Measuring Early Childhood Special Education Outcomes in Massachusetts

1
Measuring Early Childhood Special Education
Outcomes in Massachusetts

• Pat Cameron, Department of Early Education and
  Care
• Donna Traynham, Department of Education
• October 2, 2007

2
What We Will Cover

• Why collect outcomes data?
• Understanding the child outcomes
• Assessing the accomplishment of the 3 child
  outcomes
• Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF)
• Collecting and reporting data using the COSF

3
Essential Knowledge for Completing the COSF

• Team members know about
• The childs functioning across settings and
  situations
• Age-expected child development
• Content of the 3 outcomes
• How to use the rating scale

4

• Why Collect Outcomes Data?

5
Public Policy Context

• Age of accountability
• Accountability increasingly means looking at
  results not just process
• Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) is
  under increasing pressure to produce outcomes
  data on children participating in early
  intervention and early childhood special
  education programs
• Federal government is the driving force behind
  the move to collect outcomes data
• The Department has no performance information on
  preschool children with disabilities served by
  this program. from Expectmore.gov

6
OSEPs Response

• Required states to submit outcomes targets and
  data in their State Performance Plans and Annual
  Performance Reports (SPP/APRs)
• Funded the Early Childhood Outcomes Center to
  make recommendations, and to assist states in
  collecting, reporting and USING outcome data

7
OSEP Reporting Requirements Child Outcomes

• Positive social emotional skills (including
  positive social relationships)
• Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills
  (including early language/communication and
  early literacy)
• Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs

8
OSEP Reporting Categories

• Percentage of children who
• ? Did not improve functioning
• ? Improved functioning, but not sufficient to
  move nearer to functioning comparable to
  same-aged peers
• ? Improved functioning to a level nearer to
  same-aged peers but did not reach it
• ? Improved functioning to reach a level
  comparable to same-aged peers
• ? Maintained functioning at a level comparable to
  same-aged peers

3 outcomes x 5 measures 15 numbers
9
Schedule for State reporting to OSEP for Cohort 2

• Status-at-entry data must be reported to OSEP in
  February, 2008
• Progress data must be reported to OSEP in
  February, 2009
• Progress data are based on the difference between
  each childs status at entry and childs status
  at exit

10
How the Data inform State and Local Practices

• Providing data for the federal government is not
  the only reason to collect outcomes data.
• Data on outcomes are important for state and
  local purposes
• To document program effectiveness
• Support continued or increased funding
• To improve programs
• Identify strengths and weaknesses
• Determine technical assistance and/or staff
  development needs

11
Think of all that we can learn for program
planning and improvement purposes

• What would you like to know about YOUR program?
• Which demographic group of children make the
  most/least progress?
• Which service delivery options are associated
  with better progress toward outcomes?

12
Values guide choices of methods

• Although all states are required to measure child
  outcomes for early childhood programs, the
  strategies each state has chosen are based on the
  values held by the state about assessing young
  children.

13

• Understanding
• the 3 Child Outcomes

14
3 Child Outcomes

• Children have positive social-emotional skills
  (including social relationships)
• Children acquire and use knowledge and skills
  (including early language/ communication and
  early literacy)
• Children use appropriate behaviors to meet their
  needs

15
Where did they come from?

• National consensus on purpose of Part C and ECSE
  programs
• To enable young children to be active and
  successful participants during the early
  childhood years and in the future in a variety of
  settings in their homes with their families, in
  child care, in preschool programs, and in the
  community.

16
Outcomes are Functional

• Functional refers to things that are meaningful
  to the child in the context of everyday living
• Refers to an integrated series of behaviors or
  skills that allow the child to achieve the
  outcomes
• They are not
• a single behavior, nor are they
• the sum of a series of discrete behaviors

17
Outcomes are Functional

• They cross domains do not separate child
  development into discrete areas (communication,
  gross motor, etc.)
• Emphasis is on how the child is able to carry
  out meaningful behaviors in a meaningful context

18
A Puzzle

• 8, 5, 4, 1, 7, 6, 3, 2
• Where does 9 go?
• Where does 0 go?

19
Thinking Functionally

• Knows how to make eye contact
• Smiles
• Give hugs when prompted
• Functional?

