Title: Fiscal Policy Challenges Facing the New Member States in a Period of Large Capital Inflows
1International Seminar for Experts Catching up
after Enlargement Cicero Foundation October
14-15, 2004
- Fiscal Policy Challenges Facing the New Member
States in a Period of Large Capital Inflows
Substantial Investment Requirements
Armin Riess European Investment Bank
2Main questions
- Public debt fiscal deficits that countries can
afford? - Role of public investment and other expenditure?
- Role of balance of payments position (notably
capital inflows)?
3What do we need to examine?
- Key features of CEE economies
- Public debt sustainability
- Mixed blessing of capital inflows
4Real GDP growth projection (in ), 2004
Long-run CEE growth potential 4-5
EU-15 potential
Source European Commission, Economic Forecast,
Spring 2004
5Consumer price inflation (in ), 2004
2004 CEE average
EU-15/eurozone target
Source European Commission, Economic Forecast,
Spring 2004
6Public debt in CEE EU-15 ( of GDP), 2004
Maastricht 60 criterion
Source European Commission, Economic Forecast,
Spring 2004
7Key features of CEE economies - Summary -
- Real economic growth CEE gt EU15
- Inflation CEE gt EU15
- ? Nominal economic growth CEE gt EU15
- Public debt CEE lt EU15
8Public debt sustainability(ad hoc criteria)
- Keep public debt/GDP-ratio constant !
- Debt/GDP should converge to 60 (Maastricht) !
- Debt/GDP should fall to zero
- (Stability Growth Pact) !
9Debt dynamics
Change in debt/GDP ratio
fiscal deficit/GDP ratio
nominal GDP growth debt/GDP ratio
10Fiscal deficit that leaves debt/GDP unchanged
Nominal GDP growth Nominal GDP growth Nominal GDP growth
4 5 7
Fiscal deficit (in of GDP) Fiscal deficit (in of GDP) Fiscal deficit (in of GDP)
Debt in of GDP
20 0.8 1.0 1.4
40 1.6 2.0 2.8
60 2.4 3.0 4.2
11Where does public investment fit into this
picture?
- Fiscal deficit can be higher if
- public investment is large today, but expected
to fall in the future.
- Is public investment high in CEE?
12Public investment in CEE EU-15 ( of GDP,
1999-2003 average)
Source European Commission (2003 Spring
Forecast) and IMF (Staff Appraisal Reports)
13What about other public expenditure?
- High investment today can justify higher fiscal
deficit, but
- other government expenditure may be low today
relative to their future level.
- Example public pension expenditure
14Public pension expenditure in selected CEE
countries (in of GDP)
Source European Commission Occasional Paper 4,
July 2003
15Public debt sustainability - Summary -
- Debt sustainability does not imply the same
fiscal deficit for all countries
- Some government expenditure (investment) may
justify higher fiscal deficits, others (pensions)
call for fiscal restraint
- Public debt sustainability is one thing,
macroeconomic stability is another
16Capital inflows (in of GDP)(2001-2003 average
for CEE, peak inflow periods otherwise )
1998-9
1996-9
1987-91
Source IMF (Staff Appraisal Reports) Begg et
al. (2002)
17Capital inflows current account deficits(in
of GDP, 2001-2003 average)
Capital inflows
Current account deficit
Source IMF (Staff Appraisal Reports)
18Why do large capital inflows occur?
- Higher returns on physical investment
- Expected trend appreciation of currency
(Balassa-Samuelson effect)
19Why are capital inflows a mixed blessing ?
- Whats good
- Investment finance ? higher growth
- Too much of a good thing
- Overheating of economy (inflation)
- Credit boom banking sector stability
- Excessive currency appreciation competitiveness
20How to cope with large capital inflows?
- Banking sector stability
- Effective prudential regulation supervision
- Overheating of economy
- Revaluation of exchange rate/exchange rate
flexibility - Fiscal austerity
21Fiscal deficit exchange rate regime ( of
GDP, 2001-2003 average)
Flexible exchange rates
Hard currency pegs
Source IMF (Staff Appraisal Reports)
22Conclusion
- Fiscal policy assessment requires a
country-by-country approach - Coping with dark side of capital flows is key
(fiscal) policy challenge - Fiscal policy challenges other than those
concerning the bottom line