Revision - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Revision

Description:

The contract involves the Commonwealth or its organisations ... Macquarie Bank Ltd v Berg (Unreported) Supreme Court of NSW per Simpson J, 2 June 1999 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: guyha
Category:
Tags: revision

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Revision


1
Revision
2
  • Terms implied by Legislation
  • 3 Acts that imply terms in a contract
  • Criteria for TPA to apply
  • Definition on consumer contract in TPA

3
  • Application of Trade Practices Act
  • Applies only where
  • The vendor\supplier is subject to the Act
  • The purchaser is a consumer
  • The service is provided in the course of business

4
  • Application of Trade Practices Act
  • The supplier is subject to the Act if
  • A trading, financial or foreign corporation
  • It is operating in a territory (e.g. NT)
  • The contract involves interstate trade
  • The contract involves overseas trade
  • The contract involves the Commonwealth or its
    organisations

5
  • Application of Trade Practices Act (s4B)
  • A person is a consumer if
  • Price of goods\services lt 40,000 or
  • Goods\Services are of a type ordinarily acquired
    for personal, domestic or household use or
    consumption or
  • Goods are a commercial road vehicle and
  • Goods are not acquired
  • For resale or
  • To be used in commercial production or
    manufacture or
  • To be used in the repair or treatment of goods or
    fixtures on land
  • In the course of an auction
  • ie one of the first 3 and not one of the last 4
    items

Goods Services
Goods Only
6
Terms of the ContractStatutory Implied Terms
  • (Sweeney OReilly
  • Chapter 8 pp 184 199)

7
  • Goods Act (Vic)
  • Covers sale of goods only
  • Distinguishes between consumer and non-consumer
    contracts
  • Consumer contractsApplies terms similar to those
    implied by Trade Practices Act
  • Non-consumer contractsApplies different terms
    that can be excluded by agreement
  • Applies to contracts made in Victoria
  • Similar legislation in other Australian States

8
  • Goods Act (Vic)
  • Defines consumer contracts as contracts for the
    sale of goods
  • Under 20,000 or
  • Ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or
    household use and
  • are not brought for
  • Resale or
  • Use as inputs in manufacture
  • (Section 85 Goods Act)

9
  • Goods Act (Vic)
  • But Trade Practices Act defines a limit of
    40,000
  • If a consumer contract as defined by Trade
    Practices Act then TPA applies
  • Otherwise Goods Act (Vic) applies
  • Consumer provisions of Goods Act apply but TPA
    does not apply where supplier not subject to TPA

10
  • Goods Act (Vic)
  • Non-consumer provisions of Goods Act apply to,
    for example
  • Sale of component parts to manufacturer
  • Sales of raw materials to a commercial enterprise
  • Sales of finished goods to a reseller
  • Sales of industrial goods over (40,000)
  • International sales of goods

11
Yes
Is the contract for the sale of goods?
Does s 85 of the Goods Act apply?
No
Does the Trade Practices Act apply?
The contract is a non-consumer contract
No
12
  • Terms Implied by Goods Act
  • A condition that the seller has the right to sell
    (s17)
  • A warranty that the buyer to have quiet enjoyment
    (s17)
  • A warranty that the goods are free from
    encumbrance (s17)
  • Where sale by description, a condition that the
    goods match the description
  • A condition that the goods are of merchantable
    quality (s19(b))

13
  • Terms Implied by Goods Act
  • Where seller
  • expressly or impliedly makes known to the seller
    the purpose for which the goods are being
    purchased
  • In such circumstances that the seller knows or
    ought to know that the buyer is relying on the
    sellers skill or judgment
  • There is an implied condition that the goods will
    be fit for the purpose (s20)

14
  • Terms Implied by Goods Act
  • Similar to terms implied by TPA but some
    differences
  • Case law on Goods Act can be applied to
    interpretation of TPA

15
  • Fitness for Purpose
  • Overlaps with implied condition of merchantable
    quality
  • David Jones v Willis (SO p192)
  • Buyer must make known the particular purpose to
    the seller
  • Griffiths v Peter Conway (SO p193)
  • Purpose may be a matter of inference
  • Godfrey v Perry (SO p193)

16
  • Fitness for Purpose
  • Buyers reliance on sellers skill and judgment
  • may be only partial but it must be a substantial
    and effective inducement to purchase
  • Must be reasonable
  • Teheran-Europe Co v S T Belton (Tractors) (SO
    p194)

