Title: Nodal Methods for Core Neutron Diffusion Calculations
1Nodal Methods for Core Neutron Diffusion
Calculations
Reactor Numerical Analysis and Design
- October 2006
- Han Gyu Joo
- Seoul National University
- T. Downar
- Purdue University
2Contents
- Transverse Integration and Resulting
One-Dimensional Neutron Diffusion Equation - Treatment of Transverse leakage
- Nodal Expansion Method with One-Node Formulation
- Polynomial Intra-nodal Flux Expansion
- Response Matrix Formulation
- Iterative Solution Sequence
- Analytic Nodal Method with Two-Node Formulation
- Two-Node Problem
- Analytic Solution of Two-Group, One-D Neutron
Diffusion Eqn. - Implementation with the CMFD Framework
- Semi-Analytic Nodal Method
- Polynomial Intra-nodal Source Expansion
- Analytic Solution for One Node
3Introduction
- 3-D Steady-State Multigroup Neutron Diffusion
Equation - Fick's Law of Diffusion for Current out of Flux
- Computational Node in 3-D Space
- Property assumed constant within each homogenized
node - FDM accurate only if the node size is
sufficiently small (1cm) - Nodal methods to achieve high accuracy with large
nodes (20 cm)
4Nodal Balance Equation (NBE)
- Volume Averaging of Diffusion Equation for a Node
- Integrate over the node volume then divide by
volume - Volume Average Flux
- Integration of the Divergence Term using Gauss
Theorem - Surface Average Current
- Nodal Balance Equation for Average Quantities of
Interest (Nodal Power)
5Need for Transverse Integration
- NBE Solution Consideration
- Information on 6 surface average currents only
required for obtain the node average flux which
will determine the nodal power - Surface Average Currents
- Average of Flux Derivative on a Surface
- Equals to Derivative of Average Flux at the
Surface - Better to work with the neutron diffusion
equation for average flux rather than one for the
point wise flux (3-D) - Transverse Integration
- Set a direction of interest (e.g. x)
- Perform integration within node over
- 2-D plane normal to the direction, then
- divide by plane area
6Normalization of Variables
- Normalized Independent Variables
- Transformation of Integration and Derivative
Operator - Simplified Averaging
- Normalized 3-D Diffusion Equation
7Transverse Integrated Quantities
- Transverse Integration of Leakage Term
- Plane Average One-Dimensional Flux
- Line Average Surface Current at Arbitrary
Position x
8Transverse Integrated One-Dimensional Neutron
Diffusion Equation
- Transverse Integration of 3-D Neutron Diffusion
Equation - Define Transverse Leakage to Move to RHS
- Transverse Integrated One-Dimensional Neutron
Diffusion Equation (Final Form) - Diffusion Equivalent Group Constant
9Transverse Integrated One-dimensional Neutron
Diffusion Equations
- Set of 3 Directional 1-D Neutron Diffusion
Equations - 3-D Partial Differential Equation
- ? Three 1-D
Ordinary Differential Equations - Coupled through average transverse leakage term
- Exact if the proper transverse leakages are used
- Approximation on Transverse Leakage
- Quadratic Shape (2nd order polynomial)
- based on observation that change of flux
distribution is not sensitive to change of
transverse leakage - Iteratively update transverse leakage
10Transverse Leakage Approximation
- Quadratic Approximation in Each Node
- Average TL Conservation Scheme to Determine l1
and l2 - Use three node average transverse leakages
- Values of own node and two adjacent nodes
- Impose constraint of conserving the averages of
two adjacent nodes
11Alternative Schemes for Determining T.L. Coef.
- Apply linear shape to determine surface values
- use continuity of gradient of transverse leakage
to determine surface value of TL - Determine l1 and l2 by making the polynomial pass
through the two boundary points as well as
satisfying the average
12Nodal Expansion Method
- Intranodal Flux Expansion of 1-D Flux
- Approximate 1-D Flux by 4th Order Polynomial
- Basis Functions
- Not Orthogonal Function
- Integration in Range 0,1 results 0.
- 2nd Order Transverse Leakage
13One Node Formulation
- Given Conditions
- Incoming Partial Currents at Both Boundaries
- Quartic Intranodal Variation of Source
- Aim
- Solve for flux expansion
- Then update the outgoing partial current and
source polynomial
14NEM Solution Sequence
- Determination of 5 coefficients of solution in
terms of incoming partial currents and node
average flux - 0th order Node Average Flux
- 1st and 2nd order- Surface Average Flux
- Treatment of a1 and a2
- They are unknown since that they contains the
outgoing partial currents yet to be determined - In traditional NEM, however, it is assumed that
they are known from the surface average fluxes
obtained at previous iteration step while node
average flux will be determined from 3-D neutron
diffusion equation
15Weighted Residual Method
- Three Physical Constraints
- 2 Incoming Current Boundary Conditions
- 1 Nodal Balance
- Two-Additional Conditions Required to Determine 5
Coeff. - Weighted Residual Method for 1-D Neutron Diff.
Eqn. - 1st Moment of Neutron Diffusion Equation
-
- contains a1 which is unknown in principle
- 2nd Moment of Neutron Diffusion Equation
- contains a2 which is unknown in principle
16Outgoing Current Relations
- Response of Outgoing Partial Current to Node
Average Flux and Incoming Partial Currents. - Net Current at Boundary
- Substitution of net current given in terms of
expansion coefficients yields - where is relative diffusivity.
