Indicator - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Indicator

Description:

Helping Children Move Toward Age-expected functioning ... Documenting children's movement toward age-expected development is one type of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:87
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: earlyeduca
Category:
Tags: age | indicator

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Indicator


1
Indicator 7 Measuring Preschool Outcomes
  • Pat Cameron, Department of Early Education Care
  • Donna Traynham, Department of Elementary and
    Secondary Education

  • October 2008

2
What We Will Cover
  • Why collect outcomes data?
  • Understanding the child outcomes
  • Assessing the accomplishment of the 3 child
    outcomes
  • Introduction to the Child Outcomes Summary Form
    (COSF)
  • Collecting and reporting data using the COSF

3
Essential Knowledge for Completing the COSF
  • Team members know about
  • The childs functioning across settings and
    situations
  • Age-expected child development
  • Content of the 3 outcomes
  • How to use the rating scale

4
  • Why Collect Outcomes Data?

5
Public Policy Context
  • Age of accountability
  • Accountability increasingly means looking at
    results not just process
  • Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) is
    under increasing pressure to produce outcomes
    data on children participating in early
    intervention and early childhood special
    education programs

6
OSEP Response
  • Required states to submit outcomes targets and
    data in their State Performance Plans and Annual
    Performance Reports (SPP/APRs)
  • Funded the Early Childhood Outcomes Center to
    make recommendations, and to assist states in
    collecting, reporting and USING outcome data

7
OSEP Reporting Requirements Child Outcomes
  • Positive social emotional skills (including
    positive social relationships)
  • Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills
    (including early language/ communication and
    early literacy)
  • Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs

8
OSEP Reporting Categories
  • Percentage of children who
  • -Did not improve functioning
  • -Improved functioning, but not sufficient to move
    nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged
    peers
  • -Improved functioning to a level nearer to
    same-aged peers but did not reach it
  • -Improved functioning to reach a level comparable
    to same-aged peers or
  • -Maintained functioning at a level comparable to
    same-aged peers

9
Schedule for State reporting to OSEP
  • Entry/baseline data on 1,700 preschool children
    with disabilities in Year 1 Cohort were reported
    to OSEP in February, 2007
  • Progress data on nearly 900 preschool children
    exiting ECSE from Year 1 Cohort along with
    entry/baseline data on 1,624 children from Year 2
    Cohort was reported to OSEP in February, 2008
  • Progress data on Year 1 and 2 Cohorts of children
    exiting ECSE and entry/baseline data on Year 3
    Cohort will be reported to OSEP in February, 2009
  • Progress data are based on the difference between
    each childs status at entry and childs status
    at exit

10
MA Baseline Data reported to OSEP on February 1,
2007 for Year 1 Cohort
11
Progress Data of Year 1 Cohort
12
MA Baseline Data reported to OSEP on February 1,
2008 for Year 2 Cohort
13
Why Collect Outcomes Data?
  • Federal government is the driving force behind
    the move to collect outcomes data
  • However, providing data for the federal
    government is not the only reason to collect
    outcomes data

14
Why Collect Outcomes Data?
  • Data on outcomes are important for state and
    local purposes
  • To document program effectiveness
  • Support continued or increased funding
  • To improve programs
  • Identify strengths and weaknesses
  • Determine technical assistance and/or staff
    development needs

15
State Design
  • All states are required to measure child outcomes
    for early childhood programs. However, the
    strategies chosen are based on the values held by
    the state about assessing young children.

16
MA Model for Indicator 7
  • Cohort Model 4 cohorts with 70-90 districts
    each year, doubling up in year 3
  • Random Sample of 40 preschool students with
    disabilities
  • Baseline/entry data collection November (due to
    the Department in December)
  • Progress/exit data collection in May (due to the
    Department in June)
  • Subsequent progress /exit data collection in May
    2010 and May 2011

17
  • Understanding
  • the 3 Child Outcomes

18
3 Child Outcomes Assumptions
  • Children have positive social-emotional skills
    (including social relationships)
  • Children acquire and use knowledge and skills
    (including early language/ communication and
    early literacy)
  • Children use appropriate behaviors to meet their
    needs

19
Outcomes are Functional
  • Functional refers to things that are meaningful
    to the child in the context of everyday living
  • Refers to an integrated series of behaviors or
    skills that allow the child to achieve the
    outcomes
  • They are not
  • a single behavior, nor are they
  • the sum of a series of discrete behaviors

20
Outcomes are Functional
  • They cross domains do not separate child
    development into discrete areas (communication,
    gross motor, etc.)
  • Emphasis is on how the child is able to carry out
    meaningful behaviors in a meaningful context

21
Children Have Positive Social Relationships
  • Involves
  • Relating with adults
  • Relating with other children
  • For older children- following rules related to
    groups or interacting with others
  • Includes areas like
  • Attachment/separation/ autonomy
  • Expressing emotions and feelings
  • Learning rules and expectations
  • Social interactions and play

