Another CGE example: Steel Safeguards - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Another CGE example: Steel Safeguards

Description:

Industry experts summarize US and world markets ... importance: fruits and vegetables, bovine meats, processed food, and apparel. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: WORK55
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Another CGE example: Steel Safeguards


1
(No Transcript)
2
Another CGE example Steel Safeguards
  • Often industry seeking protection doesnt want
    economy wide effects of protection known.
  • Congress has often written safeguard laws to
    focus on injured industry and not the overall
    effects.
  • However not all in Congress agree example of
    steel safeguards Committee wanted to know
    economy wide effects of safeguards after they
    were introduced.
  • So what were the benefits to the steel industry
    and closely related industries of the safeguards,
    and what were the likely costs to steel users?
  • Use economic welfare or income effects.

3
The political economy dimension?
  • Economic welfare is really the tip of the iceberg
    and often not relevant in economic policy debates
  • The welfare triangles, which measure the possible
    net gains to society, are small compared to the
    income or revenue rectangles, which capture the
    income flows diverted by the distortionary
    policy
  • When looking at the political economy one needs
    to look at whos giving up how much, and whos
    gaining how much.

4
The U.S. Steel Safeguard Tariffs Example
  • Estimated welfare impact the tip
  • Central case (Es 10) -41.6 million
  • Underlying est. income changes in mil. rest
    of iceberg
  • Tariff revenue 649.9
  • Labor income -386.0
  • Capital income -294.3
  • Iron and steel ind. 239.5
  • Other pos. affected ind. 67.4
  • Indus where K income declines -601.2
  • Net GDP - 30.4
  • Another way to think about it is
  • All the political action surrounded how the pie
    was carved up not by how much bigger the pie
    might have been.

5
Example of Econometric Analysis
6
Approach
  • Industry experts summarize US and world markets
  • Develop questionnaire to collect original data on
    perceived barriers and efficiencies of logistics
    services across countries.
  • Economists combine economic data and
    questionnaire data to empirically examine
    potential economic impact.

7
Pretty pictures are helpful
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
Regression summary
13
Importance of active, independent research
agendas for staff
  • Must keep research skills up to date
  • Contribute to academic and international research
    community
  • Recognition as leading researchers
  • 2 examples that resulted in APEC, OECD, and World
    Bank contributions
  • Staff research, not Commission findings.

14
Major research efforts NTMs/Trade Costs
  • What are the potential gains from NTMs and trade
    facilitation?
  • What are the potential tools for finding out
    about the gains? How well do they work?
  • Inventories of policies and practices
  • Simple numerical measures
  • Statistical and econometric tools
  • Simulation methods
  • Surveys
  • For what purposes might policymakers use
    quantification?
  • What are some possible next steps for learning
    more?

15
Some estimates of potential gains
  • Andriamananjara et al. (2004)
  • Global welfare gains from eliminating certain
    NTMs approximately 90 billion
  • Walkenhorst and Yasui (2005)
  • Lowering trade transactions costs by 1 percent
    would improve global welfare by 40 billion
  • Wilson, Mann, and Otsuki (2005)
  • Consider improvements in ports, customs,
    regulation, and service sector infrastructure in
    countries with below-average performance (halfway
    to global median)
  • Global merchandise trade would increase by 377
    billion (9.7 percent)

16
How much of the markup is due to NTMs?
  • A global estimate (Anderson and Van Wincoop
    (2004)
  • The typical cost increase from exporting
    factory to importing retailer might be 170
  • Markups 21 transportation, 44 border related
    trade barriers, 55 retail and wholesale margins
  • They can be higher (Tempest (1996))
  • Barbie dolls cost USD 1 ex-factory in China, USD
    2 leaving Hong Kong, and retail for USD 10 in the
    United States
  • Total markup 900 (shipping and handling)

17
A general form?
  • Pk Pk-1 ck tk rk
  • Where ck transport, warehousing, and other
    logistics costs (incl. wholesaling and retailing)
  • tk government taxes, tariffs and fees
  • rk quasi-rents accruing to owners of goods
  • And ck MCk Xk rck
  • (Best-practice marginal costs plus X-inefficiency
    costs plus quasi-rents accruing to logistics
    service providers)

18
Stages of import port logistics
Source LondoƱo-Kent and Kent (2003)
19
ESTIMATING THE PRICE EFFECTS OF NON-TARIFF
MEASURES
  • Dean, Feinberg, Ferrantino, Ludema, Signoret
  • IATRC summer symposium, Bonn, June 2006
  • Abstract As multilateral negotiations focus
    more on reductions and removal of non-tariff
    barriers, the importance of quantifying the
    impact of these barriers has increased. While
    progress has been made recently, direct estimates
    of the impact of NTMs on prices has not been
    possible. This paper makes two contributions.
    First, price effects of NTMs are estimated
    directly, for many products in many countries.
    Second, explicit data on NTM incidence are drawn
    from two complementary databasesUNCTAD TRAINS
    data and a new NTM database compiled by the
    USITC. A simple differentiated product model of
    retail prices is developed to specify the direct
    relationship between NTMs and prices. From this
    model, a price gap specification is derived and
    estimated using retail price data for about 115
    cities and 47 consumer products from the EIU
    CityData for 2001. The estimation yields both
    cross-country averages and country-specific
    estimates of the effects of NTMs, for more than
    60 countries and four product groups in which NTM
    protection is of major importance fruits and
    vegetables, bovine meats, processed food, and
    apparel.

20
(No Transcript)
21
Independent research but something policy
makers would like to hear
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com