Title: Development%20of%20a%20combined%20crop%20and%20climate%20forecasting%20system
1Development of a combined crop and climate
forecasting system
Tim Wheeler and Andrew Challinor t.r.wheeler_at_rdg.a
c.uk
Crops and Climate Group
2A combined crop and climateforecasting
systemReport fromFood Crops in a Changing
Climate
3Linking climate informationto crop models
general circulation model
crop model
At what scale should information pass between
crop and climate models?
4Development of a combinedcrop / climate
forecasting system
Fully coupled crop-climate simulation
Find spatial scale of weather-crop relationships
Osborne (2004)
Challinor et. al. (2003)
Ensemble methods
Climate change
(Challinor et al, 2005b,c)
(2005c,d)
Crop modelling at the working spatial scale
Hindcasts with observed weather data
Challinor et. al. (2004)
(Challinor et al, 2004)
and reanalysis
(Challinor et al, 2005a)
5Simple correlations betweenrainfall and crop
yield
Seasonal rainfall and groundnut yields for all
India. Time trend removed. rainfall yield
6Patterns of seasonal rainfall and yield of
groundnut in India
District level groundnut yields (kg ha-1) Mean of
1966 - 1990 Data source ICRISAT
7Patterns of seasonal rainfall and yield of
groundnut in India
Sub-divisional level seasonal rainfall (JJAS, cm)
Mean of 1966 - 1990 Data source IITM
8General Large Area Modelfor Annual Crops (GLAM)
- Aims to combine
- the benefits of more empirical approaches (low
input data requirements, validity over large
spatial scales) with - the benefits of a process-based approach (e.g.
the potential to capture intra-seasonal
variability, and so cope with changing climates) - Uses a Yield Gap Parameter to account for the
impact of differing nutrient levels, pests,
diseases, non-optimal management to simulate farm
yields
Challinor et. al. (2004)
9Hindcasts of groundnut yield for all India using
GLAM
10Capturing the effects ofintra-seasonal
variability
1975 Total rainfall 394mm Model 1059 kg/ha Obs
1360 kg/ha
1981 Total rainfall 389mm Model 844 kg/ha Obs
901 kg/ha
11Using ERA40 reanalysis data
- Gujarat bias correction of climatological mean
rainfall works well - Correlation with observed yields 0.49 ? 0.60
- Andhra Pradesh simulated mean yield lt observed,
variability gtgt observed - Incorrect seasonal cycle (both mean and
variability) though Jun and Sept good. This is
harder to correct.
12Using probabilistic climate forecasts
Model average
63 ensemble members
713 kg ha-1
Observed
775 kg ha-1
Use of DEMETER multi-model ensemble for groundnut
yield in Gujarat, 1998 from Challinor et al
(2005)
13Probabilistic forecasting of crop failure
- The number of ensemble members predicting yield
below a given threshold is an indication of
probability of occurrence - Found predictability in crop failure
14The impact of water and temperature stress at
flowering under climate change
Hadley Centre PRECIS model, A2 (high emission)
scenario
1960-1990
2071-2100
1 no impact
0 max. impact
Groundnut
- Current risk is dominated by water stress in
the future climate run temperature stress
dominates in the north.
15Variety response to temperature stress alone
under climate change
Hadley Centre PRECIS model, A2 (high emission)
scenario 2071-2100 Number of years when the total
number of pods setting is below 50.
Sensitive variety
Tolerant variety
16An integrated approach to climate impact
assessments
- Crops can modify their own environment
- The water cycle and surface temperatures vary
according to land use - Integrate biological and physical modelling
- By working on common spatial scale
- By fully coupling the models
17Fully coupled crop-climate simulation
Crops growing in HadAM3
18Fully coupled crop-climate simulation
19Using satellite estimates of rainfall
TAMSAT Teo Chee-Kiat David Grimes
20Conclusions
- A combined crop and climate modelling system has
been developed and tested for the current
climate. - It shows skill in seasonal hindcasts and with
climate ensembles - It has been used to study crop responses to
climate change - Can be fully coupled to a GCM, and driven by
satellite data