Synfire chains in a balanced network of I - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Synfire chains in a balanced network of I

Description:

Will it keep this property if the E-E connections are constructed of ... The si are correlated stochastic variables that obey the following characteristic: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: ICNC
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Synfire chains in a balanced network of I


1
Synfire chains in a balanced network of IF
neurons
Y. Aviel, E. Pavlov, M. Abeles and D. Horn
Corresponding author. Email
aviel_at_cc.huji.ac.il
2
Balanced network
E
Excitatory population
Inhibitory population
I
External Input
Random sparse Connectivity.
3
Synfire Chain
pool
Link


chain
4
The Question
  • A balanced network of integrate-and-fire neurons
    has a stable state of asynchronous activity.
    (Brunel 00)
  • Will it keep this property if the E-E connections
    are constructed of synfire-chains?

5
The Answer
  • The answer depends on the ratio rw/K, where w is
    the pool width and K is the number of excitatory
    synapses on a single neuron.
  • I will show both analytically and by simulation,
    that the transition between the synchronous and
    the asynchronous regimes is sensitive to the
    value of r.

6
A Simplified Model
We have N binary neurons, each is represented by
a variable si, i1..N . si 1, if neuron i
fires or 0 otherwise. The si are correlated
stochastic variables that obey the following
characteristic
7
Correlation of a Pair of Neurons.
I1 (K inputs)

X1 (K-w inputs)
Z (w inputs)

?h
?s

X2 (K-w inputs)
I2 (K inputs)
8
Statistics of Sum of Three Uncorrelated Sub Fields
9
Correlation of Two Fields With Partial
Correlation
10
Correlation of a Pair of Neurons As a Function of
the Correlation in the Common Input
11
(No Transcript)
12
The correlations fixed point
13
Steady State Correlations
Fixed-point correlation
w pool width K excitatory afferents r
w/K
r (w/K) in units of 1/sqrt(K)
14
Steady state correlations, ?, as a function of
r,w.
Red curve is at wK1/2
15
Simulation Result. Network Architecture
Superposition of synfire chains
Random connectivity
E
Excitatory population
Inhibitory population
I
External Input
NE10,000, NI2,500 Connectivity sparsness 10
16
Simulation results
r94/2000
w pool width K excitatory afferents r
w/K
17
Population rate.
Pool width 94 r 94/2000
18
Dist. Of the Coefficient-of-Variance and the Rates
19
A trace of Membrane potential.
20
Distribution of Mem. Potential.
21
Spectral density of the population rate.
22
Simulation results
r95/2000
w pool width K excitatory afferents r
w/K
23
Population rate in the epileptic regime
24
Upper bound on the synaptic weights
  • We have previously seen that in order to avoid
    epilepsy, we should take , or
  • On the other hand, we want w inputs to a cell
    will drive it to fire a spike ,
    where ? O(1), is the threshold.
  • We conclude that the synaptic weights are bounded

25
Summary
  • Using a model with binary neurons, we show that
    the ratio r between the size of a pool of neurons
    and the total excitatory input to a neuron,
    determines the correlation of any pair of neurons
    in a pool in a sigmoidal fashion.
  • We show that the same effect exists in
    simulations of a network of IF neurons.
  • Requiring the asynchronous state to be stable,
    implies an upper bound on the pool size
    .
  • Requiring stable propagation of synfire implies
    scaling J, the synaptic weight, like .

26
The Synfire Challenge
  • We have shown that a network which is
    superpisition of chains, is capable of
    asynchronous activity.
  • Can wave of SFC stably propagate along the
    chains?
  • This necessitates a study of balanced networks of
    IF neurons in the strong coupling regime.

27
Conclusions Capacity Bound
28
Capacity Bound
29
Steady state correlations, ro, as a function of
r,w. Red curve is at r1/w.
30
Scaling synaptic weights
31
More constraints on alpha
32
ro as a function of K, alpha
33
Scaling K
  • If KepsN, there will always be significant
    correlations between any pair of neurons.
  • If, however, Ksqrt(N), there will not.
  • Qualitatively, our results holds true in either
    case.
  • Biologically, the second case seems to be
    implausible.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com