17
  • Merchantable Quality
  • Claim for breach of implied term exists if
  • Sale by description by seller who normally deals
    in such goods (note not required by TPA)
  • The goods are not as fit for their normal purpose
    or purposes as is reasonable to expect having
    regard to the price and other circumstances
  • Buyer was not aware of defect
  • Inspection before sale would not have revealed
    the defect

18
  • Merchantable Quality
  • Sale by Description
  • Frank v Grosvenor Motor Auctions (SO p187)
  • There has there been sale by description if the
    buyer primarily relies upon their classification
    or possession of attributes as described in the
    description
  • Having regard to Price
  • Brown Son v Craiks (SO p190)
  • H Beecham v Francis Howard (SO p190)

19
  • Merchantable Quality
  • Having regard to other circumstances
  • New vs Used
  • ACCC circular (SO p191)
  • Bartlett v Sidney Marcus (SO p191)
  • Any defect, even if easily remedied
  • Grant v Australian Knitting Mills (SO p191)

20
  • Correspondence with Description
  • Those matters that identify the goods (cf
    merchantable quality)
  • Usually applies where
  • Goods not yet ascertained
  • Goods not yet in existence
  • Buyer has not seen goods
  • Varley v Whipp (SO p194)
  • Goods are part of a display
  • Beale v Taylor (SO p195)

21
  • Correspondence with Description
  • Extends to packaging
  • Moore v Landauer Co (SO p195)
  • Buyer must rely on description
  • Harlington Leinster Enterprise v Christopher
    Hull Fine Art (SO p196)
  • Ashington Piggeries v Christopher Hill (SO p196)

22
  • Correspondence with Sample
  • Bulk of goods must correspond with sample (s20)
    Goods shall be free from any defect rendering
    them unmerchantable which would not be apparent
    from examination of the sample (s20(2)(c))
  • Buyer shall be given a reasonable opportunity of
    comparing the bulk with the sample (s20(2)(b)
  • If sale of goods by description and sample, all
    goods (not just bulk) must correspond with
    description (s19(a))

23
  • Other Implied Terms
  • Price
  • If no price, then a reasonable price is to be
    paid (S13)
  • Delivery (s36)
  • If no time is fixed, then delivery is to be
    within a reasonable time

24
  • Other Implied Terms
  • Goods Act (VIC) implies terms relating to
  • Acceptance (ss 41 42)
  • Once accepted, goods cannot be returned
    (non-consumer contracts only)
  • Occurs when
  • Buyer says he accepts goods
  • Buyer does anything inconsistent with sellers
    ownership
  • A reasonable time has elapsed

25
  • Other Implied Terms
  • Goods Act (VIC) implies terms relating to
  • Passing of Property (i.e. title) (ss22 23)
  • Payment
  • Risk (s 25)
  • Goods Act (VIC) will not create a contract where
    none existed
  • ANZ Banking v Frost Holdings (SO p198)

26
  • Excluding or Limiting Implied Terms
  • The terms implied by the Goods Act (Vic) in
    non-consumer contracts can be excluded or limited
  • Normal rules relating to exclusion clauses apply
    i.e
  • Is the exclusion clause a term of the contract?
  • Does the exclusion clause cover the breach?
  • Subject to equitable remedies e.g.
  • Unconscionable conduct
  • Economic duress

27
eCommerce
28
  • eCommerce Issues
  • Jurisdiction
  • Form of contract
  • Time and place of offer and acceptance
  • Incorporation of terms
  • Capacity of software agents

29
  • Jurisdiction
  • Different laws
  • Conflict of Laws
  • International conventions
  • Vienna Sales Convention
  • UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce
  • International Chamber of Commerce E-Terms
    repository
  • This lecture deals only with Australian law

30
  • Jurisdiction
  • Which countrys laws are to be applied to address
    the respective rights and obligations of the
    parties?
  • What is the consequence of a countrys lack of
    jurisdiction?

31
  • Jurisdiction
  • The Internet transcends geographic borders ,
    there are no laws or borders on the Internet.
    There is no Lex Internet.
  • Different countries have different
  • Legal systems
  • Criminal law
  • consumer protection legislation
  • etc

32
  • Jurisdiction
  • France
  • The Yahoo case
  • Germany
  • The Adelaide Institute
  • Trade mark cases
  • Legislation (1997) Any web site accessible from
    Germany is subject to German law

33
  • Jurisdiction
  • USA approach
  • Systematically doing business with territory or
  • Minimum contact with Territory
  • Targeted solicitation
  • Interactive response features
  • Provisions for taking orders and making contracts
  • Australia
  • Macquarie Bank Ltd v Berg (Unreported) Supreme
    Court of NSW per Simpson J, 2 June 1999
  • Gutniks case

