still slow due to the complexity
- Inadequate resource in RD
- Efforts at Wyeth Corp
- A potent serotonin receptor antagonist to enhance
cognition and QOL - An antibody directed against beta-amyloid
- Call for designating the epidemic as a No.1
research priority
Robert Essner, Wyeth Corp, Washington Post,
June 26, 06
6NIH PA Neurotechnology Research, Development,
And Enhancement (R01/R21)
- Informatics tools for analyzing, organizing,
querying, integrating, sharing, or visualizing
data about the brain or behavior - Microfluidic systems for in vivo spatial and
temporal controlled delivery of neurotransmitters
and other biomolecules - Proteome analysis arrays, proteome data storage
and analysis of proteome data from the nervous
system - Genetic approaches to study structure or function
of neural circuits in animal models - Biosensors that would be selectively activated by
neurochemicals, such as particular
neurotransmitters or pharmacological compounds - Delivery systems for exogenous agents such as
drugs, gene transfer vectors, and cells - Non-invasive methods for in vivo tracking of
implanted cells - Tools for real-time analysis of
neurophysiological events - Tools for data mining for genetic discovery and
functional insights into genomics and proteomics
of the nervous system - Nanocrystals or quantum dots covalently bonded to
neural receptor ligands - Probes of brain gene expression that can be
imaged non-invasively (e.g., with magnetic
resonance or near infrared optical imaging) - Genetic approaches to manipulate or monitor
synaptic activity - Microelectromechanical system (MEMS) devices used
for monitoring neuron function in slice and
culture preparations - Amplifiers that are small and light enough to be
worn by mice for recording neural activity from
many neurons - Tools, technologies and algorithms for
neuroprosthesis development - Tools to enhance visualization of specific brain
markers - New methods or agents to study neural
connectivity in living or post mortem brain,
especially human brain - Improved electrodes, microcomputer interfaces,
and microcircuitry for chronic implantation,
monitoring of neural activity, and promoting
efferent function - Dynamic monitors of intracranial pressure and
cerebral spinal fluid composition (particularly
important in following disease progression or
recovery from brain injury)
7NIH Neurotech PA program areas related to
technologies in cognitive and behavioral
neuroscience research (1)
- Informatics tools for analyzing, organizing,
querying, integrating, sharing, or visualizing
data about the brain or behavior - Genetic approaches to study structure or function
of neural circuits in animal models - Tools for real-time analysis of
neurophysiological events - Amplifiers that are small and light enough to be
worn by mice for recording neural activity from
many neurons - Tools, technologies and algorithms for
neuroprosthesis development - Tools to enhance visualization of specific brain
markers - New methods or agents to study neural
connectivity in living or post mortem brain,
especially human brain - Improved electrodes, microcomputer interfaces,
and microcircuitry for chronic implantation,
monitoring of neural activity, and promoting
efferent function - Tools for relatively non-invasive ways to assess
damage and monitor function in regions of injured
or diseased brain tissue
8NIH Neurotech PA program areas related to
technologies in cognitive and behavioral
neuroscience research (2)
- Non-invasive optical imaging approaches
- Technologies for detection, intervention, and
prevention of acute, adverse neurological events - Biomarkers to indicate existence of, or change
in, brain disorders - Technologies to facilitate high-throughput
analysis of behavior - Tools for therapeutic electrical stimulation for
rehabilitation following stroke, trauma or other
events or disorders that disrupt normal function
of the nervous system - Telemetry devices small and light enough to be
worn by mice for transmitting data (e.g.,
electrophysiological data) during behavior - Software to translate neuroimaging data from one
data format into another - Algorithms that use shape analysis approaches to
understand human neuroimaging data - Computational approaches to analyzing video data
(like those used in behavioral research)
9Other related NIH program announcements and
activities related to RD in technologies for
cognitive and behavioral neuroscience research
- Development of PET and SPECT Ligands for Brain
Imaging (SBIR/STTR) - Novel Technologies for In Vivo Imaging
(SBIR/STTR) - Probes for Microimaging The Nervous System
(SBIR/STTR) - Basic and Translational Research in Emotion (R01)
 - Methodology and Measurement in the Behavioral and
Social Sciences (R01/R03/R21) Â - Research Partnerships for Improving Functional
Outcomes  (R01/R21) - ..
10Other related NIH program announcements and
activities related to RD in technologies for
cognitive and behavioral neuroscience research
- Neurorehabilitation
- Cognitive rehab after TBI and Stroke
- NIH Neural Prosthesis Working Group
- Cochlear implants
- BCI
11New funding initiative from NIH Neuroscience
Blueprint
- NIH Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and
Behavioral Function - Request for Proposal (RFP) AG-260-06-01, issued
by NIA - NIH Blueprint, an intra-agency partnership to
accelerate neuroscience research by increasing
collaboration and information-sharing among 16
ICs - Contract mechanism to develop toolbox for
providing tools of assessing cognitive,
emotional, sensory and motor function - Emphasis is on seeking innovative approach to
outcome measures - RFP 260-06-01 was made available electronically
in March, 2006 and was due on May 15, 2006
12Issues Relative to Aging, Cognition, and
Technology
- Autonomy
- Trust
- Complexity
- Information Management
- Technological Press Cognition
- Executive Function
13Aging and Technology Use
- The motivation for much of the emphasis on the
use of technology for older individuals is
autonomy.
