Engines of the Texas Economy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Engines of the Texas Economy

Description:

Automotive manufacturing. Aerospace and Defense. Biotechnology and Life Sciences ... Work with Governor's Office to implement the Emerging Technology Fund plan ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: TWC1
Category:
Tags: economy | engines | texas

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Engines of the Texas Economy


1
Engines of the Texas Economy
Bay Area Houston, Texas June 29, 2005
2
Texas Industry Cluster Initiative
  • Objective of the Initiative
  • The Texas Refining and Chemical Products Cluster
    is part of a recently launched intensive effort
    to identify, bolster and exploit Texas
    competitive advantage in six technology areas
    each considered to be key to the state future
    economic growth

3
Competitive Landscape
  • Global pricing mechanisms now are at work for
    both crude oil and natural gas.
  • Given the rising global demand for crude oil and
    refined products, OPEC is not able to keep up its
    production.
  • The continued strong demand for incremental
    barrels of crude is being funneled into
    energy-thirsty Asian customers, especially China
    and India.
  • Production constraints and higher cost supplies,
    especially heavy crudes, from non-OPEC sources
    are re-setting the pricing base, but even these
    outlets are limited by refining capacity.
  • Rising crude oil prices bring parity to energy
    costs, on a million BTU basis.
  • As the energy potential of crude oil and natural
    gas reach this equilibrium point, operational
    efficiencies of Texas plants will finally deliver
    a slender marginal competitive advantage.
  • Texas currently has 6 liquefied natural gas
    facilities under permit by the Federal Energy
    Regulatory Commission, with a total send-out
    capacity of some 15.5 BCF per day.
  • These 6 facilities have a combined capacity of
    over 4 TCF per day, more than 3 times the current
    US capacity (including planned expansions), and
    over 2 ½ times the total European capacity for
    handling LNG imports.
  • As these LNG facilities come on line, natural gas
    prices are expected to plateau, and eventually
    recede to near the 4.00/MCF level, resulting in
    an improved competitive position for Texas
    plants.
  • Many Middle Eastern exporters of LNG are shipping
    wet gasses, due to the lack of facilities in
    that region, presenting an additional benefit to
    Texas plants to strip heavy gasses from the LNG
    mix
  • These heavies can be used in a variety of
    products, from plastics to fertilizers, and could
    provide both a lower price feedstock and an
    opportunity to develop higher-margin niche
    products in existing facilities.
  • Exporters will continue to ship wet gas,while
    beginning to construct stripping facilities.

4
Assessment Methodology and Approach
  • Launch cluster teams
  • Review cluster identification data, industry
    trends and state strengths and weaknesses
  • Draft legislative recommendations
  • Conduct industry assessments
  • Interviews with key stakeholders and cluster team
    members
  • Online survey of statewide representatives
  • Regional forums
  • Final Report Development
  • Collaborate in the development of a master,
    market-driven economic plan to position Texas as
    a global competitor
  • Spur the collaboration between state government,
    academic institutions and industry.

Launch
Trends, SWOT
Draft Legislative Recs
Interviews
INDUSTRY ASSESSMENT
On-line Surveys
Regional Forums
Draft Final Report
Interface w/Other Initiatives
5
Background and Operating Environment
Since 2000, Texas refining and chemicals
competitiveness has deteriorated. Recent record
high crude and gas prices have started a reversal
in this trend
US Gulf Coast Competitive Position
Cost of US Gulf Coast Natural Gas
Cost of Crude Oil /bbl
Petrochemical Markets
Period
  • Advantage Lost
  • 2.50- 7.00
  • 20-35
  • Weak
  • 2000-2003
  • Improving position
  • 5.00 - 7.00
  • 35-55
  • Tight
  • 2004-2005

Source University of Houston Global Energy
Management Institute
6
Survey - Key Findings
  • Business climate issues topped the list of
    challenges.
  • Industry sees the commitment of state and
    regional leaders as two-fold dealing with
    taxation and educational reform. Taxation,
    especially property taxation, is seen as
    burdensome on an industry that has such a high
    concentration of fixed assets. Education, as an
    extension of the commitment question, relates to
    the lack of qualified workers entering the
    industry.
  • fostering of new technologies, for the
    development of new or improved products, and for
    the development of new plant processes. Plant
    processes are seen as everything from a new
    catalysis process to innovative and less
    expensive ways to generate and delivery energy to
    the plants.
  • The ability of Texas plants to reach new markets
    is of high concern. True commodity products are
    undifferentiated, so competition is based on
    economies of scale, margins, and volume. New
    markets should improve revenue, profitability,
    and jobs.
  • Workforce concerns reinforce the difficulty of
    attracting talented technical professionals.
    Retaining technical professionals is even more of
    an issue to management. Since there is little or
    no pipeline from which to draw replacement
    workers, companies are forced to compete on
    employee retention, and tend to poach each
    others employees.
  • New product development through research and
    development is also a high impact area for the
    industry. The commitment on the part of the state
    to foster collaboration, among companies, and
    between industry and the university systems, can
    help these players develop new and higher margin
    niche products, and develop robust entries into
    new markets.

