Title: Working with Local Communities
1Working with Local Communities
2Purpose of Participation
- legitimation (Skeffington 1969)
- a palliative co-option
- choice from pre-determined options
- devolution of power, power sharing
- empowerment (transformative?)
- enabling people to determine choices in life and
to influence the direction of change.
3Typology of Participation
Goodwin
4Who is participating?
- Communities are heterogeneous.
- The community never thinks
- Individuals think
- Different members of the same group may have
different views - Men and women, old and young .
5Who are you exploiting?
- What are you getting out of it?
- What is the individual you are talking to getting
out of it? - What are you putting back?
- Who is gaining from that?
- How many of the people in the room are being paid
to be there? - What are their opportunity costs?
6Where do you stand?
Researchers Agenda
Host communities
Host institutions agenda
7Methods for Working with Communities
- Stakeholder Analysis
- Participatory Rural Appraisal
- Livelihood Analysis
81 Stakeholder Analysis
- All parties (or stakeholders) with an interest in
the outcome of a decision should be considered - Stakeholder theory is normative it redefines an
organisation as a group of - stakeholder interests coordinating and
optimizing entity (Freeman)
9Freeman Strategic Management 1984
- An organization is characterised by its
relationships with various groups and individuals
- Employees
- Customers
- Suppliers
- Governments
- Local Communities
- A stakeholder in an organisation is (by
definition) any group or individual who can
affect or is affected by the achievement of the
organizations objectives - The power to affect the firms performance and/or
- A stake in firms performance
10Key Principles www.stakeholderforum.org
- Accountability
- Effectiveness
- Equity
- Flexibility
- Good governance
- Inclusiveness
- Learning
- Legitimacy
- Ownership
- Participation and engagement
- Partnership/Cooperative Management
- Societal gains
- Transparency
- Voices, not votes
11Protected Areas Stakeholders
12Process
- Balancing interests
- Wide range of groups whose primary focus may not
be the issue under consideration - Intrinsic value is not the same as equal value
(issues of worth and substance) - Consultation and negotiation
13Stakeholders Donaldson Preston 1995
- Stakeholders are persons or groups with
legitimate interests in procedural and/or
substantive aspects of corporate activity.
Stakeholders are identified by their interests in
the corporation.. The interests of all
stakeholders are of intrinsic value. That is,
each group of stakeholders merits consideration
for its own sake.
14All equal?
- Consideration should be given to each stakeholder
group regardless of the relative power of each
group. - Normative, descriptive and instrumental
- To be an effective strategist you must deal with
those groups that can affect you, while to be
responsive (and effective in the long run) you
must deal with those groups that you can affect.
Freeman 198446
15Failure
- Failure to retain participation by a primary
stakeholder group is an indicator of failure - Identify stakeholders and perceived stakes
- Implement a process to manage relationships with
the stakeholders
16Implementation
- management of a set of transactions or bargains
among the organization and its stakeholders
(Freeman) - Balance interests
- Recognise that for a wide range of groups your
organisation will not be central. - Intrinsic value is not the same as equal value
- Be aware of the difference between consultation
and negotiation
17Stakeholder Participation
http//www.dfid.gov.uk/
902 results found,top 500 sorted by relevance
sddstak3.pdfSection 1. TECHNICAL NOTE ON
ENHANCING STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION IN AID
ACTIVITIES April 1995 CONTENTS PART ONE
DEFINITIONS AND ISSUES INTRODUCTION 1 WHAT IS
STAKEHOLDER ...http//62.189.42.51/DFIDstage/Pubs
/files/sddstak.pdf - 109.9KB
18http//www.earthsummit2002.org/toolkits/women/down
load.htm
Toolkit Booklet (in PDF format) The Stakeholder
Toolkit. A Resource for Women and NGOs.Edited by
Minu Hemmati Kerstin Seliger. March 2001Part I
Introduction (1.1 MB)Part II The United Nations
(313 KB)Part III NGOs Womens Organisations
(327 KB)Part IV International Agreements on
Womens/Gender Issues (109 KB)Part V
Networking Annexes (81 KB
19Reading
- Sautter Managing Stakeholders Annals 1999.
- www.odi.org.uk
- www.iied.org/resource
202 Participatory Rural Appraisal
- A growing family of methods and approaches to
enable local people to express, enhance, share
and analyse their knowledge of life and
conditions and to act. - Engage local people in planning, developing,
managing and monitoring and appraising projects. - Participation of all people in learning about
their needs and opportunities and in the action
required to achieve the shared .
