Title: Identifying%20conserved%20segments%20in%20rearranged%20and%20divergent%20genomes
1Identifying conserved segments in rearranged and
divergent genomes
- Bob Mau, Aaron Darling, Nicole T. Perna
- Presented by Aaron Darling
2Comparing genomic architectures
- Genome sequence and architecture comparison can
lead to insight about organismal - Evolutionary forces
- Gene functions
- Phenotypes
- Rearrangement, gene gain, loss, and duplication
obfuscate homology
3Structure of the bacterial chromosome
Breakpoints of inversions occur an equal distance
from the origin to maintain replichore
balance. (Tillier and Collins 2000, Ajana et. al.
2002) We call such rearrangements symmetric
inversions
Replication proceeds simultaneously on each
replichore
Replichore size difference gt 20 is selected
against (Guijo et. al. 2001)
4A dot plot Each dot is a pairwise (or n-way)
local alignment
5Blue Same strand Red Opposite strand
Goal Identify local homologous (orthologous)
segments
6Tools for segmental homology detection
- GRIMM-Synteny (Pevzner et. al. 2003, Bourque et.
al. 2004) - - cluster markers within a fixed distance
- FISH (Vision et. al. 2003)
- find statistically over-represented
- clusters of markers within a fixed distance
- LineUp (Hampson et. al. 2003)
- find collinear runs of markers among
- pairs of genomes, allowing degeneracy
- Some alignment tools
- Shuffle-LAGAN (Brudno et. al. 2003),
- Mauve (Darling et. al. 2004)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9Small segments separated by lineage-specific
regions may not be detected by methods based
strictly on distance.
Key idea use a combination of conserved marker
order (collinearity) and alignment score
10Finding conserved regions A pseudo-Gibbs
sampler method
- Given A set of M monotypic markers M
- Do Assign a posterior probability that any
marker m ? M is part of a conserved region - Use MCMC methodology to sample the frequency of
- each markers inclusion in high-scoring
configurations. -
- Use frequency as an estimate of posterior
probability
11Finding conserved regions A pseudo-Gibbs
sampler method
- Define a configuration X as a vector of length M
of - binary random variables
- e.g. X ( X1, X2, , XM )
- A configuration value xj maps marker mj to either
- signal (1) or noise (0)
- e.g. x (0,1,0,0,1,1,,1,0)
- There are 2M possible configurations
- Run a Markov chain of length N over configuration
- space (X1, X2, , XN)
12Sample possible marker configurations
- Start with a random initial configuration, THEN
- Select a marker, sample whether it should be a 0
or 1 based on the current configuration
wv is the score of marker v, xv is the
configuration value (0 or 1)
13Transform LCB score to probability
- The scale parameter c is used in tandem with the
sigmoid to map a markers score to a probability
14Sample a new value for xj
- Set xj to 1 with probability given by the
markers - score transformation
- First allow the chain a burn-in period, then
- continue for many iterations.
- The frequency, or posterior probability of mj
is
15Our method assigns each marker a p.p.
- Threshold ? separates signal from noise
16Our method assigns each marker a p.p.
- Using ? .5, the X pattern appears
17Our method assigns each marker a p.p.
- Using ? .5, the X pattern appears
18Application to 4 divergent Streptococcus
- Markers are reciprocal best blastp hits of ORFs
among - S. agalactiae
- S. pyogenes
- S. pneumoniae
- S. mutans
S. pneumoniae
19What is the distribution of segment sizes in
Streptococci?
- As resolution increases, large segments are
broken up by - smaller segments
Total Segments
c 75, ? .45 Low resolution
26
c 30, ? .45 Medium resolution
32
c 20, ? .50 High-1 resolution
57
c 20, ? .30 High-2 resolution
72
Segment sizes (Markers per segment)
20What was the ancestral genome organization?
- Try building inversion phylogeny by applying
GRIMM and MGR to the 57 high resolution segments
21What was the ancestral genome organization?
- Try building inversion phylogeny by applying
GRIMM and MGR to the 57 high resolution segments - Failed The suggested rearrangements do not
maintain replichore balance
22What was the ancestral genome organization?
- Try building inversion phylogeny by applying
GRIMM and MGR to the 57 high resolution segments - Failed The suggested rearrangements do not
maintain replichore balance - Try using the 26 larger, low resolution segments
- Surprise! A success
23Transforming S. agalactiae into S. pyogenes
24Conclusions
- - The pseudo-Gibbs sampler method detects
- collinear segments at a variety of scales
- - It would be nice to have an inversion phylogeny
- inference tool that accounts for replichore
balance! - - Large segments in Streptococci appear to
- rearrange by symmetric inversions
- - Small segments? An open problem.
25Future directions
- Can a biologically relevant full joint
probability - distribution be expressed over configurations?
- - If so, then a true Gibbs sampler could be
employed - Problems
- - Some rearrangements occur with different
frequency (e.g. symmetric inversions about the
terminus vs. IS-mediated translocation) - - Distinguish rearrangement by H.T., gene
duplication and subsequent loss, symmetric
inversion, etc.
26Acknowledgements
- Bob Mau did most of this work
- My Ph.D. advisers
- Nicole T. Perna and Mark Craven
- Others who have contributed insight
- Jeremy Glasner, Fred Blattner, Eric Cabot
- GEL_at_UW-Madison
- Grant . Money NIH Grant GM62994-02.
- NLM Training Grant 5T15M007359-03 to A.E.D.