7
Industry Impacts
  • North American expansion will be limited.
    Capacity should grow about 0.5 per year through
    2008. As a result, operating rates should climb
    to near full capacity towards the end of the
    decade, and any additional demand growth is
    expected to be filled by reduced exports and
    increased imports.
  • At the same time, European expansion will be
    modest, and primarily located in Eastern Europe.
  • The Chemicals sector customer base will continue
    to grow in developing countries, especially China
    and India, and manufacturing capacity increases
    will follow consumption.
  • Health, safety and environmental concerns will
    continue to be a driving issue, both in workforce
    and technology development.
  • As margins continue to drive operations, the
    importance of improved technology will remain a
    cost of competition.
  • Environmental regulations will continue to impact
    the economic feasibility of expansions, and will
    emerge as increasingly important considerations
    in developing regions.
  • The critical mass of Texas operating plants,
    pipelines, supply, and transportation
    infrastructure will continue to generate
    economies of scope and scale however, both
    capacity and process capabilities will need to be
    upgraded to remain globally competitive.
  • Labor costs in developing countries will
    increase, but will remain dramatically lower than
    in the US.
  • Globalization of downstream customers of the
    chemicals industry will threaten the Texas
    chemicals industry, as industrial consumers
    source intermediate product from less expensive
    regional providers.
  • Low-cost feedstocks will continue to favor Middle
    East and Far East regions LNG capacities and the
    importation of wetter LNG may be the equalizer.

8
Regional Forums
An Overview of Regional Strengths, Weaknesses,
Opportunities and Threats
Beaumont
Houston
Corpus Christi
Strength There is a highly skilled workforce,
supported by extensive infrastructure, existing
in the region. Weakness As regional plants
automate to try to remain competitive in a global
market, worker displacement will continue, and
workforce skills are lost to other industries and
regions. Opportunity At Lamar University, there
is an emerging center of excellence built on
composite materials development. Threat The
industry is looking for increasingly higher
education levels for entry positions high school
graduates no longer qualify for technician
positions. Entry level positions require more
math and chemistry skills than are being pursued
in local schools.
Strength The national perception of engineers
educated in Texas universities is that they are
the best qualified to graduate directly into a
job site position Weakness The industry is not
seen as an attractive industry because of its
cyclicality and image. Graduates dont see the
high tech content in these jobs Opportunity
There is a significant opportunity to create a
research triangle around petrochemicals in the
Houston region, based on the combination of
plants, universities, and supporting services
that are available. An example of such a
paradigm-shifting project would be in low sulfur
regulations, which necessitate the development
of new catalysis processes, providing a
competitive advantage Threat The ramifications
of the Clean Air Act, and Houstons position as
being at non-attainment, make it very difficult
to add to or build new refining capacity in the
region.
Strength Infrastructure a critical mass of
plants and support services, combined with
transportation assets such as sea, air, highway
connections, etc. - is a major strength, and
creates an environment of collaboration. Weakness
Millions have to be spent to improve a process
or remain compliant, as a cost of staying in
business. At the same time, these major capital
projects are slowed by the permitting process,
which only raises costs. Opportunity LNG is
one of the keys to the future of the region,
lowering costs, creating jobs, and guaranteeing
feedstock availability. LNG plants may require
new skillsets, which the industry can develop in
concert with state and regional workforce
authorities. Threat Current state and local
tax structures will continue to be a damper on
new development and expansion plans unless new
types of incentives are created to reduce cost of
location, expansion, and operation.
9
The larger patters of clustered activities across
the Lone Star State ...
10
mirror much of the Gulf Coast regions network
advantages of scale/scope
Source University of Houston Global Energy
Management Institute
11
Creating Communities of Innovation
Knowledge Creation
Technology Transfer
Licenses Patents Incubators
Research Development
Innovation
Texas Globally Competitive
Venture Capital Angels
Clinical Trials Business Planning
Regulatory Approval
Marketing Sales Industry Alliances
Partners State Funding Federal RD
Supply Demand
Commercialization
Job Creation Product Development IPOs
Product Pipeline Workforce Training
Academic Curriculum Development
Clusters Networks
12
What gives a Cluster a competitive advantage?
  • Competitors will eventually and inevitably
    overtake any company that stops improving and
    innovating. Ultimately, the only way to sustain a
    competitive advantage is to upgrade it. So why
    are certain companies based in certain regions
    capable of consistent innovation? The answer lies
    in four broad attributes
  • 1. Factor conditions. The regions position in
    factors of production, such as skilled labor or
    infrastructure, necessary to compete in a given
    industry. This also includes such factors of
    production as land, labor, capital, and
    intellectual property
  • 2. Demand conditions. The nature of local market
    demand for the industrys product or service.
  • 3. Related and supporting industries. The
    presence or absence in the region of supplier
    industries and other related industries that are
    internationally competitive
  • 4. Firm strategy, structure, and rivalry. The
    conditions in the region governing how companies
    are created, organized, and managed, as well as
    the nature of domestic rivalry