34
  • Form of Contract
  • Many statues require
  • Writing
  • Signature
  • Sealed and delivered (Deed)
  • Witnesses etc
  • Section 8 Electronic Transactions Act
  • A transaction is not invalid because it took
    place wholly or partly by means of one or more
    electronic communications

35
  • Time Place of Offer Acceptance
  • Are electronic communications subject to the
    postal rule?
  • instantaneous
  • does not refer to speed of communication
  • Refers to if other party can immediately notify
    the other if he does not receive whole or part of
    message
  • Vienna Sales Convention
  • Applies to contracts involving signatory
    countries
  • Doesnt apply to consumer goods or auctions
  • Contract is formed when acceptance is delivered
    to the offerors mailing address

36
  • Time Place of Offer Acceptance
  • Is email instantaneous?
  • Vienna Sales Convention
  • The acceptance is sent when it is put in the
    offerors mailbox
  • Is online shopping instantaneous?
  • Vienna Sales Convention
  • Offer is made when it is delivered to the
    sellers URL

37
  • Time Place of Offer Acceptance
  • Section 14 Electronic Transactions Act
  • Dispatch occurs when it enters the first
    information system outside the control of the
    sender
  • Receipt occurs when it enters the information
    system designated by the recipient
  • If no information system designated then receipt
    occurs when it comes to the recipients attention

38
  • Time Place of Offer Acceptance
  • Section 14 Electronic Transactions Act
  • Dispatch occurs at the senders place of business
  • Receipt occurs at the recipients place of
    business
  • If more than one place of business then
  • Place of business most closely related to the
    transaction
  • Otherwise, principal place of business

39
  • Time Place of Offer Acceptance
  • Section 14 Electronic Transactions Act
  • If no place of business
  • Place of residence

40
  • Time Place of Offer Acceptance
  • Clicking I accept button
  • This is the offer
  • Seller can accept or reject
  • Electronic Auctions
  • The bid is the offer
  • Auctioneer can accept or reject
  • But, there may be a collateral contract with
    auctioneer that he will accept the bid

41
  • Shrinkwrap Agreements
  • Terms and conditions are not shown to purchaser
    until after he has bought the box and opened it
  • Terms cannot be imposed after contract formed
  • Purchaser must be given reasonable notice of
    terms before contract formed

42
  • Shrinkwrap Agreements (cont.)
  • Are there 2 contracts?
  • One to buy the box
  • One to licence the software
  • Cases have recognised practical importance of
    allowing terms to be made known after sale
  • McRobertson Miller Airlines v Commissioner for
    State Taxation (1975) 133 CLR 125
  • Hill v Gateway 2000 Inc.
  • Try and return clauses

43
  • Electronic Agents
  • Can a partys intention be expressed by a
    computer
  • Can a computer act as an electronic agent
  • Ostensible (apparent) authority of agents
  • Principal is bound where he puts agent in a
    position where he appears to have authority
  • Principal is nopt bound where agent it is clear
    to others that agent is acting outside ostensible
    authority

44
  • Electronic Agents (cont.)
  • Section 15 Electronic Transactions Act
  • For the purposes of a law of the Commonwealth,
    unless otherwise agreed between the purported
    originator and the addressee of an electronic
    communication, the purported originator of the
    electronic communication is bound by that
    communication only if the communication was sent
    by the purported originator or with the authority
    of the purported originator.
  • Subsection (1) is not intended to affect the
    operation of a law (whether written or unwritten)
    that makes provision for
  • conduct engaged in by a person within the scope
    of the person's actual or apparent authority to
    be attributed to another person or
  • a person to be bound by conduct engaged in by
    another person within the scope of the other
    person's actual or apparent authority.

45
  • Electronic Signatures
  • 3 possible legal scenarios
  • Minimalist
  • Only recognise that electronic signatures can be
    the same as written signatures
  • Prescriptive
  • Specify details of technology to be used
  • Set broad criteria for electronic signature to be
    effective

46
  • Electronic Signatures
  • Section 10 Electronic Transactions Act
  • adopts minimalist approach
  • Requires identification, attribution and assent
  • Does not require signature to verify message
    integrity
  • Technology used must be as reliable as is
    appropriate

47
  • Electronic Signatures
  • Section 10 Electronic Transactions Act
  • Recognises the need for different levels of
    authentication
  • Caters for technological advances
  • Does not favour one technology
  • Is consistent with international developments
    (e.g. UNCITRAL)
  • Only applies to areas covered by Commonwealth law
  • States are enacting parallel legislation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com