22
Children Acquire and Use Knowledge and Skills
  • Involves
  • Thinking, reasoning, remembering, problem-solving
  • Using symbols and language
  • Understanding physical and social
  • worlds
  • Includes
  • Early concepts symbols, pictures, numbers,
    classification, spatial relationships
  • Imitation
  • Object permanence
  • Expressive language and communication
  • Early literacy

23
Children Take Appropriate Action to Meet Their
Needs
  • Involves
  • Taking care of basic needs
  • Getting from place to place
  • Using tools
  • In older children, contributing to their own
    health and safety
  • Includes
  • Integrating motor skills to complete tasks
  • Self-help skills (e.g., dressing, feeding,
    grooming, toileting, household responsibility)
  • Acting on the world to get what one wants

24
Elaboration of the ECO Outcomes
To be active and successful participants now and
in the future in a variety of settings
25
  • Assessing the Accomplishments
  • of the 3 Outcomes

26
What is Assessment?
  • Early childhood assessment is a flexible,
    collaborative decision-making process in which
    teams of parents and professionals repeatedly
    revise their judgments and reach consensus about
    the changing developmental, educational, medical,
    and mental health services needs of young
    children and their families.
  • Bagnato and Neisworth, 1991
  • Quoted in DEC Recommended Practices, 2005

27
DEC Recommended Practices for Assessment
  • Involves multiple sources (e.g., families,
    professional team members, service providers,
    caregivers)
  • Involves multiple measures (e.g., observations,
    criterion-curriculum-based instruments,
    interviews, informed clinical opinion)

28
Assessment Instruments
  • Potential Assessment tools can inform us about
    childrens functioning in each of the 3 outcome
    areas
  • Challenge There is no assessment tool that
    assesses the 3 outcomes directly

29
The Assessment Tool Lens
  • Each assessment tool carries its own organizing
    framework
  • Many are organized around domains
  • But what is covered in the domains isnt always
    the same, even if the names are the same

30
Currently Available Assessment Tools
  • There are not right or wrong assessment tools
  • Key question to ask about any assessment tool
  • How much and what information will the tool
    provide about the attainment of the 3 functional
    child outcomes?

31
Using Data Collected from Assessment Tools
  • ECO has crosswalked assessment tools to the
    outcomes
  • Crosswalks show which sections of assessment are
    related to each outcome
  • The number of items addressing an outcome does
    not necessarily mean that the assessment captures
    functioning across settings

32
(No Transcript)
33
Making Use of Information from Assessment Tools
  • Information from formal or published assessment
    tools can be very useful, as long as it is used
    in the context of achievement of the three
    functional outcomes
  • The information almost always needs to be
    supplemented with additional information

34
MA Direction and Decisions
  • Using the Child Outcome Summary Form (COSF)
  • Rating children annually in the fall and spring
  • Using information from assessment tools currently
    in use in local districts
  • Gathering data from multiple sources

35
  • Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF)

36
Thinking About the Achievement of Each
Child Outcome
37
Helping Children Move Toward Age-expected
functioning
  • Assumption Children can be described with
    regard to how close they are to age-expected
    behavior in each of the 3 outcomes
  • By definition, most children in the general
    population demonstrate the outcome in an
    age-expected way
  • By providing services and supports, ECSE is
    trying to move children closer to age expected
    behavior

38
Measuring Functioning Compared to Age-Expectations
  • Documenting childrens movement toward
    age-expected development is one type of evidence
    that program services are effective
  • The Child Outcome Summary Form was designed to
    measure this type of progress

39
Essential Knowledge for Completing the COSF
  • Team members need to know
  • The childs functioning across settings and
    situations
  • Age-expected child development
  • Content of the 3 outcome areas
  • How to use the rating scale

40
Child Outcomes Summary Form
41
Summary Ratings are Based on
  • Types of Evidence
  • Curriculum-based assessments (e.g., Creative
    Curriculum)
  • Norm-referenced assessments (e.g.,BDI-2)
  • Developmental screenings (e.g., Ages and Stages)
  • Parent and professional observation and report
  • Sources of Evidence
  • Parents and family members
  • Service providers
  • Therapists
  • Physicians
  • Child care providers
  • Teachers
  • People familiar with the child in all the
    settings and situations that he/she is in

42
Group Sharing
  • Questions? Needed clarifications?
  • Comments and reactions?
  • What TA and/or other supports will you need?

43
Contact Information
  • Pat Cameron
  • Sr. Policy Specialist, Special Education
  • Department of Early Education and Care
  • 51 Sleeper Street
  • Boston, MA 02210
  • 617-988-7812
  • patricia.cameron_at_massmail.state.ma.us
  • Donna Traynham
  • Elementary School Services
  • Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
  • 350 Main Street
  • Malden, MA 02148
  • 781-338-6372
  • dtraynham_at_doe.mass.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com