20
Thinking Functionally

• Can imitate a gesture when prompted by others
• Functional?

21
Thinking Functionally

• Uses finger in pointing motion
• Functional?

22
Thinking Functionally

• Takes 4 steps on 6 inch balance beam
• Climbs 6 stairs, one foot on each step
• Functional?

23
Children Have Positive Social Relationships

• Involves
• Relating with adults
• Relating with other children
• For older children- following rules related to
  groups or interacting with others
• Includes areas like
• Attachment/separation/ autonomy
• Expressing emotions and feelings
• Learning rules and expectations
• Social interactions and play

24
Children Acquire and Use Knowledge and Skills

• Involves
• Thinking, reasoning, remembering, problem-solving
• Using symbols and language
• Understanding physical and social
• worlds
• Includes
• Early concepts symbols, pictures, numbers,
  classification, spatial relationships
• Imitation
• Object permanence
• Expressive language and communication
• Early literacy

25
Children Take Appropriate Action to Meet Their
Needs

• Involves
• Taking care of basic needs
• Getting from place to place
• Using tools
• In older children, contributing to their own
  health and safety
• Includes
• Integrating motor skills to complete tasks
• Self-help skills (e.g., dressing, feeding,
  grooming, toileting, household responsibility)
• Acting on the world to get what one wants

26
Elaboration of the ECO Outcomes
To be active and successful participants now and
in the future in a variety of settings
To be active and successful participants now and
in the future in a variety of settings
27

• Assessing the Accomplishment
  
• of the 3 Outcomes

28
What is Assessment?

• Early childhood assessment is flexible,
  collaborative decision-making process in which
  teams of parents and professionals repeatedly
  revise their judgments and reach consensus about
  the changing developmental, educational, medical,
  and mental health services needs of young
  children and their families.
• Bagnato and Neisworth, 1991
• Quoted in DEC Recommended Practices, 2005

29
DEC Recommended Practices for Assessment

• Involves multiple sources (e.g., families,
  professional team members, service providers,
  caregivers)
• Involves multiple measures (e.g., observations,
  criterion-curriculum-based instruments,
  interviews, informed clinical opinion)

30
Assessment Instruments

• Potential Assessment tools can inform us about
  childrens functioning in each of the 3 outcome
  areas
• Challenge There is no assessment tool that
  assesses the 3 outcomes directly

31
The Assessment Tool Lens

• Each assessment tool carries its own organizing
  framework
• Many are organized around domains
• But what is covered in the domains isnt always
  the same, even if the names are the same

32
Currently Available Assessment Tools

• There are not right and wrong assessment tools
• Key question to ask about any assessment tool
• How much and what information will the
• tool provide about the attainment of the
• 3 functional child outcomes?

33
Using Information from Assessment Tools

• ECO Center has crosswalked assessment tools to
  the outcomes
• Crosswalks show which sections of assessment are
  related to each outcome
• The number of items addressing an outcome does
  not necessarily mean that the assessment captures
  functioning across settings

34

35
Making Use of Information from Assessment Tools

• Information from formal or published assessment
  tools can be very useful, as long as it is used
  in the context of achievement of the three
  functional outcomes
• The information almost always needs to be
  supplemented with additional information

36
MA Direction and Decisions

• Using the Child Outcome Summary Form (COSF)
• Rating children annually in the fall and spring
• Using information from assessment tools currently
  in use in local districts

37

• Using the
• Child Outcomes
• Summary Form
• (COSF)

38
Why is There a Need For the Child Outcomes
Summary Form?

• No assessment instrument assesses the 3 outcomes
  directly
• Many states will allow local programs to use
  different assessment instruments, and outcomes
  data will need to be aggregated
• The summary forms 7 point rating scale defines a
  childs current functioning in a metric that can
  be compared over time to reflect child progress

39
Features of the Child Outcomes Summary Form

• Not an assessment tool
• Uses information from assessment tools and other
  data sources to determine an overall rating of
  how the child is functioning in each outcome
  area, at one point in time