From The Competitive Nature of Nations Michael
Porter Harvard Business Review, 1990
13
Refining and Chemical Products Recommendations
  • The Refining and Petrochemicals team, along with
    industry stakeholders across the state, met in a
    series of cluster meetings and regional forums.
    The groups were asked to develop opportunities
    that would impact both the industry and the
    region. These results were then reported back to
    the cluster team, were compared and prioritized.
    The three priorities, along with associated
    project recommendations, were collaboration,
    workforce, and education.

Recommendations Summary
  • Advanced Industry Collaborative Alliance
  • Economic Development and Facilities Expansion
  • Applicant Screening

Collaboration
  • LNG Skills Training
  • Industry Image

Workforce
  • Industry Demographic Study
  • Just in Time Workforce

Education
Tax Policy Incentives
  • Institute non-traditional economic incentives for
    expansion and jobs creation that mitigate the
    current tax structure

Workforce Displacement Re-Training
  • Develop workforce intervention strategies and
    plans for re-training displaced workers

14
Common Issues Arose Among the Clusters
  • The education / workforce pipeline is not working
    in synch
  • The state is facing a demographic cliff, in
    which it is losing workers from both ends of the
    career ladder, with high dropout rates and baby
    boomers preparing to retire
  • The quantity and quality of educated workers is
    suffering
  • Industry and state agencies must come together to
    explore and implement professional certification
    programs to counter the impending loss of workers
    to retirement
  • School systems should be the most important
    economic development organization in the state
  • The business climate in Texas can be more
    conducive to business recruitment
  • There is a lack of coordination and collaboration
    in the economic development process
  • Taxation and regulation issues are prohibitively
    expensive and have a high impact for capital
    intensive companies
  • Incentives are primarily a local issue, and are
    not always aligned with a regional economic
    development process
  • The Research and Development tax credit in Texas
    is considered by business to be inferior to
    broader based programs in other states
  • The lack of training dollars in Texas is seen as
    an impediment
  • States are going to stop recruiting businesses
    and start recruiting talent
  • There is an increasing awareness of the
    possibilities presented by technology transfers
    from other industries
  • Technology transfer must foster increased
    collaboration
  • Collaboration will mean that all industries
    benefit in the long run

15
Common Issues Arose Among the Clusters (2)
  • The state must maximize the returns on its
    geography
  • Texas has a strong resource base in its
    transportation infrastructure
  • world-class highways, rail facilities, pipelines,
    seaports, airports, etc.
  • There is a great opportunity to leverage
    workforce, education, and capital investments to
    develop an infrastructure for distribution and
    logistics
  • what incremental investments will need to be made
    for broadband and communications capabilities?
  • What incremental investments will be needed in
    infrastructure?
  • The state is making strides in closing the
    commercialization gap
  • There is a strong spirit of entrepreneurship in
    the State
  • the role of the State must be to facilitate the
    commercialization process
  • There is an abundance of capital for early-stage
    research and late-stage product release
  • There must be more capital for product and market
    development to enable emerging technologies
  • Multi-industry consortia will leverage Texas
    resources, focus technology and training
    investments, and lead to a Man on the Moon
    strategy for workforce development, and transform
    the base of the Texas economy from resources to
    knowledge

16
Next Steps
  • Cluster assessments and recommendations will be
    submitted to the Governors Office for
    prioritization
  • Cross-cluster initiatives give the most bang
    for the buck
  • Which recommendations require legislation?
    Funding? Regulatory action?
  • Continue building relationships, connecting
    stakeholders, and encouraging collaboration
    across Texas
  • Work with Governors Office to implement the
    Emerging Technology Fund plan
  • Prepare a work plan for implementation of
    high-value, cross-cluster initiatives
  • After receiving priorities for implementation
    from the Governors Office, the Chairs of each
    cluster team will brief their respective groups
    in core team meetings.
  • Work teams will be selected for each project, to
    include industry, education, economic
    development, and others

17
for more informationDoug B. RidgeIndustry
Initiatives ManagerTexas Workforce Commission
  • Phone 512-463-1986
  • Fax 512-475-1133
  • Email douglas.ridge_at_twc.state.tx.us
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com