14Autonomy and Technology
- Lives are not lived in total autonomy even when
we are at our most capable. - We accept social influence and a pooling of
knowledge and resources to obtain goals. - Nevertheless, the technology and autonomy
relation is being tested as never before.
15Autonomy and Technology
- Technology is most easily accepted when it
promotes or maintains agency. - Agency Actions to promote self-interest.
- Agency Promotes the obtaining of goals.
- Agency Flexibility of time as opposed to
hostage to time and place. - Agency Better time use not worse time use
- Agency more control rather than less control
- Agency better self regulation, not worse
16Too Much Information!
17(No Transcript)
18When does information become usable knowledge?
19Competence Technological Press
Dr. M. Powell Lawton - the most significant
thinker, researcher, and practitioner in
environment-behavior studies within the field of
gerontology. Physical Environments and Aging
Critical Contributions of M. Powell Lawton to
Theory and Practice Examines many aspects of
environmental gerontology
20Competence Technological Press
High
Positive affect and adaptive behavior
Marginal
Negative affect and maladaptive behavior
Marginal
Competence
ZONE OF MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE POTENTIAL
ZONE OF MAXIMUM COMFORT
Negative affect and maladaptive behavior
Low
Weak
Strong
Technological Press
(Adapted from Lawton Nahemow, 1973)
21- Environmental Docility Hypothesis
- The environment becomes a more potent
determinant of behavioral outcome as
personal competence decreases. - Lawton and Simon, 1968
- Environmental Proactivity Hypothesis
- As personal competence increases, the variety
of environmental resources that can be used in
satisfaction of a persons needs increases. - Lawton, 1989
22Factors Contributing to Cognitive Age Changes
1.) Sensory Decline
2.) Memory Decline
3.) Speed of Processing Decline
4.) Motor function Decline
5.) Mobility Decline
6.) Affective information processing focus
7.) Executive function decline
8.) Previous knowledge
23EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS HAVEACTIVE PASSIVE
BEHAVIOR PATTERNS
- ACTIVE
- Environmental Dependency (e.g., frontal pull
utilization behavior habit driven). - Imitation Behavior (echolalia, echopraxia).
- Disinhibition (behavior habit driven
impulsivity social awkwardness). - Vulnerability to intrusions (distractibility
tangentiality, childishness).
24EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS HAVEACTIVE PASSIVE
BEHAVIOR PATTERNS
- PASSIVE
- Apathy (loss of initiative loss of spontaneity,
lack of persistence, need for prompting). - Behavioral stereotypy (motor/cognitive
perseverations)
25SUMMARY OF ISSUES FOR EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF
TECHNOLOGY
- COGNITIVE ABILITIES
- FAMILIARITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT IN WHICH THE
TECHNOLOGY IS INTRODUCED - ENVIRONMENT COGNITIVE INTERACTIONS
- ACCEPTANCE/USABILITY
- COST/BENEFITS USER (PRIVACY-EFFORT-TIME)
26ISSUES FOR EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF TECHNOLOGY
- COST-BENEFITS - MARKET
- TYPE OF TECHNOLOGY
- FAMILIARITY WITH TECHNOLOGY
- ACTIVE OR PASSIVE INTERACTION WITH TECHNOLOGY
27Think Low Tech Prior to Implementation of High
Tech
- ACCESSIBILITY Is device reasonably accessible
and manipulated is dexterity, strength, or pain
an issue? - VISION Can controls be seen and are visual
errors of operation anticipated in design? - AUDITION Is audition a considered component of
usability and has reduced usability with
background noise and poor hearing been
anticipated?
28Think! Low Tech Prior to Implementation of High
Tech
Common visual and auditory communication and
technology use concerns with aging include
- Poor usability with background noise
- Poor usability when there are competing
information sources - Too many auditory signals of the same nature for
different devices - Poor usability in low contrast visual
environments - Poor usability when there is visual glare
29TECHOLOGICAL PRESS VS TECHNOLOGICAL ADAPTATION
GOAL Â FIND THE RIGHT BALANCE Â Â Â CAUTIONÂ ONE
SIZE WONT FIT ALL
30Think! Fit to the Individual and the Environment
Acceptability The degree that the perceived
benefit exceeds the perceived cost of use
- Takes too much time relative to perceived benefit
- Cost in seen as too high relative to benefit
- Cost in aggravation and irritation exceeds
perceived benefit - Intermittent effectiveness cost seen as too high
relative to effort and frustration - Cost to self-concept doesnt exceed perceived
benefit
31Research on brain cognitive function and the RD
of new integrative technologies and education
- The Coevolution of Human Potential and
Converging Technologies - Summary of a NSF-DOC workshop held in 2003
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- May 2004 - Vol. 1013 Page vii-258
32Neuroethical issues pertaining to developments in
cognitive neuroscience and applications of the
new forms of knowledge and technologies
- What new forms of law will be necessary to cope
with rapid advances in cognitive intervention and
monitoring? - What common concepts will require re-evaluation
based on new models in our understanding of the
brain and its functional properties? - How will these emerging technologies, with an
enhanced capacity to monitor and control
cognitive function, be restricted or applied? - How will the law cope with discoveries and
revelations from brain science that call for a
revision of some of its most basic core
assumptions of human autonomy and freedom?
Sententia, 2004