40
Features of the Child Outcomes Summary Form

• 7-point rating scale
• Rating is based on childs functioning
• How a child functions across settings and
  situations
• Compared to what is expected of a child his/her
  age

41
Thinking About the Achievement of Each
Child Outcome
42
Helping Children Move Toward Age-Expected
Functioning

• Assumption Children can be described with
  regard to how close they are to age-expected
  behavior in each of the 3 outcomes
• By definition, most children in the general
  population demonstrate the outcome in an
  age-expected way
• By providing services and supports, ECSE is
  trying to move children closer to age-expected
  behavior

43
Measuring Functioning Compared to
Age-Expectations

• Documenting childrens movement toward
  age-expected development is one type of evidence
  that program services are effective
• The Child Outcome Summary Form (COSF) was
  designed to measure this type of progress

44
Essential Knowledge for Completing the COSF

• Team members need to know
• The childs functioning across settings and
  situations
• Age-expected child development
• Content of the 3 outcome areas
• How to use the rating scale

45
Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF)
46
Summary Ratings (1-7)

• Provide an overall sense of the childs current
  functioning in 3 areas
• They are not
• Information on the services provided themselves
• The familys satisfaction with services
• An explanation of why the childs functioning is
  at that level

47
Summary Ratings (1-7)

• Reduce rich information from assessment and
  observation into a rating to allow a summary of
  progress across children
• Do not provide information for planning for the
  individual child
• Information at the rich, detailed level will be
  more helpful for intervention planning purposes.
  

48
A Domain Score on an Assessment Tool Does Not
Necessarily Translate Directly into an Outcome
Rating

• Ratings require
• Looking at functional behaviors, and
• Collecting and synthesizing input from many
  sources familiar with the child across different
  settings and situations.

49
Summary Ratings are Based on

• Sources of Evidence
• Parents and family members
• Service providers
• Therapists
• Physicians
• Child care providers
• Teachers
• People familiar with the child in all the
  settings and situations that he/she is in

• Types of Evidence
• Curriculum-based assessments (e.g., HELP)
• Norm-referenced assessments (e.g.,BDI-2)
• Developmental screenings (e.g., Ages and Stages)
• Parent and professional observation and report

50
Ratings on the 3 Child Outcomes

• Ratings on all 3 outcomes should be reported for
  every child enrolled
• Ratings are needed in all areas even if
• No one has concerns about a childs development
• A child has delays in one or two outcome areas,
  but not in all three outcome areas
• Even if the domain is not in the area of
  disability

51
Assistive Technology
Considerations

• Ratings should reflect the childs level of
  functioning using whatever assistive technology
  or special accommodations are present in the
  childs typical settings
• Children who could benefit from assistive
  technology but dont have it will get lower
  scores
• This does not reflect on the childs inability
  inasmuch as the fact the child does not have the
  necessary equipment/services

52
Children who have Articulation Problems only

• How are articulation difficulties impacting the
  child in each of the outcome areas?
• social relationships?
• acquisition of skills and knowledge?
• ability to communicate wants and needs?

53
Including Parents in the Discussion

• No consensus around the country on whether
  parents should be included in deciding on the
  summary rating. Even parent groups dont agree
• Some states are including parents to help reach a
  rating
• Others states are deciding on a rating without
  parents there

54
Including Parents in the Discussion

• Parent input about the childs functioning is
  critical
• Family members see the child in situations that
  professionals do not
• Need to ask family members about what the child
  does at home
• Need a way to learn about what family members
  know about the child
• No expectation that parents will be able to
  determine if what they are seeing is age
  appropriate

55
Explaining the Rating to Parents

• If parents are included in deciding on a rating,
  professionals will need to be able to explain
  this process to parents
• Even if parents are not included in deciding on a
  rating, professionals will need to be able to
  explain why the rating is being done and what it
  means

56
ECO Resources for Child Outcomes Work

• A variety of information and resources, including
  additional crosswalks, training slides, and
  examples of state developed materials for
  professionals and parents are posted on our web
  site
• www.the-eco-center.org

57
Group Sharing

• Questions? Needed clarifications?
• Comments and reactions?
• Recommendations to the state about efficient
  procedures for using the COSF?
• What TA and/or other supports will you need?