Thinfilms flows over microtextured surfaces: Polygonal water sheets - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Thinfilms flows over microtextured surfaces: Polygonal water sheets

Description:

Thin-films flows over microtextured surfaces: Polygonal water sheets ... School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: howard72
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Thinfilms flows over microtextured surfaces: Polygonal water sheets


1
Thin-films flows over microtextured surfaces
Polygonal water sheets
Adrian P. Delancy , Emilie Dressaire , Laurent
Courbin , and Howard A. Stone School of
Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard
University Purdue University, 2008 REU Program,
Materials for BRIDGE APS DFD 2008
TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint
manual before you delete this box. AAAAAAAA
2
Liquid films and sheets Production use
Taylor 1959
Bremond et al. 2003
Liquid atomization
http//graphics.stanford.edu/lucasp/pictures/ital
y/sink/spoon4.jpg
3
Main point
  • Regularly patterned substrates at a micron-scale
    influence the size and shape of liquid sheets

5 mm
5 mm
5 mm
Eight-corner star
Hexagon
Circle
4
Experimental set-up
Water
Jet diameter Flow rate
Hexagonal arrays
Square arrays
5
Sample result
Smooth Substrate
5 mm
5 mm
5 mm
Circle
Eight-corner star
Hexagon
Hexagonal lattice, Q1.2L/min
6
Evolution with Q and surface properties
Smooth Surface
Hexagonal Lattice
Square Lattice
Q 0.5L/min
Q 1.0L/min
Q 1.4L/min
7
Mean radius vs flow rate
Mean radius R (mm)
Q (L/min)
Roughness induces Reduction of mean radius at
given flow rate Increase of critical
flow rate for sheet formation
Interpretation Momentum losses caused by
roughness
8
Taylor radius
Mass conservation in the sheet at radial position
r Using Bernoulli approximation For
, inertia is balanced by surface tension
effects Radius of the jump
with
R
r
Taylor, PRS, 1959 Clanet, HDR, 2002
9
Additional friction of the substrate

For small pressure losses (
) Classical argument not valid
for rough substrates friction losses
10
Accounting for the roughness
  • Lattice distance
  • Posts height

Mean radius, R (mm)
Mean radius, R (mm)
l 100 µm l 200 µm l 300 µm
Q (L/min)
Q (L/min)
Friction losses depend on geometrical features of
lattices
11
Towards a model Friction from substrate
Estimate of the film thickness
Pressure drop mostly due to losses/leakage in
porous medium
non-trivial function of Reynolds number (Ergun
flow )
12
Conclusions
13
2 slides in one
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com