21Participatory Learning and Action
- Rapid Rural Appraisal RRA
- Participatory Rural Appraisal PRA
- Participatory Learning Methods PALM
- Participatory Action Research PAR
- Farming Systems Research FSR
- Method Active de Recherche et de Planification
Participative MARP
22Too good to be true? IIED
- increasing accountability
- Enhancing participation and advocacy efforts
- Improving local and external awareness of key
issues - increasing local level capacity
- sustaining partnerships between different
stakeholders.
23http//www.iied.org/sarl/pla_notes/whatispla.html
- What is PLA?
- Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) is an
umbrella term for a wide range of similar
approaches and methodologies, including
Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA), Rapid Rural
Appraisal (RRA), Participatory Learning Methods
(PALM), Participatory Action Research (PAR),
Farming Systems Research (FSR), Méthod Active de
Recherche et de Planification Participative
(MARP), and many others. The common theme to all
these approaches is the full participation of
people in the processes of learning about their
needs and opportunities, and in the action
required to address them.
24What is PLA? IIED website
- Creative approach to investigating issues of
concern to poor people, and to planning,
implementing, and evaluating development
activities
- Visualisation
- Interviewing
- Group work
- Interactive learning
- Shared knowledge
- Structured analysis
-
- Offer opportunities for mobilising local people
for joint action
25Principles
- Learning rapidly and progressively
- Reversal of learning (androgogic)
- Optimising sharing knowledge
- Off setting biases seeking diversity
- Triangulating
- Facilitators play a key role - requires self
critical awareness
26Foundations of PRA
- Increasing awareness of the failure of
conventional approaches to meet the needs of poor
people. - Emphasis on information sharing the production of
knowledge and development of strategies - Behaviour and attitudes
- Methods
- Sharing
- From extracting to empowering
27From RRA to PRA
28Highly skilled facilitation
- Be clear and open about your objectives
- Embrace and admit error
- Be self critical and listen to criticism
- Hand over the pen from us to them
- Relax and enjoy it
29Teamwork methods
- Team contracts reviews
- Peer assessments
- Interview guides and checklists
- Work sharing in local activities
- Local presentations
- Process notes and personal diaries
30Sampling methods
- Transect walks
- Wealth ranking, well being analysis
- Social maps
- Interview chains
31Discussing and interviewing methods
- Semi-structured interviewing
- Focus groups
- Key informants
- Ethno histories and biographies
- Case studies story telling
- Direct observation
- Livelihood analysis
32Visualisation methods
- Participatory map
- Social map and wealth ranking
- Seasonal calendar
- Daily routine
- Time lines
- Matrix scoring
- Venn diagrams
- Preference and pair ranking
- Mobility maps
- Network diagrams
- Impact diagrams
- Pie diagrams
- Flow diagrams
33Characterising PRA
- Field based visualisation, interviewing, group
work characterised by - Interactive learning
- Shared knowledge integrated vision
- Flexible structured analysis
- Mobilisation for joint action
34Be self critical
- Reflect on your practice how participative/
transparent is it? - Think about your ethics are you being
manipulative/manipulated? - Put something back.
353 Livelihoods Analysis
- The Impacts of Tourism on Rural
- Livelihoods Namibias Experience
- Caroline Ashley
- http//www.odi.org.uk/publications/wp128.pdf
36Livelihood Approach
- Livelihood analysis is a methodology, which can
be used to analyse the contribution that
different forms of tourism might make to the
livelihoods of the local people. - The great advantage of livelihood analysis is
that it provides a methodology that looks at the
positive and negative impacts of a particular
form of tourism development upon the livelihoods
of the poor.
37Livelihood Assets the livelihood building
blocks
Financial Capital cash at hand or which can be
borrowed Human Capital the skills base of
particular individuals and of the group Natural
Capital the resources of the environment
available to individuals and the group water
resources, forest, arable land, pasture, rivers
and lakes, wildlife Physical Capital
buildings, machinery, equipment Social Capital -
the social cohesion of the group and the strength
of its networks.
38Key potential impacts on livelihoods
39Reading
- www.odi.org.uk
- www.iied.org/resource
- Ashley C. (2000) The Impacts of Tourism on Rural
Livelihoods Namibia's Experience, Overseas
Development Institute Working Paper 128
40(No Transcript)
41(No Transcript)
42(No Transcript)
43(No Transcript)
44(No Transcript)
45(No Transcript)
46(No Transcript)
47(No Transcript)
48Implications
- Addressing a full range of costs and benefits
- Matching tourism options to livelihood priorities