The total solution for a HIPPS requirement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

The total solution for a HIPPS requirement

Description:

Nowadays it is obvious that solving the HIPPS requirement or any other safety ... Don't go shopping for bargains when you want to realize a HIPPS solution. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:621
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: isa60
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The total solution for a HIPPS requirement


1
The total solution fora HIPPS requirement
2
ir. Hein C. SteinzSales Marketing Solid
Safety Solutions
  • Graduated master degree electronics 1978
  • Started safety systems development Holec 1983
  • Yokogawa since 1997, commercial since 2001
  • Born 1951, married, two kids, a boy and a girl
  • Hobbys

3
(No Transcript)
4
Introduction
  • Nowadays it is obvious that solving the HIPPS
    requirement or any other safety challenge is a
    matter of observing the total loop from process
    variable to process variable.
  • It is, since a long time now, not a matter
    anymore of individual components or suppliers.

A chain is only as strong
as the weakest link
  • Or, like the picture, the HIPPS chain is only as
    strong as the weakest link.

5
Contents
  • HIPPS, an overall loop requirement
  • Manifolds
  • Transmitters
  • Logic Solver
  • Solenoids and HIPPS Valves
  • Partial stroke testing
  • Communication and sequence of event registration
  • Plant Resource Manager

6
Typical HIPPS solution
7
Important specifications
  • Safety Integrity Level (SIL),
  • Process Safety Time,

8
Requirements
  • General description of the process to be
    protected.
  • General description of how HIPPS is integrated
    into the process and other safety systems,
    including the objectives of what the HIPPS shall
    protect, and how and when it is activated.
  • The required SIL level of the loop and the
    minimum acceptable initial loop average
    Probability of Failure on Demand (Pfd average).
  • The required minimum proof test interval and a
    description on how the operator proposes to proof
    test the HIPPS. This is directly related to the
    production availability and therefore an
    important issue in the specifications.
  • Specification of the system response time and the
    criticality thereof in relation to the time
    before over-pressure occurs.
  • Detailed specification of the final element
    (shut-off valve) describing materials, design
    standards, actuator sizing/integration, details
    of the instrumentation such as solenoids and
    actuator. Specific safety aspects shall be
    addressed. Reference to a design standard like
    DIN 3381 can be considered.
  • Detailed specification of the pressure
    transmitters and their safety aspects.
  • Detailed specification of the controller
    including the required logging, local readout,
    test buttons, and communication to other
    controllers like the DCS. Event recorders shall
    be considered, also to record proof-tests.
  • Components tests and integrated factory
    acceptance test (FAT) requirements for the
    complete system.
  • Documentation requirements that may include
    procedures and checklists for the site acceptance
    test (SAT) and proof testing of the system.

9
Manifolds
  • Manifolds for the transmitters have to provide
    the necessary double block and bleed interlocking
    2oo3 arrangement especially for HIPPS.
  • Special attention has to be paid on the
    specifications and functionality of the manifolds
    to use.
  • measures against clogging such as
  • size of the process connection,
  • mounting instructions
  • temperature monitoring
  • heating,
  • Double block and bleed on (most of the time)
    three transmitters with mechanical interlocking
    on the transmitter selection, limit switches to
    monitor the position of the mechanical
    interlocking and the capability of applying a
    test pressure to individual transmitters.

10
Transmitters
  • Pressure Measurement Component in Safety
    Instrumented Systems.
  • To meet at least all requirements for a single
    instrument in SIL2 loop or two transmitters in
    SIL3 Loop.

11
Logic solver
  • Highest safety class available
  • TÃœV AK 1 7 / SIL 4 certification
  • Inherently Fail-Safe
  • Zone 2 applications
  • Very high mechanical and electrical robustness
  • High temperature range
  • Very low power consumption
  • Physical/Galvanic separations
  • Very high EMC immunity
  • Very long technical life span (gt 30y)
  • Test intervals many years
  • Low Cost of Ownership
  • Event Recorder (1 ms resolution)

12
Actuators and valves
  • Large valves
  • Very fast closing time.
  • Single component will not satisfy the safety
    requirements and there will be a need for
    configurations is series and parallel for safety
    but also for availability.
  • Specifically designed for fast reliable stroking
    over an extended service life.
  • On failure, they are to close the final element.

13
Partial stroke testing
  • Every test done on a HIPPS will have to prove at
    least two things
  • its capability to close and
  • within the specified time.
  • Partial stroke testing can give you an indication
    and might remove some faults from the Pfd list
    to the known failure modes, but too often
    partial stroking will result in a vast data flow,
    which is to be stored and evaluated and, for
    higher SIL and fast acting applications, it
    cannot replace a real proof test.

14
Communication / sequence of event recording
  • Part of total instrumentation jobs
  • Need for communication
  • Existence of a firewall around the logic solver
  • Event registration is very useful, when
    synchronized with other process related systems,
    to determine what actual happened.
  • Show the timed response
  • Timing is the keyword
  • Proper documented, can be used as
  • a proof test

15
Plant Resource Manager
  • PRM or Asset Management is a dynamic software
    tool that supports the daily business activities
    of maintenance personnel.
  • The Plant Resource Manager Package for the
    digital network era of fieldbus efficiently
    handles field device management and maintenance
    work for the FOUNDATION fieldbus and HART
    devices, which helps reduce Total Cost of
    Ownership in the plant.
  • Incorporating the transmitters and, if present
    for example for partial stroke testing or valve
    signatures, valve positioners will be a valuable
    add on the HIPPS functionality and especially
    maintainability.
  • Advanced diagnostics on the transmitters and
    valves might reduce the necessary test intervals,
    however at least once per year is still
    recommended.

16
Conclusion
  • Dont go shopping for bargains when you want to
    realize a HIPPS solution.
  • Go for the balanced solution for both functional
    and safety requirements.
  • Be sure there is sole responsibility for your
    total loop and be sure this is a competent person
    or company.

17
Thank you for your attention.
Commitment means building the future to last.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com