17Response Matrix
- Three-Directional Outgoing Currents Described
Altogether - a3 and a4 are treated as known by using a1 and a2
which are approximated by previously known
surface fluxes - otherwise, to solve rigorously, need to solve for
13 unknowns including a3 and a4 for each
direction simultaneously.
18Solution of 3-D Nodal Balance Equation
- 3-D Neutron Diffusion Equation for Node Average
Flux - Substitution of outgoing partial current to 3-D
neutron diffusion equation yields node average
flux. - Then use the response matrix to update outgoing
currents
19One-Node NEM Iterative Solution Sequence
- For a given group
- Determine sequentially
- Source expansion coeff.
- a1 and a2 from previous surface fluxes
- a3 and a4 using source moments and a1 and a2
- node average flux
- outgoing current
- Move to next group
- Move to next node once all groups are done
- Group sweep and node sweep can be reversed (node
sweep then group sweep) - Update eigenvalue
20Analytic Nodal Method for 2-G Problem
- 1D, Two-Group Diffusion Equation
- All source terms except transverse leakage now on
LHS - Analytic Solution Homogeneous Particular Sol.
- Trial Homogeneous Solution
21Determination of Buckling Eigenvalues
- Characteristic Equation
- For Nontrivial Solution
- Eigen-Buckling (Roots of Characteristic Equation)
- Fundamental Mode
- Second Harmonics Mode
22Homogeneous Solutions
- Each Group Homogenous Solution
- Fundamental Mode
- Second-Harmonics Mode
- Combined Homogenous Solution
- Linearly Dependent Group 1 and Group 2 Equations
- Fast-to-Thermal Flux Ratio
23Particular Solution
- Particular Solution for Quadratic Transverse
Leakage - Determined Solely by Transverse Leakage!
- General Solution in a Node
- 4 Coefficients to determine for the 2 group
problem
24Two-Node ANM Solution
- Boundary Condition and Given Parameters
- Quadratic Transverse Leakage for Two Nodes, keff
- Node-Average Fluxes for Two Nodes
- 8 Unknown Coefficients
- 4 per node x 2 nodes
- 8 Constraints ? Unique Solution
- 4 Node Average Fluxes (2 Groups x 2 Nodes)
- 2 Flux Continuity at Interface (2 Groups)
- 2 Current Continuity at Interface (2 Groups)
- Solution Sequence
- Assume Node-Average Flux
- Solve for Net Currents for each Direction from
2-Node - Update Node-Average Flux from Nodal Balance
- Repeat
25Semi-analytic Nodal Method
- Transverse Integrated One-Dimensional Neutron
Diffusion Equation for a Node and for a Group - Approximation of Source with 4-th Order Legendre
Polynomial - Analytic Solution of Second Order Differential
Equation - Exponential Homogeneous and Polynomial Particular
Solutions
26One-Node, One-Group SANM Formulation
- Incoming Current Boundary Condition
- Problem Statement (2D for easier illustration)
- Solve 2 coupled second order differential
equations (one for x and the other for y, given 2
BCs, respectively)
- Coupled through average transverse leakage term
- Higher order terms in transverse leakage assumed
to be fixed (only constant term representing the
average would vary by the simultaneous solution
of the two) - ?All source terms except the average transverse
leakage are given (Q tilde)
27Solution Sequence
- Normalization of Variables
- Balance Equation to Solve for x-dir
- Homogeneous and Particular Solution
- General Solution
28Solution Sequence
- Determine particular solution coefficients for
non-constant terms (c1.. c4) - Express the two homogeneous solution coefficients
in terms of incoming boundary conditions - Coefficient B contains unknown node average flux
- Outgoing current is given in terms of average
flux as well
29Solution Sequence
- Three Dimensional Nodal Balance Equation for
Simultaneous Solution of Node Average Flux and
All Outgoing Currents - Solve for average flux first
- Coeff. B determined ? All the coeff. known
- Then use average flux to determine the outgoing
current which is to update the incoming current - Determine source expansion coefficient
- Fourth order Legendre expansion of sinh and cosh
functions - Move to next group by updating the scattering
source
30Accuracy of SANM in Two-Group Application
- NEACRP L336 C5G7 MOX Benchmark
Thermal Flux
Error of Various Nodal Schemes
MOX FA
UOX FA
ReferenceANM 4x4 Calculation
Fission Source
31Performance of Various Nodal Methods in NEACRP
A1 Transient Problem
Transient Core Power Behavior
? SANM performs almost as accurately as ANM
32Summary and Conclusions
- Transverse integrated method is an innovative way
of solving 3-D neutron diffusion equation which
is to convert the 3-D partial differential
equation into 3 ordinary differential equations
based on the observation that the impact of
transverse leakage onto the a directional current
is weak. Transverse leakage is thus approximated
by a second order polynomial and iteratively
updated. - NEM is simple and efficient as long as the
fission source iteration scheme is applied. It
thus facilitate multigroup calculations. It loses
accuracy for highly varying flux problems. - One-node formulation is easier to implement, but
slower in convergence than the two-node
formulation - ANM has the best accuracy, but it is not amenable
for multigroup problems - SANM would be the best choice in practical
applications for its simplicity, multigroup
applicability, and comparable